Do you feel like protesting Scientology or sharing your opinions about them, then join us @

http://forums.whyweprotest.net/

NED for OTs Series 6

CONFIDENTIAL

BLOWING BTs AND CLUSTERS

Per the OT III materials, you can run Grades 0-IV on a BT, but it has to be addressed to that BT, and it rolls rather fast – may only take 4 – 5 minutes.
You can Date/Locate clusters and run Inc II, Inc Is.
You can Date/Locate clusters and blow them off, but the auditor who does this has got to be a shark at D/Ling. It's the moment the cluster was formed that you date, not when the cluster hits the individual. And Date/Locate is not always recommended on NED for OTs.

COPIES
You've always got to handle copies. BTs will copy. Obsessive duplication is a BT characteristic. Maybe all that engrams are is excessive copying.
The 3 – 10 days to destimulate rule; it's not the incident that was restimulated that takes 3 – 10 days to destimulate, it takes 3 – 10 days for all the copies and copying to fade out.
“Stress” is also a heavy button. You get a lot of copying of stress. So you handle the original, then copies – somebody copying what was run.

NEW TECHNIQUES
The fastest and best way of blowing BTs and clusters is by inspection.
Acknowledgement is very effective. A lot can be blown with pure acknowledgement.
Another way of blowing them is simply to sort of jolt them a bit earlier in time, and then they run on forward and blow. You use a sort of impulse to move them a bit earlier in time. It blows them off a stuck point on the track.

BLOWING BY INSPECTION
There's a trick in this – don't look at the picture – look at and find the shape and mass of the BT. If you see the picture, shift your attention to the shape and mass of the BT. You don't have to see their pictures. They use pictures as a sort of misdirection. So you concentrate on masses, not pictures. The technique is, you see a picture, trace it back to the BT, i.e. “Whose picture?” and find the BT this way and it blows.

A Pre-OT may have a somatic in one body part, being put there by a BT in another body part. Say he has a somatic in his leg and you find the BT putting it there is in the head and when you find the BT doing this, it blows. A BT can also be being a somatic – he is “pain in the arm”.

BT PATTERN
BTs do a “crush in, pull back” – it's almost an attitude. It's a sort of tense heavy physi-cal pull back. The basis is fear – they've been hit hard by something – causes their timidity – they pull back into solidity. It's a “hide” phenomena and a “pull back in” pattern. This causes pressure, the pressure is caused by them pulling back in on themselves, sort of like a thetan trying to duck. And when a BT is awakened it immediately mocks up mass. Mass is produced by “out-of-valenceness”. He's out of valence into the valence of an object or other things.

MECHANISM
There is a mechanism of somebody being a body, who has valences of past bodies superimposed on the body. BTs and clusters go into valences of pictures and things too. These guys have been parked in time and gone into a total reviv, you can look down the track and wake them up.
They do a lot of “on-ness” – stuck on things, as different from in things. They went on and couldn't get off.
The NED time track (i.e. time track of Dianetic auditing on a Clear or above) is com-posed of BTs parked on the time track – not in PT – you look down the time track and wake them up. They are stuck on the track and they also have pictures of themselves stuck on the track.

"Hubbard was a medium weight Science Fiction writer" - only in terms of book sales. In terms of literary quality he was an appallingly bad sc-fi hack. The Xenu/Thetans backstory sounds like it was written in 5 minutes on the back of an envelope. Based on the utter dreck that LRH put out I wouldn't credit him with anything other than cold cynicism in his quest to invent a "religion" for tax avoidance purposes. It certainly wasn't to further the human race.

If Scientology is so great for humanity, and it access to the finest lawyers and PR representation money can buy, why is it most people think they're a bunch of truly awful human beings?

It is actually possible for a BT or cluster to be totally out of PT, by which is meant, it is physically parked in past time. A BT or cluster can also be in PT while thinking it is in the past and mock up a picture of the past and consider that that is PT. A BT or cluster can be parked in the past so thoroughly that its only concept of a future is a future from that past which is al-ready long gone by – this is the phenomenon of future pictures; it is also the cause of worry about the future, terror stomachs & fortune telling (visions and dreams). Another mechanism that frees some is the realization that some other BT is holding them in – and it's the truth, BTs and clusters stick to other BTs and clusters.

