Registered user login:

Dangerous times for Labour

Barbara Roche

Published 06 August 2008

The minimum wage, a better deal for working families, 10 years of economic stability were not an accident, argues ex-minister Barbara Roche - it's time to fightback on Labour's record

What a difference a year makes. Last summer the Tories were in complete disarray over education. David Cameron was, quite rightly, under fire for a wholesale failure of policy. Were the Conservatives in favour of abolishing grammar schools or extending them as a response to local campaigns?

Cameron and his leadership suffered a torrid period of attack from columnists and rivals in his own party. Predictions of challenge and meltdown were rife but the Tories held their nerve and came through their conference.

The sorry truth is that they have always been better than us in hanging together and sustaining themselves in power (Public school belief in a right to rule takes some beating).

Like many other Labour Party members I have spent all my adult life in the party and can’t remember it any other way. It is too easy to forget the introspection and self-destructive episodes of the Thatcher-Major years. Just as it is too easy to forget 1980’s mass unemployment, decimated communities and the destruction of public services.

We are often our own worst advocates - why are we so reluctant to proclaim our successes?

A national minimum wage, a better deal for working families, a decade of sustained economic stability and one of the best international records on aid to developing countries did not come about by accident.

In large part they came about because of Gordon Brown. No one can doubt his strategic ability and commitment to long-term vision over short-term tactical advantage. When I started working with him at the Treasury as financial secretary, Gordon advised me to concentrate on projects that were going to last and not to be distracted by temporary events.

By the way I also found him supportive of women colleagues, not usually a fact of political life.

Now is not the time for lengthy navel gazing, loose talk of leadership challenges and a sullen conference season.

Yes, of course, I know that we have lost by-elections but the Conservatives in government lost plenty and still went on to win. Nor do I deny that Labour is facing difficult and dangerous times.

The pressure of world economic events and a resurgent and increasingly rich Tory Party mean that we will have to fight an election campaign with the political tipsters giving odds against us.

This is the time for rediscovering our vigour and reaffirming our reasons for supporting or joining the Labour Party. For me those reasons are about the importance of communal endeavour. Poll after poll shows that the public are unsure about what David Cameron stands for.

His poll ratings would be rather different if the electorate appreciated that Cameron’s core philosophy is a softer-imaged version of Thatcher’s “there is no such thing as society”.

But our task is not just to expose and attack our opponents’ stance but to set out a clear direction for Britain:

In an age of globalisation and highly skilled mobile labour what is the balance between maintaining a competitive edge and a fair taxation system which genuinely seeks to redistribute wealth ?

  • How do we reposition British foreign policy to take advantage of the arrival of a new American president, hopefully Barack Obama?
  • Working with local authorities and housing associations how do we build on our experience of the New Deal for Communities to promote sustainable neighbourhoods?
  • With the establishment of the Equality and Human Rights Commission and Civil Partnership we now have one of the best frameworks for equality and diversity in Europe.
How do we put these issues at the centre of the political agenda?

And finally how do we bring it all together so that Labour can communicate that it is back in business? Well we need to demonstrate confidence in the values of our party and the man who was the architect of our three previous general election victories, Gordon Brown.

Barbara Roche is a former MP and Minister. She now chairs a large housing association and is a visiting university professor

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

13 comments from readers

ravcasleygera
06 August 2008 at 12:30

It would be nice to read a detailed defence of Brown that responds to the many concerns about his character, dithering etc. But this isn't one. Does Ms. Roche seriously believe Labour can win again just by focusing on equality and community cohesion? Nothing about the economy, for heaven's sake? Nothing on crime? Complacency oozes from this article like oil from Cameron's face.

Michael Davies
06 August 2008 at 16:05

We are informed that: "No one can doubt his strategic ability and commitment to long-term vision over short-term tactical advantage".

Allow me to differ - Brown believes this about himself and convinced many others this was true. But in fact it isn't true and with a few policy exceptions it never was.

The 10p tax fiasco arose from a party trick (lowering the 22p) rate.

The vile politics of the 42-day detention measure arose from a calculation to divide the Tories.

