This could be worse than what followed the fall of Lehman Brothers
The UK is far from being a "safe harbour from the storm", as Osborne ludicrously claimed.
By David Blanchflower Published 11 August 2011
I have had the strange feeling over the past month or so that economic developments were beginning to mirror those of the late spring of 2008, when the world was heading into a once-in-a-century financial crisis and nobody seemed to notice. All the talk at that time was about rising oil prices and the need to tighten monetary policy, because of misplaced fears of inflation. In the UK, consumer confidence had collapsed and house prices had started their steady decline; unemployment had begun to increase and, all the while, the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) continued to fiddle while Rome burned. Some members were voting for rate increases when the right policy was to lower them. Sound familiar?
Eventually, the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 made macro policymakers take note and act but, by then, it was too late
to prevent the terrible slump that is not over by a long way. Central banks set interest rates as close to the zero nominal bound as was feasible and governments across the globe injected huge amounts of fiscal stimulus into their economies. Together, these actions saved the world from going into a second Great Depression.
The public sector stepped in and rescued large parts of the private sector, including banks, car manufacturers and insurance companies that would have failed without public funds. Without these interventions, unemployment could well have hit 20 per cent or even higher in both the US and the UK. George Osborne and David Cameron opposed the rescue package in the UK but have never told us what they would have done instead.
The rise in unemployment and fall in living standards that resulted generated a predictable response from right-wingers, who saw the situation as an excuse to push forward an agenda of smaller government. The public wanted it all to be over and has still not understood that there is going to be a downward pressure on living standards for a long time, as economies adjust to a permanent increase in the price of risk. Hence the focus on the immediate removal of stimulus, which some wrongly claim didn't work, but did.
So here we are on the edge of the economic precipice again - as I have warned could occur so many times in this column over the past year - driven by the hopeless economic policies that western governments have pursued. The decision by Standard & Poor's to downgrade the US AAA credit rating does seem rather precipitate, especially given that Fitch and Moody's have reaffirmed it. The US is perfectly able to fund its debt and make its payments and can borrow money at historically low levels. The problem is that the Republicans in the US Congress are unwilling to do so, pushing the world towards financial cataclysm. That members of the Tea Party can bring a nation to its knees has put in question the credibility of US macroeconomic policy. It is hard for economists to model behaviour when people act against their own best interests. It is the Tea Party's downgrade.
Fortunately, the Federal Reserve acted on 9 August to reassure the markets by promising to keep rates at rock bottom for the next two years. As I have been saying for months, there is a good chance that the Fed will start a further round of quantitative easing, probably by November.
At the same time, the eurozone crisis took off again. The inability to prevent the crisis in Greece from spreading to Ireland and Portugal should have set alarm bells ringing.
The actions taken were too little, too late, primarily because European leaders failed to deal with the underlying structural problems. Austerity measures compromised growth and the countries on the periphery were unable to depreciate their currencies. As I expected, the crisis in the bond markets has now moved on to Spain and Italy, with France next on the list. It didn't help that the European Central Bank raised rates twice this year, even though inflation is falling and there is no evidence of wage pressure.
Sadly, the UK is far from being a "safe harbour from the storm", as Osborne ludicrously claimed. There is a growing prospect of a downgrade for the UK, as all of the most recent economic data points downwards. So it was rather surprising to find Tory spin merchants arguing that Osborne had been "vindicated". Oh, dear. Laugh out loud. Growth has ground to a halt and, judging by the PMIs in services, construction and manufacturing, unemployment is likely to rise. Consumer confidence has fallen and retail spending is soft. The recent data on manufacturing has been disappointing, showing a 0.4 per cent fall in June against market expectations of a rise of 0.4 per cent.
The net trade data was also weak. The FTSE has fallen sharply and, worst of all, shares in UK banks have collapsed. RBS has fallen by a quarter over the past few weeks and is now around half the price at which we would get all our money back. Lloyds and Barclays share prices are markedly down. On 10 August, the MPC cut its forecast for growth and inflation. It still seems overly optimistic, and there is every prospect that its forecasts will have to be revised down a lot in the future. The MPC's credibility is now an issue, as it does not seem to have learned from its past mistakes of assuming all will be well, when it won't.
All of this incompetence has brought us to the brink of disaster once more. What we are witnessing could be worse even than what followed the fall of Lehman Brothers. These are extremely worrying days.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


104 comments
hehe just seen this- yourself and krugman must be feeling the heat cos the years of debt debt debt have come home to roost- it worked u said, the fiscal stimulus... hehehe yeah right.. it worked. Even bernanke's questioning it, but yeah, it worked... don't worry, i will be back to you my friend
How does it work that government borrows money from the bankers at interest to give to the bankers?
http://www.secretofoz.com/
http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/
just watched blanchflower on bberg- sounded very familiar.
quote"nero fiddled while rome burned... these institutions like tthe ECB aren't fir for purpose" etc...
This is new material Mr Blanchflower... a new line- You are attacking the idea tha's Europe, or the people who run it.
Distancing yourself i see.. er I mean ... a ..new line - yes. You should be paying NS ...
If Professor Blanchflower is so wrong, why do I keep seeing him being interviewed on networks such as the BBC and Bloomberg?
I may be wrong, but I have never seen Bozo555, Luddite, Indu Pendent, Mark or Mr Danger being asked to give their opinion on economics to these broadcasting outlets, or I have I just answered my own question.
I wish Bozo555 could explain why this government doesn't see fit to tax the banker's bonuses?
If anything Osborne wants to give them a tax cut by cutting the 50p tax rate, but for some strange reason this escapes Bozo555's radar.
Stephen Hester isn't going to get a bonus from QE, the head of RBS, was given a £2.5 million bonus by Cameron at the beginning of the year.
I love it when facts spoil another one of Bozo555's falsehoods.
Interstingly, you did not mention WHY europe can't survive as it is...
And the answer is.... most of it is bust. They just kept borrowing, an orgy of materialism.. and WHO backed it up with lots of charts?? Which outfit rubber stamped with lots of theory? WHO ENSLAVED NATIONS?? krugman, blanchflower, balls, brown and any other maniac who thought spanking the plastic was the way forward...
There IS a way out of this.
@RCMoya612
I posed the question. Is propping up the bubble which caused so much damage a success?
@Matt
"I wish Bozo555 could explain why this government doesn't see fit to tax the banker's bonuses?"
Still using those insults I see. It's not for me to explain the government, I think they should be taxing the bankers.
"I love it when facts spoil another one of Bozo555's falsehoods"
You keep believing that. Anyone just needs to read the previous topics to see what merit there is to your comments.
Who would sell Gold on 20 year lows? Who would sell an asset like that, knowing historically what happens when u keep rates low, what happens? Why did it get sold? what was the underlying REASON or logical thought process for raising the quick money? Does anyone know?
Mr Blanchflower
your first paragraph should be re-embursed to the new Staesman. it says nothing, and you say 'all the talk was of tightening monetary policy in 2008? http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/decisions/decisions08.htm
er... if it's a typo, I accept the apology- if I'm at fault, accept mine. Remem ber though that last week you called for Osbornes head...
They don't rate political economies, they rate the creditworthiness of the governments that make the country's fiscal and monetary policies. If the UK has to issue more debt or backup or bailout anymore of the financial sector with government debt, a downgrade is possible. That is what the 'big cuts' were supposed to do, avoid this. Japan has already been downgraded, but it finances its debt with internal personal and corporate savings (ie, they put their savings into gov't bonds, which do yield better than cash accounts, the latter at near 0%).
The horrible paradox of "globalisation" is coming home to roost. There is no doubt that it pushed the world economy into the next stage of development, but - as usual - this was not accompanied by political progress as well.
The result this time is that the corporations won. They can shift assets and liabilities around the world faster than anyone can follow, with no thought for the consequences other than the effect on the bottom line. Meanwhile the "stock exchange" has become a farce, with trading being done by computers based on fractional movements, not on informed decisions by real people. The flap of a butterfly's wing leads to tornadoes on the other side of the world.
What I find most depressing is that this has largely come about because of democracy. I never thought I'd find myself agreeing with the leader of China, but he was absolutely right in basically saying that democracy results in very bad management because politicians have to be PR people with an eye on the short term, not managers with a longer term view. What we are seeing today is the inevitable consequence of this.