Return to: Home | Politics | UK Politics

Blears defends Tory toffs campaign

Hazel Blears

Published 23 May 2008

Communities Secretary Hazel Blears defends Labour's 'Toffs' campaign in Crewe & Nantwich saying all parties run stunts but she stresses ministers are listening to voters' concerns

The result of the Crewe & Nantwich by-election is nothing other than a sound defeat for the Labour Party, and our excellent candidate Tamsin Dunwoody. I congratulate Edward Timpson on his victory, although if the pattern of these kinds of dramatic by-election upsets is anything to go by, his parliamentary career will be short-lived.

The people of this part of Cheshire were sending their government a very strong message, and our job as ministers is to listen, understand and act. From the time I spent in the constituency it was clear to me that trepidation about the economy was the big factor. The media obsession with political personalities was not reflected on the streets and estates of Crewe. People were concerned about the rising price of petrol and food, and expressed their concerns on the doorsteps. In these turbulent economic times, I understand perfectly why people want to send the Government a message. Although much of the economic pressures have been created abroad, especially in the USA, people want answers from their government.

So what I took away from Crewe is a strong sense of determination to address the core issue of the economy. That’s what people want from Labour right now – a relentless focus on the issues that affect their wallets and purses. The last thing people want is the spectacle of a Labour Party looking inwards, engaging in blame and recrimination, and looking like we’re more concerned for our own jobs and prospects than those of the public. It was internal division and rancour that hobbled the last Tory Government under John Major just as surely as Black Wednesday, three million unemployed, record interest rates, and all those Tory ministers resigning in disgrace after financial and sexual scandals.

What does the hour demand? Action to stabilise the housing market, and that means building more houses for first-time buyers and key workers. Tough measures to control inflation, by taking some unpopular decisions on public sector pay. An economic package to put right the mistake of the 10p tax changes. And in the longer-term – decisions to safeguard our energy supply, deal with pensions, an Australian-style points system for immigration, and tackle to tackle global warming. Only the Labour Party has the right values, policies and leadership team to pursue this kind of agenda. From the Tories we only get shallow salesmanship, not substantive policy ideas.

Was it wrong to run the stunts on ‘Tory Toffs’ in Crewe? The fact is in a by-election all parties run stunts. They may not be elegant or subtle, but they have their place in the frenzy of a political campaign. My view is that we are all products of our backgrounds, whether we’re from Eton or Salford. Our experiences form our values and approaches to life. So in a by-election it is right that we should point out the different political values and backgrounds of the candidates. Labour’s campaign team fought an energetic and robust campaign, and I am proud of them all, especially the young volunteers who worked so hard.

Lastly, does Crewe mean that Cameron should start measuring up for curtains at Number Ten? Perhaps he should have a word with Neil Kinnock about whether big by-election wins lead inevitably to general election victories.

Rt. Hon. Hazel Blears MP

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

10 comments from readers

antileft
23 May 2008 at 17:16

"From the Tories we only get shallow salesmanship, not substantive policy ideas."

You know what's great? You go from that statement, to this one:

"Was it wrong to run the stunts on ‘Tory Toffs’ in Crewe? The fact is in a by-election all parties run stunts."

Well how dignified! Theyre just full of shallow salesmanship, are they? Hey, lets show the people how full of shallow salesmanship they are by... Getting some idiots to wear a load of top hats and walk around town poking fun at people who look successful. Yes, thatll make you look serious.

"My view is that we are all products of our backgrounds, whether we’re from Eton or Salford...So in a by-election it is right that we should point out the different political values and backgrounds of the candidates."

Right. So you think it's alright to poke fun at someone because of their background in order to get votes? If I was from a wealthy background, youd think it was alright to make fun of me just because of that fact? Well, no wonder everyone is sick of your government. Ill tell you something- I dont come from a "toff" background as you put it. But I dont like it when our government pokes fun at a entire section of society- in particular the most successful part. Why? Because I want to hear you talking about things like policies, and what's more, I dont like the idea that youre being polite to me just because you assume my parents are losers.

Shame on you! Ill be voting tory when its my turn, for sure. Id rather vote for a toff than a biggot any day of the week.

tally
24 May 2008 at 01:49

Because the North East referendum for a regional assembly in 2004 was treated as a local matter by the national press, people outside of the North East of England do not know that a tory toff campaign was run by the yes campaign for a North East assembly.

