Return to: Home | Blogs | Bright's Blog

A year of ups and downs

What a difference a year made - and for no one more so than Gordon Brown, who earns five of my coveted parliamentary awards

The New Statesman doesn't do political awards. I've always thought it a shame to leave the field clear for Channel 4 and the Spectator, but I also recognise that parliamentarians are the last people on earth who need another boost to their egos. It is particularly difficult to pass judgement this year, as the political class (with a handful of exceptions) was miserably implicated in the failure to foresee the scale of the economic calamity about to hit the country. It is not as if we had insufficient warning. Northern Rock collapsed in September 2007, remember, an event that should have alerted us to the possibility that the credit crunch was likely to hit very hard in 2008.

Another difficulty is that a single politician has dominated the year's proceedings, not just in his attempts to rescue the country from imminent economic collapse, but, in his own estimation at least, saving the entire world from descent into a pre-industrial barter system. That is the Prime Minister himself, Gordon Brown.

This judgement will fail to surprise cynics who have believed that the New Statesman is the cheerleading "house journal" of the Brownite faction of the Labour Party. So be it. This year, at least, they would be right. For, if there were a New Statesman awards ceremony, the Prime Minister would make a clean sweep of the trophies.

Here, then, are the New Statesman Political Awards for 2008, otherwise known as The Brighties.

Politician of the Year

There is simply no other contender in this category. In much the same way as the Terminator was more machine than man, at least 90 per cent of Gordon Brown's DNA is not human, but political. Like Arnold Schwarzenegger's screen character, Brown is precision-engineered to annihilate any opposition he encounters. His critics inside and outside the Labour Party should have realised this when he refused to tolerate a credible candidate during the Labour leadership campaign of 2007. Now, as Prime Minister, for better or for worse, he simply dominates the political landscape at the end of 2008.

Speech of the Year

With typical media hyperbole, it was trailed as the speech of his life, but the significance of Brown's address to the Labour party conference on 23 September 2008 was not, on this occasion, overhyped. If he had fluffed it, as he did the previous year with his shameful "British Jobs for British Workers" speech, he would have found it hard to recover. As it was, the "no time for novices" line was a stroke of genius, dealing with Davids Cameron and Miliband in a single rhetorical blow. More importantly, it has embedded itself in the public consciousness.

Comeback of the Year

This category was a tightly fought, two-way contest and some would think Peter Mandelson more deserving of the title. But the political fortunes of the twice-disgraced Business Secretary had been rising since he was appointed EU trade commissioner in 2004. So, again, the award must go to the Prime Minister, who recovered from 20 points behind in the polls in June to within striking distance of the Tories by the end of the year. Much in the world of politics in 2008 has been unprecedented, but the recovery of Gordon Brown is without parallel.

Hypocrite of the Year

This was a shoo-in for the man at No 10. Late in the year we had the unseemly spectacle of an opposition politician being arrested for receiving leaked documents, made even more unpalatable by the fact that Brown had made his own reputation as shadow chancellor through a series of such leaks. Yet this was just the culmination of a year when the Prime Minister had gone from an evangelising global free-marketeer to a Keynesian state-interventionist. He even managed to blame the international crisis on the failure of international financial institutions, despite chairing the key IMF reform committee up until he became Prime Minister in 2007.

Authoritarian of the Year

Despite a pledge to put constitutional reform at the heart of his political vision, Gordon Brown established his anti- democratic credentials early in 2008. The unelected Prime Minister, who was crowned Labour leader unopposed, used his position to announce his intention to raise the period that terror suspects could be held in detention without charge from 28 to 42 days. He also continued to support the introduction of identity cards. Brown's democratic instincts were further called into question when he ennobled Peter Mandelson in order to bring him into the cabinet as a peer. The Prime Minister's failure to condemn the police raid on the Conservative MP Damian Green's offices in parliament established him as a worthy winner of this award.

Backbencher of the Year

With the Prime Minister dominating the major awards, it seems fair to give a series of lesser awards that he cannot possibly snaffle. Tribal New Statesman readers will be relieved to hear that I have given myself a strict rule not to honour Tories or Liberal Democrats.

