Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Business
  2. Economics
22 June 2018

Sadiq Khan’s Conservative opponents can’t win. Which means they can’t lose, either

For any ambitious Tory with connections to the capital, even losing has its advantages. 

By Stephen Bush

The overwhelmingly likely result of the next London mayoral election is that Sadiq Khan will be comfortably re-elected.

The extreme likelihood of defeat means that running against Khan is win-win for an ambitious Conservative. Lose and you have exceeded expectations. You are instantly a “big beast”, whose thoughts on crime, housing, integration and a swathe of other topics are considered worthy of consideration.

Lose while cleansing some of the taint of Zac Goldsmith’s dog-whistle campaign against Khan in 2016 – which many senior Tories believe should be their real aim in the next London election – and you have exceeded expectations and are a voice on matters relating not only to the capital but also to the future of the Conservative Party and how it wins over graduates, ethnic minorities, social liberals and other groups that cluster in the big cities.

And, of course, they just might win. It’s not very likely but you can see how, if crime continues to rise, if the Conservative candidate can blame Khan without endorsing the grim Islamophobia that has characterised some of the attacks on the Mayor’s record as far as crime goes, if they can navigate the electoral damage of Brexit, if the economy suddenly improves, if Khan makes a major misstep; you can just about see how a Conservative candidate could win in 2020. It requires a lot of good luck on their part and a lot of bad luck on Khan’s part, but it’s there.

So the prize is real and the consequences even of losing are pretty good if you are Justine Greening, James Cleverly, Munira Mirza, or anyone else who might fancy having a go at it, in most possible universes.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

Because there is another possible outcome of the London mayoral race, and it goes like this: Brexit is a disaster, which hits London and annoys many traditional Conservative voters in the capital, who either stay home, vote Labour as a protest or a bit of both. Khan successfully turns the election into a referendum on Heathrow and Brexit, which hurts the Tories very badly in Richmond, Twickenham and Hillingdon, three boroughs in which the Conservative candidate must win big to have any chance of winning the mayoral election. A national scandal – like say, Windrush – which offends everyone, but London in particular, hits the Conservatives in the run-up to polling day. Khan not only wins but wins outright in the first round. The Tory candidate is no big beast, no important voice in the party’s debate, but a scapegoat. That’s the downside risk for any candidate.