The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Kony 2012: don't be fooled

The viral video is an attempt to further the US's economic and military interests in Africa.

If you do anything on the back of watching Kony 2012, the new viral sensation currently embarassing the world wide web, it's to investigate exactly who or what is behind it and why people have been so taken in.

US charity Invisible Children wants the Ugandan Lords' Resistance Army (LRA) leader Joseph Kony, responsible for forced recruitment of thousands child soldiers and sex slaves, brought to justice at the International Criminal Court (ICC).

I actually find it amazing that people can suddenly care so much about an issue that they presumably have a superficial awareness of already, just because of a social media campaign led by Twitter and Facebook twinned with a campaign that aims its cross-hairs on the western all-feeling heart.

How many people have seen Blood Diamond? On its opening weekend in January 2007 it took £1,471,104, two months later it had grossed £7,269,409. One of the main sub-plots of the film, amidst vicious militias, is saving Dia Vandy, an abducted child soldier, before returning him to his family.

This is not a new issue, nor is our awareness of it.

Aside from Invisible Children's suspect finances (pay $32 for an "Action Kit" and 10% of that goes to "direct services," the rest on salaries, travel expenses and so on), worse is the fact so many people could be duped by a video that explicitly calls for US-led intervention in Central Africa. Invisible Children wants its young and beautiful activist community to directly fund the Ugandan army (itself guilty of atrocities against civilians, according to Human Rights Watch reports), which will be led by "American advisers."

For someone who portrays himself as a good Dad and a great all-round guy, Jason Russell is peculiarly fond of using Pentagonese, the opaque, Orwellian language of the military-industrial complex that gave us "collateral damage" (civilian dead), "immediate permanent decapitation" (death) and "pacification" (destruction).

What are these advisers going to be advising about? Who will their advice be advised to? Will it be good advice?

If Invisible Children is anything to go by, probably not. Because Russell and his Hipstomatic-schmaltz wants "direct foreign intervention" in Central Africa - that means boots on the ground, drones and jets in the air and the next inevitable step in America's programme of endless war.

You would think we had learned something after Afghanistan and Iraq, wars that have already killed over 1 million innocent people with a 90 per cent civilian to combatant death rate, and a "textbook" intervention in Libya which has resulted in regime change and with it the total destabilisation of yet another Middle Eastern country. This, as they say, is what democracy looks like.

A coincidence, perhaps, but the United States military has been running an extensive continent-wide programme under AFRICOM, the United States African Command. This includes a string of new drone airfields in the Horn of Africa (conveniently in-land enough to deal with Uganda and Kenya too), and the trans-Saharan Operation Enduring Freedom, to "fight al Qaeda in the Maghreb."

But what about Central Africa? Last October President Obama deployed around 100 US special ops troops to Central Africa, reportedly "to assist African forces in the removal of [LRA leader] Joseph Kony and the leadership of the LRA from the battlefield." Perhaps these are Russell's faceless "US advisers."

And yet there has been no reported (and verified) LRA activity in Uganda since 2006, and it is widely accepted that Kony is no longer in Uganda. Does the west really want to inflame another region by pursuing a small, embattled radical organisation and giving it indispensable credibility and victimhood?

There is clearly more than Kony at stake here. Central Africa is well known for its rich natural resources - including copper, cobalt, gold, uranium, magnesium and tin. Once ravaged by King Leopold II of Belgium, the 21st-century American Empire now wants in.

At an AFRICOM Conference at Fort McNair on February 18, 2008, Vice Admiral Robert T. Moeller declared the programme's mission meant maintaining "the free flow of natural resources from Africa to the global market."

Not only that. Ugandan President Yower Museveni has for some time courted Iran and President Ahmadinejad "in all fields." This is the new Scramble for Africa - a sick twist of history in which global powers are returning to old hunting grounds and fiefdoms in preparation for a new proxy war.

If Invisible Children does not turn out to be some Pentagon-CIA front, the charity is still attempting to align social media, activism and youth political disengagement with the United States' hawkish economic and military interests in Africa.

So please, don't be fooled.

Tom Rollins is a freelance journalist. Find him at Enlightenment Blues or @TRollins88.

51 comments

iesrtpj's picture

dblpodlf

SherborneMervin's picture

The US in not giving without a fight. Their money is on the Chinese oligarch and the Chinese middle-class. Worked a treat in the old Soviet Union and now that bedraggled and moth-eaten Russian teddy-bear has about half the population of the US and its military has such a complex that it is a laughing stock. http://www.squidoo.com/best-dishwashers-for-2012

blahblah's picture

"If Invisible Children does not turn out to be some Pentagon-CIA front" - Is there any proof for this half hearted accusation or is this just reallllly poor journalism?

James Hunter's picture

I'll take that bet. Definite CIA Astroturf going on here.

James Hunter's picture

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/Special/2011/10/20/Kenya-Uganda-snared-in-ba...

MBP17's picture

I've seen the film. It's not Academy Award material. It does have that peculiarly American mawkishness and the film maker makes injects himself into the narrative far too much, a la Michael Moore. But, it is achieving what it set out to achieve and that is to raise awareness and possibly motivate people to pressure their leaders to take action. It's a lot better than the response of lefty intellectuals to the crisis, which is do absolutely nothing, then criticize when someone tries something, anything, to bring this horror to an end. A little awareness and action from the international community in the 1990s could have saved thousands of lives in Rwanda and Bosnia. Lefty intellectual do-nothings complained a lot about Western intervention, whilst people died needlessly. But, of course, human lives don't matter to them. What really matters is naysaying and their beloved ideological purity. I'm sure the kidnapped children and their families are relieved that Western intellectuals care so much about their own lefty bona fides.

James Davies's picture

People must realise that ANY foriegn intervention by US forces has to have alternative motives. The United States government does not make decisions for "the people". The video itself displays the governments lack of interest in the campaigns early stages. Only when they realise what they can get out of it do they lend their support. It's very important that even the most humanitarian and politically active of us remain sceptical cause as you say, we could not just be sanctioning another military conflict, but openly calling for it.

James Hunter's picture

America realise that time is running out before China snaps up all the available Coltan, Cu etc.

Nick Willcocks's picture

I have no intention of giving money but clearly what this guy is doing to children in Africa is outrageous and whether the world woke up to this via a campaign or a movie is irrelevant to me ,,,he needs stopping... Don't give money but surely support the desire to capture him.

labrinth's picture

very bad journalism

Samuel Adams's picture

Gee, Tom, why don't you ask the Russians or Chinese or Jamaicans or Brazilians to help these kids if you distrust American motives so much? If the US government is so interested in Africa, why do they have to be pushed into committing 100 troops? Your thesis doesn't hold water.

James Hunter's picture

Watched the video. bought a cool t-shirt. wrote to my MP "Pwease stop bad man Kony", had a burger, had a shit, put on the xbox. Job done. What's next.

oliverpa's picture

THIS GUY HAS BEEN WORKING ON THIS PROJECT AND MAKING FILMS FOR 9 YEARS!!!! you just said they found oil 1 year ago, and of course actions taking by the US may seem more likely by our gov if there's oil (dont we know our history by now)....but instead of just writing a whole article on debunking the whole kony 2012 + invisible children org, why dont you play both sides and help get info out there about some more groups that have more impact on the regions where Kony is and how to get involved. everyone who watched this due to social media is not an idiot for having an emotional reaction either, how could you not?! reading further into the details about invisible children is the only reason i started feeling a little duped and embarrassed, but after i was able to defend myself and my emotions i dont think an issue to this level and the fact the guy is #1 on the ICC list no matter if the LRA is not AS active. its not like the guy is hiding by himself living his life. this issue is not "inactive" so stop acting like its yesterdays news...its cliche to say this but it really isnt ever too late. Remember when people were afraid of the youth's obsession with the internet and social media frenzy...get out and play. well look what 1 video in less than 1 week did to those same kids around the world. does is deserve the intense backlash...i cant say i do.

Simon Ryan's picture

I'm sorry but I find your cynicism a bit "old school". I don't trust US foreign policy as much as any other NS reader, but I trust them more than the Chinese though.
This movement is really about the power of social media capturing the energy of the world's youth and trying to harness it for global good. Of course, its the innocence of youth being manipulated, but kids won't do anything about this if they don't want to. This movement is using guerilla marketing because the mainstream media has "tuned-out" of this story. Mass media can't get new pictures and evidence of this ghastly crime.
There have been so many bloody conflicts to cover since 9/11 that the average viewer has been metaphorically turned-off by stories like these. Yet we have the "Facebook generation" looking for their news from new media, and so this story reappears. You could accuse the US being savvy enough to exploit new media.
But lets look at the film-makers objective: is it to capture this guy Kony and his cohorts? Or is to make a name for himself as a visionary of exploiting social media? It's probably both, but his main aim has to be stopping this crime, as the longer this goes-on the bigger failure Jason Russell will become.

Darren's picture

Iraq War = OIL
Afghanistan War = LITHIUM
Uganda War? = Oil? Copper? Gold? URANIUM! ( IRAN's NUCLEAR PROGRAM!)
U.S. influence in Central Africa?

Hugh Markey's picture

The US in not giving without a fight. Their money is on the Chinese oligarch and the Chinese middle-class. Worked a treat in the old Soviet Union and now that bedraggled and moth-eaten Russian teddy-bear has about half the population of the US and its military has such a complex that it is a laughing stock.
Talk about giving whisky to the Indians.

John's picture

Yet another really poor article peddling the conspiracy theories but offering almost not evidence of any kind to support them. New Statesman should be exercising higher standards and not publishing unsubstantiate rubbish like this st all in the first place.

Sweet Dood's picture

tl;dr

tara/alex's picture

this video is helping the younger generation to see the light on things they had no clue about.. if this one video can let the younger generation believe in a change then why try to knock them. children no matter where they are from should have a chance to live their lives. if hitler was still around would you let that go! Doubt it

Val's picture

Things like this have been going on for years, and no one did anything about it then, but I feel it's the trend at the moment, kinda like Keybaord Cat. Call me heartless, I don't care. If the person behind the video really wants to help children and bring awareness, do something about the kids here in the US first. Children as young as 18 months are forced into prostitution, beaten, tortured, and neglected. Why do we feel the need to get involved now? The US needs to fix it's own problems first before fixing everyone else's.

Keith Watermelon's picture

godwin's law in only 1 hour and 49 minutes. is it a new record?

Frankie's picture

As much as I don't trust US foreign policy Tom Rollins, I don't agree with your views on how much good this campaign could do. Its not just about sending money, it’s about spreading the word - a free action. It’s also about erasing ignorance. We are now in the age of information where everything is a click away; yet we are completely in the dark when there is nothing to gain but everything to lose. Campaigns like these are breeding a new generation (hopefully one your not a part of), with a society that says I choose to do nothing rather than I knew nothing.
As well as this I’d like to know about your views on justice and exactly why you think it has a time limit. Does an unpunished act mean any less because it isn't frequently repeated - because I’m sure his victims would tell you differently?
Evil only prevails when good men do nothing remember that next time you choose to incite ignorance with a one sided argument.

Willp's picture

MBP17 writes, "Lefty intellectual do-nothings complained a lot about Western intervention, whilst people died needlessly. But, of course, human lives don't matter to them." Has he learned nothing from experience? We were told that NATO’s wars against Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya were humanitarian wars, that killing by NATO forces would save lives.

But those wars did not save lives but killed more people. Those wars brought not democracy but disaster, disorder, widespread use of torture, warring tribes, break-up of the country, foreign exploitation.
These wars have cost an estimated $3 trillion, have raised oil prices and cut incomes, jobs and GDP.

Likewise, war against Uganda would not save lives but would kill more people; it would bring not democracy but disaster, disorder, widespread use of torture, warring tribes, break-up of the country and foreign exploitation.
‘Humanitarian’ voices howl for war and viciously abuse those who warn that war means more killing.
When has all this self-righteous do-gooding actually done any good?

Michael Barker's picture

The former chair of Invisible Children currently represents the right-wing humanitarian outfit, the International Rescue Committee
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dave-karlman/0/352/298

For critical informatio on the International Rescue Committee, see
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/articles/display/International_Rescue_Com...

Plus for a related critique of Greg Mortenson's very popular "humanitarian" group, see http://www.counterpunch.org/2010/08/10/three-cups-of-tea-for-imperialism/

Lox's picture

The whole article, and the responses from Val and James Hunter above, are based on the premise that Americans-Americans as individuals, not the USA as a state-do not do anything except in the pursuit of US national interests. You people really ought to try and get out more: the real world is more than a lab for half-arsed conspiracy theories where you've already decided the results of the experiment in advance.

David Smith's picture

One thing I learned in Berkeley: The government (or anyone else for that matter) cannot do anything that someone (lefty, righty, lawyer, village idiot) cannot find a reasonable sounding alternative motive.

Jon Hansen's picture

Before you take up arms virtually speaking . . . you need to read this (http://wp.me/p1h552-fU) . . . let me know what you think.

