My advice to Ed Balls: don’t follow Slasher’s lead and promise the earth

Who has really been telling "shameful lies"?

George Osborne gives a rare TV interview
George Osborne gives a rare TV interview at the start of Conservative Party conference. Photograph: Getty Images

In a speech at the 2009 Conservative party conference in Manchester, George “Slasher” Osborne offered a sneering overview of Labour policy with all sorts of claims about how the streets would be paved with gold if only the Tories were to win the next general election and he was made chancellor. The following spring, after an election a ham sandwich could have won but no one did, the Tories had to form a coalition with a turncoat party that for years had opposed austerity but paused a few days and reversed all of that, once ministerial cars were on offer.

The Lib Dems banked all on the UK economy rising from the ashes; they hoped that there would be an “expansionary fiscal contraction” and growth would emerge before 2015. The governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, has what must be the worst economic forecasting record of any governor in living memory. He failed to spot the recession and the subsequent double dip; he thought that the UK and the US had decoupled; he thought that there would be a wage spiral as a result of union power and appeared to have no clue that LIBOR (the London Inter-bank Offered Rate) was being fiddled, even though it was arguably his job to know. King told the coalition posh boys to slash away and all would be well. But it wasn’t.

Some of us even had the audacity to say all of that stuff was for the birds and warned that the government was committing economic suicide; but nobody much listened and on they ploughed. Sadly, the government is now in deep trouble and knows it. It will be interesting to hear how Slasher plans to wriggle out of this mess at the Tory conference in Birmingham.

Look back in anger

Before that, it seems appropriate to go back and look at the claims Osborne made, in his speech in 2009, about what he would deliver. First, he said that the Tory party would “lead the economy out of crisis”. That could hardly be further from the truth, as the coalition has pushed us into an even deeper crisis. We are in the slowest recovery since the Second World War and are perhaps even heading for a triple dip.

The chart below shows the current estimates of GDP growth along with the initial estimates, as data gets revised all the time. The economy was growing nicely when the coalition took over; it grew for five successive quarters from the third quarter of 2009 up to the third quarter of 2010, under Alistair Darling’s policies. Output is now 4.4 per cent lower than it was at the start of the recession in 2008 and has shrunk in five of the past seven quarters. It takes time for policies to feed through to the data, so if we assume that the coalition owns the data from the fourth quarter of 2010, the economy has shrunk 0.6 per cent.

The recession deniers are clueless. The recession hasn’t been revised away and isn’t going to be; the revisions average 0.1 per cent down over the past 20 quarters. Consumer and business confidence today is lower than it was when the coalition took office. The latest European Union sentiment index for the UK (reported in the second chart, below), which is a combination of business and consumer surveys, stands at 91.9, against 102.4 in May 2010, when the coalition took over. It is markedly lower than in Sweden (100.0), which recently moved to inject a stimulus into its economy. Confidence is especially low in the services sector, with a score of -22, compared to -10 in May 2010.

In November 2010, there were 2,477,000 unemployed, with an unemployment rate of 7.9 per cent. The latest data shows 2,645,000 unemployed in July 2012, with an unemployment rate of 8.2 per cent. Over the same period, average weekly earnings rose 3.3 per cent, while the Consumer Price Index has risen by 6.5 per cent, so real earnings have fallen sharply.

Far from leading us out of crisis, Osborne has made matters worse and pushed the UK economy into a double-dip recession. The latest UK PMI for manufacturing was disappointing, falling from 49.6 to 48.4 (anything below 50 indicates decline). This is the third month of declines and job losses are beginning to mount. The PMI for construction in September showed the biggest decline in new business since April 2009, so there’s little sign of green shoots.

I have every expectation that GDP in the next quarter may be positive but the fourth quarter is likely to be negative. Plus, the deficit is up by 22 per cent so far this year. As the shadow chancellor, Ed Balls, said in his Labour conference speech, we are seeing “rising borrowing, not to invest in the jobs of the future but to pay for the mounting costs of this government’s economic failure. There is nothing credible about a plan that leads to a double-dip recession . . . That’s not credible, that is just plain wrong.”

Holidays in the sun

Second, Osborne argued in 2009 that the Tories would protect public services, claiming: “We’re all in this together.” He had the audacity to repeat this phrase seven times. He then claimed: “Our determination as compassionate Conservatives [is] to protect the most vulnerable.” In truth, the poor are all in it together and the rich are holidaying in the south of France.

Sensibly, Balls hasn’t fallen into the same trap as Osborne did just before the election. He doesn’t need to say too much about what Labour would do, other than to reiterate that he will wait and see how serious is the mess he is likely to inherit. He is entitled to say he warned that this economic disaster was looming and things would have been a lot better had he been in charge. My main advice to Balls, though, is to stay away from the pork pies. We all know who told “shameful lies”.

David Blanchflower is economics editor of the New Statesman and professor of economics at Dartmouth College, New Hampshire.

61 comments

Caroline Crampton's picture

Comments on this article are now closed.

Simon Gothard's picture

David you have been wrong on everything you have predicted. Do you predict that The New Statesman will keep paying you to write articles that are full of holes and untruths?

mike555's picture

The housing market has been artificially propped up with all time low rates and reckless QE, even though high house prices are a big part of the problem we're in. According to the latest ONS index house prices are up 1.8% over the year and stand at an eye watering £234k. People still need to borrow heavily at ridiculously low rates to get on in life, a recipe for disaster.

In a double whammy rents are also rising, trapping those who can't afford to buy houses and forcing them to pay through the nose for housing. The multi property owning buy to let landlords are having a field day, all at the expense of those who are sensible with their money and those who can't afford to buy a home.

mike555's picture

Im sure if New Labour were in power things would be alright. After all we only saw a tripling of house prices under them, an explosion in consumer debt, a widening in the gap between rich and poor, and a rise in the population which helped create a housing shortage. Still, the multi property owning Buy to Letters did very well, so it wasn't all bad (sarcasm, in case Fox is confused). People were warning about house prices and debt for years before the credit crunch hit, so what were those in power doing about it? You've got to ask.

More reckless QE and a few more years of all time low interest rates should help give us a short term boost, while giving those who are sensible with money another kick in the teeth. Borrow and spend, thats the lesson we should all take away from the last few years. With the system favouring those who borrow, we should make it part of the national curriculum to teach how it doesn't pay to be prudent with your money.

The Coalition have given us even more house price propping lunacy, the latest one being the idea of using your pension pot to help your kids buy houses. No doubt there'll be even more schemes to get people borrowing all over again. You couldn't make this up.

matthew fox's picture

It is nice to see our resident wally brain back in the house.

This is a genius who talked about low interest rates being inappropriate because the economy wasn't even in recession, yet, officially the country has been in recession since Q4 of 2011.

Bozo555 talks about being a centrist, yet has no opinion about the Thatcher housing boom, surprise surprise. As I keep reminding Bozo555, Labour handed over responsibility of interest policy to the MPC, unlike the Tories, who loved setting interest rate policy in purely politics terms.

Another ascpect of history which Bozo555 skates over, is UK Stamp duty. When Labour came to power in May 1997, not Q4 1997, stamp duty was levied at 1% for house sales of £60,000. By the 8th of July 1997, the regime changed to the following;

1% £60,000

1.5% £ 250,000

2% £500,000

By March 2000, the regime for stamp duty had changed to;

1% £60,000

3% £ 250,000

4% £500,000

One of Bozo555 dishonest lines of attack on Labour, is how Labour manipulated the tax system to encourage a house price boom, yet but the life of me, why would Labour actually raise taxation on the sale of houses?

mike555's picture

Oh look it's Fox.