BLACK BTs
Sometimes a BT will put other BTs in front of him as a sort of protection. You get a black area covered by a white area in front of it. A BT in the black area is holding some other BTs in place in front of it as a sort of protection or shield. The way to handle this is to blow the black BT who is holding the others in place, then the others come off easily. Otherwise if you try to blow the front ones first, nothing happens. If you encounter BTs not blowing, suspect and check for a BT or cluster holding the others, and handle it first, then the others blow easily.

You can get partial blows where the BT or cluster comes off the Pre-OT's body but stays in the room, plastered on a wall or outside the room. These can push TA up until blown fully. When they hang up it is because they still have a connecting string to the body or because they conceive some barrier they have hit is impenetrable. The handling is to cut the beam or push them through the barrier or simply repeat the process. What has actually happened is that the mass of BTs contain amongst them one or more BTs, to which they are stuck, which have not been handled.

A BT or cluster can go into the valence of a person – a cluster can go into the valence of a single beingness e.g. a person known to the Pre-OT in PT and there could be a “stuck picture” of this person. It actually isn't a picture as such, it is a complete mocked up identity plus a mock up of the identity's surroundings. This is very puzzling to the Pre-OT as it doesn't blow as a picture. He is really looking at the copied beingness and characteristics of the person who isn't there, but which is some BTs and clusters thinking they are the person and being the person. (This is discussed under the heading of “Ghosts” in the 1st American ACC in Camden.)

The Pre-OT feels haunted, seeing his ex-girlfriend in front of him or even hearing his mother talking to him with brand new dialogue. (Nearly everybody has a ghost if he looks.) It blows like any other BT or cluster but the Pre-OT will be puzzled when looking around for who's mocking it up when nobody is, except the ghost itself. The way to handle is to move the cluster down the time track to a moment before it knew the person and it blows.
The ideal method of blowing BTs and clusters is by inspection, you get into difficulty blowing BTs and clusters when the session has gone too long, pc getting tired, or over-restimulation.

Usually the further through the RD you get, the faster and easier they blow. However, you can hit what appears to be a bog point particularly if the Pre-OT is tired or you overrun for several sessions; at such a point just keep on giving sessions and soon you'll get a session of massive blows and after that they will blow faster and easier than ever. At such a bog point you may have to resort to the “Thetan Hand” technique until it's handled, after which you can re-turn to blowing by inspection or “What are you?”, “Who are you?”.

The OT3 xenu story maybe no more "peculiar or preposterous than say Christianity or Islam", as you put it, from a secular point of view but that's completely missing the point. It is the fact that you are supposed to be covered with all these dead alien's spirits, called BTs (Body Thetans) which then cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to exorcise from yourself using scientology "auditing". No real religion will charge you money for salvation. By OT8 and after about $400,000 (not including donations to "causes") you are supposed have power over matter, engery, space & time - a godlike entity if you like. Funny how their superpowers totally failed to make John Sweeney disappear.

I have just learned a new label: "One Lifer".

I may proudly adopt it for myself. I like how it sounds. As far as I can observe, I *am* just a bag of chemicals, with a brain walking around on two legs.

That seems like a modest and entirely safe way to view my existence. Unfortunately, I seem to to lack the skills of self-deception required to accept any of these supernatural belief frameworks which would have me be something more magical.

Too bad.

I will have to forego all that odious conduct that accompanies those beliefs. It is so much harder to do harm, when one lacks the strength derived from supernaturally inspired self-importance.

C.

The Cult of $cientolgy has taken over Kyalami Castle in Johannesburg and turned it into one of their orgs. What a waste. I wonder how Cyrus would defend LRH's claim that "I'm tired of writing for a penny a word. If one wants to make real money, one needs to start a religion!"(sic). I have no problem with religions in general. Everyone is free to do as they please, but when it involves extorting as much money as possible from individuals, ruining families (disconnecting), ruining minds, I say no. Thank the Maker for the internet. This is the start of the demise of this sick cult.

Guys, read a book called "The Scandal of Scientology" by Paulette Cooper, or "Bare-Faced Messiah" by Russel Miller, or "The Road to Xenu" by Margery Wakefield. All free on the internet as PDF's. Tell all your friends to read it too. You will be shocked at what this "Church" is all about. Louanne, and your ilk, you can spin all you "truth" want. You guys are on the way down, and there's nothing you can do about it.

Viva Xenu!!!

@RainJ said "As a Scientologist I am upset by opinion and claims by people online or not when only based on other people's opinions or comments not on documentary evidence"

Well, you can be upset, but don't mislabel valid criticisms as "bigotry and hate speech." Google "Councillor John Dixon" a politician from Wales who just yesterday was unanimously cleared of just such an accusation when he criticized scientology.

Just yesterday, John Sweeny did an hour-long BBC expose on scientology and it was clear how your religion uses the term "bigotry" to attempt to silence its critics.

And don't falsely claim critics of scientology don't know the facts, don't know your side of the story. It's been reliably retold and verified by thousands of ex-scientologists.

When vulnerable people stop being bankrupt by your church, I'm sure the critics will go away.

RainJ: Many people have considerable experience with the cult, and their opinions are a lot sharper than those forwarded by Sweeny. The abuses of the cult are well documented, even admitted to by their spokesman, including disconnection, forced abortions, the "Rehabilitation Project Force" (scientology labour camps), fair gaming and abuse of the courts for suppressing critics. No need to base a negative opinion on scientology on others opinions, the facts are there for anyone to see.

you have to be dead in the head or joking to believe in that scientology
crap , Im sgainst it 100% even a kid would realise that something dangerously dodgy is goin on with this cult, it reminds me of the tv show the prisoner , people deserve to be different and free to do whatever they want , not followed, its just power mad thats all it is , if you really want to change the earth , become an enviromentalist, at least then you cant brainwash the plants!

RainJ, why don't you tell us exactly which opinion and claims you disagree with and why, then we'll deal with it one by one, rather than just implying that the whole internet is wrong except one website with the word "scientologynews" in it.
Court records are available on the internet, and they include scientology's own policies/doctrine/dogma, claimed and copyright by your own organisation. Are those publically available records all suddenly a load of rubbish too because they are reposted from e-court services on the internet? Are all these ex-scientologists who are speaking out against your organisation, and who bring scientology materials with them, telling lies? Funny how everyone is a liar except the official bona fide "church-approved" scientologist.
So, when you come here talking about freedom of speech then remember that it is universal and doesn't just apply to you and your organisation. I know you guys would love to have a monopoly on the "truth" and it has a history of using crippling litigation from its huge war chest to get it. But it is because of the internet and the determination of ex-members, critics and activists exposing the misbehaviour of the scientology organisation that mainstream media are no longer as afraid as they once where to tackle it. When it is your turn to leave then you will be glad of that huge resource and support network and it is not for you to deny it of anyone else who has valid doubts.

There are no limits to what you can believe and in this country you are free to enjoy that. But there are limits on how you can behave. It's called the law and nobody is above it.

Mike M. gets it right on one point, Scientology is definitely out to impinge on the general populace. Let’s start with how Scientology actually views the general populace; as wogs, or “raw meat” (in the words of its founder, L. Ron Hubbard) to be recruited and exploited for either their money or their potential for being slave labor. Also, Scientology wants to eradicate psychiatry and infiltrate our society through attempting to gain public funding for its “study tech” in our schools or through its Narconon drug rehab program. While Scientologists expound on the great benefits of these programs, the truth is that they are no more effective than other similar, already existing programs (and most likely substantially less effective, in reality).
Scientology claims to be able to solve humanity’s problems through its courses on communication and an emphasis on creating affinity with others. Why then the intense criticism from the countries Mike names, France, Belgium, Australia and Russia? The organization has been found to be in violation of those country’s laws and engaging in systematic fraud there. Rather than address that outpoint, Mike M. simply dismisses those countries as being intolerant.
Mike claims that Scientology “will always be a religion in the US.” This statement overlooks some crucial facts; first of all, it was not always so. When Hubbard introduced Scientology, he stated emphatically that it was in fact, “not a religion.” Only later did Scientology attempt to change its stripes, in part to achieve tax exempt status. Even so, it took the US government years before it granted the organization tax exempt status (which does not automatically confer it legitimacy as a religious organization). Today, Scientology has largely abandoned its religious façade, no longer having members dress up in religious garb, holding no regular services of any sort and having no statement of belief that its member’s adhere to.
Mike questions whether the 4.8 million people that saw the Panorama piece agreed with Sweeney’s viewpoint. First of all, I doubt that Mike himself saw it, since as a Scientologist, he’s told by his Church not to watch programs that may be critical of it. Second, I didn’t see a “Sweeney viewpoint” to the story. I saw a documentary in which Sweeney went to the Church for answers but was harshly rebuffed. I saw him talk to individuals with many different points of view, including many who believe in the Church’s teachings. I also saw the Church in action, attempting to harass Sweeney and its former members. One question I’d like to put to Mike; if Scientologists are so unconcerned about the impact of a program like this, why did the Church go to such extraordinary lengths to stop Sweeney?
Is Scientology a cult? Mike points to Scientology orgs being located in populous areas as evidence it is not. Cult or not, Scientology is first and foremost a business. The proximity of its orgs to densely populated areas is key to its business model of bringing in fresh recruits. Much more relevant to the question of whether or not it’s a cult is how it treats its members. Former members of the Sea Org tell of harsh treatment, long work hours, forced abortions and disconnection from their families. In those respects, Scientology fits the definition of a cult like a tailored glove.
There are plenty of individuals who have suggestions on how Scientology can make better use of its resources to provide its counseling services that do not include a constant barrage of requests to its members for donations for new buildings. One of them is L. Ron Hubbard himself, who said that an org should only move to a larger facility when its current location is no longer sufficient to handle the public coming in for services. This bit of wisdom has long since been abandoned by the Church’s current leader, David Miscavige, who seems hell bent on wringing every penny he can from members to purchase new buildings that simply sit empty.

