Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

Too big to fail becomes too big to bail

With the debt crisis heading towards Portugal and after that to Spain, the whole collapsing banking system could soon be too large a mess for the bailout fund to rescue.

It's a beautiful, sunny day here in south-west Florida as I write, and I'm sorry to hear about the snow and cold you folks are having back home. Winter in New Hampshire, where it regularly gets to -20˚F, seems less attractive now that the kids have flown the nest.

On Monday 29 November, the reconstituted Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) published a little crystal-ball gazing. The new director, Robert Chote, was sensible to stress how difficult it is to forecast in these days of huge economic uncertainty. That the OBR upgraded its growth forecast for 2010 (from 1.2 per cent to 1.8 per cent) was not surprising, given the recent data releases. But the slight reductions to its projected growth figures for 2011 and 2012 - to 2.1 per cent and 2.6 per cent, respectively - still seem overly optimistic, as is clear from the chart (below). Compared to the consensus forecasts, as well as those from the International Monetary Fund and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the OBR's projections look high. They are broadly comparable to the European Commission's forecast. Only the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England (BoE), which has consistently overestimated growth throughout the recession, is more bullish. Its growth forecasts are aspiring to be hopeless.

graph

Era of austerity

According to the OBR, the unemployment rate will rise in 2010 to 8 per cent on average, falling back to 6.1 per cent by 2015. This would be well above the 5.4 per cent rate that prevailed at the onset of the recession in the second quarter of 2008. In comparison to the June forecast, unemployment is forecast to be higher in every year from 2012 to 2015, even if the OBR has lowered its estimate of the direct job cull in the public sector by 200,000 - a "very optimistic" outlook, according to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

Dr John Philpott, the CIPD's chief economic adviser, said that "if employment, unemployment and average earnings follow the path forecast by the OBR, the 'era of austerity' will be felt more in workers' pockets and living standards than in terms of lost jobs. As such, the OBR forecast is most encouraging, but it is still too soon to conclude that a rosy outlook for jobs is a dead cert."

The OBR's forecast assumes there will be strong growth in net trade, consumption and investment. Net trade is expected to make a positive contribution in the years ahead. But this looks less likely, given slowing growth in Europe, especially outside the core countries of France, Germany and the Netherlands.

There is little indication that investment is going to increase at the near-double-digit rates the OBR is forecasting. Firms see a fearful consumer, and are unlikely to start investing until there is solid evidence on the demand side. Consistent with that, there was further evidence in the past week that consumers are retrenching once again. Consumer confidence fell in November by 2 points to -21, driven principally by rising expectations of unemployment over the next 12 months.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) published data on consumer spending, which fell last year for the first time in ten years. The annual Family Spending report from the ONS showed that average weekly household spending in the UK was £455 in 2009, down from £471 in 2008. Not good news.

In his autumn forecast statement on 29 November, the Chancellor, George Osborne, claimed that "Britain is on the mend". Steady on, now - it's much too early to declare victory, given the marked risks to the downside. Even the OBR calculates that the chance of the economy contracting next year is one in ten. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) thinks the chance is closer to one in six, because of fears about weak growth prospects for Europe.

One obvious gale-force wind headed in our direction is the spreading sovereign debt crisis. The €85bn Irish bailout package did not calm nerves for very long. Bond yields have risen sharply for most eurozone members, including France, the Netherlands and Austria. The spreads of Spanish, Italian and Belgian bonds over benchmark German bunds have risen to their highest levels since the launch of the euro.

During November, the euro fell by 7.5 per cent against the dollar and 3.3 per cent against the pound. The concern is that the crisis will spread next to Portugal and then, because of their close economic ties, to Spain. The EU's bailout fund may be too small to rescue Spain, which has a GDP over six times larger than that of Portugal. "Spain has a funding requirement in excess of €150bn for 2011 and Italy needs close to €340bn," said Gary Jenkins, from Evolution Securities in London. "With the market moving rapidly on to Spain and Italy, it is possible that too big to fail becomes too big to bail."

Irish exposure

The unexpected jump in unemployment in Italy, from 8.3 per cent to 8.6 per cent in September to October, raises - as Markit's chief economist, Chris Williamson, put it - "concerns about a two-speed eurozone recovery".

The rise in yields in Ireland suggests that the crisis there is far from over. The latest growth projections provided by the Irish government seemed overly rosy and there is growing doubt about the country's ability to recover so swiftly. This is of particular concern to the UK, because Ireland is our fifth-largest trading partner, accounting for 6.2 per cent of our exports. The total exposure of the UK banking sector to Ireland is as much as £82bn. The OBR admits that "this exposure is a risk to our forecast". It sure is.

Osborne, in his autumn statement, said: "This is an uncertain world but the British recovery is on track. Employment is growing. One million more jobs are being created. The deficit is set to fall. The plan is working. So we will stick to the course. That is the only way to help confidence to flourish and growth to return." The only way? Surely not. I still have no idea where all these new jobs are supposed to come from.

