The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

The Digital Economy Bill has betrayed the young

Positive engagement with the digital generation interests the political classes only when they want

On the night before the dissolution of parliament, young people across Great Britain were glued to their laptops, smartphones and television screens in their tens of thousands -- not downloading music videos, but following the passage of the Digital Economy Bill through the Commons wash-up

After weeks of demonstration, letter-writing and vocal public opposition, young campaigners sat down to watch the results of their determined national effort to halt the passage of the bill, which threatens to summarily disconnect any internet users suspected of sharing copyrighted music and video files.

Most were under no illusion that Peter Mandelson's proposals were targeted at young people, who represent the bulk of file-sharers, and when the handful of MPs present at the debate voted to pass the bill, the response on Twitter was immediate and anguished.

"All three parties screwed us by not thinking properly about the issue. This is the opening salvo in a generational war," said one young activist.

The people behind this storm of political activity are the same young voters whom the press and political classes routinely condemn as apathetic. The prevailing public narrative about Generation Y has us involved in a species of listless social torpor, but it is anger, not apathy, that best describes young people's assessment of politics.

"I'm incensed about the lack of debate on the Digital Economy Bill," said Katie Sutton, a grass-roots campaigner for the Open Rights Group."Twenty thousand letters were sent to MPs expressing concern over the way it was rammed through wash-up with no consideration for the democratic process, and yet 410 MPs just didn't care enough to show up and vote. It's appalling."

 

Digital disengagement

Sutton, who at 22 is a first-time voter with little prior political experience, organised the Stop Disconnection Demonstration outside the Houses of Parliament on 24 March. Hundreds of young people assembled, wearing gags and holding black placards to symbolise their fear of being "silenced". Yet despite this pageant of political passion, many young voters intend to remain silent on election day.

Most of the available polling data predicts that turnout among 18- to 24-year-olds in 2010 will follow the dismal pattern established in 2005, when only 37 per cent of young voters went to the polls, down from 39 per cent at the previous election.

Not voting, however, does not imply not caring: much of the young citizenry disproportionately dispossessed by the financial crash of 2008 has flung itself into civic action, and from Climate Camp to Hope Not Hate, young campaigners have been at the forefront of the progressive political agenda, our energies focusing on single-issue campaigns.

Disenchanted by the corruption and inefficiency of central government, Generation Y is creating its own ways of doing politics, using technology to build campaigns and share ideas. The online "people-powered movement" 38 Degrees, which also fought the Digital Economy Bill, reports that in just ten months of operation its membership has grown to 100,000 -- over half that of the Labour Party.

The Digital Economy backlash is the latest iteration of a youth agenda whose radicalism is overlooked by parliamentary parties where it cannot be exploited.

"My MP claimed to be as concerned as I was when I wrote to him, but he didn't show up to vote," said Barney Carroll, a young web designer. "I don't trust any of the three main parties at present to represent public concerns."

For the young, the sincerest irony of the election period will be watching a party system that has just voted to police our access to transformative technologies lumpenly enthusing over the power of "digital engagement".

After watching Barack Obama surf into the White House on a wave of online campaigning, Westminster routinely flies in members of the president's team to explain to eager parliamentarians precisely why sitting administrations find it difficult to manufacture bespoke grass-roots activity using technology they barely comprehend. The message is plain: positive engagement with the digital generation is of interest to the political classes only when they want something from us.

 

Make some noise

Young people's despair over the state of parliamentary politics should not be mistaken for lazy indifference: many of us crave political change, but are unsure whether choosing between a narrow selection of mainstream parties will bring that change.

"Most young people think politics is important. They think democracy is hugely important. They just don't think their vote matters," said Edmund Ward, 24, an organiser for the Pirate Party.

The young people of Britain have every reason to feel angry and disaffected. Stereotyped by the media, shut out of the economy, saddled with debt and policed by a parliamentary system that claims to advocate "change" while pursuing the votes of middle-aged Middle Englanders in swing seats, many of us cannot imagine that voting will deliver the quiet revolution that we crave.

Our putative revolution is technological and transformative, based on electoral reform and progressive values; it was conceived online, under the radar of the Westminster village, and it may yet change politics for ever. Our revolution will be stillborn, however, if we fail to make our voices heard at the polls.

In an election whose outcome is fascinatingly uncertain, the youth protest vote may still make a very real difference to the shape of the next parliament. Despite the poverty of practical options, young people have much to gain by voting, not least a stake in the political conversation that will determine our cultural inheritance.

Whitehall will not be able to ignore the transformative politics of the digital generation for ever, and those of us who intend to vote on 6 May will do so to remind Westminster that our voices matter, that our values matter, and that a new blueprint for British politics is on its way.

We may have been let down, but the young people of Great Britain have everything to vote for. It's time for Generation Y to make a stand.

Laurie Penny is a writer, journalist and feminist activist from London. Her blog, Penny Red, was nominated for the 2010 Orwell Prize. Her book "Generation Square" will be published later this year by Zero

Join us for the first TV leaders' debate this Thursday.

15 comments

Dan's picture

The other thing that seemed to shock people is just how incompetent MPs were, when it came to the nitty-gritty of doing their job. This blog puts it well:
"This was the first real exposure of many of those watching to the internal functioning of the house. A large community of highly engaged people motivated to either watch, listen, or follow blow by blow descriptions of exactly how the debate proceeded. The almost universal reaction was one of abject horror.....what we saw last night was a minute by minute dissection by well informed people outside of parliament of what, with a small number of honourable exceptions, totally uninformed people within parliament were saying."

Dan's picture

Oh, no urls. http://cameronneylon.net/blog/a-letter-to-my-mp/. It's worth a read.

9xzulug's picture

and we call this DEMOCRACY,sadly for who i ask myself.digital age is here to stay and for many ie the young it's afundamental tool in their lives and we or should i say they(parliament)IGNORED the young who are our future.DEMOCRACY in what form.do as i say is not DEMOCRATIC

Crosbie Fitch's picture

It's still surprising just how many, even of the disaffected youth, still engage in doublethink that their 18th century privilege of copyright must be preserved - just so long as it's not actually legally enforceable, especially not against the likes of themselves.

"My copyright is good + enforcement of copyright against me is bad."

Neither publishing corporations nor youngsters will tolerate discussion of copyright's abolition, and yet the invidious privilege is at the root of cultural conflict.

Sean's picture

The online "people powered movement" 38 Degrees, which also fought the Digital Economy Bill, reports that in just ten months of operation its membership has grown to 100,000 - over half that of the Labour Party.

But this is a vacuous comparison. It's very easy to join a group like 38 Degrees, unlike being in a political party you don't have to stump up any money, or vote on any decisions, or do much beyond making another click on a computer screen.

Perhaps if young people saw voting as a responsibility, part of being a citizen, rather than thinking "what do I get out of it?" then voting would be more palatable.

Laurie Penny1's picture

Oh yes, I forgot how irresponsible young people are, how we're uninterested in being citizens. Silly me. It's not like we've mortgaged years of our lives working for degrees that aren't worth the paper they're written on, it's not like we work harder and longer hours than our parents could ever comprehend from the moment we hit GCSE age, it's not like we volunteer in greater numbers than any previous generation, it's not like we've got a thriving counter-cultural and activist movement that's more invested in the future of this country than anything the mainstream has produced in years.

We're just feckless, aren't we? Just out for anything we can get! Silly me.

Andy Davies's picture

It's not just 18-24 years olds, it's the people who understand the internet and find something abhorrent about the way the music industry bought our democracy

jeremiah's picture

The bottom line is that if people (young or otherwise) in the UK were not constantly being ripped off by record labels, movie studios etc. then they would not resort to downloading stuff over the internet.

I do not mind paying a fair price for a DVD or Album but people in the UK are being ripped off.

Come on Mandy pass some kind of law that lowers the price of a CD or DVD to either the continental or US average!

PhilDuval's picture

I would have I agree totally with 'steerpikelet' and disagree with Sean completely. I am 30 and have just been volunteering in Brazil and Peru. The programmes were international but they were made up overwhelmingly of British volunteers between the ages of 18 and 23. And from what I know this is repeated across the globe. They are a credit to our nation.

Young people are disllusioned with our political system for the same reasons that most adults are - we do not belive that we are being listened to, that our electoral choice is incredibly narrow and consequently that voting doesnt change a thing. It is the Television media and the political class which holds responsibilty for this state of affairs.

It appears that 'Disgusted of Winchester' and the City Boys are of far more importance to the government than ordinary working young people and families.

For starters, lets have PR now.

PhilDuval's picture

I would have to say I agree totally with 'steerpikelet' and disagree with 'Sean' completely. I am 30 and have just been volunteering in Brazil and Peru. The programmes were international but they were made up overwhelmingly of British volunteers between the ages of 18 and 23. And from what I know this is repeated across the globe. They are a credit to our nation.

Young people are disllusioned with our political system for the same reasons that most adults are - we do not belive that we are being listened to, that our electoral choice is incredibly narrow and consequently that voting doesnt change a thing. It is the Television media and the political class which holds responsibilty for this state of affairs.

It appears that 'Disgusted of Winchester' and the City Boys are of far more importance to the government than ordinary working young people and families.

For starters, lets have PR now.

A.C Gibbon's picture

Look, I am as dissapointed about the consistently negative portrayal of us youngsters as anyone, but I have to confess, I stopped reading this article when I realised that the following line was said in po-faced earnestness:

'On the night before the dissolution of parliament, young people across Great Britain were glued to their laptops, smartphones and television screens in their tens of thousands -- not downloading music videos, but following the passage of the Digital Economy Bill through the Commons wash-up.'

It appears Westminsterbubble-itis affects political commentators of all ages. Some realism. Please.

A.C Gibbon's picture

'It's not like we work harder and longer hours than our parents could ever comprehend from the moment we hit GCSE age.'

You almost make me wish I'd grown up in the 70's with our workshy, feckless, parent's. Do you really believe that? Most of my older relatives were out of secondary education before 16, or at least contributing financially to their family households.

Also, call me a cynic, but is it so hard to believe that the link between the so called increased civic engagement of our generation has a little less to do with worthiness and a little more to do with the 20% unemployment rate.

Friday Jones's picture

I'm almost 50 now, and yes, it was a LOT easier to make a living in the late Seventies and we had more time off and were able to save more of our money and got better interest on our savings.

Sean's picture

I would have to say I agree totally with 'steerpikelet' and disagree with 'Sean' completely. I am 30 and have just been volunteering in Brazil and Peru. The programmes were international but they were made up overwhelmingly of British volunteers between the ages of 18 and 23. And from what I know this is repeated across the globe. They are a credit to our nation.

Oh come on, isn't that just glorified adventuring? I'm sure those legions of bright eyed English eager beavers could have done just as much good on the deprived council estates lurking on the edges of their home towns. But would they help, or would they call them chavs? Will they be going on to a career in social work, or inner-city teaching, or instead become lawyers, doctors and software analysts...?

Gwyn's picture

Re: AC Gibbon @ 2.11

'Young people' can mean 'some' as well as 'all'. Surely you can curtail your sense of self-importance long enough to realise that?

Re: Sean @ 10.50

It's hard to say - Winston Smith's blog makes a strong argument against the kind of social work currently being practised.

Latest tweets