Breivik remains unmoved at his trial
Relief at the end of Breivik’s testimony was short-lived
By Mark Lewis Published 01 May 2012 15:20
Every day I push through the photographers and stare in his face. I want him to stare back. I want to look into the face of evil.
Anders Behring Breivik, 33, never does. He doesn’t look at anyone. He just sits there. There are only so many times that you can write about him sitting dispassionately. You never get over it. You can never fathom it.
A coroner describes separating body parts from the victims of his bomb attack in Oslo, and he sits there. The court is played an emergency call from a terrified girl hidden in the toilet on Utoya Island begging the police to come while her friends are executed outside. He sits there. Families of his 77 victims weep in court. He just sits there.
When his own testimony came to an end last week, even Breivik’s own defence attorney, Geir Lippestad, admitted some relief. The two hours spent listening to him describe executing children on the holiday Island of Utoya will haunt every person in that court. He described murdering 69, mostly teen, members of the Labour Party Youth wing as if he were recalling a journey to work. He talked about their paralysis; how he had time to reload his gun and shoot them dead. “It was odd,” he said like he’d mislaid his keys.
“Some of them are just paralysed there” he said. “They are unable to run: Something that is never shown on TV or film. It looked really odd. Two people dodge down and curl up. I think that I ran out of ammunition. They heard that. And they just stand there. Many people screamed and begged for their lives. I don’t really remember what they were saying. They were just standing there. It was really odd. Then I reload and I shoot both of them in the head.”
The day before, Breivik had shown his contempt for the court by refusing to stand when the judge entered the room. By the end of his description last Friday, when the judge stood up to leave, more than half the court stayed in their seats as well. They were too stunned to move.
But any relief at the end of Breivik’s testimony was short lived. For the survivors and bereaved families, the gruelling courtroom ordeal is really only beginning. With Breivik out of the way until the summing up at the end of this ten-week trial, the court has begun to hear the testimony of the witnesses of his twin attacks on Oslo and Utoya, and the quietly heartbreaking accounts of the survivors’ individual tragedies.
In his seat at the side of the court, Breivik stifles a yawn. Aware that his impassiveness in court might help damn him to the secure psychiatric hospital he says would undermine his anti-Islamic cause, Breivik claims to be using Bushido meditation to “de-emotionalise” himself. He has been using it since 2006, he says, when he decided to undertake a “so called suicide operation.”
But Breivik is not incapable of emotion. If psychosis had left him with an emotional lobotomy, his manner might be easier to accept. Yet he angers when the prosecutor says Bushido was only mentioned after the publication of a psychiatric report, which concluded he was mentally incompetent. He is stung by the “humiliation” when the prosecutors ask him about his love of uniforms or the year he spent playing World of Warcraft for 16 hours a day. He even cried when his own 12 minute propaganda video was played to the court on the first day.
It is just that he is incapable of understanding how other people feel. He knows that his actions have caused grief and sorrow in an abstract sense. But he describes them without any sense of what they might mean. “What I have done is contrary to human nature and there are almost no words to describe the suffering and pain I have inflicted on the families and victims,” he says again and again. “That is the best way to describe it. But I will not let this affect me.”
Next week the court will begin to hear the coroner’s reports on the 69 children and young people he gunned down on Utoya. The weeks of testimony loom black in the court schedule. “I don’t think that people should expect me to break down,” says Breivik. “I have prepared myself.”
Many people here believed he might already have cracked. Nobody really thinks he will now. We have watched him sit there unmoved for too long.
Mark Lewis is a freelance journalist reporting from the Breivik trial.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















31 comments
Muslim terrorists think crazy things - that they will have 100 virgins when they die, for instance. Clearly, psychiatry is just a ludicrous pseudo-science. Anyone who takes it seriously has an inferior IQ. http://www.squidoo.com/best-circular-saw-reviews
http://www.roseshoesoutlet2012.com
"secretly hate Islam",
Says it all perhaps.
I thought in Europe we had the right to openly hate Islam!
god knows we have enough reasons to?
just curious to learn exactly what these many reasons are. would you be so kind and list a few? thanks in advance
If racism were a feature of insanity, most people if not all should be labelled mad. In the Psychology of Social Class, Argyle cites evidence indicating that 80% of Brits are racist.
Muslim terrorists think crazy things - that they will have 100 virgins when they die, for instance.
Clearly, psychiatry is just a ludicrous pseudo-science. Anyone who takes it seriously has an inferior IQ.
Norways cultural Marxists are filled with blind fuming hatred for white values which have prevailed over centuries to shape the nations conscience.
Similar values are inherent in almost every nation on earth except the black ones who can only aspire to be peaceful beyond their genetic shortcomings.
In observing Oslos multiracial environment, where blacks and Muslims from different social, financial, cultural, tiers and time-periods, are forced together with whites who are born into the first world, one can conclude that not only does such a multiracial situation give way to incongruent social dysfunction, but that the government could not hold the situation together without enforcing Marxism and Communism which go against the very nature of human judgement.
What "genetic shortcomings" are you talking about? It's sad to see people still spouting nazi-era pseudo-scientific nonsense and using it to justify xenophobia... Sigh.
If any one is in any doubt about Breivik's mental state they might like to take a look at a translation of his first psychiatric report, which you can find at: https://sites.google.com/site/breivikreport/anders-breivik-psychiatric-r... The fact that he was able to plan and carry out this 'operation', and the fact that he has a (fairly) coherent worldview/ideology does in no way detract from the fact that he is psychotic. From a Lacanian perspective, which is my field, Breivik would be seen as suffering from a paranoid psychosis, and one of the characteristics of such individuals is that they have constructed a worldview which places the 'enemy' out there in the external world, in this case 'cultural Marxism' and 'Islamization', and believe it is their 'mission' to rid the world of such a 'threat'. Perhaps the really worrying thing about all this is that on these criteria Breivik is by no means alone.....
i'm not convinced that Breivik warrants such in-depth analysis. surely the facts are that Breivik has ideological views that are commonly shared by many others, including desire to murder others, but, by planning to murder AND seeing through his plan to achieve a specific ideological goal makes it 100% safe to conclude such a person is literally insane?
am i going wrong with this more simplified approach, if so where/how...?
Jankaas, I see where you are coming from, but on that basis couldn't we argue that many terrorist groups who also plan and carry out murderous acts to achieve a specific ideology are also insane - and let's not forget the Nazis, Stalin, the Serbs and the Croats. Where do you draw the line? I guess the point I'm getting at is that insanity, in the sense of people having what Lacanians would call a psychotic structure, may be a lot more widespread then we like to think.
indeed i would include many, but not all, terrorists in the same grouping as Breivik i.e. insane. by not grasping this nettle firmly we keep tying ourselves up in knots unnecessarily. the act condemns the individual imho, not the thought.
i do draw the line more or less where we are forced to accept the grey area in definition between freedom fighter and terrorist. there is clear divide between actions taken under conditions of war, so "the Nazis, Stalin, the Serbs and the Croats" you mentioned are subject to a different analysis, though few would argue i guess that Stalin was absolutely hat-stand-nuts, as were many higher up Nazis, Croats, Serbs, etc etc.
A more true coward was never born. According to him, this is an expression of his hatred against Islam, and yet he kills Christian children of his own race, because he knows that given the stupid modern European legal systems, killing his own countryfolk will only give him international fame, a fair, "humane" trial and fair "humane" sentence, and will only make him more popular with people who secretly hate Islam, which is about 99% of the non-Islamic world, while killing Muslims would have resulted in a possibly unstoppable chain reaction, and he would have got the justice he deserves.
Here is the devil, and people are discussing the death penalty, and psychiatric treatment. Isn't norway the same country where those Indian children were separated from their parents because they DID NOT force their children to sleep alone in a different bedroom, and disciplined them for poor table manners, and so they were therefore, deemed unfit parents.
What a country, really.... Norway punishes parents and promotes the human rights of mass murderers and child-killers.
what bizarre illogic you post....you may as well say that because of the Baby P debacle England is not a civilised nation, it makes as little logical sense.
the way you tie the Breivik trail into these other matters make it clear it would be infinitely preferrable to live under a Norwegian administration than one designed by you.
He should be operated upon, and left permanently disabled. At the end of his operation, Breivik should have no legs, no tongue, no eyes, no eardrums, and just one hand without a thumb, with which he can eat, but not write. And in such a state, he should be fed and left alive for the rest of his life, or for 77 more years, whichever is earlier. If this sounds cruel, think of the mothers and fathers of those children and what they go through, and you will realize that no punishment is enough for such a human.
And he should be dressed with a Nazi swastika and paraded out to the press every day, to remind neo-Nazis that their day will never come.
what a vile suggestion, ironically enough much closer to a Nazi approach than the civilised option of life imprisonment for a severely mentally disabled human being. you are one sick puppy imho, but as long as you don't carry out your bizarre fantasies......perhaps keep them to yourself though?
I heard this voice too, but I am ashamed of it. Lifetime imprisonment with no parole would be enough, with suicide watch all the time. I think just being alive with his memories is going to be hell.
Not only do I completely agree with Breivik's policy (bar his attitude towards Israel and the Jewish Question), but I am actually very angry with Breivik for not having planned his attack more effectively.
1. He MISSED both of his primary targets, the Marxist PM & ex-Marxist PM.
2. He failed to collapse the entire government building.
3. He only killed 77 - a pathetic number of KIA's.
I am only thankful that he did at least manage to push through with his completely legal, entirely defensive and totally just operation through to the end, despite its many setbacks and ultimately achieved his main objective, namely the raising of the public conscious to the existential threat posed by multiculturalism and all branches of Cultural Marxism in general.