A braying hooray Henry in top hat and tails got off the train at Newcastle upon Tyne supposedly to tell us flat cap Northerners how to run our lives.

The NO campaign won a resounding 78% victory.

we still got a regional assembly though but that's another story.

npgdavies
24 May 2008 at 12:15

This government listens to no one. The message from Crewe and Nantwich is that the people there (reflecting the mood of the country) want this government out of office.

The longer Labour stays in office, the worse their final defeat will be.

Assegai
24 May 2008 at 22:15

If it was just rising food and petrol prices then the gov't should only partially be blamed but it's a load of other factors (eg immigration, rising taxes, Europe, 24 week abortion threshold, falling GDP, Labour MPs expenses, Prescott, Levy, Cherie memoirs exposing Labour shortcomings).

The toff campaign was one thing but there were other alleged dirty tricks as well. It was also a bit hollow trying to expose the Tories as toffs when one of your supporters dressed up in top hat and tails attended a public school himself, Tamsin Dunwoody came from an upper middle-class background and lived in a posh house, while your erstwhile leader attended Fettes, the Scottish equivalent of Eton and now has 8 properties to his name.

Assegai
24 May 2008 at 22:26

Quote:"Lastly, does Crewe mean that Cameron should start measuring up for curtains at Number Ten? Perhaps he should have a word with Neil Kinnock about whether big by-election wins lead inevitably to general election victories."

You really are deluding yourself.

I believe this by-election represented a pivotal point which shows the Conservatives are now the government-in-waiting.

The Tories are usually hopeless at by-elections and their last successes were 20 years ago when the main challengers were the Liberals and SDP who campaigned separately so Steve Norris in Epping and William Hague in Richmond could win by splitting the vote.

As recently as 2006, they got crushed in Ealing Southall and in a by election in Bromley (a comfortable Tory seat) caused by the death of Eric Forth, the Tories only just scraped home against a strong Liberal challenge with a lower percentage majority than what they achieved in the General Election of 2005.

The fact that they won the Crewe seat so comfortably winning over Labour voters who normally vote Liberal as a protest shows they are on course for a majority in the next Parliament.

As for Kinnock and by-election successes, there was only Stafford, he failed in Greenwich which Labour lost to the SDP. Usually the Liberals performed best like in Eastbourne 1990 and Ribble Valley soon after.

Frank
25 May 2008 at 10:26

At least the Tories don't steal the Pensions funds from Company schemes. Brown does.

john problem
25 May 2008 at 15:47

The Ministers are listening to us, they say. Allelujah! Be confident that everything will change for the better. Especially, their kitchens and rockery gardens.

bripat22
26 May 2008 at 03:57

Usual colourless junk from Hazel Blears. Is there a grayer minister in the Government?

Jonny Mac
28 May 2008 at 11:47

Putting aside the utter bankruptcy of falling back on an attack not based on policy or ideology but class, it was stupid even on its own ugly terms because people realised that Edward Timpson was not a 'toff' - his family have made their money from making shoes, not from landed estates - while the Labour candidate was chosen on the hereditary principle and is listed in Burke's Peerage! My cat could have run a better thought-through campaign than that.

And interesting that Blears that now refers to the 10p tax change as a "mistake". If it was a mistake, why didn't she, or any of her colleagues, say anything at the time? Either (a) because they didn't want to rock the boat or (b) because they were too stupid to realise it was a mistake then, and needed the Tories to point it out to them. Either way, it hardly fills you with confidence, does it?

Derek Bennett
28 May 2008 at 15:55

I was at the Crewe & Nantwich by-election count, held in Nantwich Civic Hall, and when the Flying Brick, the Monster Raving Loony Party candidate entered the hall he announced to the press which pounced on him en-masse: "I am the real toff!"

It comes to something when the Monster Raving Loony Party not only get more attention than Labour Ministers, but make more sense too!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

Hazel Blears

Hazel Blears is MP for Salford, and Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. She has served as Chair of the Labour Party, as Home Office Minister, and as Public Health Minister.

Read More

Newsletter

Enter your email address here to receive updates from the team

Vote!

Will the next election produce a hung parliament?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 - 2009

Tracker