"Bozo555 talks about being a centrist, yet has no opinion about the Thatcher housing boom, surprise surprise."

Fox I've told you my opinion on that boom several times, even very recently, as you well know, so why would you say this? I'm not sure what you're hoping to achieve with all this as we can all see what I've said. I'll repeat myself, seeing as you seem to be struggling, I think the house price boom under the Tories was a disaster for many people, I think all booms above and beyond inflation are a disaster. It's funny how you see me as the dishonest one.

I don't remember hearing your opinion on the much bigger boom under New Labour, despite asking you many times. We can all see who answers questions and who repeatedly ducks them.

matthew fox's picture

Yes its Matthew, well done Bozo555, the first thing you have got anything right in ages, congratulations cretin, hurrah.

Your opinion on the boom has changed, no surprise there wally brain, first we got the " I was 4 " defence, then you were at school, do you remember these bits of stupidity?

I know the Tory housing boom was a disaster, because the boom was driven by politics not economics, something you have failed to acknowledge on many occasions.

But look Bozo555 doesn't want to talk about stamp duty, I mean his " theory" that Labour somehow used the tax system to help create a housing boom, isn't holding much water now, because if Labour truly wanted a housing boom, they would have retained the power to control interest rates.

You don't remember because your dim Bozo555, you can't remember half the dross you write, if you did, you wouldn't contradict yourself so much.

I still remember the " All I Said " debacle.

mike555's picture

Laughable.

"Your opinion on the boom has changed"

Er no it hasn't.

"But look Bozo555 doesn't want to talk about stamp duty"

I can if you like, it didn't stop house prices tripling. I see you don't want to talk about the much bigger house price boom under Labour again, the effects of which are still with us, pretty unbelievable that you criticize me for not having an opinion on the 80's boom, even though I've given it several times.

"You don't remember because your dim Bozo555, you can't remember half the dross you write, if you did, you wouldn't contradict yourself so much."

I like the way you call me dim yet make the same mistake again, have you not looked up the difference between your and you're yet? I haven't contradicted myself, it's funny how you see all these traits in my posts.

matthew fox's picture

Bozo555 your a joke, an unpleasant one at that.

Your opinion on the 80s boom had to be dragged out of you cretin, so lets rewrite your previous post.

But please avoid talking about stamp duty, because your rationale that Labour manipulated the tax system to create a housing boom is dead in the water, isn't in cretin.

I take it you understand what stamp duty actually does, or is it way beyond your very limited intelligence. Why did Labour tax house sales if it wanted to artificially increase house prices Bozo555, is that yet another question that will remain unanswered for years?

I understand when we have a Tory Prime Minister and Tory Chancellor, you haven't got an opinion on raising house prices. Please blatantly ignore my point Tories actually used interest rates for political ends, I mine why should you attack the Tories, when attacking Labour seems to be more fun.

Interested to see that energy prices are going to be hitting low income households, a double whammy, considering 200,000 low income households have lost their tax credits, due to the obscene motives of this government, who are going to give £40000 tax breaks to tax cheating millionaires, and for some odd reason, you love attacking Labour over low income earners.

How does that phrase go Bozo? " Practicising what you....... "

mike555's picture

Laughable, everyone can see I've given you my opinion, where is your opinion on the tripling of house prices under Labour? Do you really think no-one notices what you do?

" because your rationale that Labour manipulated the tax system to create a housing boom is dead in the water, isn't in cretin."

Fox, I don't know whether it was deliberate or not, I've said they didn't do enough to stop it and made some very questionable decisions along the way. I don't defend the Tories either something you seem to keep forgetting.

"Yes its Matthew, well done Bozo555, the first thing you have got anything right in ages, congratulations cretin, hurrah."

That suggests I've got lots of things wrong, would you like to give any examples? Still waiting for you to tell me what these lies I'm supposed to have posted are too, if you can't come up with any, and you will struggle, you should do the decent thing and apologise.

Latest tweets