Registered user login:

Catching Karadzic

Misha Glenny

Published 24 July 2008

How did one of Europe's most wanted men give the security forces the slip for so long? Because the Serbs didn't need to seize him until now

Looking a little like God in a Cecil B DeMille film, Radovan Karadzic was genuinely unrecognisable when he was arrested on a Belgrade bus last Monday evening. Yet even more astonishing was the news that he had been working as a crystal-rubbing therapist promoting well-being to audiences around Serbia. The killer as New Age healer - you couldn't make it up.

Several people who came into regular contact with Dragan David Dabic were clearly shocked to discover that he was in fact Karadzic. "It never occurred to me," said Goran Kojic, editor of Belgrade's Healthy Life magazine, who explained that Dabic had referred to himself as "a researcher in psychology and bioenergy". As recently as May, he made a public appearance as a therapist at a health festival, lecturing on "How to Enhance One's Own Bioenergies".

That was clearly the secret: do something so wildly ludicrous, grow an outrageous amount of facial hair, and you can give all those security forces the slip.

Er . . . not quite. The most perceptive comment in the wake of Karadzic's arrest was offered by Zlatko Lagumdzija, leader of Bosnia's Social Democratic Party. "It would appear," he observed, "that the state has decided to deal with Karadzic. The same state had earlier decided on the arrest of Slobodan Milosevic. This proves that Serbia has a strong state."

Lagumdzija knows Serbia is not a tinpot republic as caricatured in Tintin books. It has a developed infrastructure and its intelligence services are among the best-informed in Europe. The implication is clear: until now, Serbia was blocking the arrest of Karadzic.

Why has that changed? The short answer is that Serbia wants to curry favour with the European Union. In longhand, this is the culmination of a sophisticated and complex political operation by President Boris Tadic.

Early this year, the US and most EU states recognised the independence of Kosovo. The timing could hardly have been worse, as Serbia was scheduled to have presidential elections soon after and Tadic was under serious pressure from his main opponent, Tomislav Nikolic, the ultra-nationalist chief of the Serbian Radical Party, the country's largest political party.

Thus, in his campaign, President Tadic had to explain to the electorate why the people should vote for his pro-European orientation when the major European powers were engaged in stripping the country of part of its territory. Whether Kosovo should be independent was not at issue: but the timing and manner of the process was extremely badly handled by the EU and the US.

As if this wasn't enough, the Dutch government then announced it would block Serbia's continued progress towards EU accession until it handed over the two most wanted indictees to The Hague, Karadzic and General Ratko Mladic. With friends like the EU, Tadic needed no enemies in Serbia. With a huge effort, he defeated Nikolic in the presidential poll. But, like some Greek hero, he was confronted with an even more monstrous opponent as soon as he had slain the first.

Vojislav Kostunica was one of the great symbols of the movement that overthrew Slobodan Milosevic in 2000. As Tadic and his Democratic Party were suffering the blows administered by a divided European Union, Kostunica was cosying up to the Russians and offering Serbs a very different future. The delicate parliamentary coalition that bound the two men collapsed in the spring. So, after the presidential elections, the nationalist and pro-European coalitions squared up for their latest showdown.

Kostunica switched partners from the Demo crats to the nationalist Radicals. The Dutch continued to refuse any negotiations with Serbia on an interim trade agreement, and elsewhere the EU was exhorting nations around the world to recognise Kosovo. In addition, the media in Europe and the United States continued to characterise Serbia as a bastion of unreconstructed nationalism.

When the vote came, the Serb electorate proved everyone wrong by giving a much larger portion of seats to the pro-European forces. Despite US ignorance, EU blundering, Russia's manipulation over Kosovo and Kostunica's switch, the Serbs rejected a nationalist solution.

The situation remained on a knife edge as neither nationalists nor pro-Europeans could form a government. The decisive party in the middle was the Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS), Slobodan Milosevic's creation. At first, Kostunica wooed the SPS intensely but then Tadic's wit and the international community weighed in. An almighty back-channel effort was made to persuade the SPS that its future lay not in its nationalist, dic tatorial past but in becoming a modern social-democratic party. Washington, Berlin, London, Paris and then, decisively, George Papandreou, the Greek opposition leader and president of the Socialist International, convinced the SPS it should move towards Europe.

And it worked. As soon as the coalition was formed, Tadic lost no time in dismantling the obstacles to Karadzic's arrest, including pensioning off Kostunica's ruthless ally Rade Bulatovic, head of the intelligence agency.

