The Tony Blair Foundation
The author of the God Delusion responds to Tony Blair's article on By Richard Dawkins Published 02 April 2009 Dear Person of Faith Basically, I write as fundraiser for the wonderful new Tony Blair Foundation, whose aim is “to promote respect and understanding about the world’s major religions and show how faith is a powerful force for good in the modern world”. I would like to touch base with you on six key points from the recent New Statesman piece by Tony (as he likes to be called by everybody, of all faiths – or indeed of none, for that’s how tuned in he is!). “My faith has always been an important part of my politics” Yes indeed, although Tony modestly kept shtum about it when he was PM. As he said, to shout his faith from the rooftops might have been interpreted as claiming moral superiority over those with no faith (and therefore no morals, of course). Also, some might have objected to their PM taking advice from voices only he could hear; but hey, reality is so last year compared with private revelation, isn’t it? What else, other than shared faith, could have brought Tony together with his friend and comrade-in-arms, George “Mission Accomplished” Bush, in their life-saving and humanitarian intervention in Iraq? Admittedly, there are one or two problems remaining to be ironed out there, but all the more reason for people of different faiths – Christian and Muslim, Sunni and Shia – to join together in meaningful dialogue to seek common ground, just as Catholics and Protestants have done, so heart-warmingly, throughout European history. It is these great benefits of faith that the Tony Blair Foundation seeks to promote. “We are focusing on five main projects initially, working with partners in the six main faiths” Yes I know, I know, it’s a pity we had to limit ourselves to six. But we do have boundless respect for other faiths, all of which, in their colourful variety, enrich human lives. In a very real sense, we have much to learn from Zoroastrianism and Jainism. And from Mormonism, though Cherie says we need to go easy on the polygamy and the sacred underpants!! Then again, we mustn’t forget the ancient and rich Olympian and Norse traditions – although our modern blue-skies thinking out of the box has pushed the envelope on shock-and-awe tactics, and put Zeus’s thunderbolts and Thor’s hammer in the shade!!! We hope, in Phase 2 of our Five-Year Plan, to embrace Scientology and Druidic Mistletoe Worship, which, in a very real sense, have something to teach us all. In Phase 3, our firm commitment to Diversity will lead us to source new networking partnership opportunities with the many hundreds of African tribal religions. Sacrificing goats may present problems with the RSPCA, but we hope to persuade them to adjust their priorities to take proper account of religious sensibilities. “We are working across religious divides towards a common goal – ending the scandal of deaths from malaria” Plus, of course, we mustn’t forget the countless deaths from Aids. This is where we can learn from the Pope’s inspiring vision, expounded recently on his visit to Africa. Drawing on his reserves of scientific and medical knowledge – informed and deepened by the Values that only faith can bring – His Holiness explained that the scourge of Aids is made worse, not better, by condoms. His advocacy of abstinence may have dismayed some medical experts (and the same goes for his deeply and sincerely held opposition to stem-cell research). But surely to goodness we must find room for a diverse range of opinions. All opinions, after all, are equally valid, and there are many ways of knowing, spiritual as well as factual. That, at the end of the day, is what the Foundation is all about. “We have established Face to Faith, an interfaith schools programme to counter intolerance and extremism” The great thing is to foster diversity, as Tony himself said in 2002, when challenged by a (rather intolerant!!!!) MP about a school in Gateshead teaching children that the world is only 6,000 years old. Of course you may think, as Tony himself happens to, that the true age of the world is 4.6 billion years. But – excuse me – in this multicultural world, we must find room to tolerate – and indeed actively foster – all opinions: the more diverse, the better. We are looking to set up video-conferencing dialogues to brainstorm our differences. By the way, that Gateshead school ticked lots of boxes when it came to GCSE results, which just goes to show. “Children of one faith and culture will have the chance to interact with children of another, getting a real sense of each other’s lived experience” Cool! And, thanks to Tony’s policy of putting as many children as possible in faith schools where they can’t befriend kids from other backgrounds, the need for this interaction and mutual understanding has never been so strong. You see how it all hangs together? Sheer genius! So strongly do we support the principle that children should be sent to schools which will