Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Business
  2. Economics
4 March 2019updated 24 Jul 2021 3:00am

Theresa May’s Brexit bribe amounts to only a tenth of cuts dealt to councils since 2010

Why £1.6bn of government funding for Labour’s Leave-voting “left-behind” communities is a meagre offering.

By Anoosh Chakelian

Another day, another inadequate Brexit scheme from the government. Theresa May is offering £1.6bn of funding for England’s so-called left-behind towns that generally voted to leave. In turn, the Labour MPs who represent such places have dismissed it as a “bribe” to buy their votes for the withdrawal agreement next time it comes to parliament.

As May has shown no sign of reversing the effects of austerity on these towns since 2010 until now, we can assume it’s a play for the votes of Labour MPs – even if it will be spent regardless of whether the meaningful vote passes.

But it’s not even a very good bribe. Here’s why.

It’s only a tenth of overall local funding cuts by government since 2010

£1.6bn will be spent across an unspecified number of towns until 2026.

In contrast, by next year, local authorities will have suffered a reduction to core government funding of nearly £16bn since the austerity programme began in 2010, according to the Local Government Association.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

It is only half of the overall funding gap in public services for 2019/20 alone

As of last December, councils were facing a funding gap of £3.2bn in 2019/20, double May’s cash injection, which won’t all be spent until 2026 anyway.

Once portioned out, the regional spend is less than cuts dealt out to some individual councils in those regions since 2010

The regional allocation of this funding shows that some individual councils have been cut by more than their entire regional allocation since 2010. For example, May is spending £105m of the £1.6bn on the north east – but County Durham has lost £224m in central government funding since 2010, Gateshead has lost £157m, and Newcastle City Council has lost £283m.

Content from our partners
The shrinking road to net zero
The tree-planting misconception
Is your business ready for corporate climate reporting?

Gareth Snell, the Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent Central, has pointed out to the Guardian that the overall money allocated to his region, the West Midlands – at £212m – is “less than the total amount that Stoke City Council has had to cut from its budget” in the last nine years.

This article was changed after publication to clarify that May’s cash injection would not go half way to filling the 2019/20 £3.2bn funding gap.