Support 100 years of independent journalism.

Radio 4’s Red Lines is a heavy-handed attempt to pin today’s crisis in Ukraine on squeamish MPs in 2013

The message is unsubtle and simplistic, and the only moment of wit is when David Davis is called a wanker.

By Rachel Cunliffe

In Alan Bennett’s The History Boys, a schoolboy argues that Winston Churchill only became prime minister because Lord Halifax missed a key meeting to go to the dentist, remarking: “If Halifax had had better teeth we might have lost the war.” I wonder if the historian Anthony Seldon and the media consultant Craig Oliver had those words in mind when writing their new radio play. Red Lines purports to tell the inside story of Bashar al-Assad’s chemical attack on the rebel-held Ghouta, on the outskirts of Damascus, in August 2013 – or rather, of David Cameron’s failed attempt to convince the British parliament to back a military response. It draws a direct line from Cameron’s defeat in the Commons to the rise of American isolationism and the invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

[See also: The Victorians in The Essex Serpent are as far-fetched as the sea-monster]

Oliver (played by Dead Ringers’ Jon Culshaw, who also does a spectacular impression of William Hague) knows what he’s talking about – he was, after all, Cameron’s director of politics and communications. But that doesn’t mean he knows how to write a radio play. Much of the dialogue is laughable: a super-cool Barack Obama addresses Cameron with “Hey brother”, while Vladimir Putin tells the PM, “I’m sending you a big hug.” We’re barely two minutes in when we get a clunky mention of the title (“a proportionate response when red lines are crossed”). The only moment of wit is when David Davis is called a wanker.

[See also: The Rest is History is breathtaking in its scope]

Much worse is the unsubtle message. Cameron just wants to do the right thing, but is hindered by the political machinations of Ed Miliband and the shadow of the Iraq War. Should we miss the point, Oliver (the character) helpfully explains that MPs oppose a military strike on Damascus because “they think it’s 2003”. You can see what this is trying to do, but the play’s heavy-handedness undermines its credibility. And while it may be useful to view Putin’s aggression in the context of the West’s reluctance to act decisively in Syria, pinning the crisis in Ukraine today on squeamish MPs in 2013 feels as simplistic as suggesting the Second World War was won on a dental appointment.

Red Lines
BBC Radio 4, available on BBC Sounds

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Content from our partners
“I learn something new on every trip"
How data can help revive our high streets in the age of online shopping
Why digital inclusion is a vital piece of levelling up

This article appears in the 18 May 2022 issue of the New Statesman, Putin vs Nato