The mosques aren’t working in Bradistan
Bradford's Pakistani community predominantly originates from the Mirpur region. In Britain it has re
By Samira Shackle Published 20 August 2010
The far-right English Defence League plans to march on 28 August through Bradford in West Yorkshire, a city still largely segregated along lines of race. Local residents are agitated and fearful that the march could reignite the tensions of the 2001 race riots. According to the last census, 22 per cent of Bradford's population is of Asian origin, mostly Pakistani. As I walked among the sari shops and supermarkets in the Horton area, it was obvious why the city has earned the name "Bradistan".
Altogether, there are nearly a million people of Pakistani origin in Britain, and an estimated 70 per cent of these have links to Mirpur or the
surrounding area. Mirpur, located in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (known as Azad - meaning "free" - Kashmir), is one of the country's least developed regions.
There is little education, and it was the last part of Pakistan to be connected to electricity. Before mass immigration in the 1960s, many relied on subsistence farming. As they moved from a rural region to the industrialised cities of northern England, villagers attempted to re-create their old lifestyle. Ishtiaq Ahmed, spokesman of Bradford's Council for Mosques, says: "As a minority, you close ranks and don't move forward so fast for fear of losing or diluting your identity."
The Mirpuri community particularly emphasises clan loyalty, or biraderi, manifested in marriage to first cousins. Studies suggest that 60 per cent of all Mirpuri marriages are to a first cousin, with a substantial proportion of the remainder being between more distant relatives. While other south Asian immigrants tend to work outwards from the family unit through marriage, Mirpuris reinforce existing connections, producing intensely bound communities. The notion of honour, important to many cultures, is reinforced by double or triple ties of obligation - a potential mother-in-law could also be an aunt. This can lead to forced marriage and, in extreme cases, honour killings.
In Mirpur, such marriages secure the status of the biraderi against other clans, and also allow the family to retain its land and property. In a transnational context, they permit people to give their families access to better opportunities. "It's really one society that exists between the two places," says Sean McLoughlin, senior lecturer in religion, anthropology and Islam at Leeds University. "There are constant circulations of money, people and ideas."
Data suggests that up to 10,000 transnational spouses enter the UK annually. Significantly, this means that even in the fifth generation, many children have one parent who is non-English-speaking. "These two people essentially come from totally different worlds," says Zaf Shah, a young Mirpuri professional from Bradford whom I meet at a coffee shop in the centre of the city. "It's difficult to make a happy union. What is Mum going to teach the children about the culture here, when she knows nothing about it?"
School's out
Shah draws attention to educational underachievement. While other Asian immigrants excel at school, Pakistani teenagers - particularly boys - struggle. "The first immigrants were people with low skills, from a farming background," Khadim Hussain, a local councillor in Bradford, says. "They were more concerned about making a good living through hard work than education. That continued, though it's changing now."
Valuing immediate earning power above staying in education to secure a better-paid job is a familiar narrative, as much tied to deprivation as to ethnicity. However, it does mean that Mirpuris have remained primarily concentrated in the lowest tier of jobs and housing, though many of those to whom I speak in Bradford stress the emergence of a professional class.
The transnational connection extends beyond marriage; there is a culture of importing imams from Pakistan. For young people born and brought up in Britain, it is a struggle to connect with Urdu services or religious instruction that consists of rote-learning Quranic Arabic.
“I'd like to ask these imams: 'How do you understand a society that you've never identified with?'" says Shah. "How can you understand the challenges young people are facing, or help them to become more involved as Muslims in their societies?"
Phil Lewis, a lecturer in peace studies at Bradford University, expands on this. "The mosques aren't working for them, home isn't working for them. These kids are in moral free fall - who are their role models?"
The same frustration is expressed by some young, tracksuit-clad Mirpuri men on a run-down street in Bradford. "I'm a Yorkshireman," Saeed, aged 19, tells me. "I get angry with my parents when it's all about 'back home' and sending money there. I'm proud of my heritage, but this is my home. I've only been to Pakistan twice."
Another risk - though one that must not be overstated - is extremism. All four bombers behind the London attacks on 7 July 2005 were from Yorkshire, and three of them had Mirpuri backgrounds. "These recruiters use your weakness - and that's Islam," says Shah, who works with the police on counterterrorism.
Honour crime
It's no less complex for young women. Other Pakistanis frequently accuse Mirpuris of confusing culture with religion. Stemming from a lack of education, this manifests itself in cultural norms - such as the primacy of honour, or the mistreatment of women - being accorded religious significance. I speak to Khadijah, 18, in an empty playground as she looks after her younger sister. She hopes to enter Bradford University this year. "I can make the distinction between Islam and patriarchal culture," she says. "But your average lad on the street won't worry about which bit comes from scripture. It's loaded in his favour."