Brown's cowardly dithering over where to meet the Dalai Lama and whether to handle the Olympic torch showed him fiddling and failing with tactics.

Without any assessment or debate, he backed a renewal of Trident - though the threat environment has changed totally and we have young men and women driving around in tin cans in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Brown spent most of his time and energy as Chancellor making feeble moves to unsettle Blair and sabotage his agenda. The Budget speeches and pre-Budget reports were always littered with tactical gestures and inadequate fiddling. No doubt we'll see more of this as he tried to hold back the oil price.

If he is so long term and strategic, why can't he articulate a long term and strategic agenda for Britain, for the public services, for the environment - for anything? All he ever says are things that everyone would agree with: "opportunity for all", "fairness for hardworking families" or similar clap trap that makes me want to scream. But never anything that distinguishes his ideas from anyone else's. the reason for that is that he is too scared of arguing his case to stick his neck out with anything too distinctive.

leveque
06 August 2008 at 16:40

New Labours' current decline is not new, it is actually the same old story, an unholy alliance of the Conservative press and the "safe seat" loony left wing of Old Labour. Blair knew this and acted accordingly. Brown does not have the Blair charisma.

cat osb
06 August 2008 at 16:44

And just think of all the socially useful projects that could have been funded with the money spent on an unnecessary war in Iraq.....(regarding which, I believe, Professor Roche voted in favour).

Jenny Webb
06 August 2008 at 16:46

She did and lost her seat.

Viscount Firm
06 August 2008 at 17:13

Barbara Roche. You're the gal for me!

Silent Hunter
06 August 2008 at 18:48

Oh Yes!

Let's just list Labours 11 years of 'success' shall we?

The illegal Iraq War

Afghanistan ‘peacekeeping’ - Now a war, because of government incompetence.

Fixing the evidence around WMD

BAE inquiry prevented by government croney Goldsmith

Arms sales to Saudi Terrorists

Pandering to the Saudi ruling family whilst ‘blind-eyeing’ democracy

Refusal to call ceasefire whilst Lebanon was burning

Blunketts penal reform ideas ie; removal of freedom

Lord Levy Pimping Peerages to Nulabour slush funders.

Billions wasted on non functioning IT systems

Ex Labour ministers becoming pimps for crap IT companies

Prescott & the Super Casino Dome fiasco.

Encouraging the vulnerable & gullible to gamble their livelihoods away

Mandelsons Neo liberal Trade deals

Jowells Mortagage & her crook of an ‘estranged’ (yeah right!) husband

Jowell ripping off the public to pay for the Olympics

Privatisation and cuts to the NHS

Trade Union Freedom Bills talked out by Labour ministers

The PPP taxpayer rip off

The PFI taxpayer rip off

Homelessness sky high

Prison population at record level

Crime increasing despite the above point

Home Secretary who scapegoats immigrants and asylum seekers

Allowing a Department ‘not fit for purpose’ to ‘carry on regardless’!

Attacks on Social Housing

Attacks on Pension rights

Raids on pension funds plunging pensioners into poverty.

Forcing us all to work until we drop to make up for the above point.

Attacks on Civil Liberties

Attacks on free speech and the right to free assembly

Like the Tories staging Nurses Pay rises and offering a pay cut to thousands of Nursing staff

Allowing Murdoch massive influence over economic and foreign policy

Inability to reform the House of Lords

Renaging on the 1997 election pledge to bring in PR.

Increasing the gap between rich & poor to a massive extent.

Croneyism.

Alastair Campbell & the Spin Doctors big hit – LIES, LIES, LIES !

The debasement of our political process.

Toadying to vested Corporate Greed – to stuff humanitarian need.

Cheries lucrative deals talking about her husband.

Education, Edukasion, Edukashun....... Get my drift?

Dr. Kelly's 'suicide'.

Tonys pseudo chistianity – pass the sick bag.

Bernie Ecclestone - remember that one?