identify them with their parents’ beliefs, that we think there is a real opportunity here to broaden it out. In Phase 2, we look to facilitate separate schools for Postmodernist children, Leavisite children and Saussurian Structuralist children. And in Phase 3 we shall roll out yet more separate schools, for Keynesian children, Monetarist children and even neo-Marxist children. “We are working with the Coexist Foundation and Cambridge University to develop the concept of Abraham House” I always think it’s so important to coexist, don’t you agree, with our brothers and sisters of the other Abrahamic faiths. Of course we have our differences – I mean, who doesn’t, basically? But we must all learn mutual respect. For example, we need to understand and sympathise with the deep hurt and offence that a man can feel if we insult his traditional beliefs by trying to stop him beating his wife, or setting fire to his daughter or cutting off her clitoris (and please don’t let’s hear any racist or Islamophobic objections to these important expressions of faith). We shall support the introduction of sharia courts, but on a strictly voluntary basis – only for those whose husbands and fathers freely choose it. “The Blair Foundation will work to leverage mutual respect and understanding between seemingly incompatible faith traditions” After all, despite our differences, we do have one important thing in common: all of us in the faith communities hold firm beliefs in the total absence of evidence, which leaves us free to believe anything we like. So, at the very least, we can be united in claiming a privileged role for all these private beliefs in the formulation of public policy. I hope this letter will have shown you some of the reasons why you might consider supporting Tony’s Foundation. Because hey, let’s face it, a world without religion doesn’t have a prayer. With so many of the world’s problems caused by religion, what better solution could there possibly be than to promote yet more of it? Richard Dawkins is the author of “The God Delusion” (Black Swan, £8.99)
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


12 comments
Richard,
In fairness to the Pope, Vatican's spokesman has argued that his comments regarding the use of condoms were taken out of context.
What the Pope supposedly meant was that in Africa, used condoms are often re-used rather than discarded. When re-used, a condom may become like a used needle and start spreading AIDS instead of preventing it.
This appears to be Vatican's argument in any case.
That said, one is still waiting for Vatican to apologise for, or even acknowledge, the immense human suffering they have caused with their prohibition of the use of condoms. The number of deaths directly caused by the comments of the present Pope and his predecessor regarding the use of protective contraceptives múst run in the millions.
Even if some people might not know how to properly use condoms, surely, human morality should prompt the Pope to emphasise the need of education and information rather than to condemn hundreds of thousands to death.
Which provides just another example of the dangers of basing one's 'morality' on superstition rather than fundamental humanitarian values.
"All religions are equally sublime to the ignorant, useful to the politician, and ridiculous to the philosopher." -- Lucretius
In my view this is an incredibly unhelpful, sarcastic and snide piece.
I’m very sceptical of claims that we can assign blame for the world’s problems to one group of people or one particular phenomenon. “Get rid of religion/republicans/democracts/black people/the jews/hippies and most of the world’s problems will instantly disappear.” Come on!
Reality is much more complex than that.
This is a superb piece from Mr Dawkins, pointing out the absurdities of the positions taken by Mr Blair and his fellow fanatics.
When the scary but almost inevitable consequences of religious belief are upon us in the near future I wonder which pile of post-nuclear debris he will choose to visit first in his capacity of peace envoy - Israel? Iran? Palestine?
Oh I forgot, he'll probably be too busy celebrating the first biblical prophecy that ever came true.
Enjoy life while you can, folks!
Adieu from Manchester (God's own country)
This is an excellent, well-reasoned, well-written and darkly humorous article.
I find the Blair Foundation hilarious in its astonishing ambition in principle to unite all the world's religions in peace and love, presumably with a Catholic look & feel, and yet its total lack of ambition in practise (representatives from various religions endlessly talking to each other with no view to actually achieving anything and absolutely no no clue about how this is to contribute to the stated goal).
Organisations like this are not concerned with alleviating suffering, but rather in making moderate people feel better about supporting policies - such as the Catholic Church's view on condoms - which will obvious cause widespread and grievous harm.
