Four in ten think worse of Cameron after phone-hacking
However, polls show a mixed picture, as Tories suffer only a small negative effect.
By Samira Shackle Published 19 July 2011 11:35
Two polls today show contradictory results for the two main parties in the aftermath of the phone-hacking crisis.
An ICM/Guardian poll shows Labour down since before the scandal broke, at 36 points to the Conservatives' 37. This is the first time the Tories have had the lead in an ICM poll in months, although Labour's three-point drop is due to a rise in Lib Dem support, not Tory. By contrast, a Populus poll for the Times (£) shows the Conservatives sharply down, with 34 points to Labour's 39. This is down five points on last month, and the lowest in a Populus poll since the coalition was formed. Despite this drop, however, Labour did not appear to have benefitted, and at 39 were a point down on last month.
The Populus poll found that four out of ten members of the public (39 per cent) said they thought worse of David Cameron as a result of the last fortnight's revelations, while 55 per cent said their view of him was unchanged.
Just 14 per cent said their view of Ed Miliband had improved as a result of the phone-hacking scandal, while 20 per cent said it had gone down, and 61 per cent were unchanged. Westminster and media circles have lauded Miliband's handling of the crisis and say that it has reinvigorated his leadership of the party. This result may indicate that this has not filtered through to the public as much as Labour had hoped.
The ICM poll is similarly disheartening for Miliband. The group phrased its question on the leaders differently; UK Polling Report explains that questions of the type asked by Populus "tend to give misleading results -- people who never liked a politician to start with say it's made their view worse and vice-versa."
Instead, ICM asked people for approval ratings before and after the event, and found that Cameron remains more popular than either his government or other leading politicians, although more people think he is doing a bad job than a good one. 43 per cent of voters say he is doing a good job, while 48 per cent say bad job, both up one point from last month. This gives him a net negative rating of -5.
By contrast, just 31 per cent say Miliband is doing a good job -- although this is up three points on last month -- while 47 per cent say he is doing a bad job, down two. This means his net rating is -16, up from -21 last month. It's a significant improvement, but there is a long way to go yet. The positive reaction to Miliband's handling of the crisis is stronger among Labour supporterss, 58 per cent now think he is doing a good job, compared with 45 per cent last month.
While the picture from these polls is mixed, we can draw the following conclusions: the Tories have, so far at least, suffered only a small negative effect in the polls because of the crisis. While a majority of the public thinks that Cameron has handled the crisis badly, his broader approval ratings are holding up and -- crucially -- are still substantially ahead of both Miliband and Nick Clegg. Miliband has certainly seen a boost in how the public perceive him, but he still has a long way to go to catch up with Cameron, and this bounce has not been reflected in greater support for Labour. It remains to be seen whether Miliband can capitalise on these modest gains when the news agenda moves on.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















9 comments
Sorry JohnP, you lost me. You economist johnnies are always doing that. Is what you mean that the government can simply print money and everything will be all right? Is that the Keynesianism you are always on about? I do know that he was terribly good at gambling on the Stock Exchange. Are you?
The whole scandal is a disaster for labour and this is why:
The New Statesman is often pro- Ed Miliband as journalists such as Medhi Hassan backed him for leadership and therefore have a massive interest in him succeeding. However the man is a terrible leader. He comes across in the media as weak, boring, humourless. He is part of an elite and most people will be embarrassed to have him has their leader. This might sound harsh - but it is true.
Anyone could have succeeded in the current circumstances at attacking the Tories - this has nothing to do with Ed's brilliance. Before he was (hopefully) on his way out - now Ed is wedged in power in the labour party. We really need someone better to attack Cameron.
On the benches are hugely talented and likeable politicians such as Johnson and Cooper
The question is whether a combination of the hacking scandal and the misjudgements involved in employing and supporting Coulson accumulate into a tipping point on how Cameron is perceived by the public. (The most recent example of such a tipping point would be ‘the election that never was’ for Gordon Brown.) My instincts are that as they stand the current events won’t be that significant in themselves as Cameron still retains the ‘give a new leader a chance’ good will. The thing about Brown was that while he had a bounce in popularity when he became prime minister, he was a politician that had been around for some time and had accumulated a number of negatives in the minds of many voters.
In a similar way Cameron is now acquiring some negative perceptions that might come into play at a later stage.
Ed Miliband shouldn't worry about these initial polls and just continue with his current line of questioning on the issue. It would be a big mistake to ramp things up, just to try and get a bigger public reaction. Remember how Neil Kinnock ultimatley let Thatcher off the hook when she looked really vulnerable over the Westland affair.
Do you know I can't remember anything that Kinnock ever did except fall into the sea and get a series of cushy jobs in Europe for his family and himself.
"Just 14 per cent said their view of Ed Miliband had improved as a result". I'm sensing this too.
How can the current Labour team be so incompetent. How come an old master like Mandelson isnt out savaging the Tories? A weakness of this entrenched team is that it is not uniting the party.
It was absolutely obvious what needed doing to nail this. But instead EM has focussed and focussed and focussed on Dan Coulson and Cameron but the issue has become boring. I was listening to his recently ramblings which were great for the first 5 seconds but after 30 seconds of tediously listing to EM I just thought 'oh god, what has he done, what an irritating waiste of space'. He made himself look shallow and a one trick pony only capable of dealing with one issue at a time.
EM needs desparately to expand the attack and find other weaknesses in the Tories. He needs to create the impression that the Tories are riddelled with rot not just doing them the favour of containing it to a single manageable issue. Its probably to late now as the media bubble is disappating.
Oh well. Hopefully it comes with experience so better performance next time EM. Otherwise Labour will not get in. Its a pitty as opportunities like the current one do not happen very often.
A very disappointed Indu.
==== http://www.vogue7.us ====
==== http://www.vogue7.us ====
==== http://www.vogue7.us ====
==== http://www.vogue7.us ====
==== http://www.vogue7.us ====
==== http://www.vogue7.us ====
BTW. Given the bandwogon has left town we can get back to business as usual.
Before 2008, the last government borrowed £350BN but what did our kids then get for it? The current elite's deficit reduction plan is to stack a further £250BN borowing on top. We are a small country and could never afford to pay it back but who cares so long as the elite get into power - "no limits, do whatever it takes" is the moto.
---- http://www.proxy4biz.com ------
---- http://www.proxy4biz.com ------
Post new comment