They have so much to be 'proud' of...........LOL

atropos
06 August 2008 at 21:34

"Public school belief in a right to rule takes some beating". I am a working class child of the 1940's. I got where I am today because of an education system which offered a chance of a better life to children with talent. I was reading and understanding "Cassandra" at 8 years of age. "Public school belief in a right to rule takes some beating"

You socialists tried. Most of your front bench were privately educated, as are most of their children. The children of those you profess to represent are left to sink in sub-standard State Schools.

The "Stalinistas" of the 1920's Russia would be comfortable with your actions and philosophy.

Maggie Thatcher was educated by the State. So were David Davis ,John Major and many other Tories. It is all too easy to forget the misery of the70's. Refuse uncollected in the streets, the dead awaiting burial, power strikes, 3 day weeks,(Was Labour worried about the elderly then?) ,the £ halving in value between 1976 and 1979, undemocratic unions running the Labour Party, hence the Country, The IMF being called in by an incompetent, bankrupt govt. (How much longer this time?)

The hard times in the early 80s were directly attributable to Wilson/Callaghan, just as the hard times to come in the 2010's will be the true legacy of the Blair/Brown years.

The Tories got it wrong in the 90's but had the talent to hand over a growing economy in 1997. That Blair/Brown wasted what they were given is without doubt. No posturing about human rights and equality by quangos is going to hide the fact that the Socialist education policy has made it almost impossible for the poorest familiesin the country to be upwardly mobile in our society. You have turned your backs on your natural constituency, and Glasgow East and Crew are merely the first of many. I have refrained from use of industrial language with great difficulty, but I assure you Madam that others will not so constrain themselves. I have every confidence that in 2010, this corrupt, ignorant and incompetent Labour Party will go the same way as Asquiths' Liberals - a result that will only improve the political life of my Nation

atropos
06 August 2008 at 21:38

Ed. comment at 2135 entered in error. Please delete

john problem
07 August 2008 at 08:54

Happily, everything is going to be alright when Miliband and Milburn take the reins. The Engels of the Labour party acoompanied by its most famous Trotskyite. Engels was in the Prussian Artillery which forms a fellow wonderfully well, just like going to Harvard which Miliband did. As Chancellor, the Trotskyite Milburn would no doubt succeed - Trotsky split from the Bolsheviks because he was against robbing banks to fund the party.

Thane
08 August 2008 at 22:38

"The pressure of world economic events and a resurgent and increasingly rich Tory Party mean that we will have to fight an election campaign with the political tipsters giving odds against us."

And the Tories won't have the 'pressure of world events' ? And plenty of home grown financial disasters that they will inherit from your profligate friends ?

So what did happen to all the cash that Levy raised for you? Why is your party in deficit to the tune of millions. Could it be that that is your natural state ? This nation is practically bankrupt after 11 years of Nulabour, the lack of any financial controls has allowed criminal banking practices go unchecked or worse, unnoticed.

The monkey at the BoE has not performed the right tricks, low interest rates to caress the sheeple, inflation now rampant, bugger the golden rules.

My God, a financially derelict Monster Raving Loony party would beat you at the next election.

Our Armed Forces are betrayed, private pensions are plundered, violent crimes are rising, quangos proliferate, immigration is out of control and Britain will receive less back per capita from the European Union's 2007-13 budget than any other member.

Read this book and prepare to weep.

* Squandered - How Gordon Brown is wasting over one trillion pounds of our money, by David Craig. Publisher: Constable. Price: £8.99

snotty
10 September 2008 at 04:32

Can anyone explain what a legal war is? This term has been flogged to hell. I believe Foot, Short and Brown should be tried for Serbia et.al. Did the lawyers get together after Munich and draw up a legal document.? I know the Muslims in Papua have committed war atrocities that would make the Israelis in Gaza seem like Saints but could any body point to a legal war.

snotty
10 September 2008 at 04:38

Dr. Kelly's 'suicide'. This man has also almost become an adjective. He was a state sponsored parasite who had his snout firmly in the trough ,albiet in a modest way. He made a lot of money relative to the rest of us, from travelling to Iraq, was it fifteen times to apparently find nothing and no avail? In short he played Blackjack at Vegas and lost!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should Darling have been bolder with the 45% tax rate?