Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Lessons for Ed Miliband from the Tory conference

MPs set out attack lines against the new Labour leader.

As the Conservative Party conference draws to the close of its second day, Ed Miliband is probably heeding the old adage to "know thy enemy".

But what exactly can he take from the conference so far? Well, in their addresses today, MPs have begun to set out their attack lines. Here are the key points that have emerged so far:

The union connection

It's predictable, but the nature of Miliband's victory will continue to be the Tories' main weapon. Boris Johnson's address, full of harsh rhetoric about the 3,000 tube strikers "holding London to ransom", included a jibe about the union's "lackeys in the Labour Party". In his speech today, George Osborne spoke of two sides to the economic debate:

On one side there is the IMF, the OECD, the credit rating agencies, the bond markets, the European Commission, the Confederation of British Industry, the Institute of Directors, the British Chambers of Commerce, the Governor of the Bank of England, most of British business, two of our great historic political parties, one of the Miliband brothers, Tony Blair, and the British people.

On the other side is Ed Miliband and the trade union leaders who put him where he is. The national interest or the vested interests.

This connection will only get more damaging as strikes begin to hit. Miliband has already said unequivocally that he will not be in thrall to the unions, but if that "vested interest" line comes up again, he would do well to point out the long-standing ties between the Conservatives and big business.

The economy

The overwhelming narrative of this conference is that the Conservatives have waded in to clear up the fiscal mess, like weary parents picking up the pieces after their naughty child has gone on a rampage. First and foremost, Labour must come up with a credible and exhaustive economic plan, and a clear response to the comprehensive spending review on 25 October. Moreover, it is vital to stress that the tentative recovery we are currently seeing is the result of Labour policies. Astonishingly, Osborne today claimed responsibility for the turnaround, despite the fact that he opposed the bank bail-out.

"Labour always fails"

This is subtler, but potentially deeply damaging. In his speech, Osborne said:

We've been here before: Labour do it every time they are in office: in 1931, in 1950, in 1967, and in 1976, and now.

Every Labour Government runs out of money and brings this country to the brink of bankruptcy.

And when it comes to the next election, we will say to the British people: don't give the keys back to the people who crashed the car.

If the Conservatives successfully "toxify" the Labour brand by associating it with not just the 2008 crash, but all the economic problems in recent history, it could have serious electoral repercussions.

Optimism

In his first speech as party leader, Miliband accused David Cameron of pessimism, promising that his party would offer the opposite. This is a simple but effective line, and has clearly discomfited the Tories, who are keen to show positivity at this conference ahead of the CSR. In what appeared to be a direct rebuttal to this claim, David Willets said this morning: "We're the true optimists -- optimistic about people and what they can achieve. We are the party of the wealth creators". It appears to be an attempt to co-opt the label, though this will be difficult to sustain when the full pain of spending cuts is felt.

Tags: Conservative Party Conference  Ed Miliband

9 comments

Matt Hurst's picture

Osborne's quote didn't include Ireland on his side, and failed to mention America and many leader economists on Ed's side.

Zole's picture

Well, I for one am heading off to sleep. It's way past my bedtime. Shame on you all for keeping me up so late !

Praguetory's picture

"If the Conservatives successfully "toxify" the Labour brand by associating it with not just the 2008 crash, but all the economic problems in recent history, it could have serious electoral repercussions."
Isn't it freakin' obvious that Labour are responsible for all of the above?

Benedict's picture

@Praguetory

How are Labour responsible for Lehman Brothers, AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, for example?

shufflebox's picture

Not sure the 'union connection' is too much to worry about - the TUC conference showed that the unions are aware they need to get a decent amount of the public behind any actions they take, and cuts to public services are likely to get more local and national sympathy than, say, the BA strikers did.

The 'economy' one does irk me, in that it seems churlish of Osborne not to admit that Brown was instrumental in saving the British economy. Frankly, though, he can say what he likes, events (many of which are probably outside of his control) and his reactions to them will dictate how this one turns out.

'Labour always fails' is an interesting one, and if all goes well for the Tories in terms of getting down the deficit by 2015, this'll definitely feature strongly. It's mind-numbingly simplistic of course but who knows, depending on what fronts the next election is fought on it could be a handy line and relatively difficult to rebut in a thirty-second sound-bite (despite certain attempts at talking about jobs deficits, social deficits, investment deficits (love that one)).

The optimism stuff sounds silly. I giggled a bit (though I love and agree with the sentiment) when Ed cried out 'we are the optimists' and David Willetts probably sounds sillier going 'No, we are the optimists'.

swatantra nandanwar's picture

Ed says he's into consructive opposition, and will support measures that are in the country's interest. So we may be moving away from Punch n Judy politics, that is if the Tories are going to be sensible and ignore B Johnsons extremist rubbish. The Unions are neutred enough as it is and don't need this hassle.

LiberalCommunist's picture

Of course the Tories will seek to "toxify" Labour. It's really the only kind of politics they know. It's a vital attack policy for them, that may seem them through until the economic and human costs of the cuts bite in 2011. Ed Miliband and co have no option but to hold their nerve and wait for events to rob the govt. of their strangelhold over the debate. It's tragic that this is the case. Many of us may pay a heavy price in the short term, but what option does Ed Miliband have other than to push an alternative approach in lieu of capturing a more engaged public mood?

The media (worst of all, the BBC, given their public service mission) have no interest in challenging the government's unwarranted hegemony. In my opinion, and on the evidence of coverage and interviews I've seen and heard, this has far more to do with journalists not being terribly bright, than it has with any bias, as such. Most hacks simply haven't the intellectual confidence to take on Osborne on the economy; instead, they happily cede that ground, and stick to the Westminster soap-opera comfort zone. The result is a heavy, pro-government bias, but I don't believe it's the result of a real political bias. Just listen to Humphreys, or Wark, or Paxman, or Kearney. Decent people, with a committment to impartiality, I've no doubt. Alas, they're just not capable of challenging the Thatcherite consensus on economic grounds.

LiberalCommunist's picture

Oops, "strangelhold" should, of course, read "stranglehold". Blame my editor!

Ken Symon's picture

It is interesting to compare Osborne's attempts to blame Labour for the economic crisis with the quote from American Nobel prizewinning economist Joseph Stiglitz: "America may have caused the global recession but Europe is now responding in kind."

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets