Ed Miliband during Prime Minister's Question Time.
Show Hide image

Miliband calls for public question time for Prime Ministers

Labour leader says voters should be able to ask the Prime Minister questions in the Palace of Westminster. 

Ed Miliband's interview with Andrew Marr, conducted in the relaxed setting of his back garden, contained one striking new idea: a public question time for Prime Ministers. 

After praising Nick Clegg for engaging with voters through his radio phone-in show "Call Clegg", Miliband said: 

I think what we need is a public question time, where regularly, the Prime Minister submits himself or herself to questioning from members of the public in the Palace of Westminster on Wednesdays. And why is that important? Because I want to let the public into our politics. 

This would involve the Prime Minister taking questions from members of the public at least fortnightly, and possibly weekly, following the session with MPs in the Commons. Those asking questions would, Labour says, "be chosen by a method to ensure a wide representation of the country and political backgrounds."

Miliband told Marr that he would make a "formal proposal" to the Speaker, whom he had talked to "many times before" about reforming PMQs. 

He added: 

At the moment there's the glass that separates, a few inches glass, separates the public in the gallery from the members of the House of Commons. But there is a gulf a mile's wide between the kind of politics people want and what Prime Minister's Questions offers.

It's a smart idea, and one that David Cameron and Nick Clegg will struggle to oppose: which party leader can afford to be in favour of less engagement with the public? My initial thought was that Cameron could simply embrace the idea and claim the credit (with few voters aware it originated from Miliband), but Labour has emphasised that it would not be introduced until after "the next election". 

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.

Show Hide image

Theresa May’s stage-managed election campaign keeps the public at bay

Jeremy Corbyn’s approach may be chaotic, but at least it’s more authentic.

The worst part about running an election campaign for a politician? Having to meet the general public. Those ordinary folk can be a tricky lot, with their lack of regard for being on-message, and their pesky real-life concerns.

But it looks like Theresa May has decided to avoid this inconvenience altogether during this snap general election campaign, as it turns out her visit to Leeds last night was so stage-managed that she barely had to face the public.

Accusations have been whizzing around online that at a campaign event at the Shine building in Leeds, the Prime Minister spoke to a room full of guests invited by the party, rather than local people or people who work in the building’s office space.

The Telegraph’s Chris Hope tweeted a picture of the room in which May was addressing her audience yesterday evening a little before 7pm. He pointed out that, being in Leeds, she was in “Labour territory”:

But a few locals who spied this picture online claimed that the audience did not look like who you’d expect to see congregated at Shine – a grade II-listed Victorian school that has been renovated into a community project housing office space and meeting rooms.

“Ask why she didn’t meet any of the people at the business who work in that beautiful building. Everyone there was an invite-only Tory,” tweeted Rik Kendell, a Leeds-based developer and designer who says he works in the Shine building. “She didn’t arrive until we’d all left for the day. Everyone in the building past 6pm was invite-only . . . They seemed to seek out the most clinical corner for their PR photos. Such a beautiful building to work in.”

Other tweeters also found the snapshot jarring:

Shine’s founders have pointed out that they didn’t host or invite Theresa May – rather the party hired out the space for a private event: “All visitors pay for meeting space in Shine and we do not seek out, bid for, or otherwise host any political parties,” wrote managing director Dawn O'Keefe. The guestlist was not down to Shine, but to the Tory party.

The audience consisted of journalists and around 150 Tory activists, according to the Guardian. This was instead of employees from the 16 offices housed in the building. I have asked the Conservative Party for clarification of who was in the audience and whether it was invite-only and am awaiting its response.

Jeremy Corbyn accused May of “hiding from the public”, and local Labour MP Richard Burgon commented that, “like a medieval monarch, she simply briefly relocated her travelling court of admirers to town and then moved on without so much as a nod to the people she considers to be her lowly subjects”.

But it doesn’t look like the Tories’ painstaking stage-management is a fool-proof plan. Having uniform audiences of the party faithful on the campaign trail seems to be confusing the Prime Minister somewhat. During a visit to a (rather sparsely populated) factory in Clay Cross, Derbyshire, yesterday, she appeared to forget where exactly on the campaign trail she was:

The management of Corbyn’s campaign has also resulted in gaffes – but for opposite reasons. A slightly more chaotic approach has led to him facing the wrong way, with his back to the cameras.

Corbyn’s blunder is born out of his instinct to address the crowd rather than the cameras – May’s problem is the other way round. Both, however, seem far more comfortable talking to the party faithful, even if they are venturing out of safe seat territory.

Anoosh Chakelian is senior writer at the New Statesman.

0800 7318496