Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia and lazy journalists
“They were always lazy, now they’re just a little better informed.”
By Jon Bernstein Published 14 January 2011 12:27
Tomorrow marks the tenth anniversary of the birth of Wikipedia, the collaborative online encyclopaedia launched as an experiment on 15 January 2001 and now hosting 17 million pages across 271 languages.
Yesterday, I spent most of my day in the company of Wikipedia's founder, Jimmy Wales, as he spoke at the Bristol Festival of Ideas (his only public outing of this visit) and then on the journey back to London, where he hosted a party to thank the army of British Wikipedia volunteers, under the umbrella of Wikimedia UK.
Before talking to Wales I did the social (media) thing and canvassed for questions via Twitter. My favourite came from The Media Blog's Will Sturgeon, a former colleague.
So I asked Wales: do you feel guilty about breeding a generation of lazy journalists? His answer:
I think they were always lazy, now they're just a little better informed [laughs].
No, actually I think oftentimes journalists who are lazy and using Wikipedia get caught out; and there are lots more journalists who understand how to use Wikipedia correctly. [As a journalist] you go out to interview the head of a company, or a certain politician and you don't know much about them. So this way you can quickly get some background and, also, read the discussion pages to find out what are the things the public don't quite know.
During the rest of our interview – conducted mainly on the 14.30 from Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington (carriage D) – he talked about a broad range of subjects, from the neutrality of Wikipedia and internet censorship, to Sarah Palin and the Tea Party, to David Cameron and the "big society", to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. He also offered a fascinating answer when I asked him whether he votes.
The interview will form part of a piece for a future issue of the New Statesman.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















11 comments
Wikipedia - brilliant. But...
the full time editors / pedants can drive one to distraction ! Words fail to convey sufficient contempt for them. That said, others, with ones 'blessing' did so ! One speaks as a continuing contributing editor, albeit under a different guise, ip code, also circumstances.
Warning. Wikipedia be not 'gospel'.
There are some phenomenally lazy journalists out there. When Elisabeth Schwarzkopf died, an Associated Press journalist, William J. Kole, copied off the then Wikipedia page. He wrote that she was the aunt of Stormin' Norman Schwarzkopf.
Based on the AP wire, hundreds of papers all over the world repeated this ludicrous myth. Many of them have never bothered to correct such as MSNBC: http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/14170274/ns/today-entertainment/
(The Wikipedia page was corrected within a day or so here death.)
Speaking of "lazy journalists", how about those who think Jimmy Wales was "founder" of Wikipedia, when it was Larry Sanger who championed the idea of installing a wiki architecture to create encyclopedia content, Sanger who named it "Wikipedia", and Sanger who issued the first public call for participation?
I guess the laziness of some journalists shows no bounds.
Sometimes when Jimmy Wales is playing it for laughs he speaks a truth, such as here. The truth is that before Wikipedia, all too many journalists were already lazy. Wikipedia simply provides a platform to take that laziness to a whole other level. Any doubts as to that should be resolved by the current wave of adulatory PR vomited forth by the news media on Wikipedia's 10th anniversary. The truth about Wikipedia is out there and has been for years; it is simply little noted or outright ignored. Getting at and reporting on the real story is hard, repeating Wikimedia Foundation PR prattle is easy.
Post new comment