A 'bookmarkable' article and would be so funny if the underlying message was not so horrifying!
What I fail to comprehend is that such a supposedly intelligent and I suppose educated man as Tony Blair who was our prime minister can believe in such a myth! It is beyond me!
If I, as a thoroughly educated RC, 8 years with Irish Roman Catholic nuns, can find my ex-religion hard to believe how can and ex-prime minister? I find this worrying.
As a practicing RC Tony Blair not only believes in Original Sin, which the Modern Scientific Theory of Evolution proves ('shows' for the PC brigade) that Adam & Eve could never have existed to commit it so the rest of the bible is like 'Hamlet' with out the 'Prince of Denmark' but in addition:
Transubstantiation, that at the moment of consecration the host actually turns into the body and blood of Jesus Christ in your mouth which you then swallow. All RC's have to believe this!
The Bible, which again Darwin's insight proves wrong, with all the miracles, floods, resurrections, ascensions, angels, virgin birth etc.
but also because the Pope says he is infallible the bodily assumption of the Blesses Virgin into Heaven. She actually lifted off!
All without a scrap of evidence. See
Darwin V Adam & Eve http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbucnNX5t2g
This would all be hilarious if it were not for the Pope who is just an ordinary man with an Hitler Youth back ground, preaching to his flock on the pain of mortal sin and eternal damnation that the use of condoms to prevent HIV aides is wrong.
If Fred Blogs or even Richard Dawkins or I said such a thing and millions of people caught and died of this disease we would held responsible. What the Pope is doing in the name of a myth is totally unacceptable and again congratulations to Dawkins for speaking out!
Tony Blair as a convert to this religion obviously thinks this is quite acceptable!
During a recent meeting of alumni from our former workplace, Richard Dawkins was mentioned for his "God Delusion". The book was recognised as a good piece of logic, as you might expect from an eminent scientist, but lacking in sociological context.
This piece indeed remedies the criticism. Just remember that God has been on everybody's side from the time of the crusades to the weakness of the Church during the second world war and through 30 years of death and destruction from terrorism in Northern Ireland, .
Dawkins is Vice-President of the British Humanist Association which bases decisions on the available evidence and an assessement of the outcome of human actions, not on any dogma or sacred text. Had Tony Blair done this, instead of relying on his faith, when speaking to the House of Commons about starting the Iraq war, thousands of people would be alive today instead of dead in horrible circumstances.
Sociological context indeed. Dawkins for PM anyone?
Listen now to a furtherpoint: 'no mortal thing has a beginning, nor does it end in death and obliteration;
there is only a mixing and then a serperating of what was mixed,But by mortal men these processes are named "beginnings"' Empedocles 492-432 BC
'He's not the Messiah. He's a very naughty boy!' Life of Brian 1979
Ruggles got it in one. Ultimately however, Blair's grasp of theology is as limited as that of Dawkins. In life it's usually best to stick to what one's own field of competence. Neither of these individuals are trained in history, theology or philosophy and are therefore poorly equipped to understand the myriad complex metaphysical issues upon which the God/No God debate rests. Dawkins ignores all forms of causality except the material (in defiance of Aristotle) whilst Blair avoids any attempt to define faith and belief in the form of propositional statements that may be subject to logical scrutiny. The absence of a close definition of Christian belief in Blair is as worrying as the numerous lacunae in Dawkins' neo-Darwinist hypothesis. No Darwinist has ever dealt adequately with the problems raised by a closed order mechanistic universe, particularly first principles and the origin of matter. No Blairite liberal religionist has ever succeeded in giving a defence of 'faith' that wasn't couched in the most absurdly general ecumenical terms - a generalist approach that is finally at odds with the divisive exclusivity of the Christian Gospel.
Read Dennett, not Dawkins. Read the New Testament, not Blair.
I believe myself to be morally and ethically strong, WITHOUT having recourse to the mumbo-jumbo and hocus-pocus of religion. However, realising that the word "athiesm" is a negative term, would it not be better for the likes of Dawkins to be propounding a positive philosophy of say "Rational Humanism" ?