Ed Balls speaks at the Labour conference in Brighton last year. Photograph: Getty Images.
Show Hide image

Labour targets Osborne's 24 tax rises

The party says "It’s the same old Tory con – giving with one hand while taking away much more with the other."

One of the main messages that George Osborne will aim to send in his Budget tomorrow is that he believes in cutting taxes. Having increased the personal allowance to £10,000 (despite David Cameron arguing that the measure was unaffordable during the first 2010 leaders' debate) from £6,475 in 2010, he will attempt to claim ownership of this Lib Dem policy for the Conservatives when he announces that it will rise to at least £10,500 next year. The Chancellor will frame this as his response to the "cost-of-living crisis" (without using those words).

But as Labour has highlighted tonight, he also has a record of raising taxes. The party has issued a list of 24 levies increased by Osborne since 2010, including VAT, income tax age-related allowances ("the granny tax"), capital gains tax and inheritance tax. It calculates that taxes have risen by £24bn so far this parliament, with a further £3bn of increases to follow in 2014/15.

A party spokesman emphasised to me that Labour is "not opposed" to all of the tax rises (not least because some of them are progressive) but that it wanted to remind people that Osborne has "put taxes up significantly". The opposition wants voters to remember measures such as the VAT rise, rather than just the hike in the personal allowance, the key point being that most are worse off once all tax and benefit changes are taken into account. Here's the accompanying statement from shadow chief secretary to the Treasury Chris Leslie:

“We need a Budget that tackles the cost-of-living crisis which has left working people £1,600 a year worse off under the Tories.

“George Osborne wants to take credit for increasing the personal allowance, but hopes people forget his 24 Tory tax rises including the VAT hike. While millionaires have been given a huge tax cut the truth is millions of hard-working people have seen their taxes go up.

“It’s the same old Tory con – giving with one hand while taking away much more with the other. The VAT rise alone has cost families with children an average of £1,350 over the last three years. And the 24 Tory tax rises don't include the cuts to tax credits which have hit millions of working families.

“A Labour Budget this week would cut taxes for 24 million people on middle and lower incomes by introducing a lower 10p starting rate of tax.

“We’d get young people off benefits and into work with a compulsory jobs guarantee, freeze energy bills, expand free childcare, get more homes built and cut business rates for small firms. We’d also reverse the £3 billion tax cut for the top one per cent of earners to get the deficit down in a fairer way.”

The Tories will no doubt cite Labour's attack as further evidence that it the party is unwilling to take the "tough choices" required to reduce the deficit (forecast to be £111bn this year). But Osborne's record will also increase the demands from his own side for some relief to be offered in the Budget.

Here's the list of 24 tax rises released by Labour.

The 24 Tory Tax Rises

 

1.    VAT increased – to 20 per cent from 2011

 

2.    Income Tax age-related allowances frozen and eligibility restricted (“Granny Tax”) from 2013-14

 

3.    Income Tax higher rate threshold cut to £42,475 in 2011-12

 

4.    Higher Income Child Benefit Charge introduced 2013

 

5.    National Insurance Contributions rates, limits and thresholds increased in line with CPI rather than RPI from 2012-13

 

6.    Income Tax higher rate threshold frozen at £42,475 in 2012-13

 

7.    Insurance premium tax increased – from 2011

 

8.    Capital Gains Tax increased – to 28 per cent for higher rate taxpayers from June 2010

 

9.    New Beer Duty introduced on high strength beers from 2011

 

10. Duty on hand-rolling tobacco increased by an additional 10 per cent from 2011-12

 

11. ISA subscription limit uprated in line with CPI rather than RPI from 2012-13

 

12. National Insurance Contributions changes to contracting-out rebates from 2012-13

 

13. Capital Gains Tax annual exempt amount frozen, 2012-13

 

14. Stamp Duty Land Tax increase to 7 per cent on properties over £2 million from 2012-13

 

15. VAT increases on a range of items, including caravans, sports drinks, and listed buildings from 2012

 

16. Duty on tobacco increased by RPI + 5 per cent in 2012

 

17. Income Tax higher rate threshold cut to £41,450 in 2013-14

 

18. Capital Gains Tax annual exempt amount increased in line with CPI rather than RPI from 2013-14

 

19. Income Tax cap on reliefs introduced from 2013-14

 

20. Pension tax relief restricted from 2014-15 21.

 

21. Income Tax higher rate threshold Increase capped at 1 per cent in 2014-15 and 2015-16

 

22. Capital Gains Tax annual exempt amount increase capped at 1 per cent, 2014-15 and 2015-16

 

23. Inheritance Tax threshold frozen in 2015-16

 

24. National Insurance Contributions ending of contracting-out rebates from 2016-17

George Eaton is political editor of the New Statesman.

