The Liberal Democrats’ latest U-turn: equal pay
Theresa May to scrap compulsory gender pay audits, which Liberal Democrat manifesto promised to implement.
By Samira Shackle Published 02 December 2010 13:31
Liberal Democrat MPs are increasingly well-practised at eating their words. The latest reversal is over equal pay audits.
The Home Secretary, Theresa May, will announce later today that plans to force companies to disclose how much they pay men and women are to be scrapped. Instead, companies will be asked to narrow the pay gap – one of the worst in Europe – through voluntary efforts.
It comes as no surprise that a Conservative-led government has opted to scrap this clause in the Equality Act – it is unpopular with big business. But it does fly in the face of a Liberal Democrat manifesto pledge to introduce fair pay audits for every company with more than 100 employees. This went further than Labour's draft legislation, which limited the measure to companies with more than 250 employees.
It will also be a humiliating climbdown for the Lib Dem Lynne Featherstone, junior minister for equality, who said in June 2008 that the legislation did not go far enough:
A voluntary audit system for private industry is hardly worth the paper it's printed on. We need to know when the government actually plans to step in if progress isn't made.
The government's failure to grasp the nettle of private-sector pay will provide little comfort to the enormous numbers of people who are still being discriminated against in the workplace.
Featherstone has not issued a statement in the response to the new move.
Not only is this an about-turn for the Lib Dems, it is a huge step backwards in the fight to equalise pay. Women in the UK earn, on average, 21.4 per cent less than men. A recent study estimated that, at the current rate of change, pay would not be equalised until 2067. It is clear that we need to take positive action to speed this process along.
Gender equality groups such as the Fawcett Society have consistently pointed to the UK's culture of secrecy around pay as one of the reasons that the gap persists. In Sweden, when transparency measures were introduced, the gender pay gap has narrowed greatly.
Speaking to the Financial Times this year, Harriet Harman explained the thinking behind the compulsory audit:
It is all too easy for people to say there is unfairness in pay but not here, and it is very important – knowledge is power – for people to see the pay gap in their workplace.
Though the voluntary measures that will replace gender pay audits have not yet been spelled out, it is probably safe to assume that the bite has been taken out of the act altogether.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















13 comments
I'm reminded of Tommy Carcetti in The Wire. An old politico tells him that when you become Mayor, every day brings someone coming to your office giving you another bowl of shit to eat.
If you're a Liberal Democrat, every day Cameron and Clegg give you another bowl of shit to eat. And then you have to pretend you've always liked the taste.
We awaited the libdem spin machine to whir into action on this one.
Thumbs up for Clegg and his merry men for this one!!
But to hell with females they really should be in the kitchen knowing their place.
What are the Lib Dem strategists thinking? They are facing annhilation as a party. They are a weak, ineffectual, junior, ney childlike partner being completely used. It's like they don't belong in proper adult politics, using no skill, no wisdom, no strategy. They lurch from failure to calamity, dropping voters in the millions. Why in God's name do they think the voters will return when (actually big IF, if you agree with the liberal Keynes) economy improves? Course they won't. They are not going to thank you at any point before the next election. Pull out now, with panash, with style, before you have killed a party with a long and great tradition.
Yes, how dare Lib Dems not implement every single promise they made despite getting 23% of votes at the election and 9% of seats.
And yet...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1335054/
It's almost as if they've had to compromise their positions. ("sell out" to those who put idealism above pragmatism). At a guess I'd say it's the price for not winning an election, but then if the people wanted all Lib Dem policies then more would've voted for them.
Young women earn more than young men. This is only reversed when women start having babies.
The whole pay gap discussion is based on fundamentally flawed statistics that assume gender to be the only factor in pay.
Lynne Featherstone is a wimp and won't put up much of a fight on Equalities. Again the Lib Dems have shown the worst side of themselves at sixes and sevens. They are reeling about like a punch drunk boxer.
Teressa May should know better:voluntary schemes never work and are not worth the pape they are written on. The Tories don't know the meaning of diversity or equality or parity.
You need actual regulation and penalties imposed on those that don't stick to the regulations. Another cop out from a failed Govt.
"Featherstone has not issued a statement in the response to the new move."
Um, yes she has:
http://www.equalities.gov.uk/news/featherstone_new_tools_will_h.aspx
In fact, it appears that Featherstone, rather than May, is the public face of this decision.
Jeebus's slathering flock. I am getting heartily sick of journos painting every Tory policy that the Lib Dems fail to stop dead a "U-turn".
How about, instead of blaming the Lib Dems for not being able to get 100% of their policies enacted with only 26% of the vote (UK, if you wanted 100% Lib Dem policies you should have voted 100% Lib Dem), we focus on the main point here - which is that the Tories care so little for equal rights that they are prepared to scrap this clause.
How on earth is it the Lib Dem's fault that the Tories think this is right?!
Perhaps if Featherstone was paid less than her male counterparts, she might live up to her pre election expectations and her current role of Equalities Minister and fight more vociferously for equal rights for women and equal pay rather than adopting the Clegg, Cable and Alexander position of kissing the coalition's derriére and abandoning LD political ideology. Yet another ineffective Lib Dem Minister who hasn't the courage of her convictions to challenge the policy u turn.
As for Theresa May Minister for Women and Equality - an oxymoron if ever there was one - let's not forget her voting record where equal rights for gay people are concerned, her voting record on abortion, her recent scrapping of the equality law that made public authorities have to take in to account disadvantage and inequality when making policy decisions where May described it as 'socialism in one clause'. In November, she said that economic equality 'was good for you, good for us and good for big business' yet here we are a fortnight later and she now abandons her argument for economic equality and undermines women and their rights yet again, and thus she overturns decades of hard work in getting legislation on to the statute to ensure equality prevailed.
Theresa May is a disgrace to the female race.
We're all in this together - as long as you are male, white, straight and not disadvantaged economically, socially or physically.
These backtracks are getting increasingly more infuriating- fair enough cutting jobs and harriers with a means of clumsily retrieving some of the deficit, even the tuition fees and the failure to tax the rich stems back to an archaic superiority complex...but outright rejection of equality rights?
This country is heading back to the 80's, and Labour will be fumbling about once again trying to find a backbone.
Perhaps Parties should produce 2 Manifestos at election time, one if they win outright and another if they have to go into coalition. That way we can see which policies they will ditch and compromise on.
Its the Lib Dems fault for going along with Tory policies and not forcing them to climb down. The Lib Dems have enormous power in that they could bring down that Govt and force a GE. That thought must be a constant worry to Dave 6 months into his Govt now we the public can see the true complexion of Dave the Camelion.
What is ridiculous is the spectacle of Cable voting against his own policies.
Shadow minister Chris Bryant tells this joke:
I phoned Lib Dem Head Office and asked for a copy of the manifesto.
They said they’d sold out. I said, "I know, but can I have a manifesto?"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1334545/Confusion-Queen-Sultan...
@ Lou
"We're all in this together - as long as you are male, white, straight and not disadvantaged economically, socially or physically."
Sadly, you are very right, but what else would we expect from a nasty party largely comprised of millionaire public school boys.
Post new comment