Is the Acer ad sexist?

The ADgenda: this week's most offensive advert.

Ad execs think in statements. Preferably four word punchy sentences, all in capitals. This thought process often leaves subtlety out in the cold, and tricksy terms like gender stereotyping are gleefully discarded, no doubt because they dilute the message and block that crucial blue sky thinking. So, having ditched those pesky complexities of real life at the way side, the execs set about planning the new Acer ad. A point-by-point summary of the strategy meeting follows:

1) Laptops are functional, practical and useful

2) Therefore, laptops are for men. Women don't like laptops

3) How can we make women like laptops?

4) By giving laptops a really feminine and pretty image

5) How?

6) By getting that Megan Fox lass, you know, the one famed for her acting talent the world over showcased inTransformers 1,2,3, etc

6) Yeah! But wait, isn't she mostly popular with drooling young men?

7) True, but she is really really girly, so let's get her to appeal to girls even more and pretend she can speak to dolphins

8) Eeeeeeeeeee! That is SO sweet!

If you thought the end result was crass enough, Fujitsu  Japan clearly didn't agree and decided to go one step further by unveiling the Floral Kiss - a laptop designed specifically for women. The Floral Kiss has a specially designed lid so there's no danger of chipping your perfectly manicured nails, a 'Feminine pink' colour scheme and most importantly - your daily horoscope loaded and ready to be accessed at the touch of a no doubt perfume-scented button. What's that I hear? Ah, it's the dull thump of palms smacking foreheads across the nation.

An Acer laptop. Photograph: Getty Images
Getty
Show Hide image

How Theresa May laid a trap for herself on the immigration target

When Home Secretary, she insisted on keeping foreign students in the figures – causing a headache for herself today.

When Home Secretary, Theresa May insisted that foreign students should continue to be counted in the overall immigration figures. Some cabinet colleagues, including then Business Secretary Vince Cable and Chancellor George Osborne wanted to reverse this. It was economically illiterate. Current ministers, like the Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, Chancellor Philip Hammond and Home Secretary Amber Rudd, also want foreign students exempted from the total.

David Cameron’s government aimed to cut immigration figures – including overseas students in that aim meant trying to limit one of the UK’s crucial financial resources. They are worth £25bn to the UK economy, and their fees make up 14 per cent of total university income. And the impact is not just financial – welcoming foreign students is diplomatically and culturally key to Britain’s reputation and its relationship with the rest of the world too. Even more important now Brexit is on its way.

But they stayed in the figures – a situation that, along with counterproductive visa restrictions also introduced by May’s old department, put a lot of foreign students off studying here. For example, there has been a 44 per cent decrease in the number of Indian students coming to Britain to study in the last five years.

Now May’s stubbornness on the migration figures appears to have caught up with her. The Times has revealed that the Prime Minister is ready to “soften her longstanding opposition to taking foreign students out of immigration totals”. It reports that she will offer to change the way the numbers are calculated.

Why the u-turn? No 10 says the concession is to ensure the Higher and Research Bill, key university legislation, can pass due to a Lords amendment urging the government not to count students as “long-term migrants” for “public policy purposes”.

But it will also be a factor in May’s manifesto pledge (and continuation of Cameron’s promise) to cut immigration to the “tens of thousands”. Until today, ministers had been unclear about whether this would be in the manifesto.

Now her u-turn on student figures is being seized upon by opposition parties as “massaging” the migration figures to meet her target. An accusation for which May only has herself, and her steadfast politicising of immigration, to blame.

Anoosh Chakelian is senior writer at the New Statesman.

0800 7318496