Getty Images
Show Hide image

Is there such a thing as responsible betting?

Punters are encouraged to bet responsibly. What a laugh that is. It’s like encouraging drunks to get drunk responsibly, to crash our cars responsibly, murder each other responsibly.

I try not to watch the commercials between matches, or the studio discussions, or anything really, before or after, except for the match itself. And yet there is one person I never manage to escape properly – Ray Winstone. His cracked face, his mesmerising voice, his endlessly repeated spiel follow me across the room as I escape for the lav, the kitchen, the drinks cupboard.

I’m not sure which betting company he is shouting about, there are just so many of them, offering incredible odds and supposedly free bets. In the past six years, since the laws changed, TV betting adverts have increased by 600 per cent, all offering amazingly simple ways to lose money with just one tap on a smartphone.

The one I hate is the ad for BetVictor. The man who has been fronting it, appearing at windows or on roofs, who I assume is Victor, is just so slimy and horrible.

Betting firms are the ultimate football parasites, second in wealth only to kit manufacturers. They have perfected the capitalist’s art of using OPM (Other People’s Money). They’re not directly involved in football – say, in training or managing – yet they make millions off the back of its popularity. Many of the firms are based offshore in Gibraltar.

Football betting is not new. In the Fifties, my job every week at five o’clock was to sit beside my father’s bed, where he lay paralysed with MS, and write down the football results as they were read out on Sports Report. I had not to breathe, make silly remarks or guess the score. By the inflection in the announcer’s voice you could tell if it was an away win.

Earlier in the week I had filled in his Treble Chance on the Littlewoods pools. The “treble” part was because you had three chances: three points if the game you picked was a score draw, two for a goalless draw and one point for a home or away win. You chose eight games and had to reach 24 points, or as near as possible, then you were in the money.

“Not a damn sausage,” my father would say every week, once I’d marked and handed him back his predictions. He never did win a sausage.

Football pools began in the 1920s, the main ones being Littlewoods and Vernons, both based in Liverpool. They gave employment to thousands of bright young women who checked the results and sang in company choirs in their spare time. Each firm spent millions on advertising. In 1935, Littlewoods flew an aeroplane over London with a banner saying: Littlewoods Above All!

Postwar, they blossomed again, taking in £50m a year. The nation stopped at five on a Saturday to hear the scores, whether they were interested in football or not, hoping to get rich. BBC Sports Report began in 1948 with John Webster reading the results. James Alexander Gordon took over in 1974 – a voice soon familiar throughout the land.

These past few decades, football pools have been left behind, old-fashioned, low-tech, replaced by online betting using smartphones. The betting industry has totally rebooted itself. You can bet while the match is still on, trying to predict who will get the next goal, the next corner, the next throw-in. I made the last one up, but in theory you can bet instantly, on anything, at any time.

The soft sell is interesting. With the old football pools, we knew it was a remote flutter, hoping to make some money. Today the ads imply that betting on football somehow enhances the experience, adds to the enjoyment, involves you in the game itself, hence they show lads all together, drinking and laughing and putting on bets.

At the same time, punters are encouraged to do it responsibly. What a laugh that is. It’s like encouraging drunks to get drunk responsibly, to crash our cars responsibly, murder each other responsibly. Responsibly and respect are now two of the most meaningless words in the football language. People have been gambling, in some form, since the beginning, watching two raindrops drip down inside the cave, lying around in Roman bathhouses playing games. All they’ve done is to change the technology. You have to respect that.

Hunter Davies is a journalist, broadcaster and profilic author perhaps best known for writing about the Beatles. He is an ardent Tottenham fan and writes a regular column on football for the New Statesman.

This article first appeared in the 05 February 2015 issue of the New Statesman, Putin's war