Control Freaks at Climate Camp

Climate Camp has come to an end but here Carly Fraser relates how while it was underway the organise

This past week over 2,000 people will have made their way to a large field in the quiet village of Sipson, on the outskirts of Heathrow beside the M4, coming together to protest against the effects air travel has on the environment.

The Camp for Climate Action 2007 is working to unite people in the fight against climate change, to galvanise the British public into action and protest against the building of a new runway at Heathrow, one of the world's busiest airports.

Activities at the camp involved running workshops, peaceful rallies and a day of 'mass direct action' to demand radical reduction in air travel. The protest movement has been hailed ‘the most important protest of our time', and sparked a flurry of media coverage.

‘We have the power right here in our hands- we can choose what the future holds', screams the press release. With this rallying cry ringing in my ears, I felt compelled to witness the movement in action and in its closing days, I headed to the camp.

A train and couple of buses rides later, plus a foiled attempt by two helpful railway staff at Hayes and Harlington to send me in the wrong direction with a 'hippies go that way', I finally made my way up a country lane to a field with an assortment of multi coloured tents, a couple of large marquees, wind turbines and some large banners with slogans reading 'Make Planes History'.

The camp is situated on the site designated for the new runway. Local residents have been campaigning against the airport expansion plans, which if they go ahead will demolish a large part of the village, changing life irrevocably for residents, and mark a considerable rise in air and noise pollution.

Startling was the heavy police presence leading to and by the entrance of the site. Earlier in the week there had been reports the police were heavy handed with campaigners, operating a stop and search policy and filming anybody entering the camp. I was told by one campaigner that around 40 police had tried to enter the camp, but campaigners linked arms and formed a line to stop police from entering.

Arriving at the camp I was heartily greeted by a friendly campaigner who lead me into the Welcome Tent to give me a brief intro to camp life. The camp is a fully functioning self contained community, an eco-friendly commune of sustainable living, recycling, composting, solar heated washing facilities, with compost toilets and recycled toilet paper.

Organised into neighbourhoods, campers live, eat (only vegan food) and sleep in marquees labelled London, Nottingham and Scotland. The Wellbeing and Support tent offers a place to relax and meditate, and should the need arise, a place to resolve conflict through a mediator. Workshops run throughout the week with lectures ranging from ‘Introduction to Consensus Decision making and Facilitation’, ‘BAA- the reality behind the spin’ ‘Songwriting for activists’ to practical skill learning like ‘How to build your own wind turbine.’

Climate camp could have been mistaken for a summer festival, with people browsing at the book stall, children running about, a guitar playing while people relax in the sunshine.

And then it all began to go wrong. I asked if I could put a couple of questions to people. I was swiftly escorted to the media tent where I encountered a man that might well make Alastair Campbell wince.

I was informed in no uncertain terms about the camp’s strict media policies; I would not be allowed to write anything while on site, interview, or take pictures freely. 'People don't want hassle' was the justification.

During the camp the press got a one hour official tour, accompanied by 2 members of the camp's media team at all times, who carry a flag to make the journalists identifiable. "All journalists must be off site by 1pm at the latest and no journalists at all on Saturday, Sunday or Monday," I was told.

I was about as welcome as the police. Reading the camp handbook on my way home under the section how to make the camp welcoming and inclusive, it read:

‘Avoid branding people as potential police/journalists. Just because someone ‘looks’ the part doesn’t mean they are.’

I left the camp feeling thoroughly disheartened. I had encountered a community which within days had created their own set of stringent rules - oppression, even, and on occupied land.

The media team operated their version of private policing, freedom of the press was once again choked.

A free press in the UK? Not in the alternative society envisaged by the organisers of the Climate Camp.

11 comments

jorgen's picture

Has "democratic socialism" ever existed? Take a good look around at the socialistic parties and you will see control-freaks running them.

James Thorne's picture

Your beliefs are your own, I was merely correcting you on what Orwell believed in - you could try reading him, you might find it a bit of a revelation.

12345's picture

2000 Does not make a protest in the scheme of things. I did not see them standing outside the Indonesian Embassy bemoning their emmisions over 3 times higher than world airtravel! The legacy of free press has been distorted because the real truth may be less palatable.

Elizabeth Anne's picture

That journalists are but in the same bag as police implies that the young people of today have got wise to mainstream media, and _ with dubious organisations like "Journalists Without Borders" (the US aided organisation which is not even allowed observer status at the UN) routing for "freedom" of the press _ I'm afraid you haven't finished feeling "disheartened".I'm afraid I cannot feel that information is being controlled in a place where everyone (except journalists and policemen) are made welcome

gringo's picture

It's not true that journalists were accompanied by flags and the hour long media tour each day was to ensure that journalists could get interviews and take photos without pissing off the large numbers of poeple who don't welcome have the press sticking their noses into their homes 24/7. I was there for a week, 24/7, and while I am a journalist I was there as a participant in the camp and not on assignment. I found myself perfectly welcome and had a great and inspiring time.

sunny3's picture

With all the good will in the world, you say you came to "witness" the camp, but what you really mean is write an article for the mainstream media about the camp. You were free to enter and exit, camp and contribute just like me or any other person who wandered into that field, as soon as you took off your PRESS badge. In fact, ANYONE who wanted to make a report on what they saw and experienced was encouraged to submit reports via the Internet in the Indymedia tent, even with video and photos . Free press? A free press isn't driven by multi-coloured car insurance adverts.

The sheer density of journalists has been a blessing to the cause, but at times, like the police, you unfortunately came across as aggressive and rude. How fortunate the media team didn't let that spoil the idyllic eco-village vibe of such a wonderful camp!! Yes! We CAN choose what the future holds!

Sarah1's picture

Having just attended the Climate Camp, I think your article is inaccurate and misleading. The media policy you describe was not decided centrally by the organisers or the media team. It was based on a consensus decision. While I can see the potential benefits of more media access, I can also understand why people may not want the media constantly circulating, photographing and asking for interviews around a site which is effectively their home for the time they are there. I don't think this demonstrates an aversion to free press, and think you may be letting your personal feelings get in the way of accurate reporting.

ToddisGod's picture

This is typical of the authoritarian streak which runs through all green politics, which seeks to censor those views which disagree .Thank god these people arent in positions of power theyd make Stalin look like a liberal!

johnjones's picture

With regards the 'authoritarian streak'": the camp is run on a consensus basis so any participant could block any camp decision. The whole camp is non-hierarchical and the idea of consensus decisions makes for both a large number of meeting and a very involved group of people. The processes are also transparent, the climate camp website has huge ammounts of information with regards decisions made.

A consensus could not be made on open access for press. A compromise was reached. There where no flags.

jorgen's picture

Freedom and socialism does not travel well together. Orwell was right.

Latest tweets