Is the world of rap finally entering the twenty-first century?
With Nicki Minaj, Azealia Banks, Angel Haze and the recent emergence of “queer rap”, we could finally be seeing some progress in a musical genre that's long been dominated by straight men and macho self-aggrandisement.
By Joe Rivers Published 23 November 2012 10:21
Singer-songwriter and former Everything But The Girl frontwoman, Tracey Thorn, was recently asked in an interview whether her “not being an extremely hot girl” has held her back in her career. Long-running international music monthly Rolling Stone has just announced the winner of a contest called "Women Who Rock". American lifestyle magazine, Complex, last month ran a feature on the ten “hottest women” at a New York music festival, fitting in nicely with other articles they’ve published this year, including "Ten Sexy Indie Artists You Should Know" and "The 15 Hottest Frontwomen In Rock History".
These are all examples of the sexism female artists face in the music industry, and they’re all from media that covers genres where women have long been successful. So what about a style of music where women are, historically, less likely to make a go of things, such as hip-hop?
Hip-hop has long been known for its negative attitude towards women, its commodification of them, and its view of females as being useful for little more than sex. The average rap video will tell you that, with its legion of semi-naked, booty-shaking dancers. This is a culture where behemoths Jay-Z and Kanye West have both come under fire for their use of the term “bitch” in their lyrics, yet have decided to continue to use it. The closest West came to a one-eighty was when he tweeted: “Is it acceptable for a man to call a woman a bitch even if it’s endearing?” which brings into question Kanye’s understanding of “endearing”. We’re talking about a genre where the opening line to one of its best-known and much-loved songs reads: “Bitches ain’t shit but hoes and tricks”.
All these negative stereotypes in a world of macho self-aggrandisement makes the recent success of a breakthrough band of female MCs, or "femcees", all the more heartening. Nicki Minaj is now a household name, but hot on her heels are Azealia Banks, Angel Haze, Iggy Azalea, Kreayshawn and more.
What all these rappers have in common is that they’re defiantly solo artists and are unaffiliated to a wider group or crew. Perhaps as a result of this, the music press have been keen to play up any potential rivalries, with a brief Twitter spat between Azealia Banks and Kreayshawn generating far more column inches than it should have done.
But in a man’s world, are these women able to succeed on their own terms? Minaj has sold over a million copies of both her studio albums thus far and has been vocal in speaking out against the sexism she’s faced. Yet her most recent LP, Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded, contains a track called "Stupid Hoe" and a duet with Chris Brown, notorious for his assault on then-girlfriend Rihanna. Critics’ darling Azealia Banks has showcased her frenetic and explicit lyrics, most notably on the song that propelled her to fame, "212", and often refers to herself as a “bad bitch”.
Banks has challenged the status quo and critics alike with her openness about her sexuality and those lyrics. Despite this seemingly anti-commercial stance, she’s received frequent radio play and has been extremely successful in 2012, so much so that she’s likely to be found on a magazine cover near you. This may have contributed to the fact that her debut album, Broke With Expensive Taste, originally due to be released in August of this year, has been put back to February 2013. Banks’ confrontational, no-holds-barred approach have given her a huge following and made her arguably the most famous female rapper behind Nicki Minaj.
Perhaps more interesting though is Angel Haze. The Michigan MC was largely unknown before the release of her debut single, New York, but had soon sold out her show at the Hoxton Bar & Grill. What’s particularly striking about Haze is her range of lyrical themes, most clearly evidenced on her mixtape, Classick, which she put online in October. She’s about as far away from the hip-hop video dancing female stereotype as it’s possible to be, as she takes on matters of confidence and self-image, and contemplates the effects domestic violence have on the wider family. Classick also features a cover of Eminem’s confessional Cleaning Out My Closet, with the lyrics rewritten into a jaw-dropping autobiographical account of childhood abuse. While it may not be a comfortable listen, it handles a near-impossible subject to cover in an unflinchingly honest but mature way.
Of the rest, Kreayshawn has followed online hit, "Gucci Gucci" (over 39 million YouTube views at the time of writing), with an underperforming album, and Iggy Azealia is expected to sign with a major label before her debut full-length LP comes out next year.
All this seems a far cry from the time when to hear of a female rapper was genuinely rare, with Missy Elliott being the main exception to that rule. Whether the new breed of MCs trade in raw, gritty rhymes or conform to a more mainstream view of what a woman in rap “should” be, their very presence can only be a positive thing. Add to this the recent emergence of a strain of hip-hop made my predominantly gay males, known as “queer rap”, and it seems the world of rap may finally be ready to enter the twenty-first century.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















12 comments
I know far, far less about rap than the writer, and I'm deeply glad about that.
Without resorting to personal insults, this article does read as if someone at the New Statesman heard Azelia Banks or Angel Haze at a party and decided to commission a few hundred words. Not all articles have to be academically or thoroughly researched, of course but this reads as if the writer considers hip-hop/rap to only have started in the late 90s with Jay-Z and as if only Top 40 stuff matters: it really does read as if the author has no real depth of knowledge or interest in the subject & didn't bother to research it either (although perhaps no time before deadline?)
I'm sure there is a good article to be written, but perhaps a bit more research, depth & knowledge would be welcome.
Well quite. Anyone who'd mention Kreayshawn and Minaj in the same sentence obviously has no clue. A shame, there's a point to be made here, but not by this writer.
Absolutely agree with the utterly clueless nature of this article.
It's fine to have opinions but at least base them on evidence and research.
It is blatantly clear that no real effort went into researching this article.
That MC Lyte, Salt & Peppa and Sister Soulja are utterly ignored just reeks that the author just has opinions about a music genre they know nothing about.
Next time you want a critique of a musical culture at least get someone who understands it. Rather than some snobby right-on numpty who clearly can't even be bothered to do the most basic of research (and appears to be incapable of typing "female rapper" into Google).
A disgraceful and bit of useless punditry that should be beneath the standards of the New Statesman.
Although previous commenters have been quite harsh, I largely agree that this article has a troublingly myopic view of hip-hop "culture". I do certainly sense a positive trend of new female MCs getting recognition in the mainstream, which is great - but the article doesn't name anyone I wasn't already familiar with. Moreover it doesn't actually do anything progressive, it just comes across as rather condescending by pigeonholing women artists - what is actually happening with the new trend of women MCs is that they aren't actually being treated as "female MCs" (or "femcees", ugh) as much any more. They're more readily accepted as just rappers. OK it'll still be a while before someone like Angel Haze will be discussed on completely equal terms as her male contemporaries, (even though even just on a purely technical level, she's a fricking amazing rapper) - but there's genuine progress here. That's what the progress is, not that more women are trying their hands at hip-hop, because I don't think that's true, or that that's the main issue; if attitudes are changing then the wider acceptance of women artists will give more women the confidence to participate. Talking about "femcees" does not help.
It's not sufficiently clarified what it is that means women artists historically aren't recognised as much, and this seems to attribute the problem to hip-hop "culture". The beginning of the article acknowledges that sexism is still a huge problem with music discourse much more generally, but in many ways it's just as bad in rock music as in hip-hop - for instance Rolling Stone published their "100 greatest guitarists" a year ago, and only included two women, way down on the list; and the most flagrantly sexist publication I can think of is Terrorizer, a metal magazine. As previous comments have suggested there have always been outstanding women rappers but they aren't picked up by mainstream media, or hip-hop "culture" in a narrow sense (this idea of "hip-hop culture" is mediated by the media so it's difficult to talk about equivocally).
It's important that there is more discussion in journalism about women artists, and this article clearly has honest and positive intentions, but it should never be this sort of "more women are doing this now" angle, especially if it lumps women artists together. It should be more about analysing the changing attitudes and different treatments of women artists, which this piece begins to do but doesn't really make any new conclusions.
Rap has been a progressive force for years. Look at NWA's "F* the Police". If you listen to it, it's actually a genuinely funny and inventive structure, evoking the style of a courtroom, with Ice Cube as the MC, "Judge Dre residing", and the line, "Eazy E, will you stand up and tell the court how you feel about this bullllsh*". Add that to the fact that, far from being about simple 'macho self-aggrandizement', it actually addresses important issues regarding the treatment of minorities by the police force. The year? 1988. It was even played over loud speakers in some Eastern European revolutions.
This article was clearly written by someone who doesn't understand rap music, or life in general. There have been shedloads of good female emcee's: Roxanne Shante, Lady of Rage, MC Lyte, and so on. This article fails to see past the public stereotype of rap music. The term bitch is particularly approached as if somehow it is demeaning. Is it demeaning to women when a man is called a bitch? Why when that word is used do people assume that it refers to all women? If I said I hate arseholes would people naturally assume I was speaking about all men? No they would know I meant only a small minority. Anyone who gets offended by Rap's use of the word bitch are offended by their own misogyny attributing a gender to the term.
Firstly, gender is attributed to the term, it means female dog.
Secondly, it is not only used to refer to a portion of the female population because it does not have a single objective definition, it is a subjective term that is used according to the whims of the person using it, it can denote either admiration or scorn, aggression or pathos (see, beautiful b****, ugly b****, stupid b****, clever b****, fat b****, skinny b****, poor b****, rich b****). It is often used generically to refer to any female who has reached puberty rather than any aspect of her character, in some contexts it has become almost a neutral way of referring to women (see, its use in porn, in pop culture and the growing use of it by boyfriends to describe their girlfriends).
Thirdly, when b**** is used to refer to men, it is precisely because it is a female gendered term - thus adding an extra layer of insult (because being likened to a female is widely regarded by men as insulting, see "you're such a woman/throw like a girl/ ladies/pu33y". In much the same way as being accused of being gay is). When a man is accused of being a b**** it indicates that he is girlish aka whiney, stupid, weak, exploitable. When he is told he will be treated like a b**** it indicates he will be aggressively mistreated.
Fourthly, should all women be offended by the use of b**** against some women? Should all black men be offended by the use of n***** against some black men? Should all gay men be offended by the use of "f**" against some gay men?
Should all women be offended that some women are demeaned and insulted? What about if they are being demeaned and insulted for being female? Should they worry that the generic and widespread word for female is an aggressive and insulting one? Should they be concerned that femaleness is associated with the following sexist stereotypes:
1: submission, stupidity, naivity, sexual exploitation (see, "use you like a little b****", "dumb b****"), conversely
2: greed, avarice (see , "greedy b****"), conversely
3: promiscuity (see, "that b**** is nasty"),
3: likely victim of violence (see, "I'm going to f*** you up b****", or "die b**** die")?
Should all women recoil from a term that frequently accompanies realworld sexist harassment and violent assaults on them?
Well, what do you think?
Firstly you appear to be saying that the meaning of a word cannot evolve over time, clearly ignoring the fact that 'n***er' was a pejorative term in it's inception and has evolved into 'n***a' which isn't
Secondly 'a growing use of it by boyfriends...'?? Is this meant to be a serious point or just your isolated experience used to generalise the wider male population?
Thirdly I cannot deny that it has negative connotations when used against men but they are not necessarily female connotations. For the same reason that it is used to refer to SOME women it is used ti refer to SOME men. When either men or women exhibit a certain type of behaviour the word is then used. Of course the type of behaviour seen as negative is subjective to the user of the word but it is not gender specific so please remove yourself from your high horse
There is no need to address your fourth point because as I have said, there is no gender specificity in the word b****, whereas there are inherent specific negative connotations in the words n***er and f**
In answer to your fifth point should all men be offended/demeaned/insulted by the use of the word p***k? Many a time I have been called it and have heard other men called in exclusively by women (e.g. fat p***k, stupid p***k, f***ing p***k etc.) and yet I hear no one standing up for the male population in this respect. Is it possible that your type of feminism has become outdated and the gender struggles of 30 years ago have been replaced by new ones?
I would postulate that you are in fact demeaning women more by generalising that all women are vulnerable and need people like yourself to protect them when in fact most of the women I have met in my lifetime are perfectly capable of handling themselves.
Firstly, the meaning of a word can evolve over time, but it hasn't. The word b**** like n***** had innocuous beginnings, became demeaning, were reclaimed by their targets with variable success and remain demeaning. The day you call your mother either on her birthday will be the day you know they've evolved.
Secondly, it's a serious point. I take it you don't listen in on teenage and 20-something male conversations much.
Thirdly, you haven't addressed my third point which illustrated that the word is not used according to character traits in many cases, and even where it is, those character traits are a sexist parody of genuine female character traits.
Fourthly, saying it doesn't make it so. What masculine traits are encompassed by the term? The word n***** is also sometimes applied to white people, by your measurement this makes it non racist.
Fifthly, no not all men should be offended by the use of p***, because it is not a word applied generically to males. All Asian men most likely will be offended by it because it applies generically to them. As b**** applies generically to all women.
Sixthly, that's a lame as attempt to shame women into acquiscing with sexism and misogyny. The sleaziest of all excuses men give to continue as they choose. Here's another woman to add to your list who doesn't put up with it.
I must say you speak with the air and arrogance of someone who thinks they know better as if through some sort of experience.
There really is no need to debate with you here as clearly you won't climb down off of your high horse. Don't misconstrue what I say for sexism, as far as I'm concerned you're more of a misogynist than I am. Whilst all I have said thus far is for men and women to be treated as equal, your perception that women are not leads you to argue for some sort of preferable or soft treatment. I don't hope to coerce any woman into sexism and I find it slightly insulting that you would accuse me of doing so. Again I believe you are out of touch with your demographic. As a 22 year old male I'm quite sure that I've got more of an idea of how teenagers and 20 something males speak about women than you do, and believe me I have never heard a man casually refer to a woman as a bitch, let alone their girlfriend! More to the point, most of the women I know from my generation and above don't really care for your particular brand of feminism. This is not to say that they have acquiesed to sexism or misogyny as you so arrogantly put but that they have bigger struggles to face with men than whether the word b**** is demeaning all womankind. I find it rather funny that you think racism cuts both ways and yet misogyny doesn't particularly that you can stereotype all men and all other viewpoints as misogynistic while I am apparently the sexist...
Nicky Minaj? Rap? Are you kidding me? She's a teenypop popstar with short (rubbish) rap skits in her songs.
Also, the line...
"the time when to hear of a female rapper was genuinely rare, with Missy Elliott being the main exception to that rule"
... is mixing up female rapper with mainstream female rapper. There's been a ton of brilliant female rappers, but it's possible most people just won't have heard of them. It's akin to saying "there are no good indie bands any more" - there are, they're just not in the charts.