I first came across this crowd when I was 10 years old. My father was on their mailing list. As he never seemed interested in signing up they used to write, 'What is preventing you from communicating with us?' If I could see through it then I wonder why it's taking so many people so long?

Both Sweeney and the BBC were exposted for disregard of journalistic ethics in the extreme.

For those who prefer basing an evaluation upon both sides, visit:

http://www.freedommag.org/special-reports/bbc/john-sweeney-panorama-of-l...

And for those who want to see and hear what religious, social, medical practitioners and politicians have to say about Scientology's effective solution to various world-wide problems (drugs, failed education, criminality) see the videos posted at:

http://www.scientology.org/activity/activity.html

All new religions have been called "cults" -- including Christianity and the Mormon faith -- all new religions have been attacked by those who support the status quo. That's what happens. To be expected.

A popular term that is starting to be used is "one-lifer" -- a person who believes he/she is just a brain attached to a sack of chemicals walking about on two legs.

What an incredibly near sighted view of existence, but it is a viewpoint worthy of expression by those who so believe.

Hey, Louanne. I gather you're not at OTIII yet? Lemme save you hundreds of thousands of dollars. You can thank me later....

"The head of the Galactic
Confederation (76 planets around
larger stars visible from here)
(founded 95,000,000 yrs ago, very space opera)
solved overpopulation (250 billion
or so per planet -- 178 billion on
average) by mass implanting.
He caused people to be brought to
Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H Bomb
on the principal volcanoes (Incident 2)
and then the Pacific area ones
were taken in boxes to Hawaii
and the Atlantic Area ones to
Las Palmas and there "packaged."
His name was Xenu. He used
renegades. Various misleading
data by means of circuits etc.
was placed in the implants.
When through with his crime Loyal Officers
(to the people) captured him
after 6 years of battle
and put him in an electronic
mountain trap where he still
is. "They" are gone. The place (Confed.)
has since been a desert."

the Freedom Magazine articles aren't written for the general public...the average person would see the insanity spewed out after reading a few paragraph.

its only purpose is to manipulate those trapped inside the cult. from peering out into the outside world.
its a big mind game. written as a scare tactic,pushing accepted propaganda. that would make the 3rd Reich proud.
Becoming a Scientologist you are giving away your free will to that of a group..and the control of that group. its a trap they are willing to fall into,when you do enough of their Training Routines you allow yourself to be controlled.

Scientologists never read columns like these,they may skim a few words,
to but to actually read it is verboten.

there is No Freedom in Freedom Magazine.

Al Somerville,

If you go through the thousands of taped lectures, books, courses etc (and the resulting huge financial drain) you are bound to come across a few sensical statements. In Hubbard's case (the founder of scientology), they are usually derivative from other better and more sincere sources of wisdom.

It's just like Hubbard's book "All About Radiation." He claimed to be a nuclear physicist (he wasn't) and wrote a book about radiation safety which is basically filled with nonsense. Real physicists have established that he didn't know what he was talking about. So within the book there may be a few accurate statements (grade school level understanding), but these are the exception rather than the rule.

So when you think of scientology, remember it was invented by a man who was comfortable writing mistruths. A good trait for a science fiction writer.

A bad day for Scientology = A good day for humanity.

To see and hear elected officials and social leaders praise FreedomMag, check out http://www.Scientology.org and watch the videos.

4.3 milion viewed the BBC show. So? Since when does a viewing public equate to truth? It does not. It simply indicates interest in a subject.

Reading the "logic" bwehind some of these postings is amusing. And with that,I'm outta here.

So much for

About the Authors of the internal scientology publication "Handling the Press"....

Jane Kember ......
On December 5, 1975 Jane Kember issued Guardian Program Order 158, which intended to give L. Ron Hubbard early warning of impending legal action. The plan called for the infiltration of the government agencies that had either the power to issue, or the knowledge of, impending subpoenas.[31] Specific agencies include the US Attorney’s Office in DC and LA, the IRS Office of International Operations, the DEA, and the Coast Guard and Immigration and Naturalization. After reviewing the letter, Meisner concluded it would be a better idea to infiltrate the Department of Justice than the US Attorney's Office.

In the trial over what was known as "Operation Snow White", Kember was convicted on nine counts of aiding and abetting burglary in connection with break-ins at US government offices, and was sentenced to two to six years.

The late David Gaiman (yes, Neil Gaiman's father) ..........
He joined the Guardian's Office (GO), the Church's public relations bureau / intelligence agency. In 1969, Gaiman was involved in an attempt by the Church to take over the British mental health charity, the National Association for Mental Health (now Mind). Some 300 Scientologists joined the group and nominated Gaiman, among others, for high office. Gaiman was nominated for the Chairmanship. Eventually, the Scientologists were asked to resign but contested that request in court (and lost).

In the 1970s he became Deputy Guardian for Public Relations World Wide and Minister of Public Affairs for the Churches of Scientology Worldwide, as well as serving as public spokesman.

According to documents in the US vs Kember and Budlong case, Gaiman issued an order in 1975 for an operation to put false information in U.S. security agency computers using planted agents. It was known as 'Operation Cat'. Kember also credited Gaiman with the strategy to claim that CoS plants inside the American Medical Association were reporters for Freedom Magazine.

He rose to become the head of GO Public Relations and was a member of the powerful Watchdog Committee. In 1981 he was promoted to the position of Guardian (i.e. head of the Guardian's Office), replacing Jane Kember following her criminal conviction for conspiracy against the US Government (she had been part of Scientology's Operation Snow White).

---------------------------

Way to go Scientology! Great "church"! Not.

Scientology is a brainwashing cult that wants your money. And they harass their critics - this is what I experienced.

In other (related) news today, the Druids were recognised as a relgion for chairitable purposes and recieved their registered charitable status by the Charities Commission for England and Wales.

In 1999, despite appeals, scientology failed to gain registered charitable status.
In 1971 it lost a test case which prevents it from claiming any of its buildings to be registered places of worship.

Ouch!

Scientology will never acheive charitable status in the UK because it is required to pass a public benefit test. It cannot do this unless it changed its core practice and if it did that then it wouldn't be scientology.

In a recent report from a senate committee in Australia, plans are being drawn up rehash their outdated charity/tax-exemption system which includes having both a charities commission very much like the UK along with a public benefit test and a specific body to tackle abusive pseudo-religious groups such as the cult of scientology.

Ouch Ouch!

It's not going well for scientology on planet earth. Maybe it's time to make peace with xenu, disconnect his eternal battery, let him out of that volcano and ask if he'll prep the mothership and give y'all a ride back with him.

Louanne and DaviDem are OSA agents who patrol internet, they'd be happier if there was a "report abuse" button to abuse and delete the posts they don't like and then post glowing testimonies about Scientology under multiple nicknames.
Scientology seems to produce a love of dishonesty and dirty tricks, the people near the top of the pyramid are really a nasty lot.

Oh my, that e-mail is quite interesting.
Don't forget to talk about expansion! Don't read the article and don't forget to attempt and change the subject!
Scientologists are the biggest bunch of liars and con artists I have ever seen.