There are strong candidates for the first of these prizes. The decision by David Davis to return to the back benches and trigger a by-election in his Haltemprice and Howden constituency over the 42 days detention issue was a brave, if somewhat foolhardy, expression of the importance of defending ancient liberties. Denis MacShane has worked tirelessly on European issues, anti-Semitism, parliamentary democracy and, more recently, libel. It remains a mystery that he does not have a government job. But, for his dignified campaign over the abolition of the 10p tax band that made him an effective thorn in Brown's side throughout the year, and for reminding the Prime Minister of the people whom the Labour Party is supposed to represent, Backbencher of the Year is Frank Field.

Loyalist of the Year

Alistair Darling is a strong candidate. Having tolerated a wave of vicious attacks from allies of the PM for telling a Guardian journalist that the economic crisis was serious, the Chancellor remained utterly loyal to the government cause. The "Go Fourth" campaign, led by John Prescott, was the surprise success of Labour conference and set the tone for the party's fightback. But, perhaps controversially, the award goes jointly to Siobhain McDonagh and Joan Ryan, the two ultra-loyal Labour MPs brave enough to call for a leadership contest and tell the Prime Minister the truth - that his own leadership was going off the rails.

Survivor of the Year

This award could go to a number of politicians, including George Osborne, who survived as shadow chancellor despite his excruciating dalliance with the Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska. Harriet Harman has also had a good year and continues to defy political gravity. David Miliband has weathered the collapse of his leadership bid to establish himself as a respected Foreign Secretary. This is another award that could also go to the Prime Minister, although, alone among politicians, he is the master of his own fate. The real survivor, as the economy crumbles around him, is Alistair Darling, who lives on into 2009 despite all speculation to the contrary.

Moment of the Year

There were some dramatic moments in the House of Commons, including Speaker Martin's "apology" over the raid on Damian Green's offices and Alistair Darling's historic pre-Budget report. David Davis's resignation was high drama at its best and the Labour party conference was a series of extraordinary events. But the Political Moment of the Year happened beyond the gaze of journalists on the Greek island of Corfu, when Peter Mandelson and George Osborne discussed Gordon Brown over a platter of meze. Little did the young Tory know how completely that sun-drenched conversation was to change the political weather.

Rising Star

Within the cabinet, James Purnell has ploughed a Blairite furrow and steadily enhanced his reputation as a minister and a media performer. Hard-nut Tony McNulty has moved from the thankless job of immigration minister to the impossible job of employment minister and must surely be rewarded with a cabinet post soon. Between them, Liam Byrne and Tom Watson have transformed the Cabinet Office and made No 10 functional once more. But if the Labour Party is looking for vision in the successor generation, then David Lammy is the man to watch in the new year.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

20 comments from readers

gez pearce
18 December 2008 at 18:43

A capital punishment supporting Thatcherite Tory MP and the two major neo conservative, Thatcherites in the Labour party as your backbenchers of the year. Interesting.

One remembers when you were home affairs editor at the Observer, your paper ran a campaign calling for the privatisation the NHS and bring in Charles Murray type welfare reforms and Field did support you on those issues. So it is not surprising.

How the New Statesman has changed with the times.

“Gordon Brown established his anti- democratic credentials early in 2008. The unelected Prime Minister, who was crowned Labour leader unopposed, used his position to announce his intention to raise the period that terror suspects could be held in detention without charge from 28 to 42 days.”

True, but did not McShane and Field vocally support the Government's attempt to introduce a period of 42 days' pre-charge detention or in Field’s case did not think it went far enough.

Field has also asked for Draconian measures to deal with immigrants. Both have also supported the use of rendition in the war on terror, which I cannot believe is a democratic goal.

Also the point about Brown not elected as PM. True, but is that not the fault of the party system which we have had in place for the last 300 hundred years. Churchill was an unelected PM.

Before you make the obvious flippant remark. We are talking about the principle not the individual.

swatantra nandanwar
18 December 2008 at 20:16

Loser of the Year? Why our Red Ken.