David Blanchflower is professor of economics at Dartmouth College, New Hampshire, and the University of Stirling

51 comments

David Blanchflower1's picture

Mike555
Interest rates have to remain low because of the level of slack in the economy. It was necessary to do QE because all the models were saying that interest rates had to be negative. In these circumstances central banks move to changing the quantity rather than the price of money. There is no alternative.

Today in an interview on CBS posted on Youtube Bernanke said, and i agree, that actions by the monetary and fiscal authorities have prevented unemployment rates getting to depression levels of 20-25%.

Fortunately eight members of the MPC believe interest rates shouldn't be increased
Danny Blanchflower

zhidian2011ppp's picture

YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

-------------- http://www.ftoto.com/ -----------

a leading worldwide wholesale company (or ucan say organization). We supply more than 100 thousand high-quality merchandise and famous brand name products all at wholesale prices.

-------------- http://www.ftoto.com/ -----------
Send Christmas Gifts. Buy more to send.

Attrition47's picture

The worse it gets, the better it gets for us decent people. If their crisis abates now we'll be stuck with the bill if not they'll have to do their jobs properly.

Barny's picture

Really great to see David Blanchflower come on and respond to Mike 555 in an adult way.

matthew fox - Your debating style is unnecessarily insulting and personal and in the style of the Tory trolls who all to often roam theses boards. Please don't let the side down.

Eddy S's picture

The banks were borrowing too much money too us. The last decade was a debt fuelled path. Unfortunately we did not use this boom to pay western debts and run a few years of budget surpluses.

The are more serious underlying issues that need to be addressed. Currently China and other countries running huge trade surpluses are feeding cheap money to the West economies they need to keep financing our debts so that we can continue to buy there imports. China currently has the most ruthless trade and economic policies on the planet. This wall of cheap money needs to end up somewhere and causes bubbles and many other distortions.

What the west needs to do is gradually reduce all types of debt - gov't, personal and company. We need to reduce our consumption and invest more in our infrastructure at the same time countries like China need to do the opposite i.e. consume more - these are the serious issues that no one is talking about or knows how to resolve.

Luddite's picture

Economic crisis what economic crisis? I know no one unemployed most are extremely busy exports are booming.

'Clearly house prices are still too high - based on house price to earnings ratios they have a further 20% at least to fall - usually there is overshooting'. Try 60% for working folks. As a young man bought my first home for £16.000 earning at the time £11.000. see my point.

mike555's picture

That's another sensible question you haven't answered Matt, is it because you know that high housing costs have a devastating impact on the poor and low paid? I will answer your growth question but not until you can answer all of mine.

Stuart's picture

@ Danny Blanchflower

Would these be the same models which predicted the current recession with such unerring accuracy?

Economists these days think they have such control over the economy when in reality they little. Just because you invent a new term "quantitative easing" does not get away from the fact that it is simple printing of money. Now how does printing money lead to economic growth, all it will lead to is inflation. You have no idea what unemployment might have been without all this money printing. Quoting Ben Bernanke is utterly childish. All he is saying is that his actions and the actions he advised help prevent catastrophic collapse of the economy. Well he would say that wouldn't he. Printing money certainly helps the government and the banks who get hold of this new printed money but as printing money can only reduce the value of every pound in my pocket I'm not very happy about it but the people worst off are those living on savings, pensioners, the unemployed, the prudent. The money those people earnt by their hard graft is being devalued. In 1937 the Prime Minister earnt about £10,000, a very very good wage in those days. Today he earns about £150,000. Keynesian economists like you over the last 70 years have devastated the value of the pound, stealing money from savers to give the debtors. This new idea of quantitative easing is not new at all, it is printing money, which is simply theft from those people who already own money. It is morally wrong, and economically illiterate.

mike555's picture

Matt.

I haven't had a personal pop at anybody. Where have I had a pop at you? Re-read the posts, then see who's been taking pops.

"I see you haven't commented on the drop in consumer confidence, why is that Mike?"

I commented on that in my first post, take a look. Consumer spending needed to come off the boil. My point was there are positive reports on the economy too. I note you haven't answered any of my questions.

"see you also have failed to acknowledge Gideon's brilliant analysis of the Irish Economy in 2006. I didn't know Osborne could see into the future"

What are you talking about? I am not a Tory supporter or a supporter of the Chancellor. I am not here to score political points. I think you'll find I described the analysis as embarrassing on a previous thread.

"With regards to QE, I really think you need to get your act together "

The same applies here, you talk to me as if I'm a Tory supporter, I'm not. I am against QE therefore against more of it.

"better warn you Mike555, your crocodile tears for the British youth is no comfort at all, espically when the Tories made it a campaign issue in 2010."

Same again, I'm not a Tory and why do you assume my tears are crocodile?

matthew fox's picture

When did you grow up Mike555. Some more good news out today, the BCCC has revised down economic growth for 2011, and in November UK service sector grew less when compared to October.

The problem with your definition of debate, it lacks cold hard facts.

Still waiting for you to explain the decrease in consumer confidence, Osborne's QE about turn.

Once you have finished whinging, you might get around to coming up with an answer, but I don't it much.

Over to you old man.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets