Phil Woolas's day in court
Labour MP faces expulsion from Parliament over election campaign smears.
By George Eaton Published 13 September 2010 12:26It's going to be an uncomfortable day for former Labour minister Phil Woolas, who's in court fighting an attempt to have his election victory overturned on the grounds of "corrupt practices".
Woolas's Lib Dem opponent, Elwyn Watkins, who lost by just 103 votes at the election, took legal action after a demagogic leaflet by the MP (see below) suggested that the Lib Dems were courting support from Islamic extremists. On another occasion, Woolas and his campaign team doctored a police photo (see below) to make it appear as if Watkins had been arrested.

A campaign leaflet claimed that Islamic extremists "want you to vote Lib Dem to punish Phil".

A doctored photo made it appear as if Lib Dem candidate Elwyn Watkins had been arrested.
The Lib Dems' central contention is that such "misleading" material swung a tightly-fought election in Labour's favour. Legal documents submitted to the High Court appear to confirm that there was a calculated attempt by the Woolas campaign to whip up racial tensions in the area in a bid to get the "white vote" behind him.
An email by Woolas's election agent, Joseph Fitzpatrick, to the candidate declared: "we need ... to explain to the white community how the Asians will take him out ... If we don't get the white vote angry he's gone." Another from Fitzpatrick to Steve Green, the MP's campaign adviser, said: "we need to go strong on the militant Moslem angle" and proposed the headline "Militant Moslems target Woolas."
A defeat for Woolas (who remains a frontbench spokesman) would see him expelled from Parliament and a by-election held in the extremely marginal seat of Oldham East and Saddleworth. He has pledged to "robustly defend" himself. But whether he loses or not, let's hope that Woolas finally apologises for one of the most disgraceful election campaigns in recent history.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















