Steve Jobs resigns as Apple CEO
The charismatic figure, credited with turning around the fortunes of the technology giant, steps down.
By Samira Shackle Published 25 August 2011 9:51
Steve Jobs, the man credited with turning Apple into one of the most industry-shaping companies around, has resigned from his position as chief executive officer.
The 55 year old, who co-founded the technology giant from a garage, has been on medical leave for an undisclosed condition since January. He previously survived pancreatic cancer. In his resignation letter, Jobs said:
I have always said if there ever came a day when I could no longer meet my duties and expectations as Apple's CEO, I would be the first to let you know. Unfortunately, that day has come.
In a statement, Apple said that Tim Cook, who has been running things in Jobs' absence, will take over as chief executive, while Jobs will move to the newly-created role of chairman.
The decision has sent shockwaves through the business world, with shares in Apple dropping by at least 5 per cent in overnight trading.
Perhaps more than any other current corporate leader, Jobs is closely identified with the success of his company. Seen as a visionary, Jobs' many admirers say that his talent lies in predicting what consumers want before they know they want it.
He ran Apple twice. The first time was from its creation in 1976 until he was ousted in 1985, and the second was 20 years later when he returned to rescue the floundering company. He successfully turned Apple round, releasing a series of iconic products. The iPod has reshaped the music industry, while the iPhone changed expectations of what a mobile phone should do.
Earlier this month, Apple briefly became the world's most valuable company, overtaking the oil giant Exxon Mobil, worth over $350bn. It didn't last long, but is astonishing given that Apple sells things that people want, rather than necessities like oil.
Over at the Telegraph, Shane Richmond suggests that it is important not to overstate the impact of Jobs' departure:
Apple's innovations over the last decade are the result of the company's structure: a small team at the top, focusing on a tightly-controlled number of products. Ideas can come from anywhere but those top executives spend a lot of time deciding what not to work on, to ensure that the company's resources aren't spread too thinly. Though Jobs played a key role in developing those working practices, the ideas are embedded deep within the company by this point. Apple's competitors might be hoping that the company's fortunes will change for the worse without Jobs but I wouldn't bet on it.
Whether Apple continues to hit the mark remains to be seen, but the technology industry has lost one of its most charismatic figures.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















6 comments
I'm probably going to be shot down for this, but as a long term geek & computer hobbyist, I feel that Apple is a huge triumph of marketing over substance. MP3 players, tablet computers, desktop pc's all existed before Apple 'invented' them. They just made them prettier, hobbled their functionality in the name of 'user friendliness' (friendly as long as you use them exactly the way Apple want you to) and then used wall to wall marketing and the strange turtle-neck, skinny latte cult thing to persuade people it was the alpha & omega. If Apple made cars, they would have no bonnets, because they'd convince you that they didn't need servicing (and when they did break down that would be the users fault for driving on non-Apple approved roads). Apple may have increased market penetration for technology, but it's McTech, shallow and unsustaining.
My word, I feel better getting that off my chest :)
Thanks for not speculating wildly like the Guardian did. Nobody knows 100% why the man is ill but of course it seems every needs to know.
Small clarification however, Steve returned in 1997 after he was ousted in 85, so it's 12 years, not 20. He was the guy who killed the floppy drive in 1997 remember! :-)
Core. Jobs and Gates changed the C20 and should be honoured permanantly by having a star or planet or city named after them.
@Swatantra Nandanwar
Besides lowering the cost of ownership of computers for everyone, what else has Gates done in the computing world? People tend to overstate what Bill has done compared to Steve.
@ JonathanJK
He personally rewrote IBM's DOS, and helped create Windows 3.1 and then 95, which were the worlds first real operating systems for technically challenged people.
He therefore fundamentally changed computing from the late 70's until the mid nineties and made mass computing possible.
Lost the plot a bit though when the web came about. He never really grasped the possibilities properly. That is why the once all powerful Microsoft is now slipping.
That said nearly half of all servers use Microsoft software be it IIS, Microsort SQL Server, or Windows Server.
@ Smiler, if you watch 'Pirates of Silicon Valley', Gates bought and rewrote 'QDOS' from Tim Paterson of Seattle Computer Products, MS then sold it to IBM.
I cite a film because it's been stated as fact that everything in that movie happened. But you can also read about those events anywhere with a google search; it's just more interesting when you watch it happen. :-)
I would challenge your view that Windows 95 was the first 'real operating system for technically challenged people', especially when the Mac had existed since 1984 and only it's high cost of ownership placed it out of reach of 99% of people. Those technically challenged would get on fine with it just as much as Windows if not more so.
What is the C: Drive prompt and a keyboard to the layman compared to clicking on an icon with a mouse.
Again what Gates has done (which you're alluding to in your post and in a long winded way that confirms what I stated in my reply to Swatantra) is make computing cheap, and MS still does today. That in itself IS a massive achievement which I'm not denying but other than that, what else has he done in the field of computing that is so culturally defining as all of Steve Jobs' efforts?
Server software doesn't count if you want to compare it to Pixar Studio, NeXT and the iPod. I would include the iPad but we are still playing that revolution out at the moment.
Post new comment