Support 110 years of independent journalism.

  1. International Politics
  2. Coronavirus
13 December 2021updated 14 Dec 2021 12:23pm

Making the unvaccinated pay for their treatment is immoral and dangerous policy

Most of us will end up needing medical care due to bad decision-making: whether it is a fondness for salted butter or failing to look both ways before crossing the road.

By Stephen Bush

How should society treat people who can receive a coronavirus vaccine, but refuse to do so? Since 8 December the Singaporean government has been making Covid patients who have chosen not to be vaccinated pay the full cost of their own treatment – an approach that some have approved of in the United Kingdom. 

I think in many ways the vaccines are a poor starting point. While the various vaccines have received regulatory approval and been declared safe, and carry a much, much lower risk than actually getting Covid-19, they are very new. I think that people who refuse to have a shot have very badly misjudged the risk they are taking – but they aren’t wrong that there is more of a risk with a coronavirus vaccine than with a much older vaccine, which would have a lot more substantial evidence on its long-term effects.

[see also: Will “Plan B” stop another lockdown?]

People who refuse to be vaccinated because they have imbibed one or more conspiracy theories do not have a poor understanding of risk, they believe something that isn’t true. However, neither “believing something that isn’t true” nor “having a poor understanding of risk” are offences that ought to carry a death sentence: which, for many people, being asked to pay for their own medical treatment essentially would be. 

Given the Covid vaccines’ novelty, a better starting point – on the grounds that you should always test an argument against its strongest possible opponent – is a vaccine that has been in use for a long time, and where we can make confident predictions about the long-term benefits of getting that vaccine: the tuberculosis jab, for example, which is offered for free to babies and children in most major cities in the UK, or the MMR (mumps, measles and rubella) inoculation, which is offered to everyone in the country. 

We can say with essentially close to 100 per cent certainty that these are safe, reliable vaccines whose side-effect risks are trivial compared to the risks of catching TB or mumps, measles or rubella. If you refuse these vaccines for yourself or for your children, your understanding of risk is much worse than that of someone who declines a coronavirus vaccine, and your exposure to conspiracy theories is probably even greater. But these still aren’t transgressions that should result in a death sentence. 

The reality is that most of us will end up needing medical care due to bad decision-making: whether it is a fondness for salted butter, unprotected sex or failing to look both ways before crossing the road. And those shouldn’t be mistakes that the rich take a lighter punishment for than the poor.

That’s surely the most dangerous part of the argument that people who don’t get a coronavirus vaccine should pay for their own treatment: we are ultimately saying that bad decisions should carry a higher cost for the poor than for the wealthy. There are many ways and many walks of life in which that is already true, but we should be aiming to reduce those, not add to them.

Content from our partners
How trailblazers are using smart meters to make the move to net zero
How heat network integration underpins "London's most sustainable building"
How placemaking can drive productivity in cities – with PwC
[see also: How the battle against Covid became a forever war]

Select and enter your email address Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend - from the New Statesman. A quick and essential guide to domestic politics from the New Statesman's Westminster team. A weekly newsletter helping you understand the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email. Stay up to date with NS events, subscription offers & updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Topics in this article : ,