A clear and present peril
Immigration has become the new fault line cutting across the British political landscape.
By Jon Cruddas Published 23 November 2010 9:00
Race, class, economics, law and order, foreign affairs, religion, education, employment, community cohesion, social identity: sooner or later every major political issue is channelled through the prism of immigration. And as it refracts, so it is subtly redefined.
The immigration debate itself is, of course, not new. From the Windrush generation of the 1950s, through the radical social realignment of the '60s, the far-right backlash and anti-fascist fight-back of the '70s, the Thatcherite neo-nationalism of the '80s and the Cool Britannia patriotic reclamation of the '90s, immigration and race have always occupied a prominent place on the political agenda. However, in the past they have existed either as self-contained issues or as a subset of a wider political discourse. Never -- at least not in my lifetime -- has immigration had such a dominant or pervasive hold over every strand of our national politics.
Increasing voter concern
At the time of the 1997 election, MORI's Issue Tracker recorded those citing race or immigration as the most important issue facing the nation at 3 per cent. By last May's election, it was 38 per cent. In 1997, the British National Party (BNP) put up 54 candidates and secured 36,000 votes, at an average of 664 votes per candidate. In 2010, 339 BNP candidates obtained more than half a million votes, at an average of 1,663 votes per candidate. A YouGov poll taken in March found that 69 per cent of those questioned believed Labour's management of immigration had been bad for the country, compared to 21 per cent who thought it had been beneficial.
Immigration, the elephant in the room? Not any more. Now it's parading down the high street, garlanded in ribbons, leading a three-ring circus.
This detonation over migration has shaken both left and right. For the Conservatives, who had long seen the issue as a licence to print votes, the increase in support for the BNP has presented a serious political problem, akin to UKIP in bovver boots. It has also generated a wider debate within David Cameron's inner circle about whether tough lines on immigration cut across the 'New Tory' brand, a debate heightened by the awareness that both William Hague and Michael Howard, when they were Tory leader, ran hard on the issue, to little tangible benefit. To be fair, there's also a generational shift taking place within the Conservative Party, with a number of younger MPs and members looking to put distance between themselves and the legacy of Powell's 'Rivers of Blood' and Tebbit's 'Cricket Test'.
For the left, the issues thrown up are even more challenging. We're now confronted with a need to reassess old certainties on three fronts: political, economic and cultural.
Past failures
Politically, our response has been disastrous. Immigration had been seen as just another issue to triangulate. Attack the BNP, whilst co-opting their language; criticise Tory dog whistles as we blow trumpets about "British jobs for British workers"; pay lip service to the 'white working class', then thrust them to the margins in pursuit of votes from the citizens of a middle-English Shangri-La. The immigration genie burst from its box on Labour's watch. And we must adopt a radically different political posture if we're going to get it back in again.
On an economic and policy level, we've also been chasing shadows. On the Labour leadership debate shown on Channel 4 News in September, the candidates were asked the patsy question, "has there been too much immigration?" They trotted out their responses, each pitching to their constituencies. But it's a false question, without a tangible answer. Because we don't have an immigration problem - we have an immigration management problem.
What is a sensible limit? 1,000, 10,000, 100,000? The numbers are an abstraction. Yes, we need controls on migration. But whatever the figure, what really matters is our capacity at a national, regional and community level to manage the migratory shifts that do occur. A net increase of 1,000 migrants is nationally insignificant. But if those migrants settle in a single location, within a community that has little or no experience of external migration, with no flexibility in its capacity to provide housing, employment, education and other social services, then that's a recipe for trouble.
Perversely, Labour's broader policy agenda has cut right across this imperative. At the macro-economic level we've been using migration to introduce a covert 21st century incomes policy. Our housing policy has vainly relied on the market to follow migratory patterns, instead of allowing the state to predict, plan and build around those patterns. Our failure to tackle the legacy of de-industrialisation, fused with the globalisation of employment markets, is creating a battleground between domestic and migrant labour. Again, these are policy legacies of both Tory and Labour governments. And again, we need to construct a programme for integrating migration policy, as well as moulding migration into a wider progressive socio-economic narrative.
But perhaps the biggest challenge we face on the left is cultural. How can we reconcile our progressive instincts with the demand from elements of our working class base to directly confront the inverse inequalities in housing, employment and education that immigration is perceived to have generated? Because there is no mileage in pretending any longer that those demands aren't being made.
New opportunities
My own view is that we must view this challenge not as a threat but as an opportunity. Until recently, Labour's working class base was politically marginalised. Now there is a consensus across the party that this support can no longer be taken for granted. While immigration is seen right now to lie at the heart of white working class concerns, if we can deconstruct the issue into its component parts -- job creation, quality education for all, affordable housing - we have the first outlines of a new and exciting political agenda.
We can also seize the organisational opportunities. The threat posed by the BNP has mobilised our activist base like no other issue since we entered government. The organising model pioneered by the Hope Not Hate campaign, which routed Nick Griffin and his party at the general and local elections, provides the perfect blueprint for revitalising our own party structures.
But perhaps most crucially, the immigration debate provides the opportunity to construct new progressive alliances, and reach across what is essentially an artificial divide. In my own Dagenham constituency, the migratory patterns of African families are precisely mirroring the migratory patterns of 50 or 60 years before, when white working class families moved out of inner East London.
They have a strong belief in education, advancement and aspiration. There aren't anti-social behavior problems or issues of neighborhood nuisance. They bring strong faith traditions with them, in exactly the way that people nostalgically remember their own migration here 50 years ago. And, as we saw locally, when the community was forced to face up to the challenge presented by the BNP then similarity and commonality were thrown into focus just as sharply as any difference.
Of course, the challenges surrounding immigration policy are significant. The BNP's implosion provides some breathing space but does not represent a cessation of hostilities. The Coalition's cuts agenda will further strain the social fabric. A Labour Party coming to terms with opposition for the first time in over a decade will have its missteps as it sets out on a new political journey.
But at least the fault line running through British politics is a clear one. The perils are out in the open, not lurking beneath the surface. We have the tools to bridge the divide. All that's needed are the wisdom and courage to use them.
Jon Cruddas is MP for Dagenham and Rainham and founded the All Party Parliamentary group on Migration. This essay is included in a collection of essays published by ippr called "Immigration under Labour" which is available for download here.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















56 comments
Thomas
I am sorry if I caused any offence with my previous postings but I never initiated an argument that immigrants should speak English in public at all times, and I certainly DON`T hold that view.
My opinion about speaking English is that it is crucial in certain areas of society e.g. working in hospitals and emergency services.
Maybe I wasn`t clear enough, what I meant is that I feel it is important immigrants who work for emergency-service industries should try to speak English WHILST ON DUTY.
I`m sorry if that view offends anybody but the concern I expressed is to do with maintaining functionality in critical situations. Is that a racist view? surely not.
Also, for the record, I am not a member of the BNP.
i noticed how the coward anton did not answer my post, so i will repeat it again.where are all you uaf jokers when brown muslim racists are preaching hatred against non muslims of all faiths,calling jews monkeys and pigs,calling for homosexuals to be murdered and thrown off cliffs,preaching seperatism and demonising non muslims as dirtty kaffirs and filth,does that remind you of something=nazi germany....go watch last nights panorama on bbc 1 anton you ignorant moron and educate your small little brain about the fascist islamic threat we have on are doorsteps now you uaf joker
I see I have smoked out the Nazi BNP types. See how unintelligent and hateful they are.
SMASH THE BNP
UP THE UAF and LABOUR MOVEMENT
NEVER AGAIN
Note how the Nazis cannot debate
Anton,
Why do you ignore the great harms caused to Asia and Africa by the brain drain to Britaim of their elite doctors and engineers teachers nurses etc ?
Jon Cruddas would do well to go undercover to his local hospital, Queens Hospital, where I work.
Queens Hospital has multi-cultural staff and I must say these staff are very talented and very hard working, but there are issues of concern.
Inside the Queens Hospital I frequently hear staff from other cultures talking to each other in their own language, and they do this in front of English speaking staff like myself and English speaking patients. This is wrong. When a sick patient comes into hospital, the fact they are sick means they are already vulnerable, immigrant staff who want to speak their own language in front of them would make patients even more vulnerable, as well as making staff like myself feel alienated. Also, Queens Hospital is an major trauma centre and every day we have a trauma team on-call to come to resus to attend e.g. Road Traffic Accident victims, could you imagine how the trauma team would function if all the staff spoke in different languages (whilst the patient in question is fighting for his/her life).
