Return to: Home | Blogs | The God Blog

Mixed race marriage Bban

Unbelievable -- and still happening today

I was going to blog today about Geert Wilders, but then my eye was caught by this astonishing story: "Anger at US mixed marriage 'ban". Keith Bardwell, a white Justice of the Peace in the US state of Louisiana, refuses to issue marriage licences for mixed race couples on the grounds that any children they may have may not be accepted by their parents' communities. "I think those children suffer and I won't help put them through it," says Bardwell, who nevertheless insists that he has "piles of black friends". "They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom," he says. Fancy -- even letting "them" go to the loo in his own house.

Incredibly, no one ever seems to have called Bardwell to account for operating this policy, which, besides being repulsive, is of course illegal -- and he's been a JP for 34 years. It was only after a couple consulted a lawyer on being refused a licence by him that his case was raised, and is now being taken up by the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People).

Stories like this crop up from time to time and are often dismissed as being so awful and extreme that they don't have to be taken very seriously: people with such views are isolated crazies, tends to be the line. When Italy's Northern League proposed putting limits on the number of mixed marriages in January, one former colleague with impeccable left-wing credentials pretty much told me not to be silly when I raised the subject. ( I wrote about it at the time, here.) As the League is, and was then, an important partner in Silvio Berlusconi's government, I was astonished. Italy is not so far away, and the rising profile of the BNP leads one to suspect that there are probably quite a few people in the UK who would have some sympathy both for the League and for Bardwell -- who naturally insists that he's not a racist, he just doesn't "believe in mixing the races that way".

It is possible that Bardwell means well -- we probably all know otherwise kind and gentle souls of a certain age who don't see their "it isn't fair on the children" line as bigoted -- but even if we extend him that latitude, such an attitude only perpetuates the prejudice. Bardwell is also of the opinion that mixed-race marriages don't last long. I'm sure that all of us whose skin colour is of a different hue to our wife's or husband's would beg to differ . . . and happily prove him wrong as the anniverary milestones pass by.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

10 comments from readers

Matt
16 October 2009 at 21:02

Good call there, Sholto.

Any excuse to ignore the Islamisation of Europe.

jake
17 October 2009 at 02:37

The man has been a JP for 34 years. Must not be all bad. He's entitled to his opinion.

jhimmi
17 October 2009 at 06:55

An old man from a different time. What's he afraid of, one of those 'mixed' children becoming president? Before being sacked, he should be required to spend a little time getting to know some people who are the product of such unions.

Afshan
17 October 2009 at 12:03

I am pakistani and in a mixed marraige. My husband of 13 years is white....We have two beautiful children who are mixed. They are being brought up to respect everyone as human beings and not because of the colour of anyone's skin. How sad we live in a world where some people only see what is on the outside and not on the inside.

Ellie
17 October 2009 at 23:31

Keith Bardwell was born in 1953 which makes him 56 years old. He is young enough to know better than to believe the self-serving drivel he is feeding the media.

historybuff
18 October 2009 at 06:13

You neglect to mention the ban on marriages between Christian men and muslim women throughout the Islamic world, while Muslim men are allowed to take Christian women as wives.

Chris
18 October 2009 at 12:22

Such an enlightened world we live in - all this fear and distrust of "the Other".

You're probably right that more people than you'd think have some sympathy for the League etc. I think their support increases when times are tough and people feel threatened when they see "foreigners" and people with darker skins - people whom they consider inferior - taking "their" jobs or becoming President of the USA. Bardwell is just a bigot abusing his power - hopefully he'll lose his job over this.

Thomas Devine
19 October 2009 at 00:55

The Deep South is deeply weird. This is probably a fairly rural parish ( the adminstrative divisions of Louisiana are called parishes, a holdover from French rule). I doubt this fool's delusions affected anyone before now.

As much of the rural US becomes more secular, religious conservatives are going nuts. They never really needed to defend their worldview before. The fact that Keith Bardwell is newsworthy is about the fact he's a vanishing breed, a horror story from the past.

If you really want to scare yourselves, read Bitterly Divided: the South's inner Civil War. You Brits loved the Confederacy, and your historians still promote the "Lost Cause" mythology, so remind yourselves of what you loved, and still love. You'll be appauled and scikened.

Michael
22 October 2009 at 22:34

As someone who is in a mixed marriage with mixed-up children (heh heh). I can understand Bardwell's view; not that I agree with it.

Our children do have difficulty fitting in. In some circles, I (the white dude) don't fit in; they don't speak in a language I understand, even though they could. From what little I do understand and my wife has translated, they speak in derogatory tones about white people. In some circles my wife doesn't fit in - but she's never heard anyone derride her for being darker.

In our experience, many of our Muslim friends who married Muslims from other sects aren't accepted by the other family. And black families haven't accepted the white girl.

It bothers me that the "elite" people who comment on this and want to make Bardwell out to be a bigot, need their head read. Bardwell didn't say they couldn't get married, just that he wouldn't marry them.

Anyone who recognises that Barwell is probably trying to being kind and gentle but still wants to blast him in the public media as being a bigot are the most profoundly arrogant - more so that Bardwell.

Andrew
06 November 2009 at 20:28

In most of the USA there has been a massive campaign to bring in laws banning people from marrying someone of the same sex, so it isn't surprising that someone has decided to take it a step further and start deciding what other kinds of marriage they wish to ban.

Post your comment

(Your email address will not be published)

Recent Posts

Who are you calling anti-Semitic?

17 November 2009 17:43

A giant leap forward for Muslim women

11 November 2009 17:23

Goldmans boss says he does "God's work"

09 November 2009 10:07

"Jesus was a leftie"

06 November 2009 17:37

It's official: faith in science is a belief

04 November 2009 15:43

Cameron on Blair and Europe

28 October 2009 10:53

Jewish: or just Jew-ish?

27 October 2009 12:30

Past Entries

Follow this blog

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker