Photo: Getty
Show Hide image

What to do when you're not the hero any more

From Star Wars to Mad Max, a new, more diverse kind of storytelling went mainstream this year - and the backlash shows how much it matters.

I saw Star Wars this week like everyone else, and yes, it was madly entertaining, and no, it wasn't perfect, and if I want to see a film that's deeply iconoclastic and challenges all my cultural preconceptions I will see something that isn't Star Wars. The part that had my heart in my teeth, though, wasn’t the part I’m not supposed to tell you about. It came a little bit later. It was when Rey, the techie scavenger girl, picks up the lightsaber to fight the bad guy as an equal.

And the music swells. The same old theme and a new kind of hero on a new kind of journey. The same old story made stunning in its sudden familiarity for every girl who ever dreamed of being more than a princess.

Rey picks up her weapon, and everything changes.

In a box-office-pulverising film whose gorgeous effects and point-perfect pacing leave their fingerprints on the back of your eyeballs for days, it says something that the most dazzling feature of all is the female protagonist and her love interest (possibly). Stories about outliers and unexpected heroes have always been around - the difference is that being a woman, a person of colour, a queer person, or some shocking combination of the three does not make you an outlier in quite the same way any more.

We’re allowed stories now that aren’t just "look what she did, despite what she is". Our heroism is no longer quite so unexpected. And that’s as thrilling as it is threatening to those who are used to a single story about white boys winning the day.

The way we tell stories is changing. The change is creeping slow and political as hell. Just look at the diverse stories we’ve had this year, none of them perfect, all of them groundbreaking in the simplest and most shocking of ways. It’s Jessica Jones and Kimmy Schmidt. It's Steven Universe. It’s Orange Is The New Black and How To Get Away With Murder. It’s Black Hermione and female Ghostbusters. It’s Transparent and Welcome To Night Vale. It’s Gamergate and the Hugo Awards. It’s Mad Max. It’s Star Wars. Diversity shouldn't be exciting by now, but it is.

And of course, the backlash is on.

People who are quite happy to suspend disbelief in superpowers, summoning spells, dragons, aliens, planet-destroying starbases and Mark Hamill's acting abilities somehow find the idea of, for example, a black Hermione a bit too much and react with death threats and hate-mobs. This week, when the internet learned that a black woman had been cast in a new play billed as the ‘next instalment’ in the Harry Potter series, author J K Rowling reacted perfectly, reminding fans: "Canon: brown eyes, frizzy hair and very clever. White skin was never specified. Rowling loves black Hermione".

Was Rowling imagining a black girl when she sat down to write that book in the mid-1990s? Probably not. But she knows, like the best storytellers, that books are hands held out to lonely children of every age, and not all those lonely children are white boys, and those stories change lives in ways even their authors cannot guess. So it matters. It matters that the "brightest witch of her generation", the bookish heroine of a generation’s definitive fairytale, doesn’t have to be white every time.

Let's not get carried away here. These stories and retellings are still exceptions. Women are still paid less, respected less and promoted less at almost every level of every creative industry. For every Jessica Jones there's a Daredevil, whose female characters exist solely to get rescued, provide the protagonists with some pneumatic exposition, or both. For every Orphan Black there's Mr Robot and Narcos and you know, sometimes I wonder if perhaps I watch too much television. The point is that what we have right now isn't equality yet. It's nothing like equality. But it's still enough to enrage the old guard because when you've been used to privilege, equality feels like prejudice.

The rage that white men have been expressing, loudly, violently, over the very idea that they might find themselves identifying with characters who are not white men, the very idea that heroism might not be particular to one race or one gender, the basic idea that the human story is vast and various and we all get to contribute a page - that rage is petty. It is aware of its own pettiness. Like a screaming toddler denied a sweet, it becomes more righteous the more it reminds itself that after all, it’s only a story.

Only a story. Only the things we tell to keep out the darkness. Only the myths and fables that save us from despair, to establish power and destroy it, to teach each other how to be good, to describe the limits of desire, to keep us breathing and fighting and yearning and striving when it'd be so much easier to give in. Only the constitutive ingredients of every human society since the Stone age.