Can this despicable and wicked comment please be urgently removed. It's almost as evil as Breivik.
What this demonstrates more than anything is that Bush's wars and America's "operation" along with it's torture, renditions and massive collateral damage, has created a fan club of thugs who think that this sort of thing is ok. We are really in danger of seeing a repeat of the Holocaust, only with different victims this time.
You need help, urgently.
I cannot understand why any amount of dead people can be "pathetic"... those people had their own lives and loved ones? Perhaps I am missing something....
The vast majority of people will not be able to see or understand the reasons behind his actions. Unfortunately, I do not see that he has achieved the goal you mention in raising the public's conscious to the threats faced by multiculturalism... only portrayed himself to be a very disturbed individual.
Perhaps if he had used a diplomatic, polital and intelligent process in order to air his views... then his intellect and determination would not now be being wasted on a lifetime of either prison or institutionalisation.
he somewhat achieved his goal, the goal was raising voice agianst mullas. and showing them that what they were doing in the name of jihad that "hurts" and how much they should have an experience themselves. and mullas all over the world are now giving up violence, the real problem with mulla is unearned money.
I guess I can see what you are saying.... I just think its a shame that people like Breivik have to cause so much distress and trauma... and by the use of one shot at what they believe, which will only end one way. I personally would much rather be given the choice to listen and learn about what people have to say than see such sadness.
I have watched people die in my job and held someone as they took their last breath as a result of violence.... not good. Achieved nothing.
it was wrong but "only upto some extent". as you know violence is the only language violent understands. You are talking about listening, people were enduring the pain these mulla were giving to them, what about the victims of 9/11 or London bombing or various other acts of violence, the persons died in those attacks also had families, they too had near and dear ones, they too were tarnished.
The fact that Breivik carried out his plan to kill those people is not evidence of him being insane. The human mind is very resistant and he could have, in fact, "trained" himself to become numb to the crimes that he committed. Sometimes, when a person believes in something so strongly, nothing else really matters.
I do not agree with his views and I certainly do not support his actions, but I am intelligent enough to realise that all in life is not so simple.
In comparison, violent attacks based upon extremist religious views.... this is not something I agree with or support, but who am I to judge them for the beliefs that those individuals hold. They know what is right and wrong, and they understand the consequences.....
Breivik is insane. the fact that he managed to carry out his plan is evidence of his insanity. all he deserves is to be incarcerated for the rest of his life under close psychiatric supervision.
if this is punishment then most of the mullas and all the maulvi and qazi will be incarcerated for the rest of his (their) life under close psychiatric supervision. The sooner you guys learn this lesson the better it will be for your own health.
The fact that Breivik carried out his plan to kill those people is not evidence of him being insane. The human mind is very resistant and he could have, in fact, "trained" himself to become numb to the crimes that he committed. Sometimes, when a person believes in something so strongly, nothing else really matters.
I do not agree with his views and I certainly do not support his actions, but I am intelligent enough to realise that all in life is not so simple.
In comparison, violent attacks based upon extremist religious views.... this is not something I agree with or support, but who am I to judge them for the beliefs that those individuals hold. They know what is right and wrong, and they understand the consequences.....
nope, the simple fact that Breivik managed to convince himself so thoroughly is the evidence of insanity i refer to. no sane person would concoct such a plan AND then carry it out. if we fail to draw such a simple and obvious line in the sand then we are designing loop holes for insane people do carry out insane acts.
in your last paragraph you appear to show part of a hidden agenda where you isolate acts of violence that have a specific theistic rationale. this is quite telling. to the fair minded there is no difference between a religious and a secularly flawed bit of insane reasoning.
Nobody understands this sad individual, unless you look at his background of parental abandonment, becoming a loner without love in his life, playing electronic strategic war games and becoming radicalised to give him some purpose and sense of importance to his existence. That there are many out of work teenagers and young adults, some disenfranchised from their motherland, is concerning, in this country but also around the world. All for lack of the milk of human kindness.
Who the f**k are you kidding? Stop trying to look at BS factors that influenced him to do what he had done. Anyone out there who isn't blinded by the fog of political correctness can see the damage and incompatibility of Islam in Europe. He's not insane and on top of that he has already given out his reasoning for the attacks. There are millions of young men out there who share the same lifestyle qualities and upbringings as Breivik; are they all going to massacre people as well? What have those things got to do with political ideology? While I don't condone the measures he took, I still believe that his heart was in the right place in terms of his ultimate goal of opening ignorant eyes to the caustic effect of Islam in Europe and the West in general. There were other ways he could have elicited a response from the public without the bloodshed. 'Becoming radicalised', Wtf?
yes dear, spot on. by resorting to "bloodshed" rather than "other ways" of convincing people is he correctly labelled as insane.
top of the class Someone Else!