Greece to cancel referendum on bail-out package
After a dramatic day, the Greek PM indicates referendum will be dropped as national unity talks cont
By Samira Shackle Published 03 November 2011 17:41
After a day of tumultous political developments, the Greek prime minister, George Papandreou, has said he is ready to drop a proposed referendum on the latest bail-out package from the eurozone. Four ministers, including the Finance Minister, Evangelos Venizelo, opposed the referendum and pressured Papandreou to drop it on the basis that eurozone membership is too important.
The EU bailout, agreed last month, would give the heavily indebted Greek government a further 130bn euros (£111bn; $178bn) and a 50 per cent write-off of its debt. However, to receive this pay-out, the government would have to agree to even more deeply unpopular austerity measures.
Papandreou said the referendum was "never an end in itself". A key part of this decision appears to be opposition politician Antonis Samaras deciding to support the rescue package.
The prime minister's own future is still uncertain. While the BBC reported earlier that he was preparing to resign, Greek state TV said that he had ruled this out. However, the opposition New Democracy party has said it would only be part of a coalition government if Papandreou stood down. Since it looks increasingly likely that a national unity government might be necessary, this could be a problem.
A little closer to home, the UK has admitted that it may have to pay more into the IMF to support Greece's financial recovery. It means some back-pedalling for David Cameron, who has made much of his achievements in restricting Britain's donations to the eurozone bailouts. My colleague Rafael Behr explores this issue in more detail in an earlier Staggers post:
The government (or at least its Conservative side) think it is a terrible idea for sovereign nations to bind themselves into a single currency and yet supports the urgent acceleration of that process. It rejects the contribution of British taxpayers' money to a bailout that might explicitly support a euro stabilisation process but would be happy to contribute to one that helped eurozone countries independently, thereby supporting euro stabilisation indirectly. This is not a sustainable position.
In a public speech, Papandreou retained his trademark composure, but looked pale. He spoke of "wag[ing] a battle of Titanic proportions, our first duty being to fend off bankruptcy, to prevent the country collapsing". The challenge of balancing the contesting demands of foreign lenders and the Greek public appears to have been too much. Even if he survives the coming hours or weeks, it is difficult to see how Papandreou will reinvigorate his spent political capital for much longer.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















11 comments
One gets the impression of encountering many overblown news articles.
George Papandreou will do what he is told... or he will get his bottom smacked.
swatantra nandanwar
03 November 2011 at 17:35"Electorates don't understand Referendums one bit. So its pointless asking them. "
Do you mean they probably won't agree with you?
This democracy is a foul thing. Let us all pray the UK is not infected by it!
george papandreou, the referendum is the best thing for greece, either the greek people buy into the austerity measures or they default and exit the euro either way it would the people who decide.
the euro leaders are in panic because italian and spanish default is also on the cards, the problem is who is to carry on buying these debts? the banks or china? china ain't so willing, if it does then it will attach alot of strings with the deals, if the banks carry on buying govt debt then they themselves are at risk of bankruptcy. either way like the titanic it's heading down hill.
the west was happy during the good times, the politicans not willing to balance the budget over the economic cycle led us into this mess, just because the economy is booming and tax revenues bouyant does not mean that it will stay thay way forever and you don't spend it all and then some and create structural deficits - there is no point then saying that there was no structural deficit during the good times as that does not count, it's when the shit hits the fan when bust follows the boom you really measure what you saved.
best thing is for all govt to credibily commit to running budget surpluses during good times i.e. when we have economy growing at trend rate.
The problem with the whole Europe/'le grand projet' is that it might make economic sense, but it flies in the face of democracy. There is no European 'demos', countries want freedom, free trade but not be dictated to by central bureaucracies. Let's hope that the whole Europe project collapses and democracy is re-established in each of the member states.
True Democracy is dead. It is an insult to call nations democratic. Stop using the word.
Dave promise us a referendum, of course, when it suits his political agenda but he and Gideon criticizes the leader of a sovereign nation who rightly concludes that on such a crucial issue, the people should make the decision. That, Dave, is what you call true democracy.
Yes Lady J,
And it is the birth place of democracy after all.
But it doesn't matter now. Even with no referendum there is likely to be an election.
Electorates don't understand Referendums one bit. So its pointless asking them.
They just about understand what General Elections are about.
A pity about this. I was hoping for a Greek default, and hoping even more for it to drag a few other nations down with it. And just who the hell voted for the IMF? For years now they've been basically blackmailing countries into austerity and privatization. We just bombed Libya on the pretext of spreading democracy, we invaded Iran and Afghanistan to give the people a say. When it isn't convenient though we do everything we can to stop people having their say. Can't we get a NATO strike on the headquarters of the IMF?
Trying to prop up this failing system of disaster capitalism is costing everyone right now. It really should be ripped out and replaced with something which benefits society more than big business.
Living right next door to this mess, with ringside seats to this circus/disaster, why do the Turks pretend to want to join the EU?