37 comments
Wonder if Joanna Lumley will come to his assistance; he was under a lot of pressure at the time?
But there are no excuses for this alledged behaviour if itis is found libellous.
In these circumstances, as a general point, if any MP is expelled, then instead of a bye election, the seat should be given to the runner up.
That may be a deterrent in future for MPs erring. The same should be the case if any MP loses the Whip and tries to cross the floor. We have too many instances of MPs feeling they can do whatever they like.
I'm not sure I agree about that swatantra nandanwar.
Although in this case I think the sitting MP should be slung out on his ear, it still goes against the general principle that courts should stay out of elections.
The court will decide whether Woolas committed a corrupt practice. If he hasn't, he'll stay. If he has, he'll be barred from public office. As a result of that he will no longer be an MP. Hence there being a byelection.
There's a world of difference between that and a judge or pair (couple? brace?) of judges getting rid of one fellow and appointing another. MPs are elected, not appointed.
If you think this is one of the most disgraceful campaigns in recent History. You are demonstrating either your bias or ignorence
Let's hope that the former Minister for Racism gets his just deserts.
Well said Dave Wearing.
It would be marvelous is Woolas lost his seat over this disgraceful conduct. Given the garbage put in election leaflets by all parties it can only be good if finally someone is brought to book.
Phil Woolas has dug a bit of a hole for himself here, and has a few uncomfortable months ahead of him. It sounds as if he has been a bit of an arse in the last few years, as subtle as a breeze block in his re-election tactics.
What's the latest on Goldsmith and his jackets? Or has it been drowned in expensive litigation and being suffocated for media reporting?
It's strange how the party most disillusioned Labour supporters are likely to switch to is the BNP, isn't it?
Coiurt appearance is happening a few doors from me
will be a 5 day hearing they reckon
off on thursday may get a look in
If he loses I thought it'd be a re run ?
Don't care who wins or loses here
they're both appalling . I would have thought the lib dems would lose by more votes on a re run
seeing as how the worse lie was their no cuts bull
It's not a re-run as Woolas would be barred from public office if he loses. Hell, he'd be barred from voting. But there's some way to go yet.
I presume that you got the Labour literature during the election then? what did you make of it?
This type of electioneering is sickening. Well done NS for mentioning the case.
Actually I appreciate Woolas' stand against political Islam. We need more MPs capable of fighting against religion in the political sphere - more opposition to political Christianity is sorely needed. Political Islam currently poses a more radical threat but we must remember political Christianity is more widespread and just as insidious (even in bizarre forms such as "Christian Socialism" - have these people not read Marx?).
Woolas seems to have crossed the line into anti-Asian rather than anti-Islamic hectoring. That was a mistake that he deserves to pay for. Racial discrimination has no place in progressive politics.
There is a political argument, and there is photoshopping some London-based criminals to make it look as though they're somehow linked to your Oldham-based opponent.
The racial aspects of Woolas' campaign were exceedingly distasteful. I'm not sure that's the illegal bit though.
I'm not sure there are many politicians who wouldn't take legal action if they were accused of taking brown envelopes from murky foreign businessmen, smuggling it into the country and illegally funding his campaign with it.
I'm not sure whether this site allows links, but the opening comments from Team Woolas are available on the Manchester Evening News site.
Sorry, it's Watkins' side's opening, not Woolas'.
"Mr Woolas made these false statements as part of a series of reckless and irresponsible steps in this campaign - using doctored photographs, misrepresenting facts, stooping even to fomenting racial divisions and tensions."
You can see the badly doctored photo in its context at: http://www.electionleaflets.org/full.php?q=6100#l14875
I can't see any justification for it, much as I like Phil Woolas.
Coming on the outside, Kashif Ali could very well be a winner in a re-run. Tory vote up almost 4,000 on 2005.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldham_East_and_Saddleworth_(UK_Parliament_constituency)
Wonder if he was an air-drop candidate by Dave? Oh dear, looks like it, quote,
"When Mr Ali was selected as the Conservative candidate last year, the party’s local constituency chair Barbara Jackson stood down, complaining Mr Ali had been forced on them by the central party. However, Mr Ali said today that “just two people” left the association during the row, and he insisted the “vast majority” of Conservatives in the area are behind him."
link, http://www.saddleworthnews.com/?p=1358
New Labour: it starts with Blair attacking the Tories from the right, and it ends in the grotesque chaos of Phil Woolas whipping up race hatred to save his worthless career.
Disgusting.
@Sam. The Party has always contained a small element of supporters that would have more affinity with the the BNP and UKIP than Labour, but they've been either too lazy or too tribal to their working class roots to actually vote other than Labour. I'm pretty sure you've come across the type. But now that they the Party has been cleansed of that very small element, it would be better if they didn't return. The Party is a lot better off without them.
Enoch Powell anyone?
Ditto, Attrition and Dave Wearing. Let's hope it's the end for another Nu£abour spiv.
PHIL WOOLAS IS BEING HIGH COURT JUDGE TORY SUPPORTER VICTIMISED _ CAN YOU NOT SEE IT.
Well I can see it - it is an SE England NE England stistch up.
Plain as day with that cheat Zac about.
NW England stitch up, even.
SE England tory cun-I-help you,
song, for NW England, not those SE cups,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcoGU5i9E9s
Thatcher stole millions from Northern England in her time, millions, yes fecking millions.
And I mean pounds, let alone people.
And where was the detail on the sale of the Stretford/St.Pancreas - Channel Tunnel details in the press, Dave? Behind Times paywall, with your mates?
What Phil Woollas has done is very small potatoes compared to that cont our Prime Minister has got in his den, fecking Andy Coulson.
You Judge Shits.
Funny you get let of for things in London that woyld put you away for five years in Northern England.
People need to be told about these carry ons by you judges.
@Helen
it was so far fetched it de sensitized me
...like all of it really
I was more shocked at watkins taking such umbrage....which looks bad on me really as it was stupidly far fetched rubbish
Ha Ha! The Lib Dems complaining about "dirty" tactics!
NS should run a story about all the s*it they have pulled over the years, particularly in by-election campaigns.
It is immaterial whether or not the LibDems and Tories run nasty racist/homophobic campaigns - as we know they have.
Woolas and his agent should be expelled for bringing the party into disrepute - along with Mandy.
@jeremiah
Exactly what I was thinking!!! Their own election handbook tells them to lie and cheat!
If Woolas is on trial over this then so should Nick Clegg for his 35 metre squared VAT bombshell billboard!!!
Ol' Nicky Clegg and the rest of the LibDem gobshites do not have a leg to stand on after their fawning to Tory tossrs since May.
So pathetic as recent history, you could not have written it as fiction in April last.
Goodness. I think this is why the Labour Party is often accused of being tribalist. As Woolas said of Mandy after the Little&Sadd byelection "He might be a bstard, but he's our bstard".
Is it not possible, regardless of what you think the opposition has done in the past, of saying "No, actually, he's stepped over a line here. He can't stay in our party?"
I by NO means want to defend Woolas, but from the emails etc which will be shown in court, it sounds like it should be Mr Woolas' agent on trial alongside him
Do we have to wait for an official verdict before the Labour Party will do anything? Is the racism not enough to see him expelled? I thought that the left were meant to be hot on equality rights? Is that just another myth that's been shattered before my very eyes?
After all, equating all muslims with "mad moslem" terrorists isn't exactly going to help race relations in a town known for race riots. But still, gotta "get those white folk angry"...
Andrea: Woolas' agent IS on trial beside him. "Washed up ex-councillor on trial" just isn't as good a headline.