Gordon Brown’s statement: full transcript
“I have no desire to stay in my position longer than is needed.”
By Jon Bernstein Published 10 May 2010 19:29
Gordon Brown, 5pm, Monday 10 May 2010:
We have a parliamentary and not presidential system in this country, and as I said on Friday, with no party able to command a parliamentary majority arising from the general election, my constitutional duty as Prime Minister is to ensure that government continues while parties explore options for forming a new administration with majority support in the House of Commons.
The business of government has continued, including concerted action in Europe today to avert the financial crisis in the euro area. Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, spent much of his time yesterday in the European finance ministers' meeting in Brussels.
This morning I have had conversations with the president of the European Council, the managing director of the International Monetary Fund and the president of the European Central Bank. I have said I would do all I could to ensure that a stable, strong and principled government is formed, able to tackle Britain's economic and political challenges effectively.
As we know, the Liberal Democrats felt that they should first talk to the Conservative Party. Mr Clegg has just informed me that while he intends to continue his dialogue that he has begun with the Conservatives, he now wishes also to take forward formal discussions with the Labour Party. I believe it is sensible and it is in the national interest to respond positively.
The cabinet will meet soon. A formal policy negotiating process is being established under the arrangements made by the Cabinet Secretary, similar to the negotiations between other parties. The first priority should be an agreed deficit reduction plan, to support economic growth and a return to full employment. I know that both parties recognise the importance of ensuring economic stability in the markets and protecting Britain's standing, and both are agreed on the need for a strong and full deficit reduction plan over the coming years.
There is also a progressive majority in Britain and I believe it could be in the interests of the whole country to form a progressive coalition government. In addition to the economic priorities, in my view only such a progressive government can meet the demand for political and electoral change which the British people made last Thursday. Our commitments on a new voting system for the House of Commons and for the election of the House of Lords are clearly part of this.
I would however like to say something also about my own position. If it becomes clear that the national interest, which is stable and principled government, can be best served by forming a coalition between the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats, then I believe I should discharge that duty, to form that government, which would in my view command a majority in the House of Commons in the Queen's Speech and any other confidence votes.
But I have no desire to stay in my position longer than is needed to ensure the path to economic growth is assured and the process of political reform we have agreed moves forward quickly. The reason that we have a hung parliament is that no single party and no single leader was able to win the full support of the country. As leader of my party, I must accept that that is a judgement on me. I therefore intend to ask the Labour Party to set in train the processes needed for its own leadership election. I would hope that it would be completed in time for the new leader to be in post by the time of the Labour party conference. I will play no part in that contest, I will back no individual candidate.
I believe that the British people now want us to focus on the economy, the continuing fight against terrorism -- the terrorist threat to our country -- they want us to continue to pursue the economic recovery, and I will do so with my usual vigour and determination and I will do all in my power to support the British troops whose service and sacrifice create a debt of gratitude we can never fully repay. And I believe on Thursday the country was also telling us that they want a new politics and that the political reforms we seek will help deliver that change. I now intend to facilitate the discussions that the Liberal Democratic party has asked for. Thank you very much. As you will understand, I will take no questions this evening. Other discussions can be had later. Thank you very much.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















6 comments
God, they are like a cancer on the country.
@Patrick, I agree the Tories have to be kept out of government at all cost.
Time for a #progressivemajority ... Get tweeting that phrase, folks!
What a load of tosh!
Well, the UK could be stuck with Gordon Brown as Prime Minister until the next General Election(5 more years of Gordon Brown)! He used the words 'if' and 'hopefully' and to me this casks a matter of doubt over his resignation.
In my opinion, once he gets the 'Confidence of Commons' during the Queen's speech later this month, he could hold the Country to 'ransom'!
The position as Prime Minister in return for:
1.'The Economic Recovery' which can take years.
2.'Election Reform' which can also take years.
Gordon Brown offers an unstable government in a rainbow coalition government (somewhat a matter of a few seats), therefore one has to ask himself whether he taking the tactical position 'If I can't run the Country, then no one else will'.
Lets say, Lib Dem will not get 'Election Reform' and the 'Economic recovery' will take forever.
The above is just Reginald's opinion!
I hate the Tories rule but I am afraid the Liberal Democrats would loose all and be isolated in the end if they don't get their acts right and the Tories get the minority government they earnestly crave for. Let us all wait and see how their games play out.
brown has to do what he is doing , hes still the pm till camron can form a majority govt , which he cant ,IF BROWN GAVE CAMRON THE KEYS TO NUMBER 10 AN RESINGED , CAMRON WOULD THEN GO STRAIGHT TO THE QUEEN AND FORM A MINORITY GOVENMENT , WHY SHOULD LABOUR GIVE THAT ADVANTAGE UP ? DONT BE STUOPID . ONCE THE TORIES GOT THEIR GREEDY LITTLE HANDS ON THE LEAVERS OF POWER THEYD NEVER GIVE IT UP .and why should nick clegg see the destruction of his party bye a coalition with the tories. no the lib dems ned to fight the next election under a PR syestem nothing less and labour will provide it . in the future pr is better for both labour and the lib dems . the right is the minority in the uk they know it thats why they will not give into pr . ITS NOT THE LEFTS FAULT THAT FOR THE 4TH ELECTION IN A ROW THE CONSERVITIVES HAVE FAILED TO SECURE A MAJORITY .