Dominic Grieve demonises British Pakistanis – we must all fight back

The Tories have relentlessly caricatured Britain’s Pakistani community as Islamist extremists, child abusers and slave masters, says former Conservative councillor Imran Khan.

Britain’s Pakistani community is under attack. The Attorney General, Dominic Grieve, has said that some immigrants - particularly British Pakistanis - "come from backgrounds where corruption is endemic", "have been brought up to believe you can only get certain things through a favour culture", and are mainly responsible for electoral corruption.

Highlighting the case of Conservative councillor Eshaq Khan, who was jailed in 2008 for postal ballot fraud, Grieve reverted to the colonial tactics of divide and rule, commenting: "Yes, it’s mainly the Pakistani community, not the Indian community". "One of the things you have to make absolutely clear" (to British Pakistanis) "is that that is not the case and it’s not acceptable." Attempting a last minute back pedal, he said: "The point I was making is that, as a law officer, it's my duty to ensure the rule of law is upheld, and one of the issues that I feel requires close attention is any potential for a rise in corruption to undermine civil society."

The comments are a severe escalation in the continued denigration of non-white cultures by Tories generally and since they came to power in 2010. Unsurprisingly, a massive Twitter backlash ensued with Conservative MEP, Sajjad H Karim weighing into the debate: "As a British Pakistani I find your comments not based on fact and deeply alienating and offensive @Dominc Grieve"

The Tories have relentlessly caricatured Britain’s Pakistani community as Islamist extremists, child abusers, corrupt, and slave masters, while at the same time claiming to welcome ethnic minority participation within local and national politics. David Cameron declared in his speech in Munich that Britain needs a new "generous vision of citizenship" if it is to challenge the disenfranchisement of Muslim communities, while hammering home the message that British Muslim identities remain a key existential threat to the UK. Cameron commented at the time: "the reason so many young Muslims are drawn to extremism comes down to a question of identity". For the prime minister, Britain’s Muslims have a weakened collective identity where potential terrorists find it hard to identify with fellow compatriots resulting in an explosive anti-British rage.

Tragically, nobody in the party had thought to advise that Grieve’s comments today, and Cameron’s previous conclusions, connect a well-established Conservative psychology that seeks to subject black identities to its own memories of the recent and distant past.  Every black man and woman in this country, not to mention scores of white anti-racists remember only too well  the horrors that were the Brixton and Handsworth riots of the 1980s. They intuitively understand the populist politics which motivated Dominic Grieve today. They also know that blaming black people for society’s ills is nothing new. Racism, like a deadly virus, mutates from one generation to the next while its justification continues to resonate for an elite still flourishing from the slavery that built Britain’s global wealth and influence. Lest we forget in 1964, Tory MP, Peter Griffiths fought to win Smethwick, a parliamentary seat in the Midlands, with the slogan: "If you want a nigger for a neighbour, vote Labour."

The attorney general’s revisionist history of corruption rather conveniently omits the recent MPs' expenses scandal, one of Westminster’s most humiliating moments in modern times. It is worth reminding ourselves of Tory corruption (that British Pakistanis had absolutely nothing to do with), which still stings in the hearts of every true democrat who believes this land is all of ours and not just for the predominantly white, rich and privately educated elite.

Tories – a catalogue of corruption

Surely everyone remembers the case of Tory MP, Sir John Butterfill, who in 2010 told an undercover team of reporters that he would use his political links to benefit a fictitious company for £35,000 a year (amongst his many other corrupt practices). How about the 15 donors who gave the Conservative Party a total of £25m and who had secret dinners and lunches with the prime minister at Chequers and Downing Street?

Giving millions of pounds to a political party is not so bad, some of you might be thinking – as long as the money is not spent on any old crap. Well, you forget that in 2009, Tory David Heathcoat-Amory was shown to have claimed £388 over four years' expenses for horse manure. He lost his seat in 2010.

Of course, the countryside is where Tories truly allow their identities to develop and thrive. In 2009, David Cameron repaid £680 he claimed for removing wisteria from his chimney at your expense. Naturally, I remind you of this first because I don’t want to spoil you quite yet with – yes, you guessed it – the 2009 episode that was Sir Peter Viggers, who claimed £1,600 for a floating duck island.

There are vast swathes of deluded Tories who revere Michael Gove as some kind of messiah. Yet in 2009, Gove was reported to have flipped homes for expenses. In the same year, David "Two Brains" Willetts claimed more than £100 in expenses for workmen to replace 25 light bulbs at his home and Tory MP Oliver Letwin claimed more than £2,000 to replace a leaking pipe under a tennis court. Alan Duncan claimed £7,000 for his gardening bills. Anthony Steen MP had to retire after he claimed almost £90,000 over four years for his country home and Iain Duncan Smith claimed £39 for a breakfast, part of a £193 hotel stay. Somewhat more pathetic, yet still a clear example of Tory corruption was the 55p in expenses claimed by Tory MP, Andrew Selous for a mug of Horlicks in the House of Commons tea room and of course the £43.56 for three garlic peeling sets claimed by Tory MP, James Arbuthnot. Apparently, white British Tory MPs are not quite as clean as is implied by Dominic Grieve’s complete omission of their past injustices to the UK taxpayer.

The fightback

Anti-racists – white and black – can send a clear message to the dinosaurs roaming the corridors of power. No longer can politicians escape the growing sense of egalitarianism incubated in the crucible of Tory scandals and increasingly vocal, xenophobic MPs. Professor Muhammad Anwar of The University of Warwick’s Centre for Research in Ethnic Relations has shown that ethnic minority votes are more important than ever. He has noted that "higher levels of turn-out among Asians and particularly Muslim groups are likely to continue in future". In his book, Ethnic Minorities and Politics, Prof Anwar shows that the national average turnout in the 2005 election was 61.4%, but for Bangladeshi voters it was 76%, for Pakistanis 70% and for Indians 67%. Black Africans were the same as the national average at 61% - only Black Caribbean voters had a lower turnout at 54%. All of us can write to Dominic Grieve and tell him what we think about Tory corruption. We may also decide to vote with our feet on election day.

Imran Khan was a Conservative councillor (2008-12). He campaigns on citizenship issues.

Attorney General Dominic Grieve arrives at 10 Downing Street on August 27, 2013 in London. Photograph: Getty Images.
Getty
Show Hide image

Hillary Clinton can take down the Donald Trump bogeyman - but she's up against the real thing

Donald Trump still has time to transform. 

Eight years later than hoped, Hillary Clinton finally ascended to the stage at the Democratic National Convention and accepted the nomination for President. 

Like her cheerleaders, the Obamas, she was strongest when addressing the invisible bogeyman - her rival for President, Donald Trump. 

Clinton looked the commander in chief when she dissed The Donald's claims to expertise on terrorism. 

Now Donald Trump says, and this is a quote, "I know more about ISIS than the generals do"

No, Donald, you don't.

He thinks that he knows more than our military because he claimed our armed forces are "a disaster."

Well, I've had the privilege to work closely with our troops and our veterans for many years.

Trump boasted that he alone could fix America. "Isn't he forgetting?" she asked:

Troops on the front lines. Police officers and fire fighters who run toward danger. Doctors and nurses who care for us. Teachers who change lives. Entrepreneurs who see possibilities in every problem.

Clinton's message was clear: I'm a team player. She praised supporters of her former rival for the nomination, Bernie Sanders, and concluded her takedown of Trump's ability as a fixer by declaring: "Americans don't say: 'I alone can fix it.' We say: 'We'll fix it together.'"

Being the opposite of Trump suits Clinton. As she acknowledged in her speech, she is not a natural public performer. But her cool, policy-packed speech served as a rebuke to Trump. She is most convincing when serious, and luckily that sets her apart from her rival. 

The Trump in the room with her at the convention was a boorish caricature, a man who describes women as pigs. "There is no other Donald Trump," she said. "This is it."

Clinton and her supporters are right to focus on personality. When it comes to the nuclear button, most fair-minded people on both left and right would prefer to give the decision to a rational, experienced character over one who enjoys a good explosion. 

But the fact is, outside of the convention arena, Trump still controls the narrative on Trump.

Trump has previously stated clearly his aim to "pivot" to the centre. He has declared that he can change "to anything I want to change to".  In his own speech, Trump forewent his usual diatribe for statistics about African-American children in poverty. He talked about embracing "crying mothers", "laid-off factory workers" and making sure "all of our kids are treated equally". His wife Melania opted for a speech so mainstream it was said to be borrowed from Michelle Obama. 

His personal attacks have also narrowed. Where once his Twitter feed was spattered with references to "lying Ted Cruz" and "little Marco Rubio", now the bile is focused on one person: "crooked Hillary Clinton". Just as Clinton defines herself against a caricature of him, so Trump is defining himself against one of her. 

Trump may not be able to maintain a more moderate image - at a press conference after his speech, he lashed out at his former rival, Ted Cruz. But if he can tone down his rhetoric until November, he will no longer be the bogeyman Clinton can shine so brilliantly against.