In the foreign policy debate, what was left unsaid was most important of all
More uses of "freedom" than "liberty", and none at all for "eurozone".
By Alex Hern Published 23 October 2012 8:04
With the third and final presidential debate, what was unsaid is far more revealing than what was said. MSN's Tom Phillips suggests the rather depressing game of going to the transcript of the evening, hitting cmd+F, and typing in various keywords for important foreign policy areas.
It's a rough-and-ready form of statistical analysis, but some of the exclusions are terrifying.
No mention at all of "climate" or "environment" (used in the ecological sense) carries over a trend from the first two debates. Climate change is not something either of these candidates want to talk about: so they don't. That's not to say there aren't differences between them when it comes to policy to tackle the issue, but the one thing they both know is that saying anything concrete on it is likely to be political poison.
There was also no mention at all of India or Brazil, and South Africa only got one mention when Romney declared that he would treat Ahmadinejad as though he was a member of the apartheid regime. The other two BRICS economies got far more airtime, though, with a "China" count of 32 and a Russia count of 10.
Of the three major macroeconomic crises the world could face in the coming year, just one - the US fiscal cliff - is domestic. The risk of a Chinese "hard landing" (that is, the risk that China's miraculous growth will end with a bang) got no discussion, but at least China itself was covered amply. The third is the Eurozone. Which got no mentions. No mentions either for the euro. And "Europe" was dropped just once, when Obama decided to show off about how much we love him:
Governor Romney, our alliances have never been stronger. In Asia, in Europe, in Africa, with Israel where we have unprecedented military and intelligence cooperation, including dealing with the Iranian threat.
Despite the ongoing embargo, and the strong difference between the two candidate's stance on its continuation, "Cuba" was mentioned just once as the historical location of the missile crisis, while "Guantanamo" - one of Obama's most glaring failed promises - got no mention at all. There are still 167 detainees in the Guanatamo Bay camp.
The most telling distinction of all was that in the Middle East. "Palestine" wasn't said once, while "Palestinians" got its sole use in this passage from Romney:
Is — are Israel and the Palestinians closer to — to reaching a peace agreement? No, they haven’t had talks in two years.
Israel was mentioned a total of 34 times, more than any country other than America itself. (Although "China" and "Chinese" combined got 35 outings.)
I feel like these debates are always a Mean Girls three-way phone call where one of the candidates doesn't know Israel is on the other line.
— Jack Moore (@BuzzFeedJack) October 23, 2012
One of Obama's strongest hits of the night may have been attacking Romney over the fact that the latter brought his donors with him on his trip to Israel, but it's clear that America's closest ally doesn't run much risk of losing that position any time soon.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















7 comments
Israel commanded the support of both candidates because the overwhelming majority of US citizens be they on the right or left recognise that Israel is a beleaguered democracy of just 7 million, inhabiting a tiny stretch of land and surrounded by hundreds of millions of Islamist fanatics who daily call for their annihilation. So sorry that Islamist extremists in the UK just don't get it.
there's so little difference between Obama and Romney in this area, it is most depressing. when Netanyahu thanked Obama in his recent UN speech for all his support throughout his term in the Oval office, and, with Romney not saying he'll attack Iran asap and kick their butt, where is the genuine difference?
from this debate it is clear that both their positions are very similar and still wrong.
Romney did bring up having more trade with Central & South America. He was also devastating in defining Obama's global "Apology" tour, I just wish he had focused in on the fact that Obama has never visited Israel as President. Romney has talked much about stopping China's currency manipulation- not sure why the author doesn't mention that...No mention of Obama not defining Ft Hood military base attack in El Paso as a terrorist event, & he went light on the Benghazi terrorist debacle & cover-up. Also, didn't mention Obama's moronic idea of trying Gitmo terror cases as civilian in NYC. The Obama campaign has accepted 16 X the non-traceable internet donations over Romeny- maybe we need to fix that?.. Bams elected to go visit the woman's gabfest TV show "The View" rather than meet with Netanyahu- rather disgusting.. Loved it when moderator Schieffer said "Obama Bin Laden"... Romney won.
I have been trying to remember just how the US did treat the apartheit regime. Seems to my erratic old memory that they supported it all the way.
I have been trying to remember just how the US did treat the apartheit regime. Seems to my erratic old memory that they supported it all the way.
Israel wins either way. Don't get it. Horse races just ain't like that!
Lemon Drop Kid
I'm puzzled. I can't make my mind up which multi-millionaire to vote for.