Registered user login:

A belief in science

Icki Iqbal

Published 29 May 2007

Icki Iqbal, suffers from Parkinson’s disease and gives his point of view on why embryonic stem cell research should be encouraged.

I was diagnosed with Parkinson’s three years ago. Parkinson’s is a progressive, neurological condition, which is currently incurable although it can be managed well with medication. Being a laid back person, I took this diagnosis in my stride, but my wife was absolutely devastated at first. We’ve both had to come to terms with it in our own ways pretty quickly though, we know how important it is for me to keep physically and mentally active to keep living as normal a life as possible, for as long as possible.

My diagnosis came after I went to my GP with two unconnected problems, I had a tremor down my right side (which is the symptom most people will associate with Parkinson’s), and my voice was becoming increasingly inaudible. I was referred to a neurologist who diagnosed Parkinson’s and told me the speech problem was connected to that.

Having Parkinson’s influenced my decision to retire from full-time employment, but it’s the little things that have made the biggest difference really.

I’ve been to language therapy classes, which have been a big help, but my voice often still lacks volume, which can cause problems socially and in business meetings. I have less power in my legs so my driving speed is slower. And Parkinson’s affects the fine motor skills, so everything I do, from doing up a button, to putting on a seat belt, takes longer than it used to.

However there is no reason why early Parkinson’s should deter you from leading an active life. I am a non-executive director of a pension fund, Governor of a school. I am also involved in a couple of start up insurance operations and am writing a novel. Staying mentally active has been easy; ensuring adequate exercise has been harder.

My Parkinson’s symptoms are managed by drugs at the moment, and this is very effective – I’m lucky that my symptoms haven’t progressed too far yet. But of course I would like there to be a cure, to know that I don’t have to live with this condition for the rest of my life.

I got involved with the Parkinson’s Disease Society’s Research Network earlier this year because I wanted to find out more about research in Parkinson’s – there’s so much research being done, both in terms of long-term treatments and cures, as well as things that are going to help people live better in the short term.

I’m a great believer in science and I do believe that scientists will eventually discover what causes Parkinson’s and how to prevent it; it’s just a matter of time.

Stem cell research is one area of science that has attracted a lot of interest in recent years, and the reports that have come back so far are quite exciting. Stem cells are unspecialised cells that have the ability to develop into different types of cells, such as nerve, brain, blood, skin, etc. Because they are so versatile, scientists hope that they can be used to repair and renew cells in the brain lost in neurological conditions, such as Parkinson’s.

There are several different ways to get stem cells that can be used for this kind of medical research, including, from early embryos, from blood cells taken from umbilical cords at birth, and from bone marrow. Embryonic stem cells are the most effective for research purposes. Because of this, and the shortage of alternatives, these cells are the ones Parkinson’s research is concentrating on.

I know there are ethical arguments against the use of embryonic stem cells and I do sympathise with pro-life campaigners, but there is no loss of life involved here. Without using embryonic stem cells, there simply wouldn’t be enough stem cells available for this research. And without this research the hope of a cure for Parkinson’s in my lifetime would look increasingly distant. If this kind of research helps discover preventative cures for conditions like Parkinson’s, then it should be encouraged.

There are many different avenues of research being pursued at the moment and I believe it’s important that the current systematic approach is continued to allow the 120,000 people with Parkinson’s in the UK, including myself, to continue to hope.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

6 comments from readers

St Okney Wington
29 May 2007 at 11:44

Stem cell research is for the good of everyone. Playing russion roulette with your kidneys on national television, now THAT is an outrage!

james.m.k
29 May 2007 at 18:10

Science does not require belief, only proof.

Embryonic stem-cell research does not cause abortion, any more than organ donation causes doctors to not treat patients.

anthonyozimic
30 May 2007 at 15:26

Dear james.m.k, Neither do I require belief, only proof, and science proves that human life begins at conception. Extracting stem cells from an embryo kills that embryo, whereas organ donation does not kill the donor (usually, though there have been cases where donors have been killed by the premature removal of essential organs because they were deemed wrongly to have died).

gnuneo
30 May 2007 at 16:13

i would like to recommend a couple of clips from the show babylon 5 (even sci-fi can show truths!).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlnpjooamAQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztww-_9mtIQ

although it is not 'immortality' that is the goal of stem cell research, the principle surely stands.

peace.

Lochain
30 May 2007 at 16:38

There are not only ethical arguments against embryonic stem cell research, there are practical ones as well. Proponents of embryonic stem cell research hold out tantalising promises of cures being around the corner for everything from Parkinson's to Alzheimer's; in 1990 when embryonic research was first mooted, cures were said to be 10 -15 years away, today, 17 years later, they are still reported as being 10 -15 years away. In the mean time more than 1,200 trials and 70 diseases and conditions have been successfully treated with adult stem cells some from umbilical cord blood, some from the patient's own bone marrow, nasal cells and so on. In fact, there is a man, Dennis Turner, in the U.S.A. who had treatment for his Parkinson's ( which he'd had for some ten years) which involved using his own neural cells which left him symptom- free for four years during which he went on safari to Africa and was chased up a tree by a Rhino! His symptoms have returned now but it's encouraging that adult stem cell treatment gave him some respite. Prof. Geoffrey Raisman, Director of the Spinal Repair Unit at University College, London has also discovered promising cells in the nasal cavity where the nerve fibres are in a continuous state of growth throughout adult life; he, too is very excited about the potential of this adult stem cell research in repairing spinal injury. Both these examples can be followed up on the web. Why are we not pouring money into adult stem cell research instead of clinging to research which has not delivered on its promises and involves the destruction of human beings, albeit embryonic ones.

I do not understand how people find it possible to trace their own individual life history back to the moment of fertilisation and then deny that in using the human embryo we are using human beings.

Here, in adult stem cell research we have not only ethical alternatives to embryonic stem cell research but also evidence of successful treatments which are not dogged by the formation of aggressive teratomas ( a kind of cancer) as embryonic stem cells are.

Pauline Gately
31 May 2007 at 12:37

Dear Mr Iqbal,

I remember your name from my long-gone pre-family days in the actuarial profession (although we never met) and I am very sorry to hear your news. May you long thrive!

However, Your assertion that no life is lost comes from nowhere and is patently untrue, as is your assertion that without embyronic stem cells there "simply wouldn't be enough stem cells". What? Surely there are ample sources of ethical stem cells.

I would agree with Lochain: Your best realistic hope Is adult stem cell research and you would be well advised to switch your support and campaigning to that. The emphasis on embryonic stem cell research in the light of the evidence to date is inexplicable.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Icki Iqbal (62) is a retired actuary from Surrey. He was diagnosed with Parkinson’s three years ago and has since become involved with the Parkinson’s Disease Society’s Research Network. This is a group made up of interested and non-expert members who review research projects seeking funding from the Society to assess their benefit for people living with the condition.

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?