Now, when the immigrants are in their own home or in their own community, by all means speak their own language and live their own culture, but there are areas of society whereby speaking English and integrating into British society is crucial e.g. when working for hospitals and emergency services.
Immigration has benefited the UK but I fully agree with Jon Cruddas in that we don`t have an immigration problem but we do have an immigration management problem. Unless politicians wake up and realise the extent of the issues of concern, the ability of the UK to remain functional is in serious jeopardy.
To Arthur Williamson.
RACIST!!!
Smash the BNP!!!
good
Anton
Its negative attitudes like yours that has brought this country to its knee's.I suggest you take off your rose tinted glasses and think of something a bit more productive than ''Racist or Smash the bnp'' you sound almost racist yourself.
This be the one big issue the political class have never 'got'.
SMASH THE COMMIES
COMMIE SCUM OFF OUR STREETS
NEVER AGAIN GULAGS
anton ,you sound like a bnp reject ha ha ha,uaf anti semtic racist scum..support the freinds of isreal and screw the uaf commie twats...http://www.anglicanfriendsofisrael.com/
We could send the immigrants to fight the North Koreans and thus kill two birds with one stone!
The public always trusted the Conservatives more on immigration. Even though their rather "hardline" stance on immigration in 2001 and (especially) 2005 failed to win votes, I think the Tories' consistent line on immigration was one the major factors of them getting the largest percentage of the votes, and why Labour's vote decimated in many areas in England. I'm not saying the Tories are right obviously, but we need to face up to the fact that the majority's views on immigration outside the EU reflect the Conservative view, and we need to react to that.
Anton, My father was a decorated Korean war veteran, he said he put 20 of your lot on the slab. After I joined the BNP I said I would buy him a pint for every one. Which I did with great pleasure. So you see Anton it's a family tradition to fight communism
Shock Horror!! I am Cromwellian from Northants British National Party, I will not lower the debate here to name calling and slurring others with a different opinion to me, firstly I do believe in immigration for high skills that will benefit our economy, I dont believe in robbing the third world of their much needed Doctors and Nurses, I do enjoy a curry and a kebab, I dont believe in or troops fighting in foriegn wars what are not in our interests, i believe this country was built on christian values, and that our freedom here was paid for by a terrible cost in life and blood, I dont believe 80% of our laws should be coming from Europe, and i dont agree with foriegn police being able to arrest you here in the UK with trial by Jury, this includes the Uaf and Leftwing Crackpots, We have good laws here and bad laws, British people will be losing hundreds of thousands of jobs after christmas, will Jon Cruddas still be telling the Indiginous population unlimited immigration is still good for Britain? or will he get Lynched with the rest of the Traitors? only history will tell.
To Anton and anyone else who may have came to a similar conclusion.
I spent 18 months of my life courting a black lady with Caribean background. I am not, never have been and never will be, racist in any shape or form. I am a british citizen proud of the fact the UK is a tolerant multi-cultural society.
My article was a reflection about "issues of concern" in this day and age, and I was speaking from my own personal experience. According to Mr Cruddas article, 38% of voters in this year`s general election had concerns about immigration, does that mean 38% are racist, I don`t think so.
In my initial post, I would however like to apologise for my second last paragraph because I think I am guilty of a lack of clarity. When I talked about immigrants being "in their own home", I was referring to immigrants being in their own UK house. When I referred to immigrants being "in their own community", I was referring to immigrants being in their own UK community e.g. there are a couple of churches in my area, one of which is hired every Sunday evening by a Russian Church, the other is hired by an Afican church, in those environments I strongly advocate the Russians and Africans speaking their mother tongue and practising their mother culture.
I strongly commend Mr Cruddas for having the courage to write a very thought-provoking article about a very delicate subject. I just hope the comments/opinions lead to a productive discussion rather than a destructive argument.
Well it seems like the "EU experiment" has failed miserably. At least you never signed up for the "Euro" - time to cut your losses and get out of that failure while there's still time. But it sounds like most of you love living in a "united" Eurabia.
Population is a problem you folks on the other side of the pond will need to face. You've deindustrialised more brutally than we have. You've stamped down hard on your agriculture. You no longer even try to produce enough jobs for your population (nor do you even really pretend too). Taking in more people? How can you take care of what you've got? Clegg et al what to do to you guys what the Tea Party wants to do to us. Your population is going to be driven down by the Torries, and driven hard.
How can taking people on to a ship, that you know the captain plans to sink, be an act of kindness? Keep the immigrants away, for their own sakes! Show them the mercy you deny yourselves!
Why do we need any more immigration when there are plenty of graduates unable to get employment in the UK?
It doesn't seem to have improved services or prices.
All it appears to have done is lined the pockets of businesses that cannot afford to hire UK workers.
British workers expect higher wages because of the extortionate cost of living here, why should we share 10 to a room in poor conditions to compete for the basics in life in our own country?
If immigrants are so highly motivated and multiskilled why don't they try to improve conditions in their own country or help nations closer to home that need to improve their infrastructure?
We are often told by many liberal/left wing commentators that cultural and racial diversity has made an immensely positive contribution to life in the UK. The late Robin Cook spoke of how chicken tikka masala has become the nation dish of Britain; Tony Benn said the fact that some 20% of schoolchildren coming from ethnic minority backgrounds provide ‘a wonderful snapshot of multicultural Britain’.
However what about the politics of race and multiculturalism? Nowadays freedom of speech is curtailed for the sake of ‘multicultural harmony’ under the fascist restriction of political correctness. This has undermined British identity in many ways including those labour controlled councils of Hounslow and Lewisham who refuse to fly the Union Jack from their council buildings on the charge that the union jack is ‘socially divisive’. The very British feature of humour has also been undermined. For instance do we see Bernard Manning, Alf Garnett or Jim Davidson on TV anymore? These comics have been replaced by the less inspiring left –wing personalities such as Marcus Bridgstock, Jonathon Ross, Jo Brand and Frank Skinner who will dare offend no one -other than white heterosexual right wing males!
We are told by politicians of the economic benefits of mass immigration to the UK. Indeed it is true that mass immigration has provided a cheap supply of labour to businesses, which has kept prices and inflation low and has helped employers to fill positions where apparently British workers have not had adequate skills to fulfil the role.
However, the cheap supply of labour provided by mass immigration has kept the minimum wage low, helping to sustain higher profits for employers but thereby making the gap between high and low income earners more profound and kept the lowest income earners in a cycle of poverty. The ability of employers to recruit skilled workers from abroad has robbed British workers of the opportunity to be trained to have the skills to undertake certain employment.
In housing the Labour Government has failed to build enough council houses meaning that the supply of housing has been inadequate to meet the need of the settled population to the extent where there are some 1.6 million people waiting for council accommodation. This problem is of course exacerbated by mass immigration where newcomers often seek cheap private and council housing.
The way that attitudes to assimilation into UK life for immigrants has been mismanaged. Indeed look at areas of Luton, Bradford, Birmingham and East London where immigrant communities have transformed the area to match their way of life to the country from which they came. It seems that there is too much emphasis from immigrants on the country from which they are from –and not the one they are in! It has got to the point where a recent opinion poll found that 40% of all Muslims in the UK want to live under Sharia Law, which is in effect holding the established laws of the UK in contempt.
In conclusion, I feel that the Labour obsession with mass immigration and diversity has helped to undermine both our democracy, the British way of life, the economic standing of the working classes and our cohesion as a society. It is for these reasons that I protest by supporting the BNP!
Anton!! What a total idiot, it's people like you, who are quick to play the race card and judge others, that makes others afraid to say anything, for fear of being labelled as racist. If there's one thing worse than being racist, it's being a hater. Get a life and get a grip.
Immigration in my opinion has been out of control for years. British people should be put first.
Anton said
"To Arthur Williamson.
RACIST!!!
Smash the BNP!!!"
And they call the BNP knuckledraggers. Anton, it is no longer enough to use gagging techniques like calling anyone who you disagree with a racist or fascist anymore kindly specify what it is that you don't agree with (if you are able)
Well done Alistair Cole, of all the comments posted he has hit the nail on the head about this subject. How can Jon Cruddas state in his article 'we don't have an immigration problem - we have an immigration management problem'. Looking at it logically, cannot he figure out that the currently high levels of immigration is causing the immigration management problem.
And Anton, you are an ignorant idiot and how can you write 'the Nazi's cannot debate' when no intellectual debate has been posted by you. Try waking up from your drug-induced haze and go outside and see the real world for what it is.
Don't listen to these people Anton especially that bloke Lou who goes around pretending he's one of the black and white minstrels.
cruddas and his new labour cronies have caused all this anger in working class communitys like mine with his free for all mass immigration into working class citys and towns that have turned into hellholes of crime and a haven for the islamic hate mongers and fascists who if you watched panorama last night on bbc1 just exposed this evil nazi type thinking that has been imported into this country and is being taught and practised in mosques and so called muslim schools,absolutely horrific what was shown on panorama last night,its about time the middle and upper classes in there leafy surburbs took the burden of immigration and stop putting this burden on poor working class communitys who have suffered enough,get the message cruddas.
Congratulations Anton on returning this debate to dualistic posturing. There was nothing remotely racist in Arthur's post.
The Left should care about ALL people. Let's be honest our immigration policy is driven by the demands of big business for cheap labour. Just you watch the Tories 'go soft' on immigration now they're under pressure from the CBI et al.
Burying our heads in the sand about the problems caused by immigration will not do anything to serve the immigrants Anton postures that he cares about. If the political establishment do not address this issue our immigrant communities could be left to face the hate gangs of the BNP.
Having lived and worked abroad I believe Britain has a comparatively strong record on providing for the rights of immigrants. Having worked in Spain I can tell you that locals there barely hide their prejudices about immigrants. I regualirly listened to classes of well-educated middle class professionals describing Chinese people as 'animals'. Black people barely got a mention such was the general disdain held towards them. In Poland I listened to a mountain of hypocrisy about Belarusian / Ukrainian workers sleeping 8 to a room and undercutting Polish worker's wages. The very same things Polish workers do here!
Many British workers with families and mortgages cannot up sticks to find work in a more lucrative economy. And nor should they - we live in the fifth richest country in the world!!
Collectively, across Europe and beyond we should be addressing why our economies cannot provide full, stable, decently paid employment. As it stands we are faced with the sad old story of ordinary people from different cultures turning on each other while the rich profit from their misery.
What do you mean Lou? Are you saying that there are two Lou ? Well unfortunately I've decided to count your as one Lou, the same one that told me where to go. You know the one?
Living out of the UK I'm not sure what people object to when the BNP is mentioned. Am I missing something?
I suspect that so called labour, is not genuine about it being ready to tackle immigration but ist trying to bull us again ( notice the Cruddas weasel words "inequalities in housing, employment and education that immigration is perceived to have generated"). so all our problems are not caused by uncontrolled immigration but only it is our perception that is at fault. (notice the blame whitey syndrome here?).
Good to see people saying it like it is. Immigration has completely changed the character of the country, and the rest of the civilised world is laughing at us. The only people immigration has benefited are the businesses who've had willing workers willing to accept subsistence wages, and the middle classes who can hire a nanny, cleaner, etc for a pittance. For the white working class, however, immigrants have done untold damage to our way of life and our economic standing. We're expected to compete with these foreigners, but the foreigners are already working for such a low wage that getting into such a competition would mean we can't afford to support our families, and able to keep up with our bills and other costs of living. What a ridiculous situation this is, where a country as great and as rich as ours still needs the white working class, the people whose toil and sweat made the industrial revolution possible, to accept subsistence wages and live a life where they can barely afford basic needs.
The only way for the white working class to regain their dignity, and for the political class to show they are truly sorry for the subjugation the WWC have been subjected to, is to put through a policy of compulsory repatriation of all immigrants of non Anglo-Saxon stock. Only then will I accept that our voice is being listened to. However, only one party, and that's the BNP, is speaking up for us.
What's the point saying all this, Jon, when your party had a large majority for 13 years and you allowed this country to be swamped with immigrants, who undercut our wages, steal our jobs and put pressure on local services like education, housing, etc. Why did Labour become the party of these foreigners and immigrants, and why did you abandon your core vote, the white working class, the people you're supposed to represent. These apologetic articles are no good Jon, many have deserted Labour and only when Ed Miliband et al show they are SERIOUS about stopping non white immigration will I consider voting for Labour again. So back to the drawing board I'm afraid Jon.
We all need to address the reality of life in Britain...
We all know that gangs of BNP thugs are physically attacking people in the street every day of the week. That cannot be tolerated or appeased.
