The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Assange: “WikiLeaks is the intelligence agency of the people”

The site chief discusses radical journalism and WikiLeaks’s main threat in an exclusive New Stat

In an exclusive essay for the New Statesman, the editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, argues that the whistleblowing website is a return to the days of the once-popular radical press. He also discusses why the New York Times dislikes the website and reveals the biggest threat to WikiLeaks today.

"WikiLeaks is part of an honourable tradition that expands the scope of freedom by trying to lay 'all the mysteries and secrets of government' before the public," writes Assange, who compares WikiLeaks to the pamphleteers of the English civil war and the radical press of the early 20th century. "We are, in a sense, a pure expression of what the media should be: an intelligence agency of the people, casting pearls before swine."

Assange argues that the New York Times's hostility to WikiLeaks stems from the newspaper's illiberal tradition of failing to back organisations or figures that challenge established elites. He highlights the newspaper's failure to support the American pacifist and anti-war campaigner Eugene Debs, who was imprisoned for ten years for making an anti-war speech in 1918.

"The New York Times, true to form, had been calling for [Debs's] imprisonment for more than two decades, saying in an editorial of 9 July 1894 that Debs was 'a lawbreaker at large, an enemy of the human race. There has been quite enough talk about warrants against him and about arresting him,' " writes Assange. "Seen within this historical perspective, the New York Times's performance in the run-up to the US-led invasion of Iraq, and its hostile attitude to WikiLeaks today, are not surprising."

In its major leaks, the website only agreed to work with the NYT, among others, "for reasons of realpolitik", according to Assange.

WikiLeaks is able to succeed because, unlike many of its forebears, it does not rely on advertisers, he continues. "As well as the hostility of governments, popular grass-roots publishers have had to face the realities of advertising as a source of revenue. [T]he Daily Herald . . . was forced to close despite being among the 20 largest-circulation dailies in the world, because its largely working-class readers did not constitute a lucrative advertising market."

WikiLeaks has other problems, however, writes Assange: "How do we deal with an extrajudicial financial blockade by Bank of America, Visa (including Visa Europe, registered in London), MasterCard, PayPal, Western Union, the Swiss PostFinance, Moneybookers and other finance companies, all keen to curry favour with Washington?"

To read the piece in full, pick up a copy of this week's New Statesman, on news-stands from Thursday, or click here to subscribe to the magazine.

47 comments

anonymous's picture

@Mr. Divine

I don't understand your logic of total transparency; total transparency of governmental affairs and private citizens are entirely different matters. Not totally surprised though, seeing the assumption you made about Assange without having any factual evidence.

I'm glad that an intelligent man like Assange is trying to make a difference compared to the society-slaves that are willing to believe any subjective information and make assumptions like yourself.

Nice trollin bro.

CriticalEye21's picture

The German media have recently been producing a number of excellent documentaries in English about topical issues. Here's a very good programme on Bradley Manning: http://bit.ly/grHK6y

And here's another on the US Kill Team in Afghanistan, i.e. about the American soldiers who killed Afghan civilians for fun: http://bit.ly/hyI35g

ThinkTank's picture

@Mr Divine, call it what you want "misrepresent"/"lie", it amounts to the same thing.

But I do endorse your attempt to obscure what I said with your lies. As said, it is necessary to obscure the truth, including presenting false information because you and anyone else cannot handle it. So well done! :)

This is why Assange needs to be stopped, and smeared with rape charges.

Marty McFly's picture

Do you really believe WikiLeaks is an authentic source for the people?

Why is western media perpetuating Assange's "patriotic" stereotype? The smear campaign against him (rape charge) was double staged to further the illusion of Assange: enemy of the state. If the leaked information was such a threat to establishment, then why are the headlines plastered everywhere?

So, why would a government agency indirectly operate a site like WikiLeaks? Because controlling conspiracies & left wing information sources are highest priority for governments and the empires they support.

Think I'm wrong? Then stay inside your box. Conforming sheep are either enclosed or being driven into another enclosure – they shall never roam the paddock a free animal.

ThinkTank's picture

@Mr. Divine, Assange will never tell the truth, all he can do is present classified documents. Whenever Assange makes truth claims, he is being as disingenuous as you and I.

crabstix's picture

Marty McFly, tell me. Are they blood drinking lizard people?

Hans Castorp's picture

Someone called "anonymous" - without any sense of apparent self or irony - slags off another commenter for demanding the Assange vision of transparency (i.e. the end to all privacy, on his despotic terms).

That's yer ball game, right there.

ANONYMOUS's picture

@ YOU - 5 April 2011 at 20:40: How can you suggest that Julian Assange and Bradley Manning are cowards when they risked their liberty [and their lives] to expose the corruption of your government. The only cowards are people like YOU who fail to see the stupidity of killing people to sustain an economy [or are YOU fine with the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people just to maintain the USA's standard of living]. YOU are the coward, YOU are the one who's blind. WE are ANONYMOUS.. WE do not forgive.. WE do not forget.. WE are legion.. Expect us.. SOON..

ANONYMOUS's picture

@ Hans Castrop - 06 April 2011 at 11:18: Transparency is about everyone seeing what's happening. You only need secrets if your ashamed of what your doing. There's your real ball game, right there....

Captain Sensible's picture

@ Stuart Eels is your name a sexual inuendo? I was merely repeating what Julian, our saviour, and the voice of freedom repeated to his young lady firend.

ANONYMOUS's picture

"What you must realise is that most of these people are so inured, so dependant on that system that they are not ready to be unplugged"

Words from a Si Fi Movie maybe, but very real words none the less.

People are dependant on an economy that is based on trading in oil. A system that has been created by devaluing the dollar, and replacing that value with the assumed value of trading in US dollars to boy up the economy [The dollar is based on something like a 18th of the actual amount of gold in any US repository - this is a verifiable fact].

Saddam Hussain has no WMDs, that part has been undeniably established [Also a verifiable fact].

So why would the US create a war if that where not true? Simple, to keep the oil trading nations trading in dollars.

It's a documented fact that just prior to the war Saddam told the world he was considering trading in Euro's [Again a verifiable fact].

If that had happened, and OPEC had followed [because it would have been cheaper for them - again a verifiable fact] the US economy would have gone into meltdown [also a verifiable fact].

That's the reason that the US invaded the oil producing nations, it has nothing to do with anyone harbouring nut jobs who exist despite all the so called "War on terror". [After the bombings in London the government put tanks into airports - fact - Tanks can not prevent a suicide bomber].

You are all being held to ransom by fear created by your own government to prevent you questioning why your sons and daughters are dying overseas.

Why do you think there has been such resistance to women in the army [There is a report that was commissioned by the pentagon on the possible effects of that women dying overseas would have on the American economy - Just search the net].

Because the idea of MEN dying in combat is an established so called "TRUTH" that everyone blindly accepts. The idea of someone's wife or mother dying in combat is something that your government fears would make you question these wars.

Houdini - "You can hide an elephant in plain sight by simple misdirection".

The secrets that are being kept from you are not about national security, not because they are important for your safety, but because it's important that you don't understand what your government is doing to keep you in cheap consumer goods, in case you don't agree that the means justifies the ends. They are banking on the fact that you are such cowards that you'd chose your standard of living over a free and actually democratic world. That you would rather not know the atrocities done in your name so you can buy oil at a stupidly cheap rate, and carry on destroying the world's eco system.

If that is the hight of intelligence in the USA then we are all doomed.

We are ANONYMOUS,
WE are LEGION,
WE do not FORGET,
WE do not FORGIVE,
EXPECT US,
SOON....

Clem the Gem's picture

For the hard of understanding, let me try to explain one thing - it is simply not in anyones interests for total immediate disclosure of all Government business. How would the peace process in Ulster have got off the ground?
That we certainly need more open Government is in no doubt - we also need greater corporate disclosure as well. Freedom of speech and the press are fragile here in the UK, as is our right to know vast amounts of hidden knowledge. Yet Mr Assange is quite prepared to make stuff up - witness his claim that the unsympathetic journos he encounters in London are part of a Jewish plot. Witness his allies in Russia - pretty unsavoury...
http://clemthegem.wordpress.com/

Stuart Eels's picture

No it's not, what's yours, some sort of cover for halfwit who thinks he's clever? My comment was idiotic, like yours but never got a posting!

Who has had more effect in the last couple of years in this country? The Telegraph exposing MPs, another going down very shortly, or Wikileaks? I don't think the Telegraph leaves its sources to be locked up in inhuman conditions. I could be wrong of course.

Well IfItoldyou's picture

Julian Assange undoubtably has the biggest balls of any man living. He's smart enough to know what is at stake for the evil ones.

There is a revolution happening. Wikileaks is a symptom. It's catchy.

Everyone is going to get it.

Truth = Democracy's picture

censored in my reply as well.

you have joined the dark side; will never read your strak again.

Mr. Divine's picture

Thank you ThinkTank for your endorsement of my attempt to obscure what you said with my misrepresentations and lies.

It is a pleasure being pulled up by a person who knows when someone else like me is trying to pull the wool over the reader's eyes with lies.

Lets hope that the world's greatest intellectual, Jullian Assange, isn't as stupid as me and tells the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Especially as to how he's spending the Wikileak's donations and to what he has done with his willy.

jie4v7i14's picture

People in the know get a perverted joy with keeping things from the people, with patronising us constantly.

And wikileaks is a sign of the times, with the communication explosion we are living in. It is very exciting, but not for those perverts who play games with peoples lives, in dark rooms.

Stuart Eels's picture

Censored again in my reply to the idiotic posting by Captain Sensible, ah well I suppose Julian Assange needs his friends on the NS, after all everybody else seem to be abandoning ship.

Greg's picture

The CIA is nothing but an extremely powerful criminal organization.
I don't know who they serve but it definitely isn't the people.

Thank God for Wikileaks and those who support their efforts.

Duck hunter's picture

As has been said many,many times. Newspapers should provide honest information for the people, not be a tool for the elite.
It's absolutely true, news corporations owned by politically manipulated tycoons are destroying the very fabric of a free society, and are without daubt a tool for the elite.
Call me a lefty capitalist hater, I'm not ! All I want is the truth, and people like Assange are putting it out there. Isn't it odd that he's getting such a hard time, not from us the ordinary folk, but the mainstream media and politicians that we should be holding accountable for what they do in our name.Wake up!

Hans Castorp's picture

Is there a legacy of a luminary historical figure that this deluded little twerp and monomaniac peddler will not rape in order to aggrandise himself?

YOU's picture

this man is an insult to and a pain to the entire Globe. You who are for him have no sense of what should and shouldn't be. This man shouldn't be and any one for him is just a nerd obsessed with trying to have power over a force much higher than you. This man is an insult to many people who deserve respect and screwing up international relationships. You have to realize the truth can hurt. Sometimes you shouldn't know the truth.

Van's picture

Once an organisation or political party for that matter has too many obligations......then their freedom to speak truths tend to become eroded.

The question is, why do these organisations lead such complex lives.....quite simply, for power and money. Good principles and ideology then slip back into the books from whence they came and stay trapped on some dusty shelf.

jie4v7i14's picture

Bradley Manning is a hero, by the way, you certain unsufferable right-wing total tools.
Bradley, made in Wales,
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_jIL2QIzk9Fg/TSX8_HXeGrI/AAAAAAAAABs/zT2FwqlCw7...

Fruininut's picture

How's about an interview with Bradley manning... or is that a bad idea... ?

Van's picture

Consider this:

If a man kills people outside his home to keep his secrets then sooner or later he will start to kill people inside his home to continue maintaining his secrets.

Now apply this to a government....

Truth = Democracy's picture

just ask Jefferson. if not, there is no informed consent nor real democracy. but since this is a time of universal deceit, it's logical that telling the truth is now a revolutionary act. no other press is as beholden to the people, so much as the profiteers. those who balk at too much truth must prefer the neat silence of totalitarian regimes.

re the $ problem: could wikileaks create their own protected channel for accepting donations??

Mr. Divine's picture

Why should Wikileaks need money? Why is it asking for it? In what 5 star hotels does Julian plan to stay in?

Honourable money?

Gideon Polya's picture

I applaud Julian Assange and WikiLeaks for bringing more of the Awful Truth to the World.

However we must not forget that Mainstream media (and academic and politician) censorship and lying by omission involves not just massive, deliberate investigative failure (as now revealed by the secret documents exposed by WikiLeaks) but also deliberate refusal to publish already well-documented, Elephant-in-the room Awful Truths.

Thus everyone, of course, knows about the Jewish Holocaust (5-6 million Jews killed, 1 in 6 dying from deprivation) but there is vanishingly minmimal reportage of the WW2 Holocasut of which it was a part (30 million Slavs, Jews and Gypsies murdered) to the extent that (largely due to the genocidal racist Zionists) Holocaust has become synonymous with the Jewish victim part of the 30 million victim whole and the well-documented racist Zionist(RZ) collaboration with the Nazis and complicity in the Jewish Holocaust is ignored by Mainstream media (MSM)(e.g. see: https://sites.google.com/site/jewsagainstracistzionism/brand-joel-exposi... and https://sites.google.com/site/jewsagainstracistzionism/brenner-lenni-exp... ).

Indeed the first WW2 atrocity to be described in a book as a "Holocaust" (in 1944 by N.G. Jog in "Churchill's blind-spot: India")was the 1943-1945 Bengali Holocaust in which 6-7 million Indians were deliberately starved to death by the British for strategic reasons. For a belated BBC expose involving myself, Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen, UK medical historian Dr Sanjoy Bhattacharya and other scholars see: http://www.open2.net/thingsweforgot/bengalfamine_programme.html. For a detailed and documented account of this and other British atrocities see the 1998 or 2008 editions of my huge book "Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History": http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/ .

Yet, for example, a search for the term "Bengali Holocaust" in the entire site of the cowardly, unethical, lying and Zionist-infested ABC (Apartheid Australia's equivalent of the BBC) yields zero (0) results and a search for "bengal famine" yields a mere 10 results (4 due to me) while searches for "jewish holocaust" and "holocaust" (i.e. Jewish Holocaust) yield 127 and 2,997 results, respectively: http://search.abc.net.au/search/search.cgi?query=%22bengali+holocaust%22... .

Many, many more examples can be given - They are lying to you. WikiLeaks has made a small hole in the Mainstream media Wall of Silence.

MR's picture

YOU, you say that we who support JA have no sense of how things should be, yet you then tell everyone to actually avoid facing the truth. How is anyone supposed to have any real sense of how things should be unless they are grounded in truth? There is an inherent conflict in philosophy you present but I feel certain you don't see it. It's a sad commentary on humanity that there is even one person on this planet that willingly prefers blissful ignorance to truth and knowledge.

If you want to delude yourself and have no guts to face the awful truth doesn't mean no one else should. Keep on believing the beautiful lie otherwise known as mainstream media.

ThinkTank's picture

@ Zenopus, there is no evidence that religion, superstition, and general stupidity is in decline. Christianity may be decreasing in Europe and the US, but its being replaced by equally stupid ideas, cults, conspiracy theories and alternative religions. People don't want to know the truth. If they did, wikileaks wouldn't be a threat. The truth provokes people to anger and violence. The truth should be suppressed.

Mr. Divine's picture

@ Think Tank: ' there is no evidence that religion, superstition, and general stupidity is in decline'

Yes there is. Religion for one is declining as you readily admit. Superstition is decline as more people couldn't be bothered with it. And stupidity is definitely in decline as there are less accidents per head then ever before.

Left Leaning QC's picture

This man must be protected at all costs.

QA's picture

Here's an idea - write a book about the history of WikiLeaks with Assange's help and sell it so its proceeds all go to WikiLeaks. It would be a way for people to donate as well as get people informed.

ThinkTank's picture

Julian Assange is a threat to civilization. Human beings by their nature cannot handle truth. It is devastating to their psyche, which is why religion is needed to propagate lies about reality. Truth needs to be obscured, and in most cases withheld for a stable society to exist.

Captain Sensible's picture

Julian, Willileaks is also the sexual athlete of the people, all women should be wearing something like him on their vaginas!

ThinkTank's picture

Mr Divine says "Religion for one is declining as you readily admit." But Mr Divine misrepresented me. The truth of the matter, I said:

"Christianity may be decreasing in Europe and the US, but its being replaced by equally stupid ideas, cults, conspiracy theories and alternative religions."

