Voter registration plans need to be rethought, report says
Millions could be saved from falling off electoral register.
By Mark Jenner Published 04 November 2011 9:20
The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee has today published a report into the government's reforms to voter registration, suggesting that key parts of the legislation need to be rethought.
The initial proposals, to implement a system of Individual Electoral Registration (IER), were widely seen as a welcome move away from "head-of-household registration", thought to be out of date and prone to fraud. However legislation currently going through the House of Commons also plans to abolish the annual canvass of households, allowing potential voters the ability to 'opt-out', and removing the necessity to co-operate with electoral registration officers (EROs).
Mehdi Hassan, writing in the New Statesman last month, argued that the legislation as it stands would produce a "sick democracy, with fewer registered voters and lower turnouts" adding "It is the biggest political scandal you've never heard of." And the Electoral Reform Society claimed that "the government was making it possible for citizens to 'opt out' from democracy," potentially wiping millions (of largely Labour leaning voters) form the electoral register.
Signs that the government was rethinking the more controversial aspects of its reforms materialised in October when deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said he was "minded to change these provisions" in the face of accusations of political gerrymandering. The Committee's report goes further by supporting the continuation of the annual canvass and the ability to penalise non-compliance.
Welcoming the report, Katie Ghose, Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society said:
This is welcome reading for anyone interested in our democracy. Westminster was sleepwalking towards a catastrophic drop in voter registration. We're pleased politicians have finally woken up to the problem. These missing millions are avoidable, and the government must now take heed.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















2 comments
In fact the only real ay to stir up interest in an apathetic electorate, is threaten to disenfranchise them. Its only then the bar room lawyers start screaming about 'losing their rights' although most of them any haven't the intention of voting in the first place.
Voting should be made compulsory. Use it or lose it.
If the people of Afgahisan Iraq and Libya can queue up for hours to register their vote, surely those in Britain can.
I am all for individual voter registration. If people cant be bothered to register to vote then then its their choice...and their loss.
Of course as a Conservative I look forward to potentially millions of Labour supporters ...like students, recent immigrants and benefit claimants giving up their voting right!!
Heres to a generation of Tory rule..........