Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Business
  2. Economics
4 March 2019updated 24 Jul 2021 3:00am

Theresa May’s Brexit bribe amounts to only a tenth of cuts dealt to councils since 2010

Why £1.6bn of government funding for Labour’s Leave-voting “left-behind” communities is a meagre offering.

By Anoosh Chakelian

Another day, another inadequate Brexit scheme from the government. Theresa May is offering £1.6bn of funding for England’s so-called left-behind towns that generally voted to leave. In turn, the Labour MPs who represent such places have dismissed it as a “bribe” to buy their votes for the withdrawal agreement next time it comes to parliament.

As May has shown no sign of reversing the effects of austerity on these towns since 2010 until now, we can assume it’s a play for the votes of Labour MPs – even if it will be spent regardless of whether the meaningful vote passes.

But it’s not even a very good bribe. Here’s why.

It’s only a tenth of overall local funding cuts by government since 2010

£1.6bn will be spent across an unspecified number of towns until 2026.

In contrast, by next year, local authorities will have suffered a reduction to core government funding of nearly £16bn since the austerity programme began in 2010, according to the Local Government Association.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy
THANK YOU

It is only half of the overall funding gap in public services for 2019/20 alone

As of last December, councils were facing a funding gap of £3.2bn in 2019/20, double May’s cash injection, which won’t all be spent until 2026 anyway.

Content from our partners
Why competition is the key to customer satisfaction
High streets remain vitally important to local communities
The future of gas

Once portioned out, the regional spend is less than cuts dealt out to some individual councils in those regions since 2010

The regional allocation of this funding shows that some individual councils have been cut by more than their entire regional allocation since 2010. For example, May is spending £105m of the £1.6bn on the north east – but County Durham has lost £224m in central government funding since 2010, Gateshead has lost £157m, and Newcastle City Council has lost £283m.

Gareth Snell, the Labour MP for Stoke-on-Trent Central, has pointed out to the Guardian that the overall money allocated to his region, the West Midlands – at £212m – is “less than the total amount that Stoke City Council has had to cut from its budget” in the last nine years.

This article was changed after publication to clarify that May’s cash injection would not go half way to filling the 2019/20 £3.2bn funding gap.