Wally over the Year? Toss up between Woolas and Johnson B.

gnuneo
19 December 2008 at 06:32

another typical 'Adulation of Brown' from the NSs resident B'Liarite, slimier than that half-human, half-slug in Thatchers cabinet. Awarding Brown so many of the awards just more of Bright's ever present 'forelock-tugging' behaviour that we have so come to expect in recent months.

a perfect example:

"He even managed to blame the international crisis on the failure of international financial institutions, despite chairing the key IMF reform committee up until he became Prime Minister in 2007."

see how admiring he is here? Its disgusting, really disgraceful how by pretending to be highlighting Brown's complete complicity in what is currently happening in our economy, he is really just pointing out Brown's International experience. Brown-noser!

and as for:

"The unelected Prime Minister, who was crowned Labour leader unopposed, used his position to announce his intention to raise the period that terror suspects could be held in detention without charge from 28 to 42 days. He also continued to support the introduction of identity cards. Brown's democratic instincts were further called into question when he ennobled Peter Mandelson in order to bring him into the cabinet as a peer. The Prime Minister's failure to condemn the police raid on the Conservative MP Damian Green's offices in parliament"

look at it! Just trying to make out Gordie is one of the 'boyz', hanging out with some serious 'gangsta attitude'. All this Brown toady is trying to do is build up Brown's reputation in the ghettos - the acclaimed 'Ghetto Vote' that will secure NuLabour's historic 4th term.

a more nefarious piece of propaganda i have rarely had opportunity to read, Mr Bright, i hope you are ashamed of yourself.

i may well cancel my subscription to the NS for this.

gez pearce
19 December 2008 at 09:10

Not one to defend Mr. Bright Gnuneo, but how you can think he is "brown nosing", which by the way is a disgusting phrase, Brown. I think if you read any of his articles, or his political friend’s essays you would know they are in the Frank Field camp. They despise Brown.

Of course he or his acolytes will say he is in nobody’s camp but that is the normal journalistic response to the accusation of bias.

Also why get worked up about a shoddy piece of childish name calling from a sub standard essayist.

gnuneo
19 December 2008 at 20:38

Mr Gez, really, look behind the surface to see the truth.

What Mr Bright and his friends are doing, is attempting to make PM Brown seem 'cool', by his atrocious handling of our economy, rights, and society in general. It is but a complement to the constant flattery of Brown and his NuLabour cohorts in the MSM, and is aimed at garnering the votes of the nihilists, those who like abuse, and those who appreciate a good, f*cked up society.

mail readers and the like.

so you see, its all just a big "cunning plan".

happy xmas!

William
19 December 2008 at 22:17

NuLabour Hogmany jamboree cancelled due to ethnic lapdancers having visa's refused.

gez pearce
20 December 2008 at 09:27

Sorry gnuneo, you seem an intelligent poster but to paraphrase Baldrick

"I cannot see their cunning plan"

To call someone an authoritarian power mad, inept and undemocratic hypocrite is not complementing them and trying to make them look cool.

Cool to who ?

But I enjoy posts and a merry X mas to you.

john problem
22 December 2008 at 18:20

If 'not time for novices' is a great little piece of rhetoric, then my favourite great little piece of rhetoric would be something about kettles and black. The man knows nothing about economics - he's a lawyer for Pete's sake, and a sycophant of Antonius Blah. Boy, do we need a change in 2009.

gnuneo
25 December 2008 at 03:05

"To call someone an authoritarian power mad, inept and undemocratic hypocrite is not complementing them and trying to make them look cool."

i can only assume from that that you have never studied politics or history!

what Mr Bright is *clearly* attempting to do, is to bring in more Daily Mail readers, who appreciate a good tyrant to keep the 'evildoers' down ('evildoers' as defined by the Mail - you know, terrorists, eco-warriors, free thinkers, single mums, ethnic types and the like), and so although his *reporting* won't change, instead of readers gnashing their teeth at Brown and the NuLabour jingoists, they will be cheering him on.

no doubt he is already planning the next step from his island fortress, whereby he will use the NS as a platform to get the DNA from Thatcher, B'Liar and Brown (and Bush if he can swing it), and make a 'Super-Tyrant' who will Rule over the Briton's for centuries to come.

fall not prey to his evil, dastardly plan - Stay Free Mr Pearce!!!

JP: lets see what Santa has in store... ;)

gez pearce
26 December 2008 at 09:48

Gnuneo

I can see your point of view but Bright does not come from that angle.

Like his mentor Roger Alton, he despises Brown.

Also how many Daily Mail readers read the NS, so he has tailored his article to the readership of this magazine and their fears. When he writes for the Standard, he hints that Brown is weak on crime and terrorism.

Also you are too intelligent a gent; I assume you are a gent, to fall for this NWO conspiracy nonsense.

There are just cock ups old boy.

great9122
26 December 2008 at 10:33

in my opinion To call someone an authoritarian power mad, inept and undemocratic hypocrite is not complementing them and trying to make them look cool.

gnuneo
30 December 2008 at 02:26

"When he writes for the Standard, he hints that Brown is weak on crime and terrorism. "

really?!? I didn't know that. Now that IS interesting.

--------

cock-ups? Just you wait till his clone armies of Thatcher/Raygun/B'liar/Bush mutants come out of the secret bunker under the NS headquarters, THEN we'll know who made the "cock-up" won't we? You Have Been Warned!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(btw, Mars doesn't really exist, its just a conspiracy dreamed up so that a war-god could be added to the Roman Pantheon!)

"in my opinion To call someone an authoritarian power mad, inept and undemocratic hypocrite is not complementing them and trying to make them look cool."

so how many Kings and wars did you hear about in History, and how many social reformers and rights evolution?

history books are generally written by gilded intellectuals, who know naught of real life by the majority, and peruse ancient tomes of similar minded people, to inform us in reverent tones of various psychopaths in history, the bloodier the better covered.

these are then claimed to be History, and taught to school-children, every Nation's 'History' a little different to everyone else's. Many Russians look back to Stalin, a few Germans (and more Americans!) look back to Hitler, the English who look back to Churchill who authorised Terror bombing of civilian cities. As well as centuries of generally mad and inept 'Kings', who made war whenever they got bored, and had a surplus in the treasury due to exploiting the peasants harder.

"cool" is a very relative word, depending upon the user, the subject, and the listener. I think you would be astounded at what some people do regard as "cool".

i still think Bright is using Brown, building him up in the Public's gaze, so that when the time is right - Britain will fall to his mutant legions as easily as they do in some future computer game based upon this episode in our history.

[i am banging my head against the wall, but who is listening!?!?!?!]

Happy NY!!! :D

gez pearce
30 December 2008 at 06:03

I really enjoyed your post gnuneo.

Some of the points I agree totally with, as a small c conservative it is usually radicals of the right and left that enjoy conflict and the dispense with humanism if they get in the way of their goals.

But you are wrong about Bright. His loyalties are not with Brown but another set of radicals.

gez pearce
30 December 2008 at 08:40

I do apologise I meant to type "and then dispense with humanism if it gets in the way of their goals"

Too many red wines last night.

gnuneo
30 December 2008 at 21:17

"and then dispense with humans if they get in the way of their goals. "

would have worked as well. :/

i'm glad you enjoyed it, i was beginning to wonder how Jonesy i was going to have to become... LOL ;)

gez pearce
03 January 2009 at 12:28

Stephen

I take it you don't like Brown

One thinks you had a few shandies by looking at the time you posted your 5 points.

Far more interesting than the original article.

redharry
15 January 2009 at 12:17

This is a polite request for Martin Bright to devote his next post to the situation in Gaza.

gez pearce
15 January 2009 at 17:40

Redharry

Why ?

redharry
16 January 2009 at 14:19

Because Bright wrote a pro-Israel article at the behest of the lobby group BICOM which is backing the destruction of Gaza. It was titled, without any deliberate irony, 'The Great Betrayal'. Bright failed to quote a single Palestinian. I think he has some explaining to do.

gez pearce
18 January 2009 at 11:39

redharry.

I have no time for the banal Bright but stick to the thread.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

The horror comes home

22 January 2009 09:58

Ken Clarke's return

19 January 2009 16:10

A New Deal of the mind

15 January 2009 09:31

It's a New New Deal

08 January 2009 09:51

Mystic Mart

15 December 2008 13:06

The two-man show

11 December 2008 09:44

An abuse of power

04 December 2008 09:39

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker