Labour steps up the pressure on Cameron
Yvette Cooper: relationship with Coulson raises "serious questions" about the Prime Minister's judge
By Samira Shackle Published 18 July 2011 10:33
Labour is stepping up the pressure on David Cameron following the resignation of Britain's top police officer, Sir Paul Stephenson.
The head of the Metropolitan Police stood down yesterday, citing speculation about the relationship between News International and the police force. The pressure on him grew with the revelation that he had employed the News of the World deputy editor, Neil Wallis. Notably, Stephenson directly referred to Cameron's relationship with the former News of the World editor, Andy Coulson:
Once Mr Wallis's name did become associated with Operation Weeting, I did not want to compromise the Prime Minister in any way by revealing or discussing a potential suspect who clearly had a close relationship with Mr Coulson. I am aware of the many political exchanges in relation to Mr Coulson's previous employment -- I believe it would have been extraordinarily clumsy of me to have exposed the Prime Minister, or by association the Home Secretary, to any accusation, however unfair, as a consequence of them being in possession of operational information in this regard. Similarly, the Mayor. Because of the individuals involved, their positions and relationships, these were I believe unique circumstances.
On the Today programme this morning, the shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said that this raised questions about Cameron's "continued silence" on the matter. Here's the key section of the interview:
Cooper: It was interesting what Sir Paul said yesterday -- that one of the reasons he clearly felt he could not tell the Home Secretary, the mayor, Downing Street about that contract that he had with Neil Wallis, the former deputy editor of News of the World --- he couldn't tell them because of the relationship between the Prime minister and Andy Coulson. That seems to me to be unprecedented. I cannot think of any case where the commissioner could not tell the Home Secretary because he was worried about the Prime Minister's relationship with somebody involved in the criminal investigation.
Interviewer: To be clear, this resignation statement, he says "I did not want to compromise the Prime Minister in any way by revealing or discussing a potential suspect who clearly had a close relationship with Mr Coulson. But why would that have compromised the Prime Minister?
Cooper: Well, this is obviously Sir Paul's judgement --
Interviewer: Can you explain to us how that could be? It's difficult to know why it would compromise the Prime Minister. What are the options?
Cooper: I don't know the details of what it is Sir Paul knows about the ongoing investigation, what the role of Andy Coulson is. But as you'll know, the Prime Minister is obviously continuing to see Coulson, he invited him to Chequers some time after his resignation, so he has obviously continued to be in touch with Andy Coulson. So there are clearly questions I think about Andy Coulson's role in all of this and about the Prime Minister's judgement in appointing him and in continuing to keep that relationship up. So it does raise concerns. If the Met commissioner himself thought that relationship -- that compromised relationship -- prevented him from telling the Home Secretary what was happening, talking to her about operational things, but also maintaining the Home Secretary and the mayor's confidence in the on-going work of the Met and how they were handling a difficult situation -- that puts the Met commissioner in an extremely difficult situation.
Cameron is currently on a trade visit to Africa, a trip which he has cut from four days to two. However, his absence at this critical time looks strange to say the least. He has so far ignored the serious questions that his relationship with Coulson raises, except to say that if he was misled by Coulson, then so were police and parliament. Stephenson's comments -- while certainly not notable for their clarity -- seem designed to put the pressure back on Downing Street. This is potentially very damaging for Cameron: he will not be able to delay providing answers for much longer.
UPDATE: Cameron has rejected Stephenson's comparison between his hiring of Wallis and Cameron's hiring of Coulson. Speaking at a press conference in South Africa, he said:
I think the situation in Metropolitan Police service is really quite different to the situation in government, not least because the issues that the Metropolitan police service are looking at and the issues around them have had a direct bearing on public confidence into the police inquiry into the News of the World and indeed the police themselves.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















11 comments
It's the blairites: Tony Blair,David Cameron,Peter Mandelson George Osbourne, and Michael Gove etc who are going to be most affected because they are closest to News International. No more "heir to blair" talk! These are the losers.
A lot more information will come out in the Inquiries which will show like on just how friendly certain New Labour figures were with News International. A lot of these old faces will have to ejected in favour of new ones.
The winners in all this will be the non- blairite Tories like David Davies.
The non-blairite Labour MPs like Tom Wastson and the clean new ones like Chukka Umma and Sadiq Khan are winners. Ed Milliband also wins.
The Lib Dems are winners, Clegg is rejuvenated and more powerful, so is Simon Hughes.
He looked a little uncomfy in the SA news conference when James Lansdale made direct reference to Sir Paul's comment and there wasn't much in the line of post press conference questions at all.
He did announce parliament will be meeting on wednesday though to discuss the committee hearing tomorrow so Ed M got what he called for this morning.
On the point of the article and Sir Paul's remark, this raises serious questions for Cameron and one wonders when the no confidence vote will be forthcoming, his handling of this entire situation has been severely lacking and I would love him to do the honourable thing and go. You have to imagine this the other way around, would a Labour PM still be sure of his job in the same situation, would the Torys be shouting from the rooftops and every media platform that his judgement was seriously impaired and he should go immediately?
Time to go Dave, your time is up and your credibility (if you ever had any) is damaged beyond repair.
How much easier life might have been for Cameron had he appointed fellow Old Etonian Landsdale (see Lou's post), as he originally intended, rather than Coulson.
@Lou: Be fair, until Blair came to power resignation was common in such circumstances. Is was Tony and his cronies who utterly rejected the concept and clung to power and position regardless - see the last decade's disastrous and illegal war.
No reason for Cameron to go anywhere in response to all this; the precedent was set by the last government.
Karyobin - I can't be fair where the Tories are concerned, it goes completely against the grain!
I take your point however but actually I do think he has to go if the relentless story around this continues and all roads keep leading back to Andy Coulson and thus the PM. I don't see how he can possibly carry on with the business of government with the damage that is being inflicted on an hour by hour basis.
"until Blair came to power resignation was common in such circumstances. It was Tony and his cronies who utterly rejected the concept and clung to power and position regardless"
What rubbish! Thatcher should have resigned over Westland, and Major should have resigned over the ERM debacle (not to mention the ongoing sleaze which characterised his administration, just like this one).
If Cameron goes and we get a new Tory leader, I trust we'll get a general election as well. We had to suffer three years of jibes from the Tories about Gordon Brown being "unelected", even though no PM of this country has ever been directly chosen by the voters.
http://cuttingedgeuk.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=uk&action=display&thr...
Ultimately what happens to Cameron will be down to facts: what actually did he know about Coulson, the investigation and the whole unravelling saga? If there is any hard evidence he covered up, or was even pressured by Rebekah Wade to hire Coulson, then he is in deep doo-doo. But it still might not be enough for him to go. Ultimately he himself has done nothing upfront wrong. It is not a big national policy (like Iraq) that has gone awry, just some obscure media issue. I think the financial crisis might save him as we all change tack and start to deal with the American and eurozone crisis. Anyhow, I still think anything is better than Ed Miliband as PM.
I did say when all this broke it would be fun and it has been the really funny episode would be David Cameron having to resign. He won't however, he'll cling on like ivy!
I am continuously staggered by the comments of the Cameron apologists. Does he have to murder someone before he can resign? He has been exposed as a snake oil merchant and should do the right and decent thing and resign. He is up to his neck in the NI scandal. Just look what Stephenson has said about his employment of Coulson. I rest my case. He "danced with the devil" and has to play the price. Go now for God's sake so that this whole sordid, disgraceful "right wing" mess can be sorted-out.
"he'll cling on like ivy!"
Don't you mean wisteria?
Two big figures in journalism were hired to do PR for public bodies:-
1. Former Deputy Editor of ‘The News Of The World’ got a part-time job working for the Met. He has been arrested over phone hacking. It turns out that the Head of the Met, Sir Paul Stephenson, was not directly involved in hiring him, but he has resigned anyway on principle.
2. Former Editor of ‘The News Of The World’ got a full-time job working for the Prime Minister. He has been arrested over phone hacking. It turns out that Cameron hired him personally.
It's all quite simple really. Stephenson, a man of honour, has resigned on principle for doing less than Cameron did.
http://cuttingedgeuk.proboards.com/index.cgi