Our only hope is to talk

Israel must speak to the Palestinians: it is the sole strategy by which Israelis themselves will fin

Like the pairs of foxes in the biblical story of Samson, tied together by the tail with a flaming torch between them, we and the Palestinians are dragging each other into disaster, despite our disparate strength, and even when we try very hard to separate. And as we do, we burn the other who is bound to us, our double, our nemesis, ourselves.

So, in the midst of the wave of nationalist invective now seeping Israel, it would not hurt to keep in mind that this latest military operation in Gaza is, when all is said and done, just one more way-station on a road paved with fire and violence and hatred. On this road you sometimes win and you sometimes lose, but it leads in the end to ruin.

As we Israelis rejoice at how this campaign has rectified Israel's military failures in the Second Lebanon War, we should listen to the voice that says that the Israel Defence Forces' achievements are not indubitable proof that Israel was right to set out on an operation of such huge proportions; it certainly does not justify the way our army pursued its mission. The IDF's achievements confirm only that Israel is much stronger than Hamas, and that under certain circumstances it can be very tough and cruel.

But when the operation ends completely, and when the magnitude of the killing and devastation become apparent to all, perhaps Israeli society will, for a brief moment, put a hold on its sophisticated mechanisms of repression and self-righteousness. And then perhaps a lesson of some sort will get etched into Israeli consciousness. Maybe then we will finally understand something deep and fundamental - that our conduct here in this region has, for a long time, been flawed, immoral and unwise. In particular, it time and again fans the flames that consume us.

The Palestinians cannot be absolved of culpability for their errors and crimes. To do so would be to show contempt and condescension towards them, as if they were not rational adults responsible for each of their mistakes and oversights. True, the inhabitants of the Gaza Strip were in large measure "strangled" by Israel, but they, too, had other options, other ways of voicing and displaying their plight. Firing thousands of rockets at innocent civilians in Israel was not the only choice they had. We must not forget that. We must not be forgiving of the Palestinians, as if it goes without saying that when they are in distress, their almost automatic response must be violence.

But even when the Palestinians act with reckless belligerence - with suicide bombings and Qassam missiles - Israel, which is many times stronger than they are, has tremendous power to control the level of violence in the conflict as a whole. As such, it can also have a profound influence on calming the conflict and extricating both sides from its cycle of violence. This most recent military action indicates that there does not seem to be anyone in the Israeli leadership who grasps that.

After all, the day will come when we will want to try to heal the wounds that we have just now inflicted. How can that day come if we do not understand that our military might cannot be our principal tool for establishing our presence here, opposite and with the Arab nations? How can that day come if we do not grasp the gravity of the responsibility imposed on us by our fateful ties and connections, past and future, with the Palestinian nation in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and in Israel itself?

When the clouds of coloured smoke clear - the smoke of the politicians' declarations of comprehensive, decisive victory, when we realise what this operation has really achieved, and how large the gap is between those declarations and what we really need to know in order to live a normal life in this region; when we acknowledge that an entire nation eagerly hypnotised itself, because it needed so badly to believe that Gaza would cure its Lebanon malady - then we can turn our attention to those who time and again have incited Israeli society's hubris and euphoria of power. To those who have, for so many years, taught us to scorn the belief in peace, and any hope for any change at all in our relations with the Arabs. To those who have persuaded us that the Arabs understand only force, and that we thus can speak to them only in that language. Since we have spoken that way to them so often, and only that way, we have forgotten that there are other languages that can be used to speak with other human beings, even enemies, even enemies as bitter as Hamas - languages that are mother tongues to us, the Israelis, no less than the language of the airplane and the tank.

To talk to the Palestinians. That must be the central conclusion we reach from this last, bloody round of war. To talk even with those who do not recognise our right to exist here. Instead of ignoring Hamas now, it would be best to take advantage of the new situation and enter into a dialogue, in order to enable an accommodation with the Palestinian people as a whole. To talk, in order to understand that reality is not just the hermetically-sealed story that we and the Palestinians have been telling ourselves for generations, the story that we are imprisoned within, no small part of which consists of fantasies, wishes, and nightmares. To talk in order to devise, within this opaque, unhearing reality, an opportunity for speech, for that alternative, so scorned and forlorn today, for which, in the tempest of war, there is almost no place, no hope, no believers.

