Luddite

Don't and having seen your previous comments, you won't let these halfwits get you down!

PromRM
02 May 2011 at 13:43 It was wrong to bury him at sea. That PIG!! should have been paraded through the streets of Manhattan hanging in a cage.

Pakistan is the epicentre of Islamic terrorism. Let's never forget. ALL!! the mass-murders of 7/7 where of Pakistani origin.

How rattled your cage Luddite?

Matthew Fox! How dare you cloud our rational political debate with your TYPO!

I spit on you.

Is this a saatisfactory resolution to the tale? Bin Laden's death I mean.

silly boys,thers no daout the world is a safer better place without such a religus FOOL

Would I sound like a conspiracy nutter if I said there was something a bit fishy about the whole scenario?

If you read the whole story there are definately some porkies being told somewhere.

Is there an election in the US in the next couple of months?

The moral justification here seems to rely on the following argument. If someone kills numerable innocent civilians, that someone provides a moral justification for their own murder. http://www.trainingforcnacertification.org/cna-training-in-florida/

After almost 10yrs of hiden and strugle. Justice has prevail. Kudos to Americans for not relent.

Btw, if I was an American, I would vote Obama today. No doubts about it. You cannot win a chess game without killing the king. Bush missed that with his Saudi / Pakistani friends

Obama wins next American election. F*** another stupid 4 years.

Killed in a country which was not at war with the US. Isn't this a summary execution and therefore illegal?

Rejoice at a death and mourn at a birth... your own. !

Satan has the whole world deceived.

@PeteyMcPeterson: Well done for having the courage to say it out loud. Of course something's f**king fishy. No word for almost a decade - he denied resposibility for 9/11 anyway - all videos of him clearly, err...weren't him.

The guy's been dead for years.

Cui bono?

This event undermines the Iraq War, instead of going after Bin Laden, Bush and the Right where more interested in getting even with Saddam.

PromRM
02 May 2011 at 09:17 Isn't organising and financing mass-murder also illegal, or do we frequent a parallel universe.

As is the case with all these monsters, living in a walled compound, a villa in luxury, with his 6(?) wives and children whilst sending young innocent brainwashed children to their deaths in suicide bombings, but not risking his own, this man was evil personified.
Instead of waging war against his own corrupt Saudi Regime, with which he had issue, he decided to turn the world updside down and wage war on the innocents in this world.
Lets also hope America learns from this tragic episode and nightmare and reassesses it foreign policies and finds out who its real friends are and works for real liberty and equality and peace, otherwise God will not bless America.

scampy
02 May 2011 at 08:56
Bush and Blair are still free?

'Mustapha Jihad and the boys will be looking for revenge' That's reads like a comedy script.

Of course it is good that Bin Laden is dead and that it sends a strong message to the remaining al-Qaeda network - but there is large amount of hypocrisy. The truth is that the US and UK killed significantly more civilians, in Afghanistan, in the subsequent reprisal, than al-Qaeda did in the US in 2001.

usual mongs on here conspiracy theories or going on about Blair and Bush as war criminals, what guff.

As Maggie said, just rejoice at the news! Fucker had it coming, I just wish he had been hung like the common criminal that he was.

With a bit of luck - Gaddaffi is next!

Yeah, man was an ass. Crackpot religous fritcake. I would argue that Blair is just as bad, I don't see how anyone could argue otherwise.

Luddite, you think I am mourning him? You think I am left wing? Your response seems to be typical cowboy, hollywood, black and white oversimplified us versus then nonsense. If you want to carry on shouting "we're number one" and not think that maybe some politician somewhere would try and work his death to his advantage, you are naiive. I know without a shadow of a doubt that the media will sometimes alter little facts for it's own end (I've had stories written about me, guess how much was fact), and if you try and find out anything about it, you'll see that there is definately some kind of alteration somewhere along the line, it might just be to make a lightly jucier story, I'm assuming nothing.

Mouring a mass murderer? What an interesting world it must be inside your tiny mind

Quintessential example of western double standards.

The idea that the death of Osama Bin Laden is morally acceptable since he was allegedly behind the Sept 11 attacks - not that I or many others have seen the evidence - seems spurious to say the least. The moral justification here seems to rely on the following argument. If someone kills numerable innocent civilians, that someone provides a moral justification for their own murder.

According to such an argument to kill president Bush would would be morally justifiable, since it was his executive orders that mandated both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, in which a far greater number of innocent civilians were killed.

We don't need to defend the moral reprehensibility of Osama's actions; what we do need to do is to resolve the moral jeopardy the west has placed itself in, in the last decade.

Either we stand against killing in the name of peace and persuasion, and we find alternative non-militaristic means to engage non-agreed states, or we continue to endorse violence, and punitive action, and continue to provide sufficient justification for the revenge attacks, now inevitable, by Osama Bin Laden's followers and sympathisers.

The west needs to sort out its duplicitous moral values, before they posture on the global stage about what is right, wrong, or what is or isn't step forward.

However, I see no evidence of Osama's death. No documentation, photographic evidence, the only circumstantial evidence is that Osama had not issued a video press release, thus precluding the possibility he has been killed.

How gullible are we prepared to be? America says they've killed Obama, and buried him at sea. They did not preserve or take evidence of his death, since they did not want to make him a martyr? But he is a martyr, and has been since the very day that America waged a personal war on him.

Osama is not symbol that justifies wanton killing, since there are no defensible grounds on which such killing could be defended, but he is symbol of a maverick challenging western hegemony and hypocrisy, something that has kept the majority of the worlds population, subjugated and impoverished.