The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Liam Fox: Afghanistan is a “broken, 13th-century country”

Defence Secretary causes controversy in Afghanistan with “colonialist, orientalist” remarks.

The new Defence Secretary, Liam Fox, has got off to a flying start in Afghanistan. In an interview with the Times on Saturday, he said:

We are not in Afghanistan for the sake of the education policy in a broken, 13th-century country. We are there so the people of Britain and our global interests are not threatened.

Understandably, this hasn't gone down too well in Afghanistan. The Times today quotes a senior Afghan government official:

His view appears to be that Afghanistan has not changed since the 13th century and it implies that Afghanistan is a tribal and medieval society.

The source adds:

We see Britain as still a colonial, orientalist and racist country that they should have this view.

Fox's response has been somewhat inadequate. He clarified that his point was that national security was more important than nation-building, but on the insulting tone of his comments, his office said only:

Hamid Karzai has used similar words himself, describing what the Taliban left behind as 13th- or 14th-century.

There are several problems here. First of all, his comment overlooks the fact that a stable Afghan state is central to the interests of our national security.

As my colleague Mehdi Hasan has pointed out, it is estimated that there are fewer than 100 al-Qaeda operatives in Afghanistan. We are no longer fighting terrorists in the country. Therefore, the only way to "serve the British interest" is by ensuring that a government is in place that is strong enough to fend off the Taliban, who, if back in government, could allow Afghanistan to become a safe haven for terrorists once more. It's tenuous at best.

The second point, which Fox has declined to address, is the patronising, colonial overtones of his comments. Perpetuating an existing perception of a conquering western power that views Afghanistan as primitive and inferior is hugely damaging. Fox can think whatever he likes in private, but he cannot afford to alienate the Afghan people any longer.

Special offer: get 12 issues of the New Statesman for just £5.99 plus a free copy of "Liberty in the Age of Terror" by A C Grayling.

8 comments

Oliver Beard's picture

What's the big problem? It's not really that insulting, because Afghanistan is really only a 14th century country - by the Islamic calendar, that is.

Seared Tuna's picture

Fox is about as intellectually impressive as his televisual namesake.

ibgbt226m9p9's picture

Liam Fox: Afghanistan is a "broken 13th-century country"

Of course its insulting, Afgahnstan is a modern sophisticated society, up there with Japan, Germany and Switzerland, yeah.

Sohail's picture

At least they got rid of their Monarch years ago...

swatantra's picture

Fox probably summed it up. You have only to look at the puzzlement and bewilderment on the craggy wind beaten faces of the local peasants in the villages, the men women and children, as they try to work out what the hell these Western soldiers are doing, with all their sophisticated equipment and helicopters and weaponry, in the desolate dusty barren plains of Afghanistan.
As Fox said: Just to keep the village shop open?

Afghan's picture

Afghans did not sent an invitation card for the west to come to Afghanistan.
Fox's coment is damaging, it not the way forward.

jeremiah's picture

Far be it from me to agree with Liam Fox, but he is right.

Afghanistan is broken down hellhole of a place. They have had a war for nearly 40 years.

Why don't we fire a few Tridents and ICBM's at the place and start over?

It would be quicker and probably cheaper in the long term!

Latest tweets