Need a new identity? Just steal someone else's highlights social networking security and privacy fears.

An opportunistic new website by the name of should serve as a wake-up call to Foursquare and other social network users about the potential risks to their privacy and security -- especially those who are crazy enough to publish such personal details as their home address. uses publicly available information posted on social networking site Foursquare to find locations where a number of women are gathering -- from nightclubs to coffee shops. When it finds there's a correlation among a number of female Foursquare users it shows where they are and displays their Foursquare profile pictures so would-be stalkers -- sorry admirers -- can decide if it's worth turning up to 'meet' them.

It also sends the news out over a Twitter feed, for instance: "Bunch of ladies in yoga pants at The New Nail on Chestnut. They are talking about needing to find a man. Jackpot." Indeed.

I've written before about some of the potential risks with Foursquare, the social networking phenomenon adding 100,000 new subscribers every week, which encourages users to "check in" their location in order to win virtual badges. Users have the option of their precise location being shown on a Google map with an accuracy of a few feet, based on Foursquare's knowledge of their phone's co-ordinates via its GPS signal.

But while may raise some eyebrows among women who didn't realise they were making quite so much information about themselves available to just anyone, what it actually highlights are the less obvious privacy and security risks of social networking sites in general.

Many Foursquare users opt to link their account with other sites such as Facebook or Twitter. This is particularly risky, because it makes it likely that even if you are careful about how much you give away on one site, anyone scanning two or three of them might find some worrying details about you and your movements unless you are very careful. Adjusting the privacy settings so that they work in concert across more than one social networking site requires a degree in astrophysics as well as a great deal of patience.

By way of illustration, I searched Foursquare for people who had "checked in" their home address -- telling the world exactly where they live and also displaying it on a handy map. I soon found an attractive 20-something year-old advertising agency executive, who had posted the address of her London flat. She had also "checked in" at her workplace, so I also knew where she worked and for whom.

She hadn't posted her full name on Foursquare, but I quickly found that on her Facebook page, along with her date of birth, which University she went to and what she studied. I also found that she likes house and trance music, her favourite film is Sex and the City 2 and she watches Louis Theroux and Come Dine With Me on telly.

I know from her Twitter feed about the trip she made to Paris for a couple of days last week, and where she goes to gym. I know, in fact, what she eats for breakfast, which bus she takes to work and when she is running late. I know that today she's at home in bed, with a heavy cold. Should I have some flowers delivered, or perhaps some cough medicine?

ID theft: not your dad's smash and grab

It's no laughing matter: identity theft is on the rise. It costs the British economy an estimated £1.7bn a year, with the number of Brits falling victim to identity theft jumping 23 per cent in the first quarter of this year alone, according to fraud prevention service CIFAS.

One factor behind the rise in ID theft is known to be the amount of personal information shared on social networking sites. As James Jones, consumer education manager at information services firm Experian puts it, "There is a huge disconnect between the privacy we crave and the information we give away on social networks. It's hardly surprising that identity fraudsters have been cashing in."

Fraudsters are still using more traditional techniques of scamming your identity such as going through your rubbish looking for bank statements and the like, which is another reason not to publish your address on any social networking sites like Foursquare.

So what does Foursquare have to say about all this? Here's what their spokeswoman told me:

We know that information related to location is more sensitive than a lot of other information shared through social networks, which is why we feel it's extremely important for our users to understand exactly where their information is being shared, and the implications of that sharing.

We never share a user's real-time check-in information with anyone that they haven't accepted as a Foursquare friend, and all of our sharing features can be opted into or opted out of. A user's location is never automatically shared -- they need to choose to check in when they're at a particular venue, and when they check in they can decide whether or not they want to tell their friends where they are, and whether or not they'd like to publish this information to Facebook or Twitter if they've chosen to link those accounts to their Foursquare account.

This summer, we launched some changes to our sharing settings to give users even more control over how they share their check-ins, and we posted some resources to further educate users on sharing through foursquare. We encourage all users to check their settings regularly to ensure that they're comfortable with where they're posting check-ins, and who can view that information.

You can access our privacy-related resources at You'll find an overview of how we approach privacy/sharing on that page, along with a link to a detailed grid on our privacy settings and our privacy policy. Users with specific concerns can also contact

Which is all well and good. But it seems that many users simply haven't understood the implications of their use of Foursquare and other social networking sites. The knowledge I easily found in a few minutes about one particular advertising agency exec could enable me to track her movements day and night to within a few feet, and could put her at a high risk of an identity theft attack or worse.

At the very least, it shows that knowing is just the start.

Jason Stamper is NS technology correspondent and editor of Computer Business Review.

Jason Stamper is editor of Computer Business Review

Felipe Araujo
Show Hide image

Hull revisited: What happens when a Brexit stronghold becomes City of Culture?

We report from Hull, to find out if you can replace the kind of nostalgia that led to a Leave vote with cultural investment.

At 75 metres long, the offshore wind turbine blade erected across Queen Victoria Square, in the heart of Hull, is a sculpture intended to mark a new chapter in the city’s history. For the next 12 months, Hull, a city of more than a quarter of a million people in the northeast of England, will be the UK’s City of Culture.

The 28-tonne blade hails from the local Siemens plant. The German technology company employs around 1,000 people in the area, making it Hull’s biggest single employer.

Seen up close in this context – laid dormant in the middle of a town square instead of spinning up in the air generating energy – the structure is meant to remind passersby of a giant sea creature. It is also, I’m told, an allusion to Hull’s rich maritime history.

All photos: Felipe Araujo

Nostalgia is a big thing in this part of the country. At one point, Hull was the UK’s third largest port but technology and privatisation drastically changed that. The battle over cod fishing with Iceland in the waters of the North Sea 40 years ago has also dealt a major blow to a region with a long and proud trawling tradition.

People here still talk about a bygone era when the fishing industry provided jobs for everyone and there was enough money to go around.

Fast forward to 2017, and the country’s new capital of culture is the same city that voted 67 per cent in favour of leaving the EU last June. Its new-found prestige, it seems, is not enough to erase years of neglect by a political class “too busy for commoners like us”, as one resident puts it.

“More than a message to Brussels, it [the Brexit vote] was a message to Westminster,” Paul Leeson-Taylor, a filmmaker born and bred in Hull, tells me. “For the first time in a long time people in Hull felt like they had the chance to change something, and they took it.”

But while speaking to people on the high street and hanging out with locals at the Community Boxing Club in Orchard Park, one of the city’s most deprived areas, there is one word that consistently popped up in conversation – more than any specific policy from Westminster or the much-hated rules “dictated” by Brussels. Foreigners.

According to official figures, Hull’s population is 89.1 per cent white British. Still, immigration is big on people’s minds here.

During my two-day stay in the city, I find myself being the only black person in most places I visit – I’m certainly the only black guy at the boxing club. So when someone begins a sentence with “I’m not racist but…”, I know a tirade on immigrants is about to ensue.

“There are just too many of them,” Nick Beach, an estate agent whose Polish clientele is a big part of his business, tells me as he is about to teach a boxing class to local children. Beach was born in Shepherd’s Bush, in West London, but has been living in Hull for the last 20 years.

“When I go down there these days and go into Westfield shopping centre, it is very rare you get an English person serving you now,” he says. “I just find it disappointing that you go into your capital city and you are a minority there.”

These are the much-discussed “left behind”, a white working-class community that has gained particular prominence in a time of Brexit and Donald Trump. Under economic pressure and facing social change, they want to have their say in running a country they claim to no longer recognise.

For Professor Simon Lee, a senior politics lecturer at the University of Hull, immigration is only a superficial layer when it comes to explaining the resentment I witness here. For him, the loss of the empire 70 years ago is still something that as a country Britain hasn’t come to terms with.

“The reason for us to be together as a United Kingdom has gone, so what is the project?”

As destiny would have it, a foreign company will now play a major role on Hull’s economic future, at least in the short term. In the wake of the Brexit vote, there were widespread fears Siemens would pull out of the region and take its factory elsewhere. With the massive blade looming large in the background, Jason Speedy, director of the blade factory in Hull, assures me that isn’t the case.

“The Brexit decision has made no difference. We have made our investment decision, so Siemens, together with the Association of British Ports, has put in £310m. It’s all full steam ahead.”

As Hull becomes the country’s cultural hub for the next few months, the hope is that its residents stop looking back and start looking forward.

For Professor Lee, though, until there is a complete change in the power structures that run the country, the north-south divide will remain – with or without the EU. “The way you kill nostalgia is to have something new,” he said. “The reason why people here are nostalgic is because there is nothing to replace it with.”

Felipe Araujo is a freelance journalist based in London. He writes about race, culture and sports. He covered the Rio Olympics and Paralympics on the ground for the New Statesman. He tweets @felipethejourno.