History will acknowledge Tadic's great achievement in arresting Karadzic. But we may never learn of the many others who have been working tirelessly behind the scenes to ensure the Tadic strategy worked.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

20 comments from readers

raggedyman
24 July 2008 at 12:47

Mr Glenny:

In Piers Brendon's epic book on the inter-war years he describes the 1930s as a 'particularly low and dishonest decade'. If there is a decade that can be considered even lower and more dishonest it must surely be the 1990s - the decade that gave us Gulf War I, Rwanda & the Congolese conflicts, and the Balkan quagmire. But what distinguishes the 1990s in particular is the rise to dominance of 'informational warfare' - a component of modern warfare that has begun to outstrip conventional military warfare in terms of its importance. The growing cruciality of this form of warfare, which we may call the 'informational battlezone', especially within liberal democracies is also reflected in terms of the sums now being allocated by Governments to it from their defense budgets. It is a media war and the manipulation of mass-opinion that the 1990s in particular seems to have distilled into a new mature & sophisticated form.

I was, therefore, rather surprised to be listening to you expressing your optimistic views on the capture of Karadzic on that bastion of independent reporting - the BBC's Today Programme.

After your all too brief comments the programme went on to compare Karadzic to Goebbels and had a lengthy interview with a former inmate of the Serbian 'concentration camps'. At one point the presenter asks if the 'concentration camp' he was in was the one that 'we all remember the pictures of'. The respondent replied with an unequivocal yes. The presenter pauses at this point as if to let his listenership fully digest this dramatic revelation.

The pictures we all remember...

I won't insult your intelligence by going into the controversy that has since surrounded those 'pictures'. My real question is - do you think the presenter of the Today Programme and his editorial team new of their controversial history when he asked that question? I would respectfully suggest that if they didn't then they must have been living the past few years with their heads up a camel's wotsit.

I have read your detailed study of the history of the Balkans with special emphasis on the rise of nationalism and the meddling of the Great Powers.

Your chapter dealing with the 'vortex' of the 1990s is instructive and even-handed. You seem to think that pusillanimity of the Americans over troop committment was a big factor in the failure of an early mediated solution.

Do you think the fact that Tudjman was heroised by the west or at least absolved; and the fact that many Bosnian-Muslims have been at worst let off lightly by the ICC; and the fact that many Serbian military & political leaders by contrast have been turned into modern-day Nazis is going to leave the Serbian community feeling gratified that justice this day has been served?

And is this determinedly one-sidedness likely to be the blueprint that will enable us to now draw a line and move forward to a stable, peaceful, and prosperous future?

Your book seems to make it clear that the 'choosing of sides' by the meddling powers in the 1990s helped to make the Balkans an intractable quagmire & a protracted disaster. Is the ICC and its prosecutions not reflective of the continuity of this meddling and in the circumstances unlikely to be seen as a genuine dispenser of justice. And it is in particular the 'perception' here that really matters I would suggest.

knave
24 July 2008 at 19:48

Do you think the fact that Tudjman was heroised by the west or at least absolved;

I agree and is the point on a different thread.

Had Tuđman had lived longer, he may have been brought up on war crimes charges by the UN war crimes tribunal in The Haguebut I doubt it because of his powerful friends.

Graham Blewitt, a senior Tribunal prosecutor, told the Agence France Presse wire service that "There would have been sufficient evidence to indict president Tuđman had he still been alive." [

The Tribunal's indictment of Croatian general Ante Gotovina lists Tuđman as a key participant in a "joint criminal enterprise" aimed at the "permanent removal of the Serb population from the Krajina region by force, fear or threat of force, persecution, forced displacement, transfer and deportation, appropriation and destruction of property and other means."

This rarely makes the news and the reason is simple.

Economic. The croats embraced liberal economics and therefore their crimes were absolved.

Tudjman was the Pinochet of Europe.

As long as you had a Privatisation programme

Tuđman initiated the process of privatization and de-nationalization in Croatia. However, this was far from transparent and fully legal but was welcomed by the west politicians and journalists

gnuneo
25 July 2008 at 05:11

it is a jo that the NS has a now a comment facility, for the quality of much commenting is exceptional, and adds much to the articles. Excellent.

gnuneo
25 July 2008 at 05:11

"joy"

Douglas Chalmers
25 July 2008 at 07:08

"...a crystal-rubbing therapist promoting well-being to audiences around Serbia. The killer as New Age healer..."

Does the NHS know about this? Maybe it will be their next far-out excuse to attack homeopaths and chiropractors?

Jonty Stang
25 July 2008 at 11:58

One has to wonder whether the Dutch government's keen demands that the Serbs play ball over the criminals is driven by a sense of (well-earned) guilt over Srebranica. They actually gave those soldiers medals!

knave
25 July 2008 at 14:36

I didn't see you on TV defending the poor sods

Jonty Stang
25 July 2008 at 16:32

Er, is that aimed at me? I wasn't, as Ifar as I can recall, in the Dutch army at the time...

gnuneo
25 July 2008 at 18:18

"Does the NHS know about this? Maybe it will be their next far-out excuse to attack homeopaths and chiropractors?"

lolz - considering vegetarians are still informed that Hitler was a vegetarian, this seems more than possible! ;)

knave
25 July 2008 at 19:27

Hitler was not a vegetarian.

He enjoyed meat but had terrible flatulence and therefore had to have a large number of veg in his diet.

gnuneo
26 July 2008 at 03:22

wow, really??

heh, thanks for that. :)

knave
26 July 2008 at 06:35

No thank you to the amazing and brilliant Mr Fry and the greatest programme ever QI.

raggedyman
26 July 2008 at 12:56

Knave:

The virtuoso of the Big Lie; Hitler the trickster.

"A virtuoso is to be worshipped as our leader/mock God and with whom and to whom the self is identified. He is us. Unsere Adolf."

Hitler the vegetarian like Hitler the ascetic was a fictive construct of Goebbels the propagandist who, in turn, was a great admirer of the British. Who else but the British could have invented the BBC for example.

But the modernism of the Hitlerian tricksiness is ever with us even now thoroughly normalised within our culture.

What more fraudulent medium is there than television?

It makes men into gods, or rather, Demigods. It manufactures a 'celebrocracy' far removed from its proletarianised audience. It turns the young into 'wannabes'; not wannabe writers or thinkers or poets mind you but wannabe 'celebrities'. But celebrated for what exactly? That it would seem is of only incidental importance.

The moving images of television are an insidious illusion and the most shameless seducer of our sensibilities. It is a daily administered anesthetic. An encourager of passivity and a soporific. In fact it is now the Big Lie that festers at the heart of our moribund culture.

Here, Knave, I offer you the following cautionary tale:

By chance a while ago I happened to be chatting to Tom Baker not long after his appearance on the 'The Graham Norton Show'. He was not happy; aggrieved might be a better word. After visiting the studio they conducted a two-hour long interview whose recorded footage was subsequently edited/cut to the final five to ten minute interview that would eventually be broadcast by the programme-makers. So what was Tom's complaint? He felt, not without some justification, that Norton's best bits that made Norton look good were kept in at the expense of his. Although I was sympathetic up to a point it prompted me to musing a bit on the nature of television.

Here you might say before me was a glimpse of that hidden mechanism of television whose revelation left me feeling not unlike Dorothy when she came face to face with the 'real' Wizard of OZ.

Through the magic of the medium a mysterious deifying process operates. Ordinary men with a few endearing attributes become immortalised. A gulf widens to separate the human from the superhuman. The adulated from the adulators.

Stephen Fry is a purveyor of witty repartee and of amusing divertimento - but he is also a carefully constructed illusion like Hitler's vegetarianism.

As on the gates of Auschwitz:

Arbeit macht frei

Modern times.

gnuneo
26 July 2008 at 15:41

from the 20th Centuries Buddha, Robert Anton Wilson (writing in the 70s):

(paraphrased)

"in the near decades to come, the population will be divided into 2 groups of addicts - the rich will be cocaine addicts, and the poor TV addicts."

TV has a very similar effect upon the brain as cocaine does, cocaine makes one feel like a 'Star', whilst the projective power of the human imagination allows the viewer to temporarily identify their Self with the 'Stars' on TV.

thus people on TV appear more 'real' than reality itself, as they exist in the 'magical universe', associated with highly egoic mental states.

"It manufactures a 'celebrocracy' far removed from its proletarianised audience. It turns the young into 'wannabes'; not wannabe writers or thinkers or poets mind you but wannabe 'celebrities'. But celebrated for what exactly? That it would seem is of only incidental importance."

sublime prose, raggedyman.

knave
26 July 2008 at 17:09

Blimey raggey

There goes all my illusions but I still think the great man is tops.

Oh by the way does Tom still have the scarf.

raggedyman
26 July 2008 at 22:03

No, knave, you see that was Dr Who's scarf.

You see what I mean? You have to keep vigilant mate.

Incidentally I can't help noticing your omnipresence in these columns. It may signify nothing but when did you get out last? And are you showering regularly? And should the NS consider a stipend even a modest one?

Mind you if my memory serves me correctly it is unlikely to be anything else.

knave
26 July 2008 at 22:54

Incidentally I can't help noticing your omnipresence in these columns. It may signify nothing but when did you get out last? And are you showering regularly? And should the NS consider a stipend even a modest one?

Very true Raggey.

Thanks for the advice and I did notice my body odour

What does stipend mean ?

By the way talking to Tom Baker.

Are you somebody famous or an autograph collector.

Please tell

raggedyman
26 July 2008 at 23:22

There is a temple in greek street dedicated to the two things I cherish the most: thinking and drinking.

knave
28 July 2008 at 07:30

Greek street in Soho.

There use to be a wonderful spit and sawdust pub that old thespians would get sloshed. Is it still open.

Probably a weatherspoon now.

raggedyman
28 July 2008 at 09:56

sadly the landlord has changed but at least they have a 'thinkers' night instead of karaoke.

As far as I know they still don't count their units at the end of the evening. How long they can hold out for though in the current climate I'm not sure.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Also by Misha Glenny

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?