These concerns are common to many British Asians. So, what makes other British Pakistanis view Mirpuris as a distinct group? Those from Karachi or Islamabad use the term "Mirpuri" pejoratively, and adverts on online dating sites such as muslimsingles.com often stipulate "No Mirpuris". Many Mirpuris prefer simply to call themselves Azad Kashmiri.
These attitudes can be explained by the huge disparities in development between urbanised and rural areas in Pakistan. Lewis points out that Mirpuris might struggle in Lahore, never mind British cities. Their achievements here - inroads into government and the law, a measure of success in business - are therefore notable.
But as a generation of Mirpuris entirely socialised in Britain reaches adulthood, the community faces a crisis of identity. Traditions are evolving gradually, but change is painful. And integration is never a one-way street; a woman casually called me a "Paki" when I asked for directions, a small example of the white population's hostility. Yet as Shah points out: "Social exclusion exists, but it's not an excuse. We need to understand our own community before we start blaming society."
Samira Shackle
The Mirpur migration to Bradford
Mirpur, with a population of roughly 96,000, is the biggest city in Azad Kashmir, a rural region that suffered enormous bloodshed during Partition and was left without any proper water supply. So, how did so many people from this impoverished region come to be living in the UK?
Britain enjoyed a long economic boom in the period following the Second World War. During this time, there was an acute shortage of labour in the textile mills of Lancashire and Yorkshire and the foundries of the Midlands. The British government encouraged cheap, unskilled migrant workers from the ex-colonies to come to Britain to bolster industry.
Then, in the late 1950s, the Pakistani government began building the Mangla Dam - a huge project aimed at solving the problem of Mirpur's water supply. However, the dam flooded much of Mirpur District, submerging the arable land that farmers relied on. Thousands were evacuated.
By way of compensation, some of the displaced were offered passports, and many more people travelled to Britain. More than half the population of some villages moved to settle in British industrial towns. This history of dispossession was compounded in the UK in the 1980s with the collapse of manufacturing industries in which the first generation of immigrants had worked.
Samira Shackle
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


66 comments
there are marxists hiding in every nook and cranny some even dress in suits,these marxists worry me alot.
bat020
20 August 2010 at 13:17
The number one barrier to ethnic minority communities integrating is the racism they face from the society they are meant to be integrating into. Nobody volunteers to live in a ghetto.
You are wrong... its their own racism that is the number one barrier... !
As a Bradfordian I see things first-hand in the city and what I see is a sorry sorry sight. We have many social problems and much social deprivation which the Muslim but also poor White areas are contributing to heavily. Since the first Asian immigrants came to Bradford there has been a slow process of affluent White flight. This has not been caused solely by immigration but also the loss of traditional industry from which the City, like other industrial Cities has struggled to re-define itself. However as the City has slipped so too has the Council's dealings with the Muslim community where appeasement has become a key but continually failing strategy (Million's have been spent in Muslim areas (on private housing!!!!) every time there have been riots).
In 1989 Salman Rushdie published his 'Satanic Verses'. A section of the Muslim community rioted. As a four year old with my family I was directly caught up in the riots (A brick put through the back window of our car which was parked beside the Cennotaph whilst simultaneously the poppies were kicked all over the place. Over the road in central police station the police watched on but were not allowed to restore law and order or help an innocent family for fear of stoking up the riot. In 1997 and 2001 there were more riots in Bradford this time both Muslim and White communities were involved but beyond skirmishes in the city centre they were largely separate events. Although Whetley Hill Working Men's Club did have its doors baricaded from the outside and petrol bombed. That was a clear message that White people were no longer welcome in areas of Bradford that have become completely Muslim (no attempted murder charges were brought forth). One has to ask if the ghettoisation is an imposed or desired reality?
If this Saturday leads to riots in Bradford (which I think there will be) then it is finished as a City. No serious big business has wanted to invest in the City over the last 10 years due to its massive 'social' problems. Sadly I don't see a way to circumnavigate this issue, especially with a spineless shortsighted Council. Sections of the Muslim community in Bradford can see that in another 15 years maximum the City will be 80% Muslim, the first Muslim City in the UK. I think for some this is an unstated aim. But it is a sure fire winner as the remaining affluent Whites flee what will remain is an underclass of White's in the sink-hole estates within a Muslim majority City.
Of course this is a bleak picture and I hope I am wrong, I would live to live in the multi-cultural City I keep hearing that Bradford is but I too am on the verge on becoming another of the White flight as the situation truly becomes unliveable.
