Margaret Curran will struggle against the SNP
The new Shadow Scotland Secretary is a dogged campaigner, but better candidates have been overlooked
By James Maxwell Published 07 October 2011 18:34
Margaret Curran, MP for Glasgow East, has replaced Ann McKechin as Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland following Ed Miliband's first front bench reshuffle as leader of the Labour Party.
Curran served in the Scottish Parliament for 12 years between 1999 and 2011, rising to national prominence in 2008 when she lost a crucial by-election to the SNP -- a moment which, for many, marked the beginning of the end of Gordon Brown's premiership.
Curran's record as a dogged grassroots campaigner and opponent of independence ensures her appointment will be popular with Scottish Labour's activist base, which is desperate to take on a nationalist party still riding high in the polls six months after their momentous victory in the Holyrood elections.
At the same time, however, she represents a gamble for Labour. Her history of awkward gaffes and poor debate performances could put the party at a disadvantage in the run up to the forthcoming independence referendum, as well as at the 2012 Glasgow City Council elections, which the SNP believes it can win. Further, her close association with the failures of outgoing Scottish Labour leader Iain Gray (she helped write the party's May manifesto) will leave her exposed to nationalist accusations of incompetence, tribalism and negativity.
So why Curran? The role of the Shadow Scotland Secretary is going to be hugely important over the coming months and years as the Unionist parties try to upset Alex Salmond's bid to break-up Britain, yet Labour's most talented Scots, Jim Murphy and Douglas Alexander, appear wholly reluctant to take up the challenge.
One possible explanation for their reticence is that they know the First Minster does not poll well with woman and were as such happy to see another woman promoted to the position after McKechin. Another is that they are simply more interested in furthering their Westminster ambitions than in spending the next three years engaged in a bitter, arduous debate about Scotland's constitutional future.
But even with Murphy and Alexander unavailable or unwilling, there were other, perhaps better equipped, candidates waiting in the wings. 30-year-old Gemma Doyle, MP for West Dumbartonshire, has shown promise since she entered parliament at the last General Election, as has Gregg McClymont, a 35-year-old former Oxford history don who represents Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East (read his New Statesman profile here).
In reality, though, there is probably a more prosaic reason behind Curran's promotion: the old Scottish Labour career structure ensures that loyal party servants are justly rewarded. Labour's next leader in Scotland will certainly have his or her work cut out in dragging their comrades into the 21st century.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















12 comments
"the old Scottish Labour career structure ensures that loyal party servants are justly rewarded." errr wasn't she appointed to the post by Ed Miliband who the last time I checked isn't Scottish?
A pity that Murphy and Alexander are wasting their energies in Defence and Foreign Affairs and not addressing the more important question on the future of the Union.
I almost fell off my chair at work when I saw Curran's name in the list. She isn't a great performer and is a bit on the shrieky side. Looks like Labour are deciding they too can kiss Scotland goodbye in the next few years. And as for Murphy or Alexander being drafted in to defend the Union, Salmond would have them for breakfast without having to open his eyes.
Curran is clueless: she didn't even know where she same from during the GNE by-election:
Glasgow East By-Election: Easterhouse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQhW5VMXF40
She's my constituency MP at Westminster and she's a waste of space.
I'm areally quite angry that such a poor performer is seen to be rewarded for her many failings.
An extremely poor communicator and an intellectual pygmy.
I can tell you Salmond would get indigestion.
Nobody has the courage or talent to take on Alex Salmond.
Margaret Curran has always struck me as someone who believes she is better than reality tells us.
Deluded and sure to turn off millions of Scots.
Great result for the SNP.
I watched her on TV the evening the SNP swept to power in Holyrood, she was ill-informed and didn't even know what Labour's policies in Scotland were (to be fair neither did Labour). She was laughed of the TV studio set by saying, 'As I understand it' when replying to a question asking about Scottish Labour's policy on something or other.
The interviewer was somewhat shocked to hear, 'As I understand it' and said, you should know exactly what the policy is. She didn't and came across as a poorly educated person with little intellectual depth or grasp of policy.
What a poorly written article. Has this journalist ever actually met Margaret Curran? Or interviewed her? Or spoken to her?
She is generally regarded as one of the most experienced and competent Scottish performers in the media and in parliament. Remember Question Time from Aberdeen a few months ago when Alex Salmond was booed and she was cheered by the audience in Salmond's back yard?
As a Labour supporter in Scotland, this article is such an England-centric view of the world. Her job isn't to take on the SNP - they aren't in power in Westminster. Her job is to lead Scotland's MPs in standing up against the Tories and Lib Dems.
And since when was she, as an MP, responsible for writing the devolved MSP manifesto? Er... she wasn't. Get your facts right.
To Dundee Jambo:
With opponents of the poor quality that sit on the "Scottish" Labour benches at Holyrood, I think Westminster will soon push Curran out of Westminster as independent coutries don't send MPs to Westminster-fat lot of good opposing the Tories & LibDems at Westminster will do Curran then.
The esiest way to get rid of the influence of Westminster LibDems & Tories over Scotland is to declare independence-but Curran, Murphy, Alexander etc. are simply pursuing personal ambitions-and no doubt a seat in the Lords as a sinecure at the end of their self-interested careers.
The post of Scottish Secretary is widely seen as pretty irrelevant these days anyway.
Instead of standing up for Scotland's interests, the inhabitant is seen as London's voice in Scotland, charged with keeping the natives in their place.
Appointing someone who comes across like a nagging wife is just going to turn even more voters towards the SNP.
Take your head out of your arse, Dundee Jambo. Margaret Curran represents the worst aspects of labour political sectarianism in scotland: she appears to seethe with resentment that someone other than labour is in power in scotland. She-and you-should get used to that.
As far as your interpretation of her and salmond's performance on QTis concerned-you really are clutching at straws, aren't you?