Only a story. Only the most important thing in the whole world.

The people who are upset that the faces of fiction are changing are right to worry. It's a fundamental challenge to a worldview that's been too comfortable for too long. The part of our cultural imagination that places white Western men at the centre of every story is the same part that legitimises racism and sexism. The part of our collective mythos that encourages every girl and brown boy to identify and empathise with white male heroes is the same part that reacts with rage when white boys are asked to imagine themselves in anyone else’s shoes.

The problem - as River Song puts it - is that 'men will believe any story they're hero of,' and until recently that's all they've been asked to do. The Original Star Wars was famously based on Joseph Campbell's "Hero's Journey", the "monomyth" that was supposed to run through every important legend from the beginning of time. But it turned out that women had no place in that monomyth, which has formed the basis of lazy storytelling for two or three generations: Campbell reportedly told his students that "women don't need to make the journey. In the whole mythological journey, the woman is there. All she has to do is realise that she's the place that people are trying to get to".

Which is narratologist for "get back to the kitchen" and arrant bullshit besides. It's not enough to be a destination, a prop in someone else's story. Now women and other cultural outsiders are kicking back and demanding a multiplicity of myths. Stories in which there are new heroes making new journeys. This isn't just good news for steely-eyed social justice warriors like me. It also means that the easily bored among us might not have to sit through the same dull story structure as imagined by some dude in the 1970s until we die.

What does it mean to be a white cis boy reading these books and watching these new shows? The same thing it has meant for everyone else to watch every other show that’s ever been made. It means identifying with people who don’t look like you, talk like you or fuck like you. It’s a challenge, and it’s as radical and useful for white cis boys as it is for the rest of us - because stories are mirrors, but they are also windows. They let you see yourself transfigured, but they also let you live lives you haven’t had the chance to imagine, as many other lives as there are stories yet to be told, without once leaving your chair.

This isn’t just about "role models". Readers who are female, queer or of colour have been allowed role models before. What we haven’t been allowed is to see our experience reflected, to see our lives mirrored and magnified and made magical by culture. We haven’t been allowed to see ourselves as anything other than the exception. If we made it into the story, we were standing alone, and we were constantly reminded how miraculous it was that we had saved the day even though we were just a woman. Or just a black kid. Or just - or just,whatever it was that made us less than those boys who were just born to be heroes.

The people who get angry that Hermione is black, that Rey is a woman, that Furiosa is more of a hero than Mad Max, I understand their anger. Anyone who has ever felt shut out of a story by virtue of their sex or skin colour has felt that anger. Imagine that anger multiplied a hundredfold, imagine feeling it every time you read or watched or heard or played through a story. Imagine how over time that rage would harden into bewilderment, and finally mute acceptance that people like you were never going to get to be the hero, not really.

Then imagine that suddenly starting to change. Imagine letting out a breath you’d held between your teeth so long you’d forgotten the taste of air.

Capitalism is just a story. Religion is just a story. Patriarchy and white supremacy are just stories. They are the great organising myths that define our societies and determine our futures, and I believe - I hope - that a great rewriting is slowly, surely underway. We can only become what we can imagine, and right now our imagination is being stretched in new ways. We're learning, as a culture, that heroes aren't always white guys, that life and love and villainy and victory might look a little different depending on who's telling it. That's a good thing. It's not easy - but nobody ever said that changing the world was going to be easy.

I learned that from Harry Potter.

Laurie Penny is a contributing editor to the New Statesman. She is the author of five books, most recently Unspeakable Things.

CHRISTOPHER THOMOND/ GUARDIAN NEWS & MEDIA
Show Hide image

Terry Christian: What the most hated man in television did next

As the star of trashy but impossible-to-ignore The Word, Christian has almost become a symbol of the 1990s. Now, he says, he'd fire himself if he was his own boss.

It requires a certain kind of chutzpah to punctuate your memoirs with insults aimed at you at the height of your fame. Or perhaps, if you’re a TV and radio celebrity, it just takes insight into the inherent ridiculousness of your profession. Here are three that appear in My Word, Terry Christian’s account of his years fronting Channel 4’s infamous late-night show The Word, the wantonly trashy but impossible-to-ignore Friday-night series that exemplified the worst – and often the best, but we’ll come to that – of 1990s pop culture:

“Terry Christian, won’t someone smash his smug irritating little face in?” – Channel 4 viewer, from duty log

“Terry Christian, has this arsehole got sinus trouble? He is tacky, pathetic, has no interviewing style and insults his guests. When are you going to take him off?” –
Channel 4 viewer, from duty log

“Terry Christian, the most hated man on television.” – Daily Mirror, 1994

Yet here we are in the Lass O’Gowrie pub off Oxford Road in Manchester and the former most hated man on television is proving to be thoroughly likeable company. When a drinker in her thirties comes over to ask if he’s really Terry from The Word, he grins and leans in for the obligatory selfie.

Christian, now 55, is funny, engaging and more thoughtful than the caricature Mancunian motormouth who presented five series of the show between August 1990 and March 1995. He is also an incorrigible digresser, be it on the subject of childhood friends who went to school with Morrissey (“When the Smiths made it big, all my mates said, ‘It’s that weirdo you see on the 261 bus . . .’”), or collecting records on a pittance as a kid (“There was this huge warehouse called Robinson’s Records, where everything smelled of pies because they had a big pie counter in there . . .”), or his beloved Manchester United (they should have persevered with David Moyes; he never wanted Louis van Gaal; the owners, the Glazers, are destroying the club).

Reduced fame doesn’t always agree with those who were once nationally notorious but it seems to suit Christian, who downshifted to more grown-up engagements with Talksport, BBC Radio Manchester and ITV after The Word ended. He seems like a good bloke who had fame thrust upon him and wasn’t sure what to do with it. So why did everybody hate him so much?

“When The Word was going, I did use to wonder, ‘What crime have I committed?’” he admits. “I had nothing to be jealous of. I wasn’t even that well paid. Whenever I went out in Manchester or London, normal people were fine. They liked the show. But I was anything but confident and I had no control over my press. They really wanted to put the boot in. I wasn’t bothered at first,” he says, “but cumulatively, it did start to hurt.”

Two decades on, The Word has been reduced to a clip-show staple, its shock-horror moments now shorthand for the mad-for-it 1990s, when television’s current dispensation – that anything is justified as long as it gets eyeballs – was forged. Whether it was Kurt Cobain announcing that Courtney Love was “the best f*** in the world”, or Oliver Reed swaying drunkenly as guest frontman for Ned’s Atomic Dustbin, or Donita Sparks of the grunge band L7 dropping her trousers, The Word’s brand of controversy was instrumental in remaking Channel 4 as TV’s edgy channel.

No regular segment of the show contributed more to this than “The Hopefuls”, in which members of the general public would debase themselves to get on TV by French-kissing pensioners, licking false teeth or drinking their own vomit. A future in which calculated outrage would become central to entertainment and shameless self-publicity would become a marketable skill – in essence, Big Brother and the entire reality TV project – began here.

Yet, for all that, The Word was a drastic improvement on Channel 4’s stilted 1980s “yoof” shows Network 7 and Club X, neither of which had made much of an impression on actual young people. With its fluorescent acid trappings, its audience of genuine twentysomethings instead of listless dancers and its techno-house theme tune by 808 State, The Word connected with the more democratic, less uptight post-rave sentiments of the early 1990s. After a move from teatime to a late-night slot on Fridays, the show quickly became required viewing for an audience still shouldering the tyranny of pubs’ 11 o’clock closing time.

Its presenters, initially an odd couple of the working-class northerner Christian and the socialite Amanda de Cadenet, were new to television and it showed. Christian was prone to nervous laughter and his Mancunian cockiness divided the audience. Either you enjoyed his freshness and informality or he got on your nerves. Sometimes interviewees responded badly to his unpretentious approach. He tried to loosen up pompous Hollywood guest stars with a little levelling banter; Arnold Schwarzenegger glared back pitilessly and Joanne Whalley-Kilmer (birthplace: Salford) doubled down on her new LA accent. Christian, not his interview subjects, caught the public blame for such frosty moments.