A very weak piece of 'journalism' - and paints negativity. Mirpuri's (I am not one), have made a significant social, economic and cultural contribution, to Bradford, and beyond. Maybe the writer, Phillip Lewis, and others might tell us what integration (or to integrate) actually means, and we can then assess the benefits or otherwise of 'integrating'. Notably, it doesn't seems as if the writer has bothered to speak to many of the people she is accusing of honour killling, in extreme cases. Write something positive! You know you can!
Porn? Isn't that Californias' biggest export these days?
The USA? Don't China own that?
Part of the "crisis of identity" centres round language. The Mirpuri language is distinct from Urdu and Punjabi, but is often confused with them. Hardly surprising, since it doesn't really have a name (it's normally called "apni zabaan" = our language) and is almost never written down. Yet it is the language of the home, the community and (mixed with gangsta) the street.
you speak alot of sense christian,note the politicians caused all these problems you have outlined and i agree with you the future is bleak and time after time you hear about these problems in citys and towns all over the country but there is nothing but silence from the media and authorities who would rather sweep these issues under the carpet.
@ Sean
24 August 2010 at 14:16
@George Washington
"Excellent point. England's getting just what it deserves. Four centuries of stealing and killing and now their homeland's been invaded by those they supposedly conquered. "
Seem like Islam is getting just what it deserves for its six centuries of stealing and killing now their homeland's are being invaded by those they supposedly conquered.
It is of course the will of Allah.
1 Byzantine–Arab Wars: 634–750
2 Conquest of Persia and Iraq: 633–651
3 Conquest of Transoxiana: 662–709
4 Conquest of Sindh: 664–712
5 Conquest of Hispania: 711–718 and Septimania 719–720
6 Conquest of the Caucasus: 711–750
7 End of the Umayyad conquests: 718–750
8 Conquest of Nubia: 700–1606
9 Incursions into southern Italy: 831–902
10 Conquest of Anatolia: 1060–1360
11 Byzantine-Ottoman Wars: 1299–1453
12 Further conquests: 1200–1800
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_conquests
So- aside from all the failed and pathetic efforts at 'integration' of what for too long has been blithely referred to as the 'Asian community'- we learn that these 'communities' are so intensely divided in and of themselves that attempting to moderate, reconcile and reunite those divided will take vast quantites of resources, effort and time we don't have.
The article raised another couple of interesting points: if jobs were no longer available for the new migrants, why were their visas not terminated? They would surely have no need to stay for work that no longer existed. Secondly, why was receiving a passport as reparations for Government failure in Pakistan an un-checked admission to Britain? Presumably, Pakistan cannot be blamed here: this issue is indicative of lax, inappropriate and nonsensical border controls in THIS country.
Furthermore: why must the left demonise a multi-racial group who are legitimately concerned about real threats to their way of life, their employment and the fabric of their nation? Why can Englishmen not walk the streets of Bradford?
If anyone could kindly point out to me the 'benefits' of this failed 60-year experiment in monumental idiocy, I should be pleased to consider them.
@ Sean.... you speak as though America is a pure entity. What about the Imperial American endeavours post World War II? Your boys in Washington have invaded well over 40 sovereign states, including all of South and Central America, the Middle East, Vietnam etc etc causing catastrophic devastation to millions of people. Babies are still being born in Vietnam with disabilities and deformed limbs etc due to the chemicals weapons that your military sprayed in the jungles.
Your bankers have just plunged the world into the biggest depression since the '29 crash through self interest and greed chasing the 'American Dream' whilst the divide between rich and poor (in your own country) continues to grow at an alaming rate.
Your countrymen are so badly educated (or brainwashed) that 18% of you (stat from a recent survey) believe Obama is a Muslim. The founding father's wrote into the constitution that America was to be A-religious in its outlook, i.e a land for all. Yet the Christian far right have risen to such a degree of powere that they are running the show and setting mandates for successive presidents (especially your policy in Israel so that the Biblical prophecies can be fulfilled haha). Yours is also (perhaps just behind Switzerland and South Africa) the most institutionally racist and generally discrimatory country in the world where 'Socialism' is a horrendously dirty concept worse than rape to your Capitalist ideals.
Your 'culture' (hyphons used to signify irony) (something you Americans don't understand) has watered down and is continuing to water down every traditional culture in the developed world. England's national past-times were Cricket, afternoon tea, walks in the park, country pubs etc, now we have McDonalds and obeseity, CSI New York, Miami and Las Vegas etc etc (point proven?).
Your insults are petty and worthless but the point that you apparently enjoy watching people suffer (we're not by the way) really indicates the level that you have developed to as a human being.