Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Business
  2. Economics
9 March 2017

Shock! Philip Hammond seems to hint Brexit is a problem

The word "bloodbath" came to mind after the Chancellor was grilled on the Today program.

By Media Mole

Can someone fetch Philip Hammond some Savlon? This mole heard the Today program this morning, and he got burned.

Following yesterday’s budget, the Chancellor faced tough questions from Radio 4 presenter Nick Robinson.

Pressed on the rise in National Insurance contributions for the self-employed – which, Robinson pointed out, breaks a key Tory manifesto pledge – Hammond spoke euphemistically of “new challenges” in the country, and the “constrained environment” within which he is forced to operate.

“We are navigating within those confines to prepare Britain for Brexit”, he explained.

But Robinson was not convinced, asking: “Are you essentially saying that white van man – white van woman – is paying the consequences of voting for Brexit?”

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend - from the New Statesman. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Floundering, Hammond then suggested that a mandate to change tax rates is the right of every Chancellor – a line which is unlikely to calm his party’s own angry backbenchers. (More than ten Tory MPs are lining up to oppose the hikes for the self-employed.)

Yesterday’s “banter” was mysteriously absent as Robinson continued to grill the Chancellor.

Eventually, Robinson gave up pressing Hammond on the tax cuts and moved to a second manifesto pledge: balancing the budget.

Hammond’s predecessor, George Osborne, repeatedly stressed the importance of “balancing the budget”, using it as a justification for that “austerity” business we all know and love.

But pressed on the Today program, Hammond, again, could only plead that “our circumstances have changed”.

The world changes around us and we have to deal with the world as it really is. I could have stuck to my predecessor’s target of having the budget in balance by the end of this parliament. But that would have required us to squeeze the economy.

That would not have been a sensible thing to do as we prepare to face the challenges of coming out of the European Union and making our way in the global economy.

Is this an admission that Brexit may – gasp! – actually have consequences? Did a Tory just suggest that, actually, austerity might not be great for the economy?

I think I could get used to this.