To talk as a well-considered strategy, to initiate dialogue, to insist on speech, to talk to the wall, to talk even if it seems fruitless. In the long term, this stubbornness may do more, far more, for our future than hundreds of airplanes dropping bombs on a city. To talk out of the understanding, born of the recent horrors we have seen, that the destruction we, each people in its own way, are able to cause each other is a huge and corrupting force. If we surrender to it and its logic, it will, in the end, destroy us all.

To talk, because what has taken place in the Gaza Strip during the past three weeks places before us, in Israel, a mirror that reflects us a face that would horrify us, were we to gaze on it for one moment from the outside, or if we were to see it on another nation. We would understand that our victory is no real victory, and that the war in Gaza has not brought us any healing in that place where we desperately need a cure.

David Grossman is an Israeli author and film-maker

32 comments

sam the pantisocratist1's picture

Also Bob:

Henry Siegman offers an interesting update to recent events:

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n02/sieg01_.html

Hope this helps.

sam the pantisocratist1's picture

Bob:

In your case 'tight' may be a very apposite use of language.

sam the pantisocratist1's picture

Also Bob:

Before taking on the mantle of the Middle East Peace Envoy perhaps Perry Anderson's background filler would help you get up to speed:

http://www.newleftreview.org/?page=article&view=2330

Riaz Ahmad's picture

Israel has only one option, just peace and coexistence with the independent state for the Palestinians or a second exodus for the Israelis in 50 to 100 years time. They are living in tiny land surrounded by a sea of Arabs. There is already a power shift from the west to east. The days of western and Israeli arrogance and injustice are truly numbered. I would hate the Jews of Israel to lose their homeland once again; every race has a natural and undisputed right to their home land to live in peace and prosperity. The Zionist's in their greed are a threat to long term security and existence of Israel. What was done by an arrogant power with injustice and brute force will one day get undone by another arrogant power with injustice and brute force. Today the west is strong and arrogant, the Arabs weak and divided, but Christmas has never lasted for ever for any one in history. Peace to the world.

Ari Rusila's picture

If some ethnic groups hate each other and when both can base their views and claims to selected parts of hundreds or thousands of years so basically there only two peaceful solutions: to train tolerance for generations developing same time living conditions or separate the groups by ethnic lines. Balkans have long experience about the second option.

Recent history has examples of population movements also outside Balkans. After WWII Germans moved e.g. from Poland inside new borders. Finland settled some 10 % of its population from territories occupied by the Soviet Union, which from its side transferred new population to new regions. (More in my article http://arirusila.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/gaza-war-could-balkan-history-...)

In this never ending story it was very refreshing to read an article of John R. Bolton published in Washington post 5th Jan. 2009. Instead of empty statements and dead road maps he is proposing “The Three-State Option”, where Gaza is returned to Egyptian control and the West Bank in some configuration reverts to Jordanian sovereignty.

I agree with Mr. Bolton about three-state solution and would like to see it a bit further developed by making a buffer zone between Israel and hardliners in Gaza. From my point of view the best way to do this is to relocate population from Gaza some 50-100 km SW to Sinai. (More in my article http://arirusila.wordpress.com/2009/01/06/the-three-state-option-could-s...)

Emptying Gaza by internationally agreed and financed population movement is brutal and immoral action but what is the alternative – continuing wars, intifadas and human catastrophe forever - more dead road maps? It is pragmatic solution, good planning is needed so that new settlements are made sustainable way with possibility to various economical activities and implementation must be effective backed with sufficient financial resources for infrastructure, housing and logical socio-economical development programs.

writeon's picture

Ari,

Bolton is bonkers. He is advocating ethnic cleansing on a massive scale and the destruction of the last remaining areas of Palestine and an attempt to make the Palestionians vanish from history. This would be fine for Israel, they would effectively control all of Palestine, but somehow I don't believe the Palestinians will ever agree to a 'solution' that is so grossly immoral, brutal and illegal in international law. Why should the Palestinians, who are, after all, the majority ethnic group in Palestine/Israel give up their homeland and democractic rights, just because Israel is, for the time being, militarily superior?

What bonkers Bolton is really taking about isn't a three state solution at all, but a one state solution. And that's a Greater Israel that controls the entire area of Palestine and has effectively wiped it off the map.

But what about the Palestinians, can they be wiped away too? 4.2 million in Gaza and the West Bank, 2.6 million in refugge camps, 1.5 million spread around the world, 1.4 million inside Israel. That's over 9 million Palestinians. Bonkers Bolton is living in a Zionist dreamworld, which is, of course, a nightmare world for the Palestinians. No, my guess is, that the territory that was taken by force, will eventually be taken back by force.

ikotubo's picture

Yes, Israel should speak to the Palestinians. As if Israel itself is listening. And why should they, when they enjoy so much support from the EU and the Americans?

jednightingale's picture

The EU, UN and Western nations have to impress upon the Hamas government that they cannot expect to have a blank check on repairing the damages created by wars with Israel. Whether Israel over reacted or not, the Hamas rocketing of civilian population centers in Southern Israel should be forbidden. The Hamas government has to be informed that the money earmarked for reparation and humanitarian aid will be contingent on their attitude to enter negotiations with Israel, renouncing their call for the destruction of Israel, and stopping the rocket attacks on Israel. If they refuse to commit themselves to these measures, then aid should be restricted and it should be used instead somewhere else in the world that is in need of such funds.

Jed Nightingale
new York

Forlornehope1's picture

One conclusion from Gaza has to be that no Palestinian with an ounce of sense will accept a two state solution on any basis acceptable to Israel. For quite understandable reasons, Israel will insist on controlling the borders and airspace of such a state. The first terrorist attack against an Israeli settlement within its borders and Israel will attack. A truly independent state would be bristling with anti-aircraft missiles, but of course Israel would never allow that, so it will be defenceless. All a two state agreement will do is give Israel the advantages of being an occupying power with no need to fulfil the responsibilities.

writeon's picture

As a neutral and objective outside observer, don't laugh! I am sickened by all this killing and desruction. It's all too much. Israel is just too strong militarily for its own good. It's turning into a modern version of Sparta or Prussia, and states like this have a tendancy to eventually produce a countervailing power to take them on, as surely as night follows day.

What's a true friend? Is a true friend someone who lies to you when you're going off the rails, or is it really someone who dares to tell you the truth, pull you up and make you think about the road you're on?

As by far the strongest part in this conflict Israel has the initiative, and it would be wise to use it, before things really get out of hand.

Jimmy Carter, in his new book, spells out the future for Israel. Israel can't be un-created, neither can Israel ignore where it is situated geographically. Israel is tempeted at the moment to attempt the de facto one state solution, that is control of all the land from the Jordan to the sea, including all the Palestinians that live there. There are now around 300,000 Jewish settlers on the West Bank, virtually surrounding the Palestinian enclaves. This is a fact on the ground that the nationalist/religious movement believes will mean eventually lead to Israel annexing the entire area.

But what about the Palestinians? Do they become citizens of Israel or does one deny them equal civil rights and the right to vote, or does one attempt to expell them somehow? If one gives them full democratic rights inside Greater Israel, in a decade or two they will be the largest ethnic group, then what happens? What happens to the Zionist dream if Israel has a Palestinian majority? What happens to Israel's character as a Jewish state?

So there isn't just a demographic timebomb ticking away, there's also a democratic timebomb.

The one state, Greater Israel, solution is a nightmare for everyone involved. It will lead to the destabilisation of the entire region.

Latest tweets