Registered user login:

Working for Obama

Tommy Stadlen

Published 31 October 2008

In 2008, Barack Obama has brought politics to life for Generation Y. Here Tommy Stadlen explains what it felt like to be on the campaign trail and to meet the man himself

Tommy Stadlen (l) pictured with Barack Obama

“Show me a place where no-one cares about politics.” A skinny shop assistant hesitated before answering. “Keep heading straight down past 50th street.” Eyeing my distinctly pale skin and collared shirt with suspicion, she added, “Y’all sure you want to go down there?” Going past 50th street in West Philadelphia is about as sensible as a late-night jog in Central Park, circa 1980.

Being an enthusiastic Londoner enjoying my first day on the Obama campaign, I threw caution to the wind and pressed on. Misplaced confidence turned quickly to unease as the gentrified row-houses of University City gave way to Philadelphia’s ghetto. The early morning sun illuminated brazen drug deals carried out in defiance of a police force which seemed to hold no sway in this neighbourhood.

Unperturbed, I knocked on the door of a derelict bungalow. A few moments later the door was burst open by a muscle-bound young man reaching into a chest holster for his pistol. “I’m with Barack Obama’s Campaign For Change, are you, er, registered to vote?” an absurd voice inside me blurted out. A broad smile spread across the man’s face and, returning the Glock to its holster, he cheerfully explained that he had been expecting an angry visit from his drug dealer.

As I edged away from the porch in bewilderment, I heard something I could not quite believe. “You know man, Obama’s thinking on drilling is just not viable, y’understand? I mean, don’t doubt he has my vote – which of course I’m registered to make – but the energy plan needs a re-think. Feel me?”

This early August encounter speaks volumes for Barack Obama’s extraordinary impact on the lives of young Americans. It was a conversation that was to be repeated in different guises and mostly less dramatic circumstances throughout my summer on the Obama campaign.

At a party to celebrate the opening of the campaign’s Philadelphia office, I spoke to Andrea Perez, a Puerto Rican fundraiser for African development who had left her job to become a field organizer. I was surprised to hear Andrea, a tireless workhorse for the campaign, describe herself as “almost apolitical.” She explained, “before I move on with my African work, I have to make sure Obama is the next president – I can’t afford for him not to be.” In order for her dreams for Africa to be fulfilled, Obama in the White House is a necessity – and Andrea firmly believes that she has a role to play. In the same office I would watch Terrence Anderson, a streetwise baller from Los Angeles, say without a hint of sarcasm that he was here to “be the change he wanted to see in the world.”

When you think that Bush carried Florida, and with it the presidency, by a few hundred votes in 2000, you begin to understand the growing – if belated – belief among young Democrats that one person can make a difference. In only two weeks as an organizer I registered more new voters than it took for George W. to win the White House. But something else is at play in America, something really rather remarkable.

In the blink of an eye, it seems, young people across the West have grown a political conscience. This is the generation whose greatest political contribution to date has been the annual May Day anarchy demonstrations.

In fact, anarchy is a strong word in this context; apathy is a closer fit for a generation who just don’t care. Critically, America and Europe have failed in recent times to produce a leader with the ability to galvanise young people. Bush, Gore, Kerry, Chirac, Brown and the rest have been as easy to relate to as a convention of grumpy headmasters. And let’s face it, no self-respecting young person actually bought into Tony Blair’s ‘Cool Britannia’. Youth politics remained the preserve of the nerdy elite. Who did not wince at the excruciating film of William Hague’s address to the Tory party conference as a whiny Young Conservative?

Now, in 2008, Barack Obama has brought politics to life for Generation Y, from gun-toting gangsters to uninterested Puerto Ricans. In a pep-talk to campaign staffers on his first day as running mate, Senator Joe Biden remembered the summer of 1968, comparing his new boss to an old hero, Bobby Kennedy. Biden described on that conference call how Obama has touched a chord in young Americans in a way unheard of since JFK, the greatest charmer of them all.

By now I had moved on to the statewide headquarters, working as a policy advisor. The new job brought fewer guns but no less excitement. I ghostwrote op-eds and drafted Obama’s Economic Blueprint for Pennsylvania. I was at my desk by eight each morning, including Sundays, and rarely left before midnight.

Often the entire office crowded round the press department’s television. We cheered as Biden was introduced as the “scrappy kid from Scranton, Pennsylvania,” hissed when Sarah Palin shamelessly mocked community organisers, and cheered again as Biden veered off message to declare his wife “drop dead gorgeous.”

Occasionally, when things got tough, or just when he felt like it, our state director Craig Schirmer would bellow “blackjack, baby!” across the office. With 21 electoral college votes, Pennsylvania is the second most valuable swing state.

When Obama chose Western Pennsylvania as the first stop on his general election bus tour, I quickly reinvented myself as a press assistant. It was a chance to witness Obamania firsthand the day after his presidential nomination acceptance speech. Someone even asked me to prepare a brief for the senator on the local economy, little knowing that I can barely count, and probably think Freddie Mac is a cheeseburger.

Driving into Beaver, Pennsylvania – a conservative small town bettered in name only by its eastern counterpart, Intercourse – we passed block after block of locals patiently queuing to catch a glimpse of the man himself.

When the motorcade finally pulled into sight a toddler clutching a ‘Change We Can Believe In’ sign stamped her foot in delirium. “I saw O-Bama, I saw O-Bama!” As the senator worked the line, kissing babies and fist-bumping supporters, a teenaged girl grabbed me by the shoulder, screaming hysterically, “Oh. My. God. I just touched Barack Obama.”

Forget Kennedy, America hasn’t behaved like this since The Beatles.

After the speech – contrary to reports, he’s impressive on the stump without an autocue – I suddenly found myself alone in a room with the potential leader of the free world. The senator was relaxed, chuckling at the stereotype of European elitism. Improbably, Obama stole my closing remark: “Now you make sure we win this thing.” One to tell the grandchildren, if only it hadn’t happened in a place called Beaver.

Over the past 19 months, the Obama campaign has worked systematically through a check-list of ingredients required of a populist leader, including propagandistic iconography. LA street artist Shepherd Fairey is responsible for the ubiquitous image of Obama’s face gazing idealistically into the future above the word ‘HOPE’. Suitably epic, one imagines it emblazoned across T-shirts in Camden Market alongside the iconic Che Guevara portrait.

And here is the irony. While the hero-worship, the iconography and the sense of youthful revolution summon up the great leftwing ideologues of the twentieth century, from Lenin to Guevara, ‘ideology’ is a dirty word in the Obama camp. In The Audacity of Hope, Obama writes that “ideology…result[s] in inaction”; later, he praises Bill Clinton’s Third Way for tapping into “the nonideological attitude of the majority of Americans.”

Drafting talking points for local media outlets, I was instructed to stress Obama’s record of “reaching across party lines.” The Obama-Biden ticket is selling bipartisan compromise to a grateful audience of idealistic young Democrats.

So how does a man who preaches compromise and realism, a politician who identifies with Reagan more than with Carter, get the girls screaming and the organizers organizing?

It is the philosophy that allows a twenty-one year old from West London a position as a policy advisor.

It is neither Obama's enviable good looks, nor his undeniable elegance – though these do him no harm.

His success is based upon his ability to persuade America’s youth that he does exactly what he says on the tin: ‘Change We Can Believe In.’ Or more precisely, ‘Change We Can Be A Part Of’ is the message that has energised young people from Berlin to Beaver and given Obama a shot at the White House.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

16 comments from readers

FredClough
31 October 2008 at 16:53

A very insightful read.

As a young American, i can say this guy has really hit the nail on the head with this piece. I was lucky enough to meet Joe Biden this summer, and this writer has captured exactly what vibe i got from the great man!!

rabdocketrrty
31 October 2008 at 16:57

I really like the comparisons this guy has made between British politics and the Obama campaign trail.

A refreshing view on our neighbours over the pond.

Go OBAMA!!

isaac32767
31 October 2008 at 17:14

I think Mr. Stadlen has interpreted his encounter with that Philly gangsta exactly backwards. I take the man's surprising opinions about energy policies as a symptom of a generation that's become a voracious consumer of online news and information. Obama, himself a notorious online junkie, has simply been the right candidate for this rising Internet democracy.

McCain, by contrast, doesn't even know how to send email. And all the experienced Democratic pols Obama defeated for the nomination, while more technically clueful, were not that much better at coping with this new model of citizen interaction.

coolpillow
31 October 2008 at 19:37

Don't believe the polls.

Don't believe the media or the pundits.

I was undecided until the Obama camp started "strong arm" tactics- like investigating Joe the Plumber, TV shows "cut off" from the Obama campaign, reporters whose newspapers came out for McCain- get thrown off the Obama place.

ENOUGH.

He will be a dictator like Hugo Chavez.

Too much baggage, too many questionable radical associations- plus he wants to re-write the Constitution. All the while- Pelosi and Reid and HIM?

No way.

Nobama

McCain-Palin 2008

BCalthorp
01 November 2008 at 04:36

Mr. Stadlen has expressed exactly why Obama offers a vital change in direction for America and the western world. This is not about youth, or rockstar appeal, or refreshing racial equality. All those things are exciting. But it's about a leader who believes in getting things done. Enough with the Washington bickering, enough with the political points scoring. America and the UK need someone who is problem solver. Great article -gets to the heart of why Obama is a must in 2008.

