Registered user login:

Time for a British version of Islam . . .

Ruth Kelly

Published 09 April 2007

Deep faith and commitment to country can mix.

The recent trial of those behind the failed 21 July outrage is a stark reminder of the terrorist threat that Britain faces. There can now be no doubt of the scale of the threat. The security services estimate, since this failed attack, that a further 30 plots have been detected and foiled. Few expect these kinds of numbers to fall soon. It will be a challenge for at least another generation.

The government is constantly striving to sharpen our response. Reshaping the Home Office will give clearer oversight to the government's overall counter-terrorism effort. We must be prepared to give the security services and police the powers they need to keep our citizens safe. But we recognise as well that a security response alone will fail. We also have to address the fundamental causes of this home-grown violent extremism to win the battle for hearts and minds.

I don't underestimate the difficulties we face. But I know, too, that the good sense and decency of the vast majority of people in this country have ensured that no type of extremism has ever really got a foothold here. Oswald Mosley's fascists were defeated by decent people coming together. It is how the BNP, time and again, has been beaten back. Similarly, success today will hinge on forging a coalition against violent extremism. It means, in particular, reaching out and including the overwhelming majority of British Muslims disgusted by terrorist attacks carried out in the name of Islam. It means ensuring that those courageous individuals and communities who make public this view are not drowned out or intimidated by the minority who disagree.

It was in order to help ensure that those who stand up don't stand alone that I am today publishing an action plan to help tackle the violent extremism in our midst. It sets out how new training will help imams, particularly those engaged by the state, take on violent extremists' messages. It signals a step -change in the role of madrasas in teaching about citizenship. It supports strong and inclusive governance of mosques and establishes a new role for the Charity Commission.

These proposals come out of many discussions I have had in recent months with members of our Muslim communities. I've spoken with scholars and thinkers about where we go from here. I've listened to those behind the inspiration of community projects up and down Britain. And I have heard the views of women and younger people who have too often felt ignored.

There were, of course, concerns about aspects of the government's policies. But I was also struck by the unanimous and resolute rejection of any notion that Islam justifies terrorism and agreement, too, that being a devout Muslim is entirely consistent with accepting the laws and values that come with being a British citizen. Many are proud to be British, proud to be Muslim, and want to help all young people understand this too.

The likes of Tariq Ramadan have written about these issues. And an interim report of work I have commissioned from an impressive young academic - Tufyal Choudhury - makes a powerful argument for why the ultimate response to extremism in the name of Islam is an emerging European or British Islam.

It is not for government to engage in theological debate. But we need to show that we understand how a deep faith can be combined with a deep commitment to one's country. And we should be working together with the people who are best placed to give a lead to the young people most at risk of being influenced by the arguments from violent extremists.

The progress so far, in forging this coalition against extremism, has been impressive. From the British Muslim Forum to local organisations such as the Bradford Council of Mosques, many, I hope, respect the balance that government is making here. It is the about government challenging and supporting, not seeking to take control or provide all the answers itself.

The vast majority in this country share a vision of a tolerant and fair Britain, where people from all backgrounds get on; where all communities can marry deep faith with commitment to Britain; and where extremists are resolutely isolated. We are already taking important first steps. There is a long way to go, but I believe it sets us in the right direction.

Ruth Kelly is Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

15 comments from readers

proudlyleft
05 April 2007 at 16:31

I read your article with interest and sympathy. But I need to sound a note of warning, which arises not from what you say (which I agree with) but from the topic under discussion. We need to be careful about a glib relationship to 'European Islam.' We have been hearing a lot about this new 'European Islam' in Denmark, where I am based, and it is usually a very patronising and historically incorrect vision. It posits a kind of secularisation/modernisation of Islam under the influence of Europe, which is another version of the old colonial mission and the White Man's burden, and completely forgets that there have been Muslims in Europe (in Eastern Europe, Mediteranean regions and, a bit later, Spain) before there were Christains in Denmark! Moreover, religious Muslims -- like religious Christians or Jews -- have a sense of community that questions nationalist divisions, and this can be a powerful force and not a negative one (if harnessed properly) in our age of globalisation.

Mohammed
05 April 2007 at 16:38

Some white Europeans still think they have the right to lead the rest of world in the direction they want. Hitler had the same idea which ended in a catastrophy

helen1
06 April 2007 at 02:17

I read your article with interest like proudlyleft but failed to feel the sympathy. I am sick to the back teeth of a government who keeps trotting out the same old diatribe about terrorism and the fear we must all share, when our biggest fear is people like you, Kelly! You talk about the fact we "must be prepared to give the security service and police the powers to keep our citizens safe" when there is increasing evidence that state terrorism exists as a bigger threat before Muslim extremism - our schools, churches, communities are all being infected by state paranoia born of a desire to control an increasingly agitated population - ID cards, the SOCPA law, the daily briefing on the war in Iraq and amount of casualties, the war on Iraq of which a multitude of British citizens never wanted, the ridiculous link made between Al Qaeda and Iraq, the invisible weapons of Mass Destruction, the mysterious death if David Kelly, need I go on? I do not buy any of your lies and will resist your legislation and laws as far as is humanly possible. Your government should be being tried for crimes against humanity, not given a comfortable space to continue your deceit. You talk of "home grown violent extremists", yet it is your government who are violent. You also talk of the majority of us as having "good sense and decency"; I class myself as having both good sense and decency, yet it took one letter of protest of the Iraq war to my local MP, David Winnick, for him to decide I was a Saddam sympathiser. It is you and your party, Ms Kelly, who keeps making the connection between terrorism and the Muslims, and then in the same breath stating we should not blame our Muslim brothers and sisters. Finally, you state that “It is not for government to engage in theological debate” yet your very leader came out against the advice of his spin doctors and PR gurus to state that “God will be my judge on Iraq”, ultimately making the connection between his faith and politics. I put it to you that his `God’ is that of the market, notable the FTSE and anywhere else he stashes his state claimed pay-packet – probably Mr Bushes very own oil company! It all has very little to do with OUR security, more with the security of the ruling classes, notably the pound and dollar!

swatantra nandanwar
06 April 2007 at 11:14

I am 100% with Kelly on this. British Muslims have to come up with their own version of Islam which will work in and with the society we live in today. If they can't see that greater integration and the discarding of some ancient rituals will lead to more integration then frankly there is no hope for a cohesive society free of conflict. Old Islam is too concentrated on separtedness which goes against the grain here. That is the reason it has to change and evolve.

jltbro
06 April 2007 at 22:10

Does this not sound very much like how the west said they were going to foreign countries to 'civilise' people, when the real intention as we know now was to colonise. I don't think the same people will get duped twice.

As for ‘beating back’ the BNP Ms Kelly, two separate research papers found 25% of white people in this country are thinking of voting BNP. If we used the same sensationalist soundbites used on surveys concerning Muslims, as used by government officials or xenophobic papers like the Express or The Mail, we could say that that "1 in 4 white people are Nazis" - doesn't sound like the BNP have been 'beaten back' does it? I'm not even including Margaret Hodges 8/10 people in Dagenham thinking of voting BNP or the concept known as 'white flight' where white people do not integrate and move to areas more 'white'. Integration isn't just a Muslim problem.

birkozo
07 April 2007 at 20:08

Sharia law has one advantage, that thieves are left without hands and murderers without head. The question is would terrorist murderers face the same fate?

Waraqah
09 April 2007 at 06:58

Exactly what 'ancient rituals' would Swatantra Nandanwar have us discard?

JL
09 April 2007 at 21:07

Most foolish of Ruth Kelly to mention Tariq Ramadan as an Islamic modernizer. In a televised debate in France in 2003 Ramadan refused to condemn the stoning of women - calling famously instead for a 'moratorium'. Typical of naive Westerners to demonstrate intellectual and moral weakness when faced with Islamist pressure and accept people like this as somehow representing 'moderate' opinion. For French readers I recommend Caroline Fourrest's book 'Frère Tariq' which deals with this capacity of Ramadan's to never say what he really means. Her analysis of his speeches made before the Muslim community reveals the much more militant way in which he speaks to his coreligionists. If Ramadan was, as certain people allege, the 'Martin Luther of Islam' then why does he maintain such a negative and reactionary view of women and people's right to determine truth for themselves, in defiance of Islam if they choose? In any case, Ramadan's refusal to condemn the stoning of women outright is sufficient to disqualify him as a spokesman for 'moderate' Islam, for he can be no such thing.

writeon
11 April 2007 at 09:23

I think New Labour wishes to castrate Islam and force Muslims to abandon the central beliefs of their religion if they wish to be accepted into British society.