Watch those clips again on YouTube and it is apparent that Christian – new to TV but an experienced radio broadcaster who had won two Sony Awards for his BBC Radio Derby music show Barbed Wireless – isn’t a bad interviewer. He simply didn’t kowtow to people who were used to fawning treatment. But having fulfilled his brief to be edgy, Christian carried the can, too.

“The idea of The Word was, ‘Here’s a night out in your living room, ’cause you’re too young to go out,’” Christian says. “We wanted to bring people with us rather than saying, ‘Hey, we’re here, we’re great and you’re not.’ I was pretty inexperienced but the fact was, I was holding it together. The only one who gave me any credit for that was [the second series’ producer] Sebastian Scott.” Throughout The Word’s existence, he says, he was led to believe that he was permanently on the verge of being sacked. “I thought they’d got me on board for the show because I had a background in music. Now, looking back, I think it was just because I was young and northern.”

Christian’s cheekiness and occasional rudeness to his guests were products, he tells me, of panic and insecurity. On the one hand, he was expected to control a live audience while a voice in his ear screamed at him to get to the next killer question – for instance, asking Whitney Houston if she was a lesbian or not (on that occasion, an audience member got him off the hook by asking her first). On the other hand, here was
a young, working-class man in an industry dominated by the privately educated, with their inexhaustible reserves of confidence. What else does a northerner with his back against the wall do but go on the offensive?

“I was literally out of my comfort zone,” he says, smiling grimly. “I couldn’t sleep properly, I [was] under a lot of pressure and I just couldn’t do wacky or zany. Trying to behave like someone who actually belongs where you are was weird. And hard.” Yet he managed to front it up series after series, to the extent that this insecure, self-doubting presenter was routinely criticised for being arrogant. Meanwhile, The Word grew more sensationalist, bringing in first the gross-out segment with “The Hopefuls” in 1993 and then the future Z-list celebrity Paul Ross, with his tabloid instincts, as producer.

“That was when it went into exploitation,” Christian says. “I was against ‘The Hopefuls’ because it was a gimmick, a contrivance. Our viewing figures were going up anyway. If anything, ‘The Hopefuls’ held us back. I really think that, if not for ‘The Hopefuls’, we would have exploded over the following two years.”

Instead, by the end of the fourth series, Christian “didn’t give a shit any more, it was so stressful. I was just wondering what I could do for a living if it all went wrong.”

The surprise of Christian’s memoir may be that he wasn’t (as his critics suspected) just another middle-class lad opportunistically turning up his accent, but a genuine Mancunian of startlingly hard-up stock. The son of first-generation Irish immigrants with a seamstress mother and a ­father who recovered from TB-related paralysis to drive forklifts at Esso, Terry grew up in the Irish-West Indian Brooks Bar area of Old Trafford and led the life of a street kid. In Brooks Bar, you either learned to fight or you didn’t go out. Or you channelled your aggression into sarcasm.

Money was tight for the Christian family. “We were worried all the time,” he says. “I used to look forward to Christmas, knowing in my heart that I’d be disappointed.” Before he turned three, his elder sister Janet died of a burst appendix. “I was the fourth of six kids. I grew up in a house that was grieving and then another younger brother arrived. So I never got that much attention. I’d do anything to get my mum’s approval.”

Many years later, in an interview with the Daily Mail, Christian mentioned that for a time he had been on free school dinners. To his parents, who were now “dining out a bit” on his success around Old Trafford, this was an appalling embarrassment. “It was like, ‘You’re in here bragging about your kid and yet you couldn’t even afford to feed him?’” he recalls now, with obvious shame. “The worst thing was, I’d said it out of ego. I wanted to tell this interviewer, ‘You’re all posh twats and I’m different, I’m not like you.’ But the hurt it caused my mum and dad was terrible. I still think it’s one of the worst things I’ve ever done.”

As a student at Thames Polytechnic, he learned to smoke weed and swapped his teenage political choice – the Socialist Workers Party – for the more (he thought) authentically proletarian Workers Revolutionary Party (WRP). “I did it to wind people up,” he says. “Plus, they had Vanessa Redgrave.”

The WRP paper was marginally easier to sell on campus because it contained decadent bourgeois TV listings, which Socialist Worker did not. But the Trotskyist vanguard was not as pure as he had imagined.

“I couldn’t believe how money-orientated they were for supposedly revolutionary socialists,” says Christian. “The WRP practically got the bailiffs on to me and I only owed them about 20 f***ing quid.”

Kicked off his biology course for failing to apply himself to study, Christian returned to Manchester and found himself featuring as one of the voices of dole-bound Britain for an ITV discussion series called Devil’s Advocate, inspired by the 1981 riots and the subsequent Scarman report. (Another young guest was Johnny Marr, later of the Smiths.) The show’s producer, the future Labour grandee Gus Macdonald, identified in Christian a quickness of mind and an aptitude for presentation; he encouraged him to apply for jobs as a researcher in television.

“Gus gave me this talk about the class system in the media,” Christian recalls, “and it went right over my head. I wish I could have understood him but I was naive even for my age. He might as well have been telling your cat how to work the DVD player.” Instead, Radio Derby offered him a job presenting an issues-led show for young people ­(“UNEMPLOYED TERRY LANDS DREAM JOB”) and another path was set. After eight years presenting Barbed Wireless in Derby, The Word came calling.

Like anyone with an infamous moment on their CV, Christian has had to make his peace with how everyone will always be more interested in The Word than, say, It’s My Life, the high-spirited religious-moral ding-dong that he presented on ITV between 2003 and 2008. “I was really proud of that,” he says brightly, “but you can’t choose what you’re remembered for. I don’t lie awake at night weeping about it.”

Today, it’s a tough market out there for a former youth presenter. Christian would like to work more – “I’ve got a mortgage!” – but the problem is, he’s just no good at being freelance. “If I was my own boss, I’d sack me for being lazy,” he jokes, possibly without realising that he is his own boss. “My mates are always telling me that I’ve had it easy, I’ve never had to hustle, and they’re kind of right. The irony is that everything I’ve ever done on TV or radio, the ratings have gone up. Yet nobody’s falling over themselves to offer me stuff. It is kind of frustrating.”

***

In 2008, he lost an unfair dismissal case about his BBC Radio Manchester show after a judge ruled him a self-employed freelancer, not an employee of the BBC. He still has a show on Manchester’s Imagine FM but, ironically, one of the original northern voices in broadcasting finds that today’s stations have filled their quota for amusing provincial accents, thanks very much. “I do love radio and I miss the fact that I’ve never done a biggish national show,” he admits. Perhaps he’s just too polarising.

Instead, Christian has branched out into live performance. A few years ago, he won admiring reviews for a one-man stand-up comedy show, Naked Confessions of a Recovering Catholic. “The show boils down to: ‘I’m a bit of a twat but it’s God’s fault,’” he explains. “I suffered from a lot of Catholic guilt when I was doing The Word, feeling that I didn’t deserve any of it. But when you’re a Catholic, if you don’t feel bad, then you feel guilty that you’re not feeling guilty . . .” The show, in which he dressed as a vicar, went so well that he has another in the works. Its title is Rebel Without Applause.

Tonight, at the Dancehouse Theatre just across Oxford Road, Christian will host another instalment of what he calls his “Mad Manc Cabaret”. It’s a small-scale event, a kind of Manchester’s Got Talent without the mean judges, and the acts are entertaining. There are members of the Manchester mafia – John Bramwell from I Am Kloot, Mike Sweeney of the punk veterans the Salford Jets – and local musicians, including a 12-year-old girl, Temiah Deans-Welch, whose startlingly mature performance of Etta James’s signature song “At Last” wouldn’t disgrace Saturday-night TV. And then there’s Thick Richard, a young John Cooper Clarke in the body of Jarvis Cocker, performing the splendidly offensive “Ghost of Raoul Moat”. There are worse nights out in Manchester. I’ve been to some of them.

And between every act, Terry Christian bounds across the stage, cranking up this modest crowd as if it’s still Friday night in the 1990s on Channel 4. He’s where he wants to be. He’s among his people.

This article first appeared in the 08 April 2016 issue of the New Statesman, The Tories at war