Media 26 July 2011 An Open Letter to Andreas Whittam Smith Re: Johann Hari Sign UpGet the New Statesman\'s Morning Call email. Sign-up Dear Andreas Whittam Smith CBE, For the past few weeks, you have been spending these days of nascent summer investigating the claims that Johann Hari is a plagiarist, a distorter, a fabricator, and a sockpuppet who vandalises Wikipedia entries. Perhaps you're not looking at all of these claims, but no matter, I am confident that with your experience and judgement, you will be able to see what many others have seen - the 42 quotes in his 'interview' with Malalai Joya that Hari lifted from her ghosted autobiography; the 545 words plagiarised from the Daily Mail that Hari inserted into the mouth of his interviewee Ann Leslie; the lies about his Sky appearance with Richard Littlejohn; his fabrications and distortions of quotes in his prize-winning piece on Dubai; the startling familiarity of quotes in his interview with George Michael; his copy-pasting in his interview with Antonio Negri; his outrageously fabricated quotes for his piece on the Central African Republic; his quotes pinched from the New Yorker for his interview with Hugo Chavez; his alleged posting of unpleasant and defamatory comments online under the name of David Rose; his invention of names for interviewees whose quotes he had taken from Der Spiegel...I could go on, but I am sure you have already sucked these eggs dry. I expect the remit of your enquiry is fairly narrow, and you have simply been asked to establish whether Mr Hari should keep his job, but, if you are able, it would be valuable if your enquiry could also address these vital questions: 1. Is it true that Independent staff members routinely referred to Johann Hari as 'our Jayson Blair'?2. Is is true that when Johann Hari's piece on Dubai was filed, his encounter with the girl in hot pants was laughed at by the backbench?3. Were doubts at any time about Mr Hari's professional conduct ever expressed to the then editor Simon Kelner?4. If so, what was Mr Kelner's response?5. Would it be fair to say that Mr Kelner protected Mr Hari because of Mr Hari's stellar status?6. Why did Mr Kelner state on Twitter on 28 June 2011 that '@JohannHari101 has worked at @theIndynews for 10 years. In that time, we have not had a single complaint about his misrepresenting anyone', when at least three complaints were made about such mispresentation - by an aid worker in the Central African Republic, by Noam Chomsky, and by an interviewee in Hari's piece on Dubai?7. What opinion does the managing editor of the Independent, Imogen Haddon, hold about Mr Hari's journalism?8. What opinion does the business editor of the Independent, David Prosser, hold about Mr Hari's journalism?9. What pressure has the Independent brought to bear on the Council of the Orwell Prize in its deliberations as to whether Mr Hari should retain his Orwell Prize?10. What pressure has the Independent brought to bear on the Council of the Orwell Prize to delay its announcement concerning its decision?11. What pressure has the Independent brought to bear on the Council of the Martha Gellhorn Award in its deliberations as to whether Mr Hari should retain his Martha Gellhorn Award?12. Has the Independent used lawyers in its dealings with either the Council of the Orwell Prize or anybody associated with the Orwell Prize?13. Is the present management of the Independent indulging in a facesaving exercise? Yours sincerely, Guy Walters › Morning Call: pick of the papers Subscribe For daily analysis & more political coverage from Westminster and beyond subscribe for just £1 per month!