The "threat" from Muslim's is simple. Most of them simply do not accept or support Britain's agressive foreign policy in the Middle East. How on earth can Ruth Kelly and other New Labour propagandists use the words "extremist" and "violence" after the illegal and criminal invasion and occupation of Iraq? Have they no shame, honour or even sense?

It's Blair who is the violent extremist, and the real threat to British values, and he's at the centre of power and runs the country!

After Thatchism, which was militantly anti working-class, militeristic and authoritarian; came Blair. He was Thartchrism with a human face, but amazingly he was even wilder and more militaristic than she was, a veritable wolf in sheep's clothing.

Basically New Labour wants to force Muslim's to support it's violent and imperialistic foreign policy, but I believe this is a vain hope and a dangerous illusion. If Islam means anything, it means brotherhood and solidarity with the opressed in Iraq and Palestine. Anything else would signal the surrender of Islam to western values and, in reality, its death. It's not enough for us to demand that Islam and Muslims change when we do not. The way forward is through mutual repspect and negotiation, and our withdrawal from the Middle East, not the imposition of our values on the Islamic faith, or else.

Saghir
12 April 2007 at 10:32

Another month, another government initiative. All of a sudden we seem to have money available for all these initiatives, what about keeping some money aside for a public enquiry into the July bombings?

Also, i don't understand how this women has the audacity to talk about religuous extremism when she herself is part of an extreme christian group called Opus Dey. Double standard anywhere?

Adam
13 April 2007 at 10:15

These are desperate times for the New Labour party.

So they are taking desperate measures on the Muslims communities.

Muslims communities have been living in the U.K for a long time and never have been involved in terrorism .

Blair can not blame a whole communitie for the action of a few.

Blair has lost the war on ideas.

Ruth kelly should be looking after the different communities ! instead of dividing them and isolating the Muslim communities by using and carrot and stick approch.

The main problem is the foreigh policy of this country not the people who live in it.

Iraq and Afganistan should have never happen!

The troops need to come home now!

Blair needs to help its own people first before the rest of the world (he wants to have for his-self and his cornies!!!)

human being!
28 April 2007 at 22:37

i think u shuould all just shut up (including you kelly!) sick and tired of hearing all this crap, cant everyone let evryone else be? what terrorists? what proofs? what evidence? what muslims? what weapons? why should i believe you? who are you? what can you do for me?

Owais Rajput
07 May 2007 at 10:46

Participation, integration and cohesion are key issues for the UK and the Government must ensure that Black Asian Ethnic Minority communities and trade unions are fully consulted and involved in working towards equality in the workplace and the wider community.

Research has indicated that although the views of well educated professionals in BME community are being heard, this is not extending to some groups such as woman and disadvantage groups in BME communities. Policy and action will not be effective if BME communities feel that it is being imposed on them by the Government without their full involvement.

There also needs to be an understanding as what Integration and Cohesion means.

We have concerns that much of the Government’s agenda in this area is set in the context of terrorism and security. Combating terrorism and security are significant issues for this country, but it is important that action and laws to tackle these issues should not impede on applying justice consistently and lead to the erosion of human rights in this country.

Integration and social cohesion needs to go beyond the debate about how BME communities can be integrated into society.

Integration and social cohesion should be about creating a society where everyone can participate and contribute to economic, social and political life. This involves tackling all inequalities and ending the discrimination and barriers that exist not just because of race, but also gender, disability, sexual orientation, religion, age and class.

Employment is central to the integration and participation of everyone in society and important in tackling poverty and social exclusion. We are all aware that BME groups, particularly those of Pakistani and Bangladeshi origin, have higher unemployment and lower pay than their white counterparts.

Government needs to develop targeted action and support for socially and economically disadvantaged people if we are to see real change in this country.

The Government also needs to wake up to the fact that racism and fascist views are gaining support this country and that they must take a leading role, along with Local Authorities, to combat these tensions by challenging the myths and misinformation by the press and far right-wing groups about migrant workers and asylum seekers. This fuels the support for BNP, poisons public opinion and leads to divisions in some poorer communities who should be united in campaigning for the end of poverty and social exclusion.

Additionally, an integrated approach is required across Government to progress on race equality in this country. In particular, there needs to be co-ordination around the policy initiatives that are being developed as a result of the Equalities Review Report and that of the Commission on Integration and Social Cohesion. We need a national action plan against racism with a co-ordination, consistent strategy, supported by BME communities, trade unions and voluntary organisations working for race equality. Local authorities would need to play a leading role in this strategy to ensure that action is co-ordinated at a local, community level.

We have waited long enough to race equality in this country and we must move forward now. We must unite to tackle racism. We must unite to end poverty and social exclusion. We must not allow communities to be divided for political aims.

alex
04 December 2007 at 08:53

Jihadi Bombers are Driven by promise of 'PARADISE 72' sensuous rewards-Is this not an open incentive for “ Genocide “ ?---

The motive is to gain the fabulous sensuous pleasures & Rewards ( 72 virgins & all luxuries etc for each & their families too ) promised in the KORAN. To know more about it refer to the celebrated PENGUIN translation of Koran by NJ Dawood, or detailed commentaries in Google/Wikipedia (Houri)/. See Chapters (Sura/Verses) 56/(12 to 40),55/( 52 to 68),55/ (72to-74), 76/ (12 to 22), .This is the easiest way for dropouts, drifters, idlers & the terminally ill to pass off in great glory as “Martyrs “ & also get rewards for their families who only rejoice & never mourn their death . Now even educated youths are being brainwashed to be martyrs by using newer methods like- food & gas poisoning, nuclear & germ warfare, aircraft sabotage, ship & train blasts,car bombing etc- to get these tempting sensuous rewards in Paradise.They are not misguided youth but educated & are DELIBERATELY doing so for the cause of Islam.Even one such fanatic out of a thousand is enough to cause great harm . All of them are unmarried,overnight become highly devout,grow beards & prepare for martydom. Most of them are silent members of ‘SLEEPER CELLS ‘ ready to act on their own, working secretly with even their closest relatives kept in the dark. ” ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS but ALL TERRORISTS are TURNING OUT TO BE MUSLIMS.” Is this not true ? Worldwide publicity should be given to this despicable hidden motive & the Radical Fundamentalist preachers must be made to condemn , denounce & deny these motives with banners & issue FATWAS -warning that their families will be outcasted , deported & lynched. They will never do it -as they are a party to it & actually exhort them in madrasas for Jihad and rejoice after the killings.Is this not an open incentive & call for Genocide ??? -Your comments please---

javK
19 July 2008 at 15:16

Ms Kelly

You and the British gov't are up to your old tricks learned whilst occupying Muslim lands during the colonialist days - creating new versions of Islam with lackeys and stooges who will do anything for money may have worked historically when Muslims were naive and unquestioning, but Ms Kelly, you forget that they have learned from your devious criminal activities, broken promises and treachery - which like any experienced criminal you repeat mercilessly.

The likes of MCB, SMC, Quilliam, Middleway etc are all seen as traitors, lackeys and stooges by the majority of Muslims (have a look at exposes on sites like www.islamic-considerations.blogspot.com or http://traditionalislamism.wordpress.com) - if they had the support of mainstream Muslims, they would not need larges sums of money from you or your FCO trips and media appearances whilst denying their opponents the same... all this will not help as the inevitable political changes for freedom and independance in the Muslim wolrd are unstoppable, no matter what stooges you send out there - hearts and minds can only be won by addressing the theology of Caliphate, Jihad, Ummah and Imaan which the Muslims believe in and which unite them. I think it is best to rethink your strategy...

Far better you engage directly with groups that reflect Muslim thought and sentiment than these phonies who will cause you, the US and us Muslims more problems in the long run.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?