Mr Divine has demonstrated my point that people don't want to know the truth and willingly obscure and hide it. As he has done by lying about what I "admit".

acrea's picture

I do not think the BOA leaks are being held inside of a vault at bank of america headquarters.He cashed out. Why would his accounts being frozen prevent him from uploading a document on the internet.

Mr. Divine's picture

@ThinkTank: I haven't lied to what you have admitted. I've just misrepresented what you have said. But you have to admit that religion per head is in world-wide decline.

Plagiarized Indignation's picture

I've used condoms that when I first put them on they were tightly wrapped. but after several minutes of vigerous activity it loosened up and went inside my female partner and not to be found easily!. wouldnt that have some sort of leway?. I mean did George Hitler bush's regime invent laws in sweeden to avert truth telling!. George H.W.Bush and G.W.B. hates us all!!!!!!!!!!. abolosh the bush center for indignation intelligence!!!!!!!!. and get rid of the gate summit ASAP!.

Nicholai's picture

This man is a hero and a liberator, revealing all the corruption that has taken place withing our government, and others. We, the people, are being kept down by the corporatocracy and hes hes showing us how they have manipulated the world. Ecuador, the middle east, our taxes, our wars, all on behalf of private interests. you are a fool if you think this man is in it for glory or money.a fake. educate yourselves. Enlighten others.

Richard Mellor's picture

First off, I am a bit surprised that it wasn't mentioned that Debs was a socialist, a man who Lenin described as a genuine revolutionary. He led the Pullman strike and ran for president from Jail. "Better vote for what you want and don't get it than for what you don't want and get it" wrote Debs.

Who knows who the anonymous twerps are like "You" and others who attack Wikileaks through personal insults against Assange. Defend Wikileaks, free Bradley Manning.Here is a rally in San Fran I was at and shot a few minutes of video: http://bit.ly/ifBgJW

Mr. Divine's picture

@Richard Mellor: Is that your real name? I doubt it. And if you're so in favour of total transparency what is your income and where exactly do you live?

Zenopus's picture

ThinkTank wrote: "Julian Assange is a threat to civilization. Human beings by their nature cannot handle truth. It is devastating to their psyche, which is why religion is needed to propagate lies about reality. Truth needs to be obscured, and in most cases withheld for a stable society to exist." - Religion is in decline, at least in Europe and the US, as more and more people realize they'd rather have the truth. Or maybe your comments were sarcastic?

Fraser's picture

We all want to know the truth except those in power whom it will damage.

Mortimer Bloomington's picture

Assange aside, Wikileaks provides a useful deliberative function: it feeds necessary information to citizens and thereby increased the likelihood of informed preferences. For example, on the matter of western intervention in Libya - predictably thought of us as a good thing by most mainstream media outlets - Wikileaks provides a useful evidentiary counterpart to the "received wisdom". Even a cursory glance over the many cables passed between Tripoli and Washington between 2008-2009 leads one to the conclusion that western intervention has everything to do with oil and nothing to do with humanitarianism. We can therefore use Wikileaks to test the evidence that is being put into the public domain by mainstream journalists (I have seen scant coverage of the leaks which clearly make the case for Libya as nothing more than an oil cashcow for the west). This is not to say that Wikileaks is a perfect organisation; nor is it to suggest that its procedures are transparent or even democratic. We know that Assange is a shadowy character. But we are missing the point when we single him out as the sole bearer of informational gifts. Rather, we should look at the "quality of the data" that is being published: how high-ranking it is, what level of security clearance it requires, how detailed it is, how accurate it is at tracing the historical record. More than this, we can provide an interesting quantitative analysis of the number of times "oil" versus "rights" occurs in say the Libyan documents - to get a feel for the dominant agenda that informs military strategy and international diplomacy. In this sense, Wikileaks provides a useful insight into the underlying structure, the feints of description, that underlie officially-sanctioned arguments. What I love most of all, is that the "absence" of this evidence in the mainstream media suggests an editorialising agenda, perhaps even a conspiracy to keep information "out" of the public domain. In this way, Wikileaks actually allows the average citizen to hold the corporate media to account.

Long may it continue. Truth is a many-sided and varied thing. Wikileaks shatters the uniform smugness of corporate media. It offers alternative views, an open window to genuine public interpretation and reason. How anyone can be against this organisation is beyond any right reasoning individual.

Latest tweets