Appeasment doesn't work. We must confront and face down the BNP wherever they appear. Look at the UAF website to see how many unions and politicians of all colours concur.
You can sit on your asses all you want. The UAF and myself don't believe we can afford to do that.
WHOSE STREETS? OUR STREETS!!
SMASH THE BNP!
NEVER AGAIN!
SAY NO TO NAZIS!
Anton
I voted for the BNP in the summer election, not because I agree with some of their views (especially on interracial relations which I though were extremely OTT) but because they were willing to stand up for white, working class people who live in deindustrialised areas, unable to find work in other sectors (like construction) because foreigners are undercutting our wages and our work conditions. Only the BNP say it like it is. Only they have the courage to push through policies that make sense to people like me, even though the liberal elite denounce them as racist.
We should withdraw from the EU, stop importing cheap foreign goods from countries that have stolen our industry and are undermining our companies, stop ALL FOREIGN AID as we can barely support our own in this country, replace the elite Union leaders with true working class men, who understand the suffering we have endured because the liberal elite have ignored us in favour of coloured immigrants. Support BRITISH OWNED industry, through subsidies and protectionism (like other countries have) and force all companies owned by foreigners to either get out, or give the owners a payoff so that they leave, and replace ownership with white, British workers, so that industry is now owned by the people, for the people. Only then will the GREAT be put back in GREAT BRITAIN
The problem is not immigration it is the near million or so failed and unproductive asylum seekers taking us for a ride.
This is all well and good, Cruddas, but WHERE WERE YOU FOR THE LAST 13 YEARS??????
Why weren't the alarm bells ringing then, when our society and communities were changing beyond recognition (and for the bad) by the uncontrolled immigration from third world countries in Africa and Asia? You were an MP then, you were even in government at a time, but you didn't say anything. It's too late to make excuses now, our communities have changed, and there's no getting back to how it was, thanks to Liebour's social engineering. It'd be a miracle if I can see any white faces in my local neigbourhood anymore, it's changed that much.
uaf are a bunch of communist tossers who appease radical fascist islam,where are you anton and these uaf creeps when the muslims are preaching the anti semtism,racism and homophobia.where are all you clowns demonstrating against these muslim nazis,yes nowhere to be seen,the uaf are a bloody joke and a bunch of little middle class college boys who could not fight your way out of a paper bag,just a laughing stock.
Mr Divine,
For the record, the 'Lou' who posted earlier is not me the Lou that you are referring to in your comment regarding the b & w minstrels - your point there being what exactly?
In America, the part of the immigration debate no one Left or Right deals with is that benefits and costs aren't evenly spread. The richest ten per cent get almost all the benefits of immigration, and the costs are a burden to the eighty percent on the bottom of the ecconomy. In America and Britain, we need programs to send the costs to those who get the benefits. Only those who benefit from immigration should bare the costs.
You've got to admit, as far as immigration is concerned, we are fast approaching saturation point. We tend to concentrate our arguments and solutions to this problem on the immigrant, on those fleeing persecution or extreme poverty. If I was asked to have a go at fixing the immigration problem, I will look without, not within as is the case now.
Some immigrants/asylum seekers are from resource-rich Countries, Countries that earn billions of dollars per year from selling their natural resources to the West. I am referring to Countries in Africa; Nigeria, DR Congo, Angola, Uganda and many more. Trade with these Countries should have strings attached; a percentage of their income must be spent on developing their infrastructure, with our help. Also, foreign banks must refuse to accept millions of pounds in deposits from the leaders of these Countries. Governments in the West must put a stop to these leaders buying top-end properties in places like London, New York, Paris etc.
My aim will be to create 2-3 Countries in Africa where other Africans can emigrate to. There isn't one "Black" Country where other blacks can run to when the going gets tough. The Western society is experiencing a big change and we all know that change brings out the fragile points in humans.
As an aside, I read in the papers this morning that Oprah Winfrey "gave a brand new VW Beetle to all 275 of her audience. She was determined to go out with a bang in last year of her talk show". At £15,540 a piece.
15,540 x275=£4,273,500.
Considering what the people of Haiti, more or less next door to the US, have been through and still living in hell with the recent outbreak of cholera, donating this amount to Haiti would have been more appropriate and a better way to utilise 4 million pounds. Haiti is a "Black" Country, I expected Black Americans to take it upon themselves to help the Haitians get back on their feet.
Anton said
"We all know that gangs of BNP thugs are physically attacking people in the street every day of the week. That cannot be tolerated or appeased."
You are a liar Anton (or brainwashed) I wonder do you believe everything the uaf tell you without question? Mind you we all know how marxists deal with dissenters (bish bosh bash). The only thing worse than a fascist is a communist. "socialists are just fascists pretending to be nice" Winston Churchill
In the midst of the worst class war since the 1997-2010 war led by Liarbour, millionaire Jon Cruddas fingers immigration. Pah!
Bob,
The Nazis would drive millions back into modern day gas chambers even though they dress in suits these days.
Multi-cultural Britain is a rich and wholly positive thing. These people are out to destroy it an MUST be stopped.
Exactly, what don't you understand.
Well I'm still voting BNP - regardless of their fabled implosion
The glaringly obvious flaw with Cruddas' piece is the predictable,
pavlovian response from its own leadership, ingrained party instincts, activist supporters, extreme left and union support base, and its self-inflicted, irrational, "antifascist" nutters.
Cruddas may well be attempting to appear rational, (which he is not, he's a phoney bastard) but he is pissing into the wind with this approach.
He will be accused (again) of pandering to the BNP etc, and even of being a racist himself.
Let's stop pretending that we are actually concerned with the "brain drain" from developing countries and the fact that they're losing many of their skilled labour, and that these immigrants should remain in their country and try to improve its infrastructure, etc. I'd be extremely happy if the developing countries attain a high standard of living in the future, but at the moment, I'm only thinking about BRITISH people, and my concern is not with others. So the argument against immigration is that it is hurting BRITISH people, not that I'm concerned about the brain drain from the developing world, etc.
Stop with the weasel words Cruddas, immigration has ruined this country, undercut wages, resulted in extreme unemployment for British workers, and resulted in race to the bottom with respect to labour conditions, wages, housing etc. And all you can do is claim that "we've let the white working class down". Has it only just registered with you? This country is swamped with foreigners, and it's only benefiting the class enemy. The Unions and the left are sell outs. I cannot believe that the unions have not criticised immigrants and immigration for ruining the lives of so many white, working class workers, the type of people unions are supposed to represent. What a betrayal.
You voted for David Milliband.
BNP are not nazis, they even have a jewish councillor Pat Richardson. But while we are on the subject of nazis (NAtional soZIalist) lets look at the communists as well. soviets had concentration camps until Gorbachev closed them in the 1990's.(see Yuri Bezmenov KGB defector on youtube) According to conservative estimates 34 million soviet citizens were in them. Of course commies will deny they even existed. The list of communist dictators is too numerous to list. Their crimes too horrendous. This list includes Hitler who was left wing (national socialist).
Anton said "Multi-cultural Britain is a rich and wholly positive thing. These people are out to destroy it an MUST be stopped."
Not according to Angela Merkel "multiculturalism has failed"
We get this ridiculous argument from the liberals that "immigrants do the jobs that Brits are not willing to do". No, it's just that they do these jobs are extremely low rates of pay, and while staying in sub-standard accommodation and willing to live on the bare necessities to live. Their actions have led to a return to the 18th century style conditions for the working class, in the factories where toil was expected, but not rewarded. So that's what the immigrants have done to this country, they've taken us back to slave labour and the liberal elite expect us to work for a barely subsistence wage. Sorry, but we refuse to do that in one of the richest countries in the world. The only solution is for the repatriation (voluntary) of all non Anglo-Saxon people from the country, but of course we should give them proper renumeration because otherwise it's unfair on all those who haven't undercut our wages. This is why I'm going to vote for a party that stands up for true Brits, but unfortunately I'm not allowed to repeat the name of that party.
First Ed Balls, now Cruddas. Apparently Labour have finally realised how much damage the immigrants have done to this country. The chickens are coming home to roost. Before the immigrants were placed on a pedestal and praise was showered upon them by the liberal elite. Now, Labour have realised how much damage they have done to the people they're supposed to represent, the white, working class. The realisation was too late, which explains why they got trashed in the election, but if Labour change, and look after the interests of the people they are meant to support (the WHITE working class), then I may be persuaded to vote for them again. Otherwise, you can forget it Cruddas.
Post new comment