The Golden Latrine's picture

I think this an interesting take on Kony 2012. I totally agree about the dangers of military intervention, and I'm sure the region's national resources played a part in the US's desire to lend a hand.

I think Invisible Children's motives are probably sound myself, but the film itself made me feel queasy. My own take on it focused more on the dangers of intervention, I've linked to it below:

KONY 2012: Yes, social media can raise awareness, but does "clicktivism" do more than harm than good?

http://thegoldenlatrine.blogspot.com/2012/03/kony-2012-yes-social-media-...

Tawanda W.T Mulalu's picture

The new 'scramble for africa' is sickening. And it pains me to read this as an African that we are still not being left alone.

Sam's picture

Wish the Leveson Inquiry would look into bullshit journalism like this.

Riz's picture

@Tawanda, is it really that difficult for your to consider the possibility that not all attention on an African issue is driven by a scramble by resources? Is the victim narrative so deeply embedded in African culture that it sees all human motives as being driven by greed? Maybe its time to broaden your perspectives.

Brian's picture

This is not bad journalism. You idiots are just fucking sheep. LRA hasn't been seen in Uganda in 5 years. He is known to be operating in Sudan and the congo. But we send troops to uganda? You guys sure it has nothing to do with that new oil deposit found in uganda last year... right before the gov't sign the stop kony order..

Toby's picture

How anyone can see the Invisible Children charity and the KONY 2012 campaign as a bad thing, I couldn't tell you. The thing is, its not just that its trying to raise awareness around the world about a truly terrible thing that has been happening for however many years, and that it is still happening today, its helping rebuild the affected people's lives, redevelop schools and giving areas where the LRA are still active, support and safety. Its doing nothing but good for the affected people and also trying to get countries from all over the world to join together against this man, and also so people know they can't get away with something like this again.

Sam's picture

Brian - Why not send the CEOs of oil companies instead of marines then?

James's picture

Sam-we didnt roll in the CEOs when we invaded Afghanistan or Iraq. But rest assured they are there now! Just because the US has got a new tactic in convincing us that they should be in another country shouldn't deflect us in realising their real ulterior motives

claire's picture

Sickening that someone would care more about wether or not the US has an ulterior motive, than the thousands of children forced to mutilate and kill and exist as slaves...I don't care if there's a motive! Someone has to protect the children!

Riz's picture

Cynicism is a disease. Why is the idea that young people are motivated by compassion and the need to do some good so hard to accept? It's actually quite normal. In the end this article is based on a conspiracy-driven worldview, and not on evidence. We see the world not as it is, but as we are.

Functioning brain's picture

It's like you didn't read the article.

'oh but what about the dying children!'

That's the point, Kony hasn't been in Uganda since 2006. The issue isn't kids. It's oil and AFRICOM.

Great article, maybe the western sheep could one day show as much passion in bringing their own psychotic leaders to justice. Using George Bush as a targeted policy maker should make the deception of this propaganda as clear as possible

FairlyBalanced's picture

For anyone wanting the rest of the story...Invisible Children responds to these biased and baseless accusations, including transparent finacial disclosures and acknowledgement of their pursuit or Kony/LRS outside of Uganda post 2006: http://s3.amazonaws.com/www.invisiblechildren.com/critiques.html

Jeff's picture

I find it interesting how the opposition to the issue always say this is not a new issue. They seem to put aside the facts of the situation by saying that it isn't relevant. The fact is that thousands of children are kidnapped to be child soldiers and force to cause acts of great violence against the populace. What the opposition is say is that we should always keep to the status quo. But when the status quo has failed to bring justice and liberty to a population who live under the belief that the justice and liberty must be at the forefront of as unalienable rights, then the time has come to change the status quo, whether it be an immediate response (as is to be preferred), or a response to an ignored problem. Let us always stand to say that we as a generation stood by the belief of liberty and justice for all.

jamaican-jin's picture

...and man didn't land on the moon either right? very very bad journalism, and until someone somewhere speaks up and let the world know, THIS TOO WILL CONTINUE.

Makekonyfamous's picture

Tom Rollins is desperate to make himself famous. His twitter followers is a little less than 400. The way he writes explains why.

Riz's picture

@Functioning Brain, I have heard all this before in a million different guises. You haven't provided a single piece of evidence for your claim. So you don't like "Westerners". You are lucky you are not a Westerner, because when we Westerners make negative generalisations about other cultures and races we are called racists and bigots. And of course you have called the people who disagree with you "sheep", as is standard for conspiracy theorists when people actually ask them to produce some evidence for their claims. No, people who question conspiracy theories are not the sheep. It's the people who think everything is a conspiracy and never bother with evidence who are the sheep. Please do stay angry, though - after all, you are powerless to challenge the Illuminati. Then go back to back to reading David Icke. He doesn't provide any real evidence either.

Honourable Dr Saka's picture

J.F Kennedy, once said: "Things do not just happen. Things are made to happen". Therefore one wouldn't be wrong to imagine that some of these developments might not be happening by accident, but a well-planned event.
“A MAN ALWAYS HAS TWO REASONS FOR DOING ANYTHING- THE ‘GOOD REASON’ AND THE 'REAL REASON'”, (J.P. Morgan). This is why any such US proposed military intervention must be critically examined especially when it may lead to the establishment of a US military base (AFRICOM) in the country and the possible use of depleted Uranium which equally has devastating consequences. Our experience in Iraq is still fresh in our memories. As we look forward to “get rid of” these terrorists, let us always be guided by the Iraqi experience. The US went to Iraq (and Afghanistan) with the promise to get rid of Al-Qaeda. Today, although Bin Laden “is dead” together with Al-Zawahiri and about 1.2million Iraqis, Al-CIAda is still hanging around in the Middle East and Libya with more sophisticated weapons. Yet, the military contractors made billions of money in these wars. Perhaps the bitter part of this reality is that Al-Qaeda today has grown beyond mere terrorist attacks to a much bigger role of overthrowing governments labelled as evil. Wake UP!! They want to turn Africa into a war zone in order to plunder our resources.

dibsmft's picture

The geography is a little puzzling. Has Uganda been shifted to Central Africa? I must be out of touch ;-)

Carly Kawaii's picture

So Kony hasn't been active in Uganda for years now? So America probaby has an ulterior motive? Oh that's OK then. Let's have a cup of tea and forget all about it. Forget about all the children he's abducted in the past, they CLEARLY don't matter! It doesn't matter that these children were abducted, raped, forced to kill. Never mind, eh?

These are still crimes and Kony and the others responsible still need to be held accountable. They are indicted as war criminals. I couldn't give a toss who gets involved, be it US forces or the Ugandan government, so long as these evil people are all arrested, convicted and punished. If Uganda doesn't have the resources (or the guts?) to stop this from happening to it's children then someone else will have to step in.

There are plenty of conspiracy theories and people are entitled to their opinion but the facts remain the same:- Children are/have been abducted, raped, forced to kill and murdered. Regardless of America's intentions, this is something that needs to be stopped.

Trying to be nice's picture

It's interesting how few people are willing to take a genuinely balanced view of this situation. Certainly the KONY 2012 Campaign has its flaws, certainly the motivations of both Invisible Children and the US government can be called into question on the backs of historical evidence (of which there is plenty, a deal of it being painfully current.)

However, as a counter-point, we should be lauding the effectiveness of KONY 2012 in galvanizing our youth to engage in activism - an area in which they have been routinely duped into apathy by a mainstream culture of self-involvement and mass-indulgence. Your average 'Western' youth does not truly believe in democracy, in protest, in social change. These are things that happened in the past, things that now seem unnecessary. But we should never stop pushing, and although I question the Invisible Children and the consequences of their action, I can only hope that someone with a more practical, honest objective takes their method and runs with it.

Social and viral networking as a means of true democratic action can only be a good thing.

flense's picture

"immediate permanent decapitation" that is (got killed by having their head blown/chopped off)

just sayin'

Why NOW?'s picture

This really explains the push for Kony 2012. Oil in Uganda and other East African nations. Never a dull moment in grab and steal SCHEME of African resources.This man and the LRA have not been active for almost 7 years and now this guy enters the picture with video that went viral in lest that 48 hours. For those who are unaware this whole productions stinks to the high skies. There are children dying in other war torn countries such as Syria, Democratic Republic of Congo etc. No U.S. intervention has been sent to assist in these crises, why you might ask there are no natural resources such as OIL, cobalt,copper, tin, and many precious stones. THATS WHY THERE'S AN INTEREST IN THE EAST CENTRAL AFRICAN COUNTRIES. THIS IS SO VERY SAD, WHAT'S HAPPENING AND SO MANY PEOPLE ARE BEING SUCKERED IN TO THIS CAMPAIGN.

Diddy's picture

@ Why Now, since there is not one little bit of evidence for your claims, it "explains" nothing except that you have a paranoid worldview.

Latest tweets