TJ
01 November 2008 at 05:20

One "icing on the cake" reason to vote for Obama is:

look who likes McCain: the same "red state" America

that gave us Bush-not once, but twice. Gore was such

a slam-dunk, no brainer better choice than Bush that it

wasn't even funny. I could go on (and on) about red

state America, but I'd go past 2000 characters. Bottom

line: they ain't MY America. What gets me about

diehard republicans is the continual yapping about

"liberals"-"tax and spend variety" as well. Well, Bush

and "the conservatives" just gave us the biggest deficit

in the history of the world- far beyond what "the

liberals" (like Gore !?) EVER would have done- in fact

Gore would have given us a surplus, for sure-as did

Clinton. Incredible. I've got no problem with Pelosi (or

most other reps. from Calif.) or Reid at all. As for "the

big bad liberals" what's this "liberal vs. conservative"

thing the red state types love to yap about anyway? -

Give me a break. "Conservative" to me means "the

rich and their lobbyists" trying to conservative-at all

costs- what they got and the status quo. This "coddle

the rich" jazz is bogus-yeah, maybe then they'll "trickle

down" some good stuff to middle America.Well they

had things just the way they wanted it under Bush-and

look what just "trickled down" from "the rich" via Wall

St. now ! Dig this concept: the better middle class

America does, the more will trickle EVERYWHERE:

down to poorer America and UP to richer America -as

the middle class buys more items and services, of all

types, from the companies OWNED by "rich America".

Something is wrong (very) with the concept of "make

everything great for rich America, at all costs, 'cause

that's the only way the rest of the country can thrive".

Another good reason to go with Obama is that he will

no doubt put great people in his administration- as

opposed to Jackass George Bush. People on the

cutting edge of green tech. will be heard and

welcome-as well as Gore. Maybe finally REAL

progress will return to the country.

Cybertiger
01 November 2008 at 11:21

@TJ

"... the same "red state" America that gave us Bush-not once, but twice. Gore was such a slam-dunk, no brainer better choice than Bush that it wasn't even funny."

"Ignorant politicians are elected by ignorant people": it's Democracy, stupid! I like George Monbiot's take on stupid America in his recent 'The Triumph of Ignorance' article,

http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2008/10/28/the-triumph-of-ig...

PS. It was the SCOTUS that gave Bush to the world, and it was Sandra Day O'Connor, one of the stupidest of the 'Nine' wot really did it. A wonder to behold: the selection of Bush was truly 'idiot' democracy in action. Glory be!

cynthia
01 November 2008 at 17:42

Very interesting take on how Obama has managed to run a campaign based on HOPE whilst being particularly pragmatic and non-ideological.

paulo
01 November 2008 at 18:47

"He will be a dictator like Hugo Chavez." I do hope so. That's what America needs. ("coolpiiow". ) I do hope so. That's what America needs.

Paulo

JaneDoe
02 November 2008 at 15:52

As a young American, I feel this article is very

misleading.

I was never excited or even cared for Obama. What

really got me going is the way our country has been

handled and treated over the past couple decades.

We are just headed for a giant down hill path that will

only lead us to moral destruction and chaos.

However, when Obama came along and shared some

of the same views thats what made me a supporter.

Nothing else, just a supporter.

sweety
03 November 2008 at 01:12

One year's hence and most people will look at the Bush Presidency as a lost golden age!

Vinod Nikhra
03 November 2008 at 11:37

Being a person from outside USA, I have only a passing interest in the US Election Game 2008. Mr Obama seems an energetic and smart choice. More so, his rise endorses the fact that USA has got a milieu which is favorable to talented people. Here, a person with a disadvantaged birth, name and background may rise to contest and probably win the Presidentship.

Mr. Stadlen has written well for Mr. Obama's dream and vision.

mitchy
03 November 2008 at 13:29

@ Sweety: Somehow I sincerely doubt that - I think most of the planet will be glad to see the back of f**kwit dubbya. We can only hope his nasty cronies will follow him - to the gallows...

FreedomLand
04 November 2008 at 05:54

In remembering Obama's white grandmother who passed away today, she was one reason why Obama could confidently challenge the white establishment instead of pandering to it. The other was that he was raised outside the USA.

The same kind of oppression of racial minorities exists in other Western countries today. In the end, everyone has to stand up for themselves but, ultimately, we all suffer the same domestic problems, black or white or whatever. That is finally becoming obvious in America if not in Europe, Canada, Australia, etc. Our governments are shortchanging us and blame-shifting things onto ethnic minorities.

milesdavis
04 November 2008 at 14:18

The reality is that vacuous statements like change and hope can mean anything to anyone.Its a sensible approach if you are part of the advertising industry for it recognises the disconnect between the people and their institutions ( the Nazis used it and Regan mastered it).Simple words continually reinforced begin to look glamorous and attract people. Obama looks good and delivers well -but where is the content/.

What are we going to get next - because you are worth it! what happens when the euphoria ends?

nice to see you in print / best

kameel

omarali50
04 November 2008 at 20:34

The first results (which do not actually count in the electoral college) are in:

Obama has won the territory of Guam (West of the dateline, so one day ahead of the rest of the country).

Obama 62%

McCain 37%

Barr 0.65% (212 votes out of 32,272)

This territory voted 2-1 for Bush in 2004( maybe because of a lot of military people living there?).

I think it will be a landslide.

I was volunteering for a couple of hours this morning and we were getting out the vote in a lower-middle class African American neighbourhood in Milwaukee. Almost every house we went to, the adults had already voted. AND they thanked us profusely for taking the trouble to walk around their neighbourhood and the "Bless yous" would have melted your heart. Wisconsin for Obama by close to ten points....I have never seen such grass roots enthusiasm in an American election.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should the international community intervene in Gaza?