Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Tea and kittens deployed to defeat Daily Mail and Express

Browser add-on blocks “unpleasant” papers

A recent add-on for popular web browsers is claimed to help you avoid accidentally visiting the websites of the Daily Mail or Daily Express. With the new tool, if you click a link that would take you to one of those sites, you are instead redirected to a site featuring nothing but pictures of tea and kittens. Say hello to Kitten Block.

Browsing the internet can be a perilous activity at the best of times. Following hyperlinks - a vital ingredient in the success of the internet- used to be fairly straight-forward. Whether you saw a link to Argos or the BBC, you knew whither you were headed should you click that link.

But increasingly, particularly in the worlds of social networks such as Twitter and Facebook, links are 'shortened'. A pointer is used to redirect you to the link in question, saving those all-important characters in an online world where brevity has become necessity rather than choice.

Twitter limits users to Tweets of no more than 140 characters, which helped to spawn a number of services that take the very long page addresses common on websites, and shortens them to something more manageable. Shortened, http://www.newstatesman.com/global-issues/2011/09/afghanistan-iraq-west-world becomes http://bit.ly/nwRw6l.

Both links take you to exactly the same page. That's great for brevity, but terrible for transparency. You no longer know, seeing only the Bit.ly link, where clicking it might take you.

Spammers, marketers and other ne'er-do-wells have exploited this 'trick', using the trust of the reader to get them to click a link in good faith, only to discover it takes them somewhere unexpected - the likely destinations being dodgy sites that are often pornographic or virus-ridden.

But a nifty add-on for Firefox, Chrome or Safari web browsers, called Kitten Block [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/kitten-block/], promises to protect you from accidentally visiting at least two sites - The Daily Mail and The Daily Express. Instead, clicking on a link to one of those sites redirects you to www.teaandkittens.co.uk, a site built by technology journalist Tom Royal and featuring, you guessed it, tea and kittens.

Royal, who also built Kitten Block, explains:

"When using the internet in the UK it's almost impossible to avoid occasionally accessing the website of one or the other [Mail or Express], even if one finds their political and social outlook unpleasant or offensive. KittenBlock is designed to solve this problem. It performs one simple function: if the browser is directed to either website it will be redirected instead to a selection of photos from http://www.teaandkittens.co.uk."

In fact with web browsers such as Internet Explorer, it's possible to block sites [http://www.wikihow.com/Block-a-Website-in-Internet-Explorer-7] you would rather not visit using your browser's security settings. But while that will block those sites, it won't automatically give you tea and kittens instead.

So there you have it - the combined online might of Paul Dacre and Richard Desmond stopped in their tracks by tea and kittens.

Jason Stamper is technology correspondent of the New Statesman and editor of Computer Business Review.

Tags: internet

18 comments

DAILY MAIL REPORTER's picture

Mr Royal, if you browse the site with Tor (https://www.torproject.org/index.html.en), then surely the ad crap wont work for them?

We're being run by a right-wing government pushing ever harder at the poor, and at civili liberties, and mailonline is it's propaganda machine.

This NS article is actually a step back, because liberal minded people in this country now need to monitor more than ever this hateful garbage, to be able to combat it.

If you want to do something positive, why not come up with a quirky app that allows avaerage IT users to manipulate the 'green-arrow' comments on mail 'articles', or better still, a novice's guide to DoSsing the living daylights out of them, and making it mailOFFline!

frances smith's picture

i think we should know our enemy, so i prefer to know what the daily mail is saying, rather than to block it out. some of the readers comments, that criticise it our quite entertaining.

Tom Royal's picture

Hi. I'm the guy who made Kitten Block.

Regarding the whole "know your enemy" issue - I see your point, but the problem is that by visiting the Daily Mail website you're also *paying* your enemy.

Mail Online gets huge web traffic (http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/apr/19/mail-online-website-popular) allowing it to make a packet by selling adverts. Even if you don't click - or you block - those adverts, every pageview helps bolster its web statistics, which in turn helps the rate card.

And while there may be times when it is indeed justifiable to visit the Mail because what it's writing requires challenge or rebuttal, I think there's also a not entirely healthy trade - and I'm as guilty of this as anyone - in passing around examples of particularly awful Daily Mail non-journalism merely to mock or sneer at, which again does nothing but play into the Mail Online's hands. I'm sure a good percentage of its traffic comes from people doing the journalistic equivalent of rubbernecking at a road accident.

It's often just too tempting. Hence, Kitten Block.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to burn some books (only Dan Brown, so rest easy).

Tom

Tom Royal's picture

Hello Mr Reporter,

No, Tor doesn't help in this case - it functions (in effect only - see wiki etc for the technical details) as an anonymous proxy, not a cache. At best it obfuscates where a website hit comes from, which might or might not reduce advertising value, but doesn't prevent the hit registering*.

The late Istyosty proxy did cache pages, reducing pageviews on the MailOnline, but it's now gone.

And as I said above, I agree that there are occasions when it's important to see what the DM is writing so that it can be refuted. Most of the time, though, simply pointing and mocking particularly stupid MailOnline stories on Twitter - and there's a lot of that going on - is simply playing into the hands of its owners.

Tom

* It's worth noting at this point that my Firefox plugin doesn't always prevent the hit, either - it's annoyingly slow to intercept the page load, and sadly I can't find a better way to track page loads within the FF architecture. The Chrome version works far, far better and as such I recommend it.

Pirate Prentice's picture

Excellent work Tom. Would it be possible to do an edition of the blocker with baby Pandas?

I'm not a big fan of kittens. (although they are better than the Mail.

OG's picture

Heaven forbid we should ever be exposed to views different from our own! I thought this was a liberal magazine?

Mrs Hippy's picture

"The is typical of the fascist left."

This is typical of the ignorant right.

Bill Kristol-Balls's picture

But if it blocks the Daily Mail, where will I get my fix of soft-core porn from?

Christine Bleakley in a school uniform...

Pregant MILF's in bikinis.....

Kate Moss topless......

(and that's just today)

Coast Patrol MoC's picture

It's important to watch them, to see what they're up to, and then comment on it back here ;)

The Bleakley shots today are beyond belief, lol

I'm not sure if Dacre is even involved in the website...

Hugo Daddy's picture

Hey, white-hot technology correspondents - you might want to check how long these cool websites have been around... it would be awful, say, to be reporting on something that did the rounds last year.

Next week - hilarious pictures of cats speaking using incorrect grammar! I can has cutting edge?

DudeMamood's picture

Funny!

Alex Baldwin's picture

@Flashbuck

It's not fascist, it's voluntary. The article clearly explains how it's easy to accidentally contribute your personal "traffic" to websites that you're intending to boycott.

The Mail's webpage has been intentionally publishing absurd and offensive things for a while to attract more page views. You can easily get around Kitten Block if you decide you still want to view the page, but it gives you a moment's paws to think about whether you really care what the Mail/Express have to say.

Hugh Markey's picture

We all [ about ten in number ] read the Daily Mail and the Daily Express.
Learning what your enemy or opponent is thinking is informative.
As Monty advised - looking at a photo of Erwin Rommel pinned on the wall of his headquarters - 'know your enemy inside out!'
We purchase print copies and share. The electronic version is useful for back-up.
Never purchased the NotWorld. Nor the Sun. Times very occasionally.

Catholic Taste

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets