Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Business
  2. Economics
4 November 2010

Why the coalition will struggle to make its cuts

Osborne will have to raise taxes or slash front-line services as “efficiency savings” of £35bn fail

By George Eaton

Since last month’s Spending Review, political attention has focused on the fairness (or otherwise) of the cuts and the likely effect on the economic recovery. Remarkably little thought has been given to another pressing question: how hard will the cuts be to implement?

Today’s report from the Commons public accounts committee attempts to fill this void – and the outlook for the coalition isn’t good.

The report warns that only £15bn of the £35bn of savings identified in the 2007 Spending Review have been achieved, and just 38 per cent of those were considered “legitimate value-for-money savings”. The Communities department, for instance, which faces cuts of 51 per cent – the largest of any department – has made only £40m of savings against a target of £987m.

Some will undoubtedly portray this as an indictment of the Brown years, but here’s the rub: if Whitehall fails to cut spending by £35bn (roughly 3 per cent of departmental spending) how will it ever meet George Osborne’s target of £81bn? Faced with this conundrum, Labour MPs fear the coalition will resort to slashing front-line services to reduce costs.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

Michael Portillo, once chief secretary to the Treasury, warned Osborne back in July that theoretical savings often fail to materialise in practice. He suggested that the coalition would have to raise considerably more through taxation. After all, during the last significant period of fiscal retrenchment in the 1990s, Ken Clarke split the pain 50:50 between tax rises and spending cuts.

Higher taxes or higher cuts